Hearth Record

Family First Hospice Care LLC

A hospice in Las Vegas, Nevada 89102

3111 S Valley View Blvd Ste A-206, Las Vegas, Nevada 89102. (702) 302-1182.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 80 hospices serving ZIP code 89102 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 3, 2026: a follow-up inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 3, 2026: follow-up inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner2 deficiencies
  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 208 words

    “It is required that during the initial assessment visit and in advance of providing care the hospice provides the patient—or his or her representative—with verbal (meaning spoken) and written notice of the patient’s rights and responsibilities. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 1 (100%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure the patient or his representative received written notice of his rights and responsibilities in advance of providing care. CLINICAL RECORD 1: A review of the clinical record on 04/03/2026 revealed that the election of benefits signed was on 03/19/2026 by the legal representative, but the start of care/election of benefits date was left blank. The patient was not admitted until 03/26/2026, and there was no documentation provided that explained the patient or legal representative was notified of the election of the hospice benefit date. An interview and joint clinical record review were conducted with the Director of Clinical Services on 04/03/2026, during which time she stated, “The paperwork had been signed on 03/19/2026, the family was undecided about hospice, and the start of care date was left blank. They later called back and decided to be admitted, and the consents had not been completed again.””

    Rule L0502. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 236 words

    “It is required that written patient care instructions for a hospice aide are prepared by a RN who is responsible for the supervision of the hospice aide. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 4 (25%) clinical records reviewed in which hospice aide services were accepted, the agency did not ensure the registered nurse provided specific written instructions for the hospice aide. CLINICAL RECORD 3: A physician’s order and nursing assessment dated 02/12/2026 noted the patient had a Foley catheter. The hospice aide plan of care dated 01/22/2026 included the following tasks: “Assist with diapers/briefs; bedpan/urinal; incontinent of bladder/bowel; bedbath; assist to dress; comb/brush hair; shampoo/style hair; inspect skin; shave; perineal care; bathe feet; turn and position; inspect mouth; assist with brushing teeth; record recent BM (bowel movements); gentle range of motion; linen change-weekly.” All tasks were to be completed every visit unless otherwise specified, with an aide frequency of 5x per week. The Foley was not noted on the hospice aide care plan, and the aide was not given specific instructions for the care of the Foley. An interview and joint clinical record review were conducted with the Director of Clinical Services on 04/03/2026, during which time she stated: “The patient had a Foley placed on 02/12/2026 and still had the Foley in place; however, it had mistakenly not been added to the aide care plan.””

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

Feb 26, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner7 deficiencies
  • Volunteers (42 CFR 418.78)

    The inspectors’ words, 202 words

    “It is required that volunteers are used in day-to-day administrative and/or direct patient care roles. Volunteer services provided to patients/families are in a defined role and under the supervision of a designated hospice employee. Volunteer services are: noted in the plan of care; and documented in the patient record, including the time spent. THIS IS A CMS CONDITION-LEVEL DEFICIENCY This CONDITION was not met as evidenced by document review and interview which revealed the agency did not ensure the presence of a current, viable volunteer program as follows: 1. No (0) volunteer hours documented for the years 2024, 2025 and to-date 02/26/2026 (HCDT.21.I/L644); 2. No documented evidence of volunteer recruitment and retention efforts from 04/01/2023 through 02/262026 (HSRM.30.I/L645); and 3. No current volunteer training program (HSRM.31.I/L643). The cumulative effect of these deficiencies indicates a lack of effective oversight and implementation of an effective volunteer program and could result in the hospice agency’s inability to ensure the provision of quality health care, in a safe environment, in order to meet all patients’ needs for the Condition of Participation CFR 418.78 Volunteer Program. The deficient practice demonstrates systemic process failures that have the potential to affect all patients cared for by the hospice agency.”

    Rule L0641. Condition-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 416 words

    “It is required that counseling services include an organized program for providing bereavement services delivered by or under the supervision of a qualified professional with experience or education in grief or loss counseling. Bereavement services are available to the family and other individuals up to one (1) year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling extends to residents of a SNF/NF (skilled nursing facility/nursing facility) or ICF/IID (intermediate care facility/Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities) when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care. The bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved per a bereavement plan of care that includes: The types of bereavement services to be offered; The frequency of service delivery. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. 3 of 3 (100%) clinical records reviewed of patients who were discharged due to death revealed that the hospice did not ensure that the needs of the bereaved were identified in a bereavement plan of care. Agency policy, “Bereavement Services”, policy No. 2-010.1, stated in part, “A bereavement file will be maintained on each family/caregiver unit of care. Each file will contain the following information: A bereavement plan of care.” CLINICAL RECORD 12: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 09/02/2025 and was discharged due to death on 12/16/2025. The record included bereaved individual(s), however, there was no documented evidence of a bereavement plan of care. CLINICAL RECORD 13: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/21/2025 and was discharged due to death on 03/02/2025. The record included bereaved individual(s) and regular bereavement mailings, however, there was no documented evidence of a bereavement plan of care. CLINICAL RECORD 14: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/11/2025 and was discharged due to death on 06/18/2025. The record included bereaved individual(s) and regular bereavement mailings, however, there was no documented evidence of a bereavement plan of care. During a joint record review and interview on 02/26/2026, the Bereavement Coordinator agreed there was no documented evidence of bereavement plans of care in the 3 cited records. Additionally, the Bereavement Coordinator stated, “The last Bereavement Coordinator and I shared the role, then she left and I realize I didn’t pick up where she left off. I have not done any bereavement plans of care. I didn’t know we needed one.” During an interview on 02/26/2026, the Administrator stated, “He may not have received enough education. We need to educate the Bereavement Coordinator on what the expectations are on the policy.””

