Hearth Record

Goodwill Hospice

A hospice in Las Vegas, Nevada 89146

6655 W Sahara B200 (113-114), Las Vegas, Nevada 89146. (615) 713-7465.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 83 hospices serving ZIP code 89146 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 29, 2025: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 29, 2025: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 5 (Patient #2) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient #2 - Patient was admitted to hospice service on 05/14/25. The medical record showed the social worker comprehensive assessment was not completed until 05/20/25.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 104 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #2) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #2 - the medication profile noted patient taking Miralax for constipation. There was no evidence of a diluent to be added with this medication included in the instructions. This was corrected onsite”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 262 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 5 (Patient #1,2,4) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #1 - The patient medical record showed evidence of advance directives indicating patient is choosing to be full code status. There were no problems, goals or interventions listed on patients plan of care. This was corrected onsite. Patient #2 - The nurse comprehensive assessment dated 05/14/25 indicated the patient was assessed as high risk for impaired skin integrity as indicated by scoring an eleven on the Braden Scale. There was no evidence of problems, goals or interventions related to impaired skin integrity. This was corrected onsite. Patient #4 - The patient medication profile indicated the patient was utilizing oxygen for shortness of breath. There were no problems, goals or interventions related to oxygen use on patients plan of care. The comprehensive assessment dated 05/07/25 indicated patient was on a mechanical soft diet. There were no problems, goals or interventions related to this diet on the plan of care. The medication profile also indicated patient was on aspirin and Plavix as blood thinners. There was no evidence of problems, goals, or interventions related to the bleeding risk while taking these medications listed on the plan of care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #2) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #2 - There was an order for Miralax 17 gm daily for constipation. There was no evidence of a diluent added to order.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #5) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient # 5 - Medication profile showed Zofran was initiated on 05/21/25 for a new symptom of nausea/vomiting. There was no evidence of problems, goals, or interventions related to nausea/vomiting control initiated.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 140 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 5 (Patient #1,3,4) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #1 - The IDG notes from 05/26/25 - 07/16/25 indicated a frequency order for bereavement coordinator visits 1 per week. There was no evidence of weekly pre bereavement visits or assessments noted in the medical record. Patient #3 - The IDG notes from 05/07/25 - 07/16/25 indicated a frequency order for bereavement coordinator visits 1 per week. There was no evidence of pre bereavement visits or assessments noted in the medical record. Patient #4 - The IDG notes from 05/07/25 - 06/18/25 indicated a frequency order for bereavement coordinator visits 1 per week. There was no evidence of pre bereavement visits or assessments noted in the medical record.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 166 words

    “Upon observation and home visits, 2 of 3 (Patient #2,#3) there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. Patient #2 - This patient was a home visit scheduled with the CNA. The policy no 6-013.1 under bag technique section 1, states “the bag will be placed on a clean surface and that surface can easily disinfected.” The aide was noted to walk into patient’s room and set her work bag on a recliner which belonged to the patient’s roommate and sitting on that recliner it was noted to contain a disposable chux pad that appeared to have been used. Patient #3 - This patient was a home visit with the MSW. It was noted the social worker carried a bag into the home of the patient and set it on the patient’s floor in the living room. There was no evidence of cleaning the bag prior to or after the visit.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 146 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 5 (Patient #4,#5) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary • The patient’s clinical record, if requested Patient #4 - Patient was discharged from hospice due to pursuing hospitalization related to a fall on 06/01/25. A discharge summary was completed however there was no evidence that the summary was sent to attending physician for review or documentation that this summary was sent. Patient #5 - Patient was discharged from hospice due to pursuing hospitalization related to a chest pain episode. A discharge summary was completed however there was no evidence that the summary was sent to attending physician for review or documentation that the summary was sent.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 29, 2025Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 8, 2025.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 3 owners or officers are people: Ronald Don Costa (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Madel Lumbres (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Edsel Gay Martinez (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 83 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 89146, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.