Shrivers Hospice
A hospice in Zanesville, Ohio 43701
2052 East Pike, Zanesville, Ohio 43701. (740) 487-1241.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 20 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
20 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 20 hospices serving ZIP code 43701 had 6.
The last inspection on record was on May 15, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
20 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
May 15, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission20 deficiencies
-
EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1)(i))
“Observed in HR File Review. In 2 of 8 HR files reviewed, the organization had not provided initial education and training in emergency management. In the files for HR#2 and HR#7, there was no documentation of any training about the EM plan upon hire.This was discussed with the Administrator.”
-
EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1)(iii))
“Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 8 HR files reviewed, the organization had not provided ongoing education to all staff and volunteers at least every 2 years. In the files for HR#2, there was no documentation of training in the EM plan. This was discussed with the Administrator.”
-
Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 105 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 5 patient records reviewed, for whom the hospice addendum was requested, the organization had not informed the patient of the patient rights in writing. In the charts for RRHV#1, RRHV#2, RRHV#3 RRNHV#7, the hospice addendum provided did not include information the patient’s right to immediate advocacy through the Beneficiary Family Centered Care-Quality Improvement Organization (BFCC-QIO) if they disagree with the determination which is a requirement of the notice per CMS regulation. In the chart for RRNHV#2, the patient/caregiver requested the addendum at admission, however there was no indication the addendum was provided. This was discussed with the Administrator.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 292 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 14 patient records reviewed, the written plan of care (POC) was not based on the patient’s goals and the time frame required to meet those goals. In the chart for RRNHV#3, goals were not individualized to the patient and the patient’s needs as all goals on the current POC have a target date of last day of the benefit period including Patient/caregiver will demonstrate necessary behaviors to maintain good safety awareness and minimize the risk of falls and/or injury for this patient who experienced a fall with a major injury during the previous benefit period and Patient will be pain free or verbalize an acceptable pain level with current pain management regimen for the patient with increasing pain management needs and frequent pain management adjustments to the POC. Also goals that were not measurable Pt will maintain optimal nutrition/hydration as disease process allows;. In the chart for RRNHV#10, for this pediatric patient on oxygen the care plan had no goals related to the safe use of oxygen. In addition, all goals were anticipated to be met on the last day of the benefit period, even medication safety related goals such as Patient/caregiver will verbalize understanding of the medications in the comfort pack. In the chart for RRNHV#5, all of the current goals are expected to be met on the last day of the of recertification benefit period and not individualized to an appropriate time frame for the issue. Examples included: Patient/caregiver verbalize/demonstrate proper skincare and Pt/CG can describe interventions to prevent skin breakdown on the recertification POC for patient with skin moisture issues and a need for Nystatin cream. The issues were first identified upon admission to the organization. This was discussed with the Administrator.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 118 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 14 patient records reviewed, the plan of care (POC) did not include all treatments necessary to meet the patient’s needs. In the chart for RRNHV#2, the patient developed a wound after a fall. The RN applied hydrocortisone cream and a band-aid to the site. There was no order on the POC for this treatment. In the chart for RRNHV#5, the wound care order was missing the frequency that the wound care was to be performed. In the chart for RRNHV#7, during the week of the survey, the patient developed a wound which the RN cleansed and dressed. There was no order found for this treatment. This was discussed with the DON.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 93 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization had not developed a plan of care (POC) that included all of the services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. In the chart for RRNHV#4, there was no comprehensive POC for the admission benefit period nor the recertification benefit period. There were care plans with interventions and goals, however did not include the dressing supplies, hospital bed, transfer equipment, etc. that would be required for the patient. This was discussed with the DON.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, the organization had not implemented activities for the prevention and control of infections, including the use of standard precautions. During RRHV#2, the clinician wiped her used clinical equipment (BP cuff, thermometer, stethoscope, etc.) with Sani-wipes and immediately put the items back into the clinical bag. The manufacturers recommended wet time is 2 minutes. Additionally, the clinician did not wear gloves during the cleaning, yet the recommendation by the manufacturer is to wear gloves. This was discussed with the DON.”
-
Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(2)(ii))
“Observed in Data Session. The organization had not improved compliance with hand hygiene as it had not set goals for improving compliance as confirmed with the Administrator.”
-
Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 3 patient records reviewed, the bereavement plan of care (POC) did not specify the type of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery. In the charts for RRBR#1, RRBR#2 and RRBR#3, the bereavement POC’s did not include the scheduled mailings, nor any phone contacts that are part of the bereavement program. This was discussed with the Bereavement Coordinator and Administrator.”
-
Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(3)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 97 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 14 patient records reviewed, the comprehensive assessment did not include all required elements. In the charts for RRHV#2, RRHV#3, RRNHV#2 the spiritual care assessment did not include the patient and family spiritual orientation, including their desire for the involvement of a religious group; spiritual concerns or needs identified by the patient or family, such as despair, suffering, guilt, and forgiveness. In the chart for RRNHV#3, the initial Spiritual assessment - loss/coping stated not assessed; spiritual assessment marked not assessed; spiritual resources marked not assessed. This was discussed with the DON.”
