Hearth Record

Sacred Heart Hospice Care

A hospice in Las Vegas, Nevada 89146

3311 S Rainbow Blvd, Las Vegas, Nevada 89146. (702) 859-8008.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 23 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

23 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 83 hospices serving ZIP code 89146 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on May 20, 2026: a follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

23 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

23 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 8, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care23 deficiencies
  • Medical director (42 CFR 418.102)

    “Condition of Participation: Medical Director.”

    Rule L0664. Condition-level.

  • Arrangement with Other Facilities (42 CFR 418.113(b)(5))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence of contracts/agreements with other facilities/agencies/hospices to receive patients in the event the hospice cannot provide care to their patients during an emergency. The Administrator could not identify a contract/agreement with another facility to receive patients in the event the hospice could not provide care during an emergency”

    Rule E0025. Standard-level.

  • Development of Communication Plan (42 CFR 418.113(c))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice develops and maintains an emergency preparedness communication plan that complies with federal, state, and local laws and must be reviewed and updated every two years.”

    Rule E0029. Standard-level.

  • Primary/Alternate Means for Communication (42 CFR 418.113(c)(3))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Plan communication plan must includes a primary and alternate means for communicating with hospice’s employees and Federal, state, tribal, regional, and local emergency management agencies. The agency administrator could not find the communication plan.”

    Rule E0032. Standard-level.

  • Methods for Sharing Information (42 CFR 418.113(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 92 words

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Plan communication plan includes: • A method for sharing information and medical documentation for patients under the hospice’s care, as necessary, with other health care providers to maintain the continuity of care • A means, in the event of an evacuation, to release patient information as permitted under 45 CFR 164.510(b)(1)(ii) • A means of providing information about the general condition and location of patients under the facility’s care as permitted under 45 CFR 164.510(b)(4) The agency administrator could not find the communication plan.”

    Rule E0033. Standard-level.

  • EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the agency has conducted exercises to test the emergency plan every two years.”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,5,9) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #1,2,3,5,9: There is evidence of an order for oxygen, but oxygen is not on the medication record.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #6) did not have evidence that each patient and family received education and training provided as appropriate to their responsibilities for the care and services identified in the plan of care. Patient #6: There is evidence in the medical record of an order for wound care. Under the order is a note: the “caregiver is validated to be competent in performing wound care maintenance during non-skilled nurse visits”. There is no evidence of education of the caregiver.”

    Rule L0544. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 105 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #2,3) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #2,3: There is evidence the Social Worker visit schedule is once a month as ordered by the IDG. However there is no Psychosocial problem/intervention/goal in the plan of care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #4) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #4: There is evidence in nurses note 12/5/25 the patient has a Foley catheter. There is no order for Foley catheter.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 102 words

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #4,10) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #4: There is evidence Spiritual Care visit frequency is x1 per month. There is no visit recorded in January and February 2026. Patient #10: There is evidence in the nursing narrative on admission 1/6/26 the patient has two wounds on Left ankle. The order for wound care is for one of the wounds. The other wound care does not have an order and wound care was provided by the nurse.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 94 words

    “Upon observation and home visits, 1 of 3 (Patient #1) there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. Patient #1: During visit the nurse washed hands, put on gloves, and opened bag. The nurse then touched the patient’s leg and then went into the bag to remove pulse oximeter without cleaning hands. The nurse did not remove all the equipment from the bag at once, but kept touching the patient and then reaching back inside of the bag again.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(i))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 13 (Personnel #9) did not have evidence that all bereavement services are provided by a qualified counselor in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, professional practice standards, the hospice’s policies and procedures and/or job descriptions which includes experience or education in grief or loss counseling. Personnel #9: There is no evidence Bereavement Coordinator met the qualifications of bachelor’s degree or equivalent theological degree from college or university per the job description. There is only a Certificate of Ordination.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 146 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #13) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patient #13: There is evidence of a post bereavement assessment. There is a note on the area for plan of care stating the bereaved refused services. However letters were still sent and the letters do not appear on the Bereavement Plan of Care.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 101 words

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 13 (Personnel #6) did not have evidence in the hospice aide personnel file that a registered nurse made an annual on-site visit to the location where a patient is receiving care in order to observe and assess each aide while he or she is performing care. The supervising nurse must assess an aide’s ability to demonstrate initial and continued satisfactory performance in meeting outcome criteria that include all required content. Personnel #6: There is no evidence in the personnel file of an annual on site visit to a location where a patient is receiving care.”

