Hearth Record

Hospice at Lsmnj, Inc.

A hospice in Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey 08234

6712 Washington Avenue, Suite 302, Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey 08234. (609) 380-4302.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 33 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

33 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 16 hospices serving ZIP code 08234 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 1, 2024: a follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

33 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

33 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 1, 2024: follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care2 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 142 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 5 (Patient #1,4) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #1: There is evidence in the medical record the patient was on Eliquis 2.5 mg 2x daily. The initial plan of care did not include Bleeding Risk. Patient #4: There is evidence in the medical record 9/18/24 initial nursing assessment noted “patient very restless and agitated. RN gave recommendation for Ativan, approved by the MD and given. The initial plan of care does not include Restlessness/Agitation.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 185 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 5 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1: There is evidence in the medical record of an order for Oxygen but Oxygen did not appear on the plan of care medications. Patient #2: There is evidence in the medical record nursing assessment 9/23/24 note “history of constipation controlled with Miralax and Senna QD. Senna was not on the plan of care. In addition, Miralax 17/gm/scoop powder one time daily as needed, did not indicate a diluent. Patient #3: There is evidence on the plan of care, Miralax 17/gm/scoop powder one time daily as needed, did not indicate a diluent. Patient #4: There is evidence on the plan of care, Tramadol 50 mg one tablet oral as needed for pain. Did not indicate how often to give Tramadol. Patient #5: There is evidence in the medical record nursing assessment 9/19/24 note redness in groin “skin protectant applied”. There is no order for skin protectant.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

Aug 15, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care31 deficiencies
  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    “Condition of Participation: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. L536”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level.

  • Organizational environment (42 CFR 418.100)

    “Condition of Participation: Organization and Administration of Services.”

    Rule L0648. Condition-level.

  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #19) did not have evidence that the hospice informed and provided written information to the patient concerning its policies on advance directives, including a description of applicable state law. Patient #19, No evidence of consents uploaded into chart. COS.”

    Rule L0503. Standard-level.

  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(3))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #19) did not have evidence that the hospice obtained the patient’s or representative’s signature confirming that they received a copy of the Patient’s Rights and Responsibilities. Patient #19, No evidence of consents uploaded into chart. COS.”

    Rule L0504. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #19) did not have evidence of the appropriate documentation for release of confidential information. Patient #19, No evidence of consents uploaded into chart. COS.”

    Rule L0516. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(7))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #19) did not have evidence that the patient received information about the services covered under the hospice benefit. Patient #19, No evidence of consents uploaded into chart. COS.”

    Rule L0518. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(8))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #19) did not have evidence that the patient received information about the scope of services that the hospice will provide and specific limitations on those services. Patient #19, No evidence of consents uploaded into chart. COS.”

    Rule L0519. Standard-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #18) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient #18, MSW documents will complete assessment when son calls back. No evidence of initial assessment completed at the time of survey.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 201 words

    “Upon patient record review, 9 of 19 (Patient #1,2,3,14,15,16,17,18,19) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #1, Patient is taking pantoprazole 40mg every day. No evidence of medication listed on medication profile. Patient #2, Upon home observation, Comfort pack of medications had expired in the home. Morphine discard after 11/20/23. Bisacodyl, Tylenol suppository, prochlorperol, Hycosamine, discard after 2/7/24. In addition, patient is taking Mag oxide 400mg, no evidence of medication listed on medication profile. Patient #3, Medication profile states Flagyl 500mg, 1 tablet oral 1 time a day as needed for other symptoms. Order on bottle states crush 1 tablet and apply to wound base one daily with dressing changes as needed for wound odor control. Patient #14,15,16, No evidence of oxygen on medication profile. Patient #16,17,18,19, No evidence of home medications documented on medication profile. Medication profile only had hospice comfort pack medications documented.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 106 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #6,12,16,17,) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #6, 12, Patient is full code. No evidence of initial care plan for patient being full code. Patient #16,17, No evidence of individualized care plans of problems/goals/interventions for each patient.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 190 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patient #1,3,7,8,12,19) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient #1, LVN frequency 10 PRN every 90 days, no evidence of scheduled frequency. Patient #3, Order written for case manager (specific name) 1x/week and 9 PRN visits, prn frequency too high. Patient #7, Order written for case manager (specific name) 5x/week and 9 PRN visits, prn frequency too high. Patient #8, No evidence of frequency written for SN, visits completed on 11/26, 12/2. Patient #12, Order written for case manager (specific name) 1x/week and 9 PRN visits, prn frequency too high. Patient #19, SC frequency 1x/month with 6 PRN visit, prn frequency too high.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patient #14,15,16,17,18,19) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #14, IDG note documents patient is now on 5l/nasal canula of oxygen. No evidence of written order to update oxygen on plan of care. Patient #14,15,16,17,18,19, No evidence of home medications added to medication profile. Medication profile only has hospice comfort medications.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #2,14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient #2, Home visit completed, patient has wheeled walker in living room. No evidence of wheeled walker listed on DME list. Patient #14, Patient is oxygen dependent. No evidence of oxygen listed on Plan of Care.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #14,15) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #14, MSW frequency 1x/month, visits completed 6/5 and 6/18, both routine visits. No evidence frequency was followed. Patient #15, SC frequency 1x/month, visit completed on 6/13 as telephone visit. No evidence of telephone visit order.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 124 words