-
Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 307 words
“Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 HR files reviewed, the hospice aide competency evaluation did not include the required elements. There were no initial documented competencies in the file for HR#4 as confirmed with the Administrator. Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 HR files reviewed, the organization had not observed the required competencies for the aide by evaluating performance through written exam, oral exam, or after observation with a patient or pseudo patient, including: basic infection control procedures; basic elements of body functioning and changes in body function that must be reported to an aide’s supervisor; maintenance of a clean, safe, and healthy environment; recognizing emergencies and knowing how to institute emergency procedures; the physical, emotional, and developmental needs of and ways to work with the populations served by the home health aide or hospice aide, including the need to respect the patient and their privacy and property; adequate nutrition and fluid intake; skills not covered in the basic checklist; other tasks that the organization may choose to have the aide perform as permitted under state law. There were no initial documented competencies in the file for HR#4. This was discussed with the Administrator. Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 HR files reviewed, the organization had not evaluated the hospice aides performance of the tasks with a patient or pseudo-patient as part of a simulation: communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other staff; reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respirations; appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include bed, sponge, tub, or shower bath; sink, tub, or bed shampoo; nail and skin care; oral hygiene; toileting and elimination; safe transfer techniques and ambulation;normal range of motion and positioning. This was discussed with the Administrator.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 91 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, the RN had not prepared written instructions for the aide consistent with the patient’s condition. In the files for RRHV#1, and RRNHV#2, the aide plan of care (POC) included to trim the patient’s fingernails and toenails, yet the patients are diabetic. Additionally, in the chart for RRNHV#2, the care plan was non-specific as to the type of bath to be provided and stated simply bath without clarification if this was tub, chair, bed bath. This was discussed with the DON.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 254 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 10 patient records reviewed, for whom aide services were ordered, the aide had not provided services as assigned on the plan of care. In the chart for RRNHV#1, on multiple visits, the aide completed only a portion of the tasks assigned and did not indicate why other tasks were not provided. As an example, the assignment included cleaning the patients living area, meal planning, assistance with meal prep, changing the linens an making the bed. These tasks were not provided at each visit. In the chart for RRHV#1, in multiple visits, the aide did not document the provision of all assigned tasks at each visit and the documentation did not include why all tasks were not completed. This included bathing, shampoo, nail care, peri care, etc. In the chart for RRNHV#3, in the week prior to the survey, the aide provided a bed bath, though a shower was assigned. Additionally, the aide was to document the last known bowel movement at each visit. There was only one entry in the month prior to the survey, and no entries the current month despite the aide seeing the patient twice weekly. In the chart for RRNHV#4, the assignment included shower, nail care and other homemaking tasks each visit; there were visits in the current benefit period that did not include all assigned cares. In the chart for RRNHV#7, not all cares were provided at each visit as assigned, for example laundry, bed bath. This was discussed with the DON”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, for whom aide services were ordered, the aide was not supervised no less frequently than every 14 days. In the chart for RRNHV#1, 20 days lapsed between supervisory visits in the current benefit period. This was discussed with the Administrator.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(2))
“Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 HR files reviewed, a RN had not made an annual on-site visit to the location where the patient is receiving care in order to observe and assess each aide while the aide is providing care. In the file for HR#4, there was no supervisory visit for the previous year documented as confirmed with the Administrator.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))
“Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 8 HR files reviewed, the organization had not oriented its staff to key safety content including relevant policies and procedures including those related to infection prevention and control. In the file for HR#7, there was no documentation that the volunteer had been provided with infection control information including standard precautions and blood borne pathogens. This was discussed with the Administrator.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))
“Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 8 HR files reviewed, staff competence was not assessed annually as required by organizational policy. In the file for HR#7, there was no documented competency for 2025 as discussed with the Administrator. Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 8 HR files reviewed, staff competence had not been initially assessed and documented. In the file for HR#7, there were no documented initial competencies as discussed with the Administrator.”
-
Ordering of drugs (42 CFR 418.106(b)(2)(ii))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, when a verbal order was received, staff had not sent it to the prescriber for signature. In the chart for RRNHV#1, the nurse obtained orders for wound care and updated the interventions on the POC, yet did not document the order for submission to the provider for signature. This was discussed with the Administrator.”
-
Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 91 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 4 patient records reviewed, for the patient in a skilled facility, the hospice plan of care (POC) did not identify the care and services that were needed and did not identify which provider, the hospice or the facility, was responsible for the wound care the patient required. In the chart for RRNHV#4, there was no comprehensive POC developed and no orders found for the wound care that the RN documented was being provided by the skilled facility staff. This was discussed with the Administrator.”
-
Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(2))
“Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 8 HR files reviewed, the organization had not obtained a criminal background check on the applicant as required by law and regulation. In the file for HR#2, there was no criminal background check documented. This was discussed with the Administrator.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2026 | Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission | 20 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 12, 2017.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 99.2% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 53% at home, 11% in assisted living, 35% in a nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 9.7 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 7.4% |
| Visits near death | 99.2% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 7 owners or officers are people: John Coler (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); John Coler (corporate officer, 100%); John Coler (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Cara Wickham (managing employee (on the payroll)); Eric B Blake (corporate officer); Eric B Blake (managing employee (on the payroll)); Barbara Murrell (managing employee (under contract)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 86% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 93.7% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 78.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 20 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 43701, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 20.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Genesis Hospice and Palliative Care | 2 |
| Interim Healthcare Hospice of Coshocton | 8 |
| Buckeye Hospice and Palliative Care Services | 5 |
| Shrivers Hospice This hospice | 20 |
| Fairhope Hospice & Palliative Care, Inc. | 0 |
| Hospice of Guernsey, Inc. | 2 |
| Ohiohealth Hospice With Compassus | 8 |
| Hospice of Central Ohio | 0 |
| Lifecare Hospice | 6 |
| Heartland Hospice | 40 |
| Heartland Hospice | 25 |
| Crossroads Hospice of Northeast Ohio, LLC | 0 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.