Hearth Record

Grace Hospice of Nevada LLC

A hospice in Las Vegas, Nevada 89102

2330 Paseo Del Prado Suite C201, Las Vegas, Nevada 89102. (702) 299-6068.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 15 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

15 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 80 hospices serving ZIP code 89102 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 12, 2026: a follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

15 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

15 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 6, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care15 deficiencies
  • Core services (42 CFR 418.64)

    “Upon personnel record review, 2 of 11 (Personnel #5,#6) did not have evidence that the hospice routinely provide substantially all core services directly by hospice personnel (The hospice issues a W-2 form for the employee). These services include: • Physician services (may contract for physician services) • Nursing • Medical social services • Counseling Personnel 5: MSW provides services under contract. There is no evidence of employment of the hospice. Personnel 6: Spiritual/Bereavement Counselor provides services under contract. There is no evidence of employment of the hospice.”

    Rule L0587. Condition-level.

  • Organizational environment (42 CFR 418.100)

    “Condition of Participation: Organization and Administration of Services.”

    Rule L0648. Condition-level.

  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that the hospice informed and provided written information to the patient concerning its policies on advance directives, including a description of applicable state law. Patient 2: There is no evidence the patient was informed of or provided written information regarding advance directives, as the applicable section on the admission consent form was not completed.”

    Rule L0503. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 125 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #6,#7) did not have evidence that the patient has received effective pain management and symptom control from the hospice for conditions related to the terminal illness. Patient 6: RN documentation dated 05/01/2026 indicates patient reported generalized pain and had run out of Norco, with delivery expected that day. There was no evidence of follow-up visit or communication to verify medication was received or that pain was reassessed and resolved. Patient 7: RN visit narrative dated 04/30/2026 indicates patient reported severe pain with medications not effective. Group home manager reported oxycodone had not been delivered and morphine supply was nearly depleted. There was no evidence of follow-up visit or further assessment to evaluate pain relief or medication availability.”

    Rule L0512. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 183 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #1,#5,#7,#8) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 1: On 03/28/2026, the RN documented that the patient was taking Senna tablets as needed for constipation; however, there is no evidence of this on the medication profile. On 04/28/2026, the RN documented the patient as dependent on continuous Oxygen at 5 L/min via nasal cannula; however, the medication profile contains continuous Oxygen at 3 L/min via nasal cannula. Patient 5: The hospice medication profile contained Zoloft 25mg; however, this medication was absent from facility medication profile. Patient 7: The medication profile includes MiraLAX with no instructions for diluent when preparing this medication. Patient 8: Bactrim remains current on the medication profile; however, the medication was to be discontinued on 04/22/2026.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 99 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #3,#4,#8,#11) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 3,4,8,11: Patient on anticoagulant therapy with no evidence of identified problems, goals, or interventions related to risk for bleeding in the care plan.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 166 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #1,#5,#7,#8) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1: On 03/28/2026, the RN documented that the patient was taking Senna tablets as needed for constipation; however, there is no order for this in the medical record. On 04/28/2026, the RN documented the patient as dependent on continuous Oxygen at 5 L/min via nasal cannula; however, the medical record contains an order for continuous Oxygen at 3 L/min via nasal cannula. Patient 5: Medical record contains order written on 4/6/2026 for Zoloft 25mg; however, this medication was absent from facility medication profile. Patient 7: The medical record contained an order for MiraLAX; however, there were no instructions for diluent when preparing this medication. Patient 8: Order written on 04/12/2026 for Bactrim to be given for 10 days. However, the medication remains current in the medical record.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #8) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 8: Care plan problem for UTI, opened on 04/15/2026, remains active with no evidence of closure despite completion of antibiotic treatment on 04/22/2026.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 160 words

    “Upon client record review, 6 of 14 (Patient #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 1: The aide documentation for visits provided on 02/06/2026, 02/07/202, and 02/08/2026 is incomplete. Patient 2: RN narrative documentation for visit provided on 04/30/2026 is incomplete. Patient 3: Medical record contains order for chaplain visit frequency of once monthly. There was no evidence of a visit in April. Patient 4: RN assessment and narrative documentation for visits provided on 04/07/2026 and 04/27/2026 is incomplete. Also, aide documentation for visits provided on 04/22/2026, 04/23/202, and 04/24/2026 is incomplete. Patient 5: SC assessment and narrative documentation for visits provided on 04/22/2026 and 04/30/2026 is incomplete. Also, RN narrative documentation for visit provided on 05/02/2026 is incomplete. Patient 9: RN assessment and narrative documentation not started for visits provided on 04/30/2026, 05/01/2026, 05/02/2026, 05/03/2026, and 05/04/2026.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 139 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #3,#8) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 3,8: Patient on anticoagulant therapy with no evidence of instructions for bleeding precautions.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 1: Aide services were ordered at a frequency of 7 times per week effective 01/18/2026; however, there is no evidence of aide visits provided after 04/24/2026.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 1: There is no evidence of an RN conducting an aide supervision visit after 04/09/2026.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice is directed by a Board of Directors/governing body which assumes full legal authority and responsibility for the operation of the hospice as evidenced by not providing core services of medical social services and counseling with employees, Administrator and Alternate Administrator not having orientation to their roles, and lack of human resource management. In addition, not ensuring certification of terminal illness for patient’s meet § 418.22 Certification of terminal illness guidelines.”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))

    “Upon personnel record review, 3 of 11 (Personnel #1,#2,#4) did not have evidence that the hospice employees have received orientation on their specific job requirements. Personnel 1: No evidence of received orientation to the Administrator role. Personnel 2: No evidence of received orientation to the Director of Nursing role. Personnel 4: No evidence of received orientation to the role of Hospice Aide.”

    Rule L0662. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 97 words

    “Upon personnel record review, 4 of 11 (Personnel #2,#5,#6,#8) did not have evidence that a skills competency assessment, specific to each discipline had been conducted for all personnel including volunteers initially during orientation. Personnel 2: No evidence of registered nurse or volunteer competencies completed on personnel file. Personnel 5: The personnel file does not contain competencies for the role of MSW. Personnel 6: There was no evidence of competencies for the roles of SC or BC on the personnel file. Personnel 8: There was no evidence of competencies for the Medical Director role in the personnel file.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 12, 2026Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health CareNo deficiencies cited
May 6, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care15 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 4, 2020.
  • Ownership: other.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Chs Hospice LLC owns 100% directly since Jul 1, 2024.
  • 12 owners or officers are people: Demetrio Encabo Jr (owns 5% or more through other companies, 34%); Fenina Encabo (owns 5% or more through other companies, 33%); Luzviminda Alexander (owns 5% or more through other companies, 33%); Adriana Mbacke (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Adriana Mbacke (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Fenina Encabo (corporate director, 0%); Fenina Encabo (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Luzviminda Alexander (corporate director, 0%); Luzviminda Alexander (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Wilbert Ching (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Demetrio Encabo Jr (corporate director, 0%); Demetrio Encabo Jr (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Chs Hospice LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jul 1, 2024
Dvelde LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies34%Jan 16, 2025
Jm Family TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies34%Jul 1, 2024
Sam & Fenina TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies33%Jul 1, 2024
Gary and Lou Alexander TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies33%Jul 1, 2024

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
  • 95.45% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 80 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 89102, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 15.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.