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. Patient #1, RN displayed clean area with supplies, once the items (B/P cuff, pulse ox, thermometer) were used they were returned to clean area. Patient #2, RN washed hands then turned off faucet prior to drying her hands and then used paper towel to turn off faucet. Patient #3, LVN during wound care had removed dressing and had touched her glasses, removed gloves washed hands returned to patient with new pair of gloves, then used wound wash and sponge to clean wound, returned wound wash to clean area after use and then proceeded with dressing change without changing gloves.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 146 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #5) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #5, Aide care plan states to “weigh cl monthly” or take arm circumference. No evidence of day identified to complete.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 273 words

    “Upon patient record review 9 of 19 (Patient #1,3,4,5,12,16,17,18,19) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #1, Aide care plan directed Aide to complete activity to chair, complete transfers, notify RN if no BM in 3 days, prepare meals. No evidence these tasks were completed on 8/9 and 8/12. Patient #3, Aide care plan directed Aide to complete activity to change bed linens, not completed, aide documented tomorrow. Assist with clothing, task was not completed on 8/12. Patient #4, Aide care plan directed Aide to complete activity to complete diet regular, puree, feeder and document food intake. No evidence this was completed on 8/12. Patient #5, Aide care plan directed Aide to complete activity to complete “weigh cl monthly” or take arm circumference. No evidence this was completed. No evidence this was taught to aide on 8/14. Patient #12, Aide care plan directed Aide to complete activity tasks of document last MB, incontinence, fluids, tasks were not completed. Patient #16, Aide frequency 5x/week effective 8/2 which is a Friday. No evidence of 5 visits completed in the first week. Patient #17, Aide frequency 5x/week effective 7/18. Aide visits completed on 7/8, 7/9, 7/12. Patient #18, Aide frequency 5x/week effective 7/30, Aide visits completed on 7/31, 8/1, 8/5, no evidence of 5 visit the first week. Patient #19, Aide frequency 5x/week effective 7/25, no evidence of 5 visits the first week.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. No evidence of 5% of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees was met. 2023 year end was 3%.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Hospice multiple locations (42 CFR 418.100(f)(1)(ii))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence that branch (multiple) locations share administration, supervision, and services with the parent hospice location. Parent and branch have their own Medical Director, Administrator and DPS.”

    Rule L0657. Standard-level.

  • Hospice multiple locations (42 CFR 418.100(f)(1)(iii))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence that the lines of authority, professional and administrative control must be clearly delineated in the provider’s organizational structure and in practice, and must be traced to the location issued the certification number. Organizational chart shows no evidence of the lines of authority with the branch office.”

    Rule L0658. Standard-level.

  • Hospice multiple locations (42 CFR 418.100(f)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence that the provider continually monitors and manages all services provided at all of its locations to ensure that services are delivered in a safe and effective manner and to ensure that each patient and family receives the necessary care and services outlined in the plan of care. Parent and branch both have Admin, Alt Admin, DPS, Alt DPS, Med Director, Alt Med Director.”

    Rule L0660. Standard-level.