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 859 words

    “It is required that all hospice aide services must be provided by an individual who has successfully completed one (1) of the four (4) training and competency evaluations programs described below. The individual furnishes hospice aide services on behalf of a hospice only after successfully completing a competency evaluation program also described below. The hospice maintains documentation that each hospice aide has met the requirements. A qualified hospice aide has successfully completed a competency evaluation program that evaluates the aide’s competency in the following subject areas by observation of the aide’s performance with a patient or pseudo-patient: a) Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other hospice staff; b) Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration; c) Appropriate and safe techniques in performing personal hygiene and grooming tasks, including items on the following basic checklist: i. Bed bath; ii. Sponge, tub, and shower bath; iii. Hair shampoo (sink, tub, and bed); iv. Nail and skin care; v. Oral hygiene; vi. Toileting and elimination; d) Safe transfer techniques and ambulation; e) Normal range of motion and positioning. Evaluates the aide’s competency in the following subject areas by written exam, oral examination, or after observation of a hospice aide with a patient or a pseudo-patient during a simulation: a) Observation, reporting, and documentation of patient status and the care or service provided; b) Basic infection control procedures; c) Basic elements of body functioning and changes in body function that must be reported to an aide’s supervisor; d) Maintenance of a clean, safe, and healthy environment; e) Recognizing emergencies and the knowledge of emergency procedures and their application; f) The physical, emotional, and developmental needs of—and ways to work with—the populations served by the hospice, including the need for respect for the patient, his or her privacy, and his or her property; g) Adequate nutrition and fluid intake; h) Any remaining task(s) that the hospice chooses to have an aide perform. AND The competency evaluation is performed by a registered nurse in consultation with other skilled professionals, as appropriate. The hospice maintains documentation that demonstrates the requirements of competency evaluation are met. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, interview and personnel record review. 2 of 2 (100%) personnel records reviewed of hospice aides revealed that the hospice did not ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) evaluated the aide’s competency by observing the required skills before the hospice aide began providing independent care to patients. Agency policy, “PC.H35 Hospice Aide Qualifications,” stated in part, “An individual may furnish hospice aide services on behalf of a hospice only after that individual has successfully completed a competency evaluation program. Hospice Aide skills and competencies are assessed prior to delivery of services and updated at least every 12 months. The following must be evaluated by observing an aide’s performance of the task with a patient: Bed bath; sponge, tub, and shower bath; hair shampoo (sink, tub, and bed); nail and skin care; oral hygiene; toileting and elimination; safe transfer techniques and ambulation; and normal range of motion and positioning.” PERSONNEL RECORD 7: This Hospice Aide was hired on 02/18/2025. The Hospice Aide competency evaluation forms dated 02/18/2025 and 02/18/2026 revealed that all skills were evaluated verbally (without observation). The signature pages stated, “Items that are not observed cannot be performed independently until an RN is able to observe the aide performing the tasks. If an aide is not competent in 2 or more areas, the aide cannot perform patient visits independently.” There was no documented evidence that a RN evaluated the hospice aide’s competency by observing the required skills (Bed bath, sponge, tub, and shower bath, hair shampoo [sink, tub, and bed], nail and skin care, oral hygiene, toileting and elimination, safe transfer techniques and ambulation, normal range of motion and positioning) before the hospice aide began providing hospice aide services. PERSONNEL RECORD 8: This Hospice Aide was hired on 12/01/2023. The Hospice Aide competency evaluation forms dated 12/01/2023, 12/01/2024, and 12/01/2025 revealed that all skills were evaluated verbally (without observation). The signature page stated, “Items that are not observed cannot be performed independently until an RN is able to observe the aide performing the tasks. If an aide is not competent in 2 or more areas, the aide cannot perform patient visits independently.” There was no documented evidence that a RN evaluated the hospice aide’s competency by observing the required skills (Bed bath, sponge, tub, and shower bath, hair shampoo [sink, tub, and bed], nail and skin care, oral hygiene, toileting and elimination, safe transfer techniques and ambulation, normal range of motion and positioning) before the hospice aide began providing hospice aide services. During a joint record review and interview on 02/26/2026, the Director of Patient Care Services agreed there was no documented evidence that the hospice completed a competency evaluation by observing the required skills before the aides began providing hospice aide services to patients independently. Additionally, the Director of Patient Care Services stated, “I signed off on these and we had a verbal discussion. I did not observe them completing the skills. I did not realize it was required.””