    Rule L0633. Standard-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 14 (Personnel #2) did not have evidence the alternate administrator’s personnel record verifies that: • The employee has appropriate education and experience requirements • There is a signed job description for this role • The employee has been orientated to this role Personnel #2: There is no evidence the Alternate administrator was oriented to the role.”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level.

  • Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b))

    “Upon patient record review, 8 of 14 (Patient #1,2,4,5,6,8,9,10) did not have evidence that there is a physician’s brief narrative explanation of the clinical findings that supports a life expectancy of 6 months or less as part of the certification forms, or as an addendum to the certification forms. Patient #1,2,4,5,6,8,9,10: There is no evidence of a brief narrative that included the patients clinical circumstances to justify certification. Only the diagnosis and comorbidities and certification statement was documented.”

    Rule L0667. Standard-level.

  • Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))

    “Upon client record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1,2,6) did not have evidence that the physician provides a brief narrative explanation of the clinical findings that supports a life expectancy of 6 months or less as part of the recertification form, or as an addendum to the recertification form. Patient #1,2,6: There is no evidence of a brief narrative that included the patients clinical circumstances to justify recertification. Only the diagnosis and comorbidities and certification statement was documented.”

    Rule L0668. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    “Upon patient client record review, 10 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: •Diagnoses related to terminal illness and related conditions •Diagnoses unrelated to terminal illness and related conditions Patients #1-10: There is evidence during the admission, the patient signed a blank “Patient Notification of Hospice Non-Covered Items, Services, and Drugs” form. On the election statement, there is a spot for the patient to check, “yes or no” that they wanted the form. However, neither box was checked.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Written agreement (42 CFR 418.112(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 158 words

    “Upon SNF/NF contract review, 1 of 3 (Sage Creek Post Acute, SNF/GIP contract) did not have a provision that the hospice may use the SNF/NF nursing personnel where permitted by state law and as specified by the SNF/NF to assist in the administration of prescribed therapies included in the plan of care only to the extent that the hospice would routinely use the services of a hospice patient’s family in implementing the plan of care. The contract has a statement “A provision that the hospice may use the SNF/NF or ICF/IID nursing personnel where permitted by state law and as specified by the SNF/NF or ICF/IID to assist in the administration of prescribed therapies included in the plan of care only to the extent that the hospice would routinely use the services that “MIRACLE HOSPICE CARE” patient’s family in implementing the plan of care. The hospice is Sacred Heart Hospice and has no affiliation with Miracle hospice care.”

    Rule L0770. Standard-level.

  • Orientation and training of staff (42 CFR 418.112(f))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice provides orientation to personnel of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID regarding the policies and procedures of the provision of care/service including all required content.”

    Rule L0782. Standard-level.

  • Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114(b)(3))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 13 (Personnel #5) did not have evidence that all Medical Social Services are provided by a qualified Medical Social Worker in accordance with the state’s Social Work Practice Act, the hospice’s policies and procedures and/or job descriptions. Personnel #5: There was no documentation that the MSW serves as an active advisor, consulting with the BSW on assessing the needs of patients and families, developing and updating the social work portion of the plan of care. There is no evidence of supervision by an MSW.”

    Rule L0787. Standard-level.

  • Multiple locations (42 CFR 418.116(a))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the organizational chart matches the hospice’s information submitted to CMS and/or State licensing agencies, and ACHC for ownership and management personnel. The Medical Director was new last year and there is no evidence documentation submitted to CMS, state agencies and ACHC.”

    Rule L0799. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 20, 2026Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health CareNo deficiencies cited
Apr 8, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care23 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 10, 2023.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 27.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 86.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 59% at home, 41% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends27.8%
Visits near death86.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Francisco Retirado (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Francisco Retirado (corporate director, 100%); Francisco Retirado (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Wilbert Ching (managing employee (under contract)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 96.15% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 83 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 89146, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 23.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.