  • Medical director (42 CFR 418.102)

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice designates a physician to serve as Medical Director which includes: • The Medical Director must be a doctor of medicine or osteopathy who is an employee or is under contract. • When the Medical Director is not available, a physician designated by the hospice assumes the same responsibilities and obligations as the Medical Director. Parent and Branch office each have their own Medical Director and Alt Medical Director.”

    Rule L0664. Standard-level.

  • Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 129 words

    “Upon patient record review, 13 of 19 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) did not have evidence that the medical director or physician designee provides written certification that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less if the illness runs its normal course. The physician must consider the following when making this determination: • The primary terminal condition • Related diagnosis • Current subjective and objective medical findings • Current medication and treatment orders • Information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness Patients #1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13 did not have evidence of an oral certification of the certifying physician stating that the patient is terminally ill with a prognosis of 6 months or less. The agency had order for admit and treat.”

    Rule L0667. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    “Upon patient client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #15,19) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient #15, No evidence of election date documented on consent for election of Medicare benefit. Patient #19, No evidence of consents uploaded into chart. COS.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 131 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #2,14,17,18) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #2, Prior to admission, patient listed as a number 2 for Disaster Plan, Disaster Acuity marked as N/A on the Plan of care after patient was admitted. RN documented oxy and script in note. No evidence these words are approved abbreviations. Patient #14, No evidence of Advance Directive was completed on the Admission consent. Patient #17,18, No evidence of POLST and DNR completed. Both yes and no boxes left empty.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary • The patient’s clinical record, if requested Patient #10, No evidence of discharge summary forwarded to attending MD.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #10,11) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient #10, Discharge summary only stated “ no longer appropriate”. No evidence of the summary documenting the patient’s stay, treatments, symptoms and pain management. Patient #11, Discharge summary only stated “Revoked”. No evidence of the summary documenting the patient’s stay, treatments, symptoms and pain management.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

  • Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(A))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence a copy is provided of the hospice written policies and procedures on the management and disposal of controlled drugs to the patient or patient representative and family. Patient #19, No evidence of consents uploaded into chart. COS.”

    Rule L0695. Standard-level.

  • Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(B))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice discussed the policies and procedures for managing the safe use and disposal of controlled drugs with the patient or representative and the family in a language and manner that they understand to ensure that these parties are educated regarding the safe use and disposal of controlled drugs. Patient #19, No evidence of consents uploaded into chart. COS.”

    Rule L0696. Standard-level.

  • Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(C))

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #18,19) did not have evidence that the written policies and procedures for managing controlled drugs was provided and discussed. Patient #19, No evidence of consents uploaded into chart. COS.”

    Rule L0697. Standard-level.

  • Professional management (42 CFR 418.112(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 107 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that the hospice assumes responsibility for professional management of the resident’s hospice services in accordance with the hospice plan of care. The hospice is responsible for providing all hospice services including: • Provision, in a timely manner, of all supplies, medications, and DME needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions Patient #4, Patient admitted to hospice program and lives in SNF; patient was on oxygen but no evidence oxygen was provided by the hospice agency; no contract for oxygen and hospice not paying for oxygen per hospice administrator.”

    Rule L0762. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 1, 2024Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care2 deficiencies cited
Aug 15, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care31 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 28, 2015.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 84.6% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 32% at home, 33% in assisted living, 30% in a nursing facility, 3% in a skilled nursing facility, 2% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.5%
Visits near death84.6% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Lutheran Social Ministries of New Jersey, Inc. owns 100% directly since Nov 15, 2017.
  • 18 owners or officers are people: Ronald Singer (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Denise Raymond (managing employee (on the payroll), 60%); Gary W Raab (managing employee (under contract), 40%); Pradip S Shah (managing employee (under contract), 40%); Jeannine M Richman (corporate officer); Anthony Steinbronn (corporate director); Edward P Noble (corporate officer); Edward P Noble (corporate director); Maria L Fogata (managing employee (under contract)); Amelia Matadeo (managing employee (on the payroll)); Bardford Hildebrandt (corporate officer); Bardford Hildebrandt (corporate director); Colleen P Frankenfield (corporate officer); Colleen P Frankenfield (corporate director); Tracie L Bartholomew (corporate director); Juhan Runne (corporate officer); Juhan Runne (corporate director); Denise K Harris (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Lutheran Social Ministries of New Jersey, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Nov 15, 2017

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 76% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 80% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 53.39% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 49.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 16 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 08234, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 33.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.