Hospice and Palliative Care of St Lawrence Valley
A hospice in Potsdam, New York 13676
6805 Us Highway 11, Potsdam, New York 13676. (315) 265-3105.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 5of 5 family caregiver rating
- 9of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
4 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 2 hospices serving ZIP code 13676 had 3.
The last inspection on record was on Oct 17, 2024: a complaint and recertification inspection by the state.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jan 9, 2024: complaint and recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))
The inspectors’ words, 712 words
“Based on a review of clinical records and interviews with the Administrator, and Director of Patient Services, it was determined in 2 of 19 records (patients #3 and 11), the comprehensive assessment was incomplete and failed to identify all of the patient’s needs. Evidence was as follows: 1. Patient #3 was admitted to the hospice on 12/21/23 with a terminal diagnosis of cerebral infarction and additional diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes, osteoarthritis, and hypertension. On 12/21/23, the hospice nurse visited the patient for the initial comprehensive assessment and documented the patient had dysphagia (swallowing difficulties) and was on a pureed diet with thickened liquids following a swallow evaluation. There was no evidence the hospice nurse determined the level of thickened liquids the caregiver was providing and assessed the caregivers knowledge and ability to correctly thicken liquids. On 12/23/23, the on-call registered nurse documented a call was received from the social worker in the patient’s home “requesting a visit for increased congestion.” The registered nurse contacted a licensed practical nurse who visited the patient’s home and documented the family stated the patient “may have aspirated last evening.” “;Fluids may have been too thin, or the patient took them in too fast.” The licensed practical nurse reported “;abnormal sounds in the lungs on the right side, left side is clear” to the on-call registered nurse via phone, who notified the physician. Orders were received for an antibiotic and a bronchodilator inhaler. On 12/26/23, 3 days after aforementioned event, the registered nurse case manager performed a “quick visit” to check in with the patient after the holiday weekend. There was no documented follow-up assessment of the aspiration event including auscultation of the lungs, or evidence the thickened fluids were addressed at the visit. The registered nurse failed to visit timely, and failed to perform a complete assessment of the patient’s respiratory system, after a possible aspiration was reported. As identified in New York Education Law, section 6902 of Article 139, Licensed Practical Nurses in New York State do not have assessment privileges; they may not interpret patient clinical data or act independently on such data; they may not triage; they may not create, initiate, or alter nursing care goals or establish nursing care plans. Licensed Practical Nurses function by law in a dependent role at the direction of the registered nurse or other select authorized health care providers. Performing nursing assessments and corresponding progress notes are non-permissible tasks. On 01/04/24, the surveyor conducted an observational home visit and interviewed the caregiver afterward. The caregiver stated the thickening products were purchased independently. They developed a trial-and-error method; the patient would indicate if the liquid was too thick or thin until it was a “good consistency.” She stated she had received no instruction on thickening liquids at the hospital, rehabilitation center, or from the hospice. On 01/08/24 at 11:30 a.m. the surveyor reviewed the record with the Administrator, Director of Patient Services, and Director of Quality Compliance. They acknowledged the findings, and no additional information was provided. 2. Patient #11 was admitted to the agency on 12/08/23 with a terminal diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and additional diagnoses of atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, hyperlipidemia, essential hypertension, and benign prostate hyperplasia. On 12/08/23 the hospice nurse visited with the patient and the patients caregivers to establish the patients plan of care which included a medication profile review as well as medication administration and management. The 12/08/23 plan of care included morphine (20 mg/mL) 0.5 mL-1 mL every 2 hours as needed for dyspnea (shortness of breath. On 12/12/23, 12/19/23, and 12/26/23 the hospice nurse documented the patients breathing was labored at rest and the patient was “;visibly SOB” (short of breath) “;that increases with exertion”. There was no evidence that the hospice nurse assessed the use of the morphine, including the frequency, effectiveness, and ability to administer, in relation to the patients shortness of breath. On 01/08/24 at 11:30 a.m. the surveyor reviewed the record with the Administrator, Director of Patient Services, and Director of Quality Compliance. They acknowledged the findings, and no additional information was provided. Failure to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the patient has the potential for the development of an incomplete plan of care and unmet patient needs.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 669 words