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.78(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 283 words

    “It is required that the hospice maintains, documents, and provides hospice volunteer orientation and training that is consistent with hospice industry standards; it includes: The volunteer’s duties and responsibilities; the person to whom they report; the person to contact if they need assistance and instruction; hospice goals, services, and philosophy; confidentiality and protection of the patient’s and family’s rights; family dynamics and psychological issues surrounding terminal illness, death, and bereavement; procedures to be followed in an emergency and/or following the death of a patient; guidance specific to individual responsibilities. Volunteers are supervised by a designated hospice employee. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review and interview. A review of the Volunteer Binder revealed that hospice did not ensure to have a volunteer training program that is consistent with industry standards. The Volunteer Binder did not include any documented evidence of a volunteer training program. During an interview on 02/26/2026, the Volunteer Coordinator agreed there was no volunteer training program. Additionally, the Volunteer Coordinator stated, “I am aware we do not have a volunteer training program. We haven’t had a patient want a volunteer, so we don’t have a training for volunteers.” During an interview on 02/26/2026, the Administrator agreed there was no documented evidence of volunteer training. Additionally, the Administrator stated, “We don’t have a volunteer training program, just an outline. I have been looking at the guidelines, and I will be working on this.” The Administrator also stated, “We don’t have anyone that has completed volunteer training because we don’t have a volunteer training program.” A review of the Volunteer Binder revealed that hospice did not ensure to have a volunteer training program that is consistent with industry standards.”

    Rule L0643. Standard-level.

  • Role (42 CFR 418.78(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 197 words

    “It is required that volunteers are used in day-to-day administrative and/or direct patient care roles. Volunteer services are noted in the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review and interview. A review of the Volunteer Binder and Volunteer Requirement Report revealed that hospice did not ensure that volunteers provided day-to-day administrative or direct patient care roles. The Volunteer Binder did not include any documented evidence of Volunteer hours for 2024, 2025 or 2026 to-date. The Volunteer Requirement Report for January 1, 2024, through February 26, 2026, revealed that the volunteer hours were at 0. During an interview on 02/26/2026, the Volunteer Coordinator agreed there have been no volunteer hours or volunteers available to see patients. During an interview on 02/26/2026, the Administrator stated, “We haven’t had anyone ask for a volunteer.” The Administrator also stated, “We could have a staff member go see a patient if requested but we don’t have anyone that has completed volunteer training because we don’t have a volunteer training program.” A review of the Volunteer Binder and Volunteer Requirement Report revealed that hospice did not ensure that volunteers provided day-to-day administrative or direct patient care roles.”

    Rule L0644. Standard-level.

  • Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 193 words

    “It is required that the hospice documents and demonstrates viable and ongoing efforts to recruit and retain volunteers. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review and interview. A review of the Volunteer Binder revealed the hospice did not ensure to demonstrate and document viable and ongoing efforts to recruit and retain volunteers. The Volunteer Binder did not include any documented evidence of recruitment and retention efforts for April 1, 2023, through February 26, 2026. During an interview on 02/26/2026, the Volunteer Coordinator agreed there was no documented evidence of volunteer recruitment efforts. Additionally, the Volunteer Coordinator stated, “The program has not been effective. I’ve been thinking about it, where we can get volunteers, but I haven’t done any recruitment efforts.” During an interview on 02/26/2026, the Administrator agreed there was no documented evidence of volunteer recruitment efforts. Additionally, the Administrator stated, “Everything we have is in the binder. I spoke to the Volunteer Coordinator and they don’t have anything. We didn’t realize this was required.” A review of the Volunteer Binder revealed the hospice did not ensure to demonstrate and document viable and ongoing efforts to recruit and retain volunteers.”

    Rule L0645. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 212 words

    “It is required that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice per hospice regulation §418.26 (i.e., no longer terminally ill), the hospice forwards to the patient’s attending physician: a copy of the hospice discharge summary; and the patient’s record, if requested. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. 2 of 2 (100%) clinical records reviewed of patients who had a live discharge revealed that the hospice did not ensure that the discharge summary was sent to the patients’ attending physicians CLINICAL RECORD 10: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/15/2024 and was discharged due to no longer terminally ill on 10/09/2025. A discharge summary was completed on 10/09/2025. There was no documented evidence that the discharge summary was sent to the patient’s attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/29/2025 and was discharged due to revocation on 08/27/2025. A discharge summary was completed on 08/27/2025. There was no documented evidence that the discharge summary was sent to the patient’s attending physician. During a joint record review and interview on 02/26/2026, the Director of Patient Care Services agreed there was no documented evidence that the discharge summaries were provided to the patients’ attending physicians.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 3, 2026Follow-up inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner2 deficiencies cited
Feb 26, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 30, 2023.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 100% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9%
Visits near death100.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 8 owners or officers are people: Richard Calderon (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Mary Virginia Calderon (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Richard Calderon (corporate officer); Richard Calderon (corporate director); Richard Calderon (managing employee (on the payroll)); Mary Virginia Calderon (corporate officer); Mary Virginia Calderon (corporate director); Mary Virginia Calderon (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 91.67% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 52.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 80 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 89102, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.