Hearth Record

Partners in Care

A hospice in Bend, Oregon 97701

2075 NE Wyatt Court, Building B, Bend, Oregon 97701. (541) 382-5882.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 7 hospices serving ZIP code 97701 had 1.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 19, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 6, 2024: complaint and recertification inspection by the state1 deficiency
  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 320 words

    “Based on observation, interview, and document review, it was determined the agency failed to ensure direct patient care staff followed accepted standards of practice for the prevention of infection transmission for 1 of 6 home visits. Findings: Home Visit #1: Observation of a home visit on 8/15/2024 at 8:00 AM revealed Employee #14 provided bed bath to Patient #22. Review of Patient #22’s record titled “HOSPICE PLAN OF CARE” revealed start of care date of 02/09/2024 with “Principal Diagnosis” of “Degenerative disease of basal ganglia, unspecified” and “Pertinent Diagnoses” of “Personal history of urinary (tract) infections.” Observation of a home visit revealed, during bed bath after washing Patient #22’s face with a washcloth, Employee #14 washed Patient #22’s left arm and left leg using a soapy washcloth. Employee #14 then dried left arm and axillae with a towel then applied lotion without rinsing or changing gloves. Similar technique was used by Employee #14 to clean Patient #22’s right arm and right leg. Observation also revealed, Employee #14 took a clean wipe and soaked it in the same dirty soapy water used to clean Patient #22’s upper and lower extremities and wiped Patient #22’s perineum. Employee #14 failed to use clean water for the perineum area. Review of the undated hospice policy titled “HAND HYGIENE,” revealed under “Procedure” the following statement: “Hand decontamination using an alcohol-based hand rub should be performed: ...C. After contact with a patient’s intact skin... D. After contact with body fluids or excretions, mucous membranes, non-intact skin, and wound dressings, if hands are not visibly contaminated. E. When moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during patient care. F. After contact with inanimate objects (including medical equipment) in the immediate vicinity of the patient. G. After removing gloves.” During an interview via telephone call with Employee #15 on 8/19/2024, beginning at 8:40 AM, the above findings were presented. Employee #15 acknowledged the findings.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Aug 22, 2024: recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies
  • EP Program Patient Population (42 CFR 418.113(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 119 words

    “Based on document review and interview during the survey, it was determined through on-going dialog with the Hospice House Manager, Quality Manager and Support Services Manager that the facility failed to comply with Federal, State and local EP requirements to establish and maintain a comprehensive EP program (CFR 42 Part 418.113(a)(3)). Findings include: On 8/22/2024, during record review between 9:25 am and 11:00 am, the facility failed to provide documentation within their written EP Plan that addressed patient/client population, including patients at risk and the types of services the facility has the ability to provide in an emergency. Surveyor was accompanied by the Hospice House Manager, Quality Manager and Support Services Manager who acknowledged the existence of these conditions.”

    Rule E0007. Standard-level.

  • Doors with Self-Closing Devices (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    The inspectors’ words, 123 words

    “Based on observations and interview during the survey, it was determined through on-going dialog with the Hospice House Manager and Support Services Manager that the facility failed to install proper hold-open devices that will release on the actuation of the fire alarm system, fire sprinkler system or power loss for the entire building. This resulted in the potential for smoke and fire to spread to other areas of the facility (LSC 7.2.1.8.2, 19.2.2.2.7, 19.2.2.2.8). Findings include: On 8/22/2024 at 12:41 pm, the door closer on the Soiled Utility Door was missing which did not allow the door to automatically close and latch as required. Surveyor was accompanied by the Hospice House Manager and Support Services Manager who acknowledged the existence of these conditions.”

    Rule K0223. Standard-level.

  • Subdivision of Building Spaces – Smoke Barrier Construction (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    The inspectors’ words, 126 words

    “Based on observations and interview during the survey, it was determined through on-going dialog with the Hospice House Manager and Support Services Director that the facility failed to maintain/construct at least a 1-hour fire resistance rated smoke barrier for 1 of 3 sampled smoke compartments of the building. This resulted in the potential for the spread of fire/smoke to other smoke compartments (LSC 19.3.7.3, 19.3.7.4, 19.3.7.5 8.3, and 8.5). Findings include: On 8/22/2024 at 12:34 pm, there were multiple openings/penetrations in the ceiling of the mechanical room greater than 1/4 inch that would allow for the spread of smoke or fire to other areas of the facility. Surveyor was accompanied by the Hospice House Manager and Support Services Manager who acknowledged the existence of these conditions.”

    Rule K0372. Standard-level.

  • Fire Drills (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    The inspectors’ words, 186 words

    “Based on observations, interviews and record review during the survey, it was determined through on-going dialog with the Hospice House Manage and the Support Services Manager that the facility failed to provide fire drills for all staff affecting the entire building. This resulted in the potential for inadequate staff knowledge during fire emergencies, potentially exposing residents to smoke and fire in the facility (LSC 19.7.1.4 - 19.7.1.7). Findings include: On 8/22/2024, during record review between 11:00 am and 12:00 pm, facility documentation presented to the surveyor by the facility showed that fire drills for day and night shifts in 2023 and 2024 were not completed at random time throughout the shifts. Fire drills for day shift were conducted at 11:30 am, 1:30 pm, 11:20 am and 11:00 am; fire drills for night shift were conducted at 9:01 pm, 9:13 pm, 9:10 pm, and 9:02 pm which demonstrates that fire drills were conducted in a manner that created a pattern, instead of at different times throughout the shifts. Surveyor was accompanied by the Hospice House Manager and Support Services Manager who acknowledged the existence of these conditions.”

    Rule K0712. Standard-level.

  • Electrical Equipment – Power Cords and Extension Cords (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    The inspectors’ words, 129 words

    “Based on observations and interview during the survey, it was determined through on-going dialog with the Hospice House Manager and Support Services Director that the facility failed to ensure that that electrical wiring & equipment was used/maintained and in accordance with NFPA 70 for 1 of 3 sampled smoke compartments of the building. This resulted in the potential for injury to patients and staff (LSC 9.1.2, NFPA 99 10.2.3.6, 10.2.4, NFPA 70, TIA 12-5). Findings include: On 8/22/2024, at 12:36 pm, there was a washer and dryer in the Laundry Room plugged into a multiplex outlet extender and not directly into the wall which could overload and short the circuit. Surveyor was accompanied by the Hospice House Manager and Support Services Manager who acknowledged the existence of these conditions.”

    Rule K0920. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 19, 2024Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Sep 6, 2024Complaint and recertification inspection by the state1 deficiency cited
Aug 22, 2024Recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 21, 1990.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 55% at home, 41% in assisted living, 3% in a nursing facility, 2% in an inpatient hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.1%
Visits near death95.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: John Clark (managing employee (on the payroll)); Stephen B Kornfeld (corporate director); John Weinsheim (managing employee (on the payroll)); John Weinsheim (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Lisa J Lewis (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 93% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 97% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.7% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 72.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 7 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 97701, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 1; this one had 6.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 7 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 97701
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
St. Charles Hospice1
Partners in Care This hospice6
Heart ‘n Home Hospice & Palliative Care, LLC0
Signature Healthcare at Home1
Bristol Hospice - Bend, LLC5
Adventist Health Hospice2
Hospice of Redmond1

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.