“Based on a review of clinical records and interviews with the Administrator, Director of Patient Services, and Director of Quality Compliance, it was determined in 3 of 19 records (patients #1, 3 and 12), the plans of care were incomplete and failed to reflect all of the patients’ needs. Patient #3 was admitted on 12/21/23 with a terminal diagnosis of cerebral infarction and additional diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes, osteoarthritis, and hypertension. The hospice failed to ensure the interdisciplinary plan of care included the specific consistency of thickened liquids. The 11/08/23 hospital discharge summary as part of the referral to hospice included “;diet: pureed diet; nectar thick.” The 12/21/23 Hospice Certification and Plan of Care (POC) included “;Nutrition” as follows: - Ensure - Pureed diet - Diet as tolerated The POC heading “;Orders/treatments, additional services” included: - “;pureed diet; thickened fluids, as tolerated.” The POC failed to include the ordered level of thickening which was “;nectar thick” to all liquids. On 01/03/24, the interdisciplinary group met and discussed the patient. The surveyor was present at the meeting. The social worker reviewed the spouses report of the patient choking the evening prior to the 12/23/23 visit when the on-call RN was notified, and the LPN visit was made. The social worker mentioned the patient was taking a pureed diet and drinking water, however, no discussion of the aspiration event or ordered level of thickening occurred. On 01/08/24 at 11:30 a.m. the surveyor reviewed the record with the Administrator, Director of Patient Services, and Director of Quality Compliance. They acknowledged the findings, and no additional information was provided. Patient #12 was admitted to the ospice on 11/15/23 with a terminal diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain and additional diagnoses of mitral insufficiency, congesrtive heart failure and type 2 diabetes. The 11/15/23-02/12/24 Hospice Certification and Plan of Care included Hospice Aide service 2 days a week to assist with personal care. The aide visit note dated 12/23/23 included a narrative note written by the licensed practical nurse (LPN) performing aide services. The LPN documented the patient donning clean clothing including compression stockings on both legs. The 11/15/23 Hosppice Certification and Plan of Care failed to include compression stockings. On 01/08/24 at 11:30 a.m. the surveyor reviewed the record with the Administrator, Director of Patient Services, and Director of Quality Compliance. They acknowledged the findings, and no additional information was provided. Home Visit Patient #1 was admitted to the hospice on 09/23/23 with diagnoses of heart failure and oxygen dependent. On 11/17/23 the physician had ordered wound care as follows, stage 2 pressure sore of the coccyx, clean with normal saline pat dry, apply skin prep to peri wound, medihoney to wound bed and cover with mepliex, change every 4 days, and as needed for loosening or soiled. On 11/22/23 the intradisciplinary team notes had documented stage 2 pressure sore to coccyx resolved today, family will start using 50/50 creams after incontinent care. The 12/25/23 plan of care included interventions for wound care, stage 2 pressure sore of the coccyx, clean with normal saline pat dry, apply skin prep to peri wound, medihoney to wound bed and cover with mepliex, change every 4 days, and as needed for loosening or soiled. On 01/04/24 the surveyor conducted an observational home visit with hospice nurse present. After the nurse conducted the visit and left the home, the surveyor interviewed the patient and care giver. The patient and caregiver confirmed that the wounds to the coccyx area had healed, and no further treatments were necessary other than the cream they apply. On 01/04/24 the hospice nurse had documented in the narrative note, no wounds. The hospice nurse failed to update the plan of care. On 01/08/24 at 11:30 a.m. the surveyor reviewed the record with the Administrator, Director of Patient Services, and Director of Quality Compliance. They acknowledged the findings, and no additional information was provided. Failure of the agency to develop a plan of care that accurately reflexes patients current health status.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 391 words
“Based on review of clinical records and interviews with the Administrator and Director of Patient Services, it was determined in 1 of 11 records of patients receiving Hospice Aide Services (patient #8 ),aide written instructions were incomplete and/or inaccurate. This was evidenced by: Patient # 8 was admitted to the hospice on 10/30/23 with a terminal diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and additional diagnoses of lymphedema, hypertension, atrial fibrillation and benign prostatic hypertrophy. The 10/30/23-01/27/24 Hospice Certification and Plan of Care included Eliquis (blood thinner) 2.5 mg twice daily. Hospice Aide service was ordered 7 days a week for 1 hour to assist with personal care. The 10/30/23 hospice aide care plan failed to included bleeding precautions and directed the aide to shave the patient. The care plan failed to direct the aide to use an electric razor to prevent injury from a razor blade and bleeding. On 01/08/24 at 11:30 a.m. the surveyor reviewed the record with the Administrator, Director of Patient Services, and Director of Quality Compliance. They acknowledged the findings, and no additional information was provided. Patient #9 was admitted to the hospice on 07/10/23 with terminal diagnoses of heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and epilepsy. The 11/07/23 – 01/05/24 aide plan of care ordered home aide 4 times a week for 8 weeks. That included: skin care Recognize and report any changes in the patients skin condition. Incontinent care change adult briefs bath May apply 50/50 cream or barrier cream to patients buttocks/peri area as needed, intact skin only. The 11/07/23 – 01/05/24 plan of care orders included wound care to the left upper posterior back scapula blister that has developed into a stage 2 pressure sore, and buttocks coccyx – clean with normal saline pat dry, apply dressing. The aide plan of care failed to include: How the aide is to care for the wounds/dressing during bathing, dressing and to report with changes to wounds. Who is managing the wounds in the home. On 01/08/24 at 11:30 a.m. the surveyor reviewed the record with the Administrator, Director of Patient Services, and Director of Quality Compliance. They acknowledged the findings, and no additional information was provided. Failure of the hospice to ensure aide plans of care include specific instructions necessary to provide care has the potential for unmet patient needs and possible negative patient outcomes.”
-
Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))
The inspectors’ words, 375 words
“Based on record review and interview with the Administrator, Director of Patient Services and Director of Quality Compliance, it was determined for 1 of 1 patient residing in a skilled nursing facility (patient #5), the hospice failed to establish and maintain the hospice plan of care in consultation with facility representatives. Evidence as follows: Patient #5 was admitted to the hospice on 10/13/23 with a terminal diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and additional diagnoses of anxiety, hypertension and hypothyroidism. The patient was a resident of a skilled nursing facility. On 10/13/23 the hospice nurse visited the patient for the initial assessment and documented the patient had been a resident of the facility since 2018. During the visit the hospice nurse documented providing education to the patient and caregiver, who was identified as a family member, regarding bowel regimen, prevention of skin breakdown, inhalation therapy, oxygen therapy, and review of the plan of care. There was no evidence the hospice nurse provided instruction and reviewed/developed the plan of care with facility staff. On 10/14/23 the medical social worker visited the patient and documented meeting with the patient and family member for an assessment visit. The social worker documented the patient struggled with being in the facility, the lack of help and quality of care. The patient expressed anxiety and depression primarily related to nursing home care and lack of that. There was no evidence the social worker collaborated with the facility staff and discussed a plan to relieve anxiety. The 10/25/23 Interdisciplinary Group Meeting documented the care location as the skilled nursing facility. The plan of care failed to include a plan for how the hospice was going to communicate with the skilled nursing staff to update the care plan, the responsibilities of the skilled nursing staff and the name of staff contacts. The bereavement plan identified the patients daughter as the bereaved and failed to identify staff of the nursing home as potentially needing grief support. On 01/08/24 at 11:30 a.m. the surveyor reviewed the record with the Administrator, Director of Patient Services, and Director of Quality Compliance. They acknowledged the findings, and no additional information was provided. Failure to coordinate and consult with skilled nursing facility staff has the potential for unmet needs.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2024 | Complaint and recertification inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Jan 9, 2024 | Complaint and recertification inspection by the state | 4 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 28, 1986.
- Ownership: non-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.3% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 96% at home, 4% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% in a hospital.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 12.3 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 7.6% |
| Visits near death | 97.3% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 11 owners or officers are people: Sonya Boyce (corporate director, 0%); Chad W Green (corporate director, 0%); Jordan Backus (corporate director, 0%); Ruth Fishbeck (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Eleanor Menz (corporate director, 0%); Stacey Tarbox (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Frank Mclaughlin (corporate director); David Peggs (corporate director, 0%); David Moulton (corporate director); David A Dunn (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Laura Cordts (corporate director, 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 93% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 92% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 99.65% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 82.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 9 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 2 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 13676, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 4.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Hospice and Palliative Care of St Lawrence Valley This hospice | 4 |
| Hospice of the North Country Inc. | 2 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.