Hearth Record

Gentiva

A hospice in Piscataway, New Jersey 08854

242 Old New Brunswick Rd, Ste 410, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854. (732) 562-8800.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 26 hospices serving ZIP code 08854 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 24, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 24, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 127 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 records (Patient #6,#8) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #6: The medication profile indicated for A & D topical ointment, apply to affected area daily. There was not evidence of a specific location. Corrected on site. Patient #8: The medication profile indicated a duplicate entry; Diclofenac 1% topical gel 3x/day bilateral feet and Voltaren 1% topical gel 3x/day bilateral feet. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 94 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 records (Patient #2) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient #2: There was not evidence of a bereavement assessment within 5 days of admission.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 123 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 records (Patient #4) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse ensured continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and coordinated activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient #4: The record indicated a call to triage on 6/23/24 at 4:14 pm with the called stating that the patient had taken 3 doses of Morphine for chest pain and the pain was still present. A visit need was identified per policy. There was not evidence of a visit or contact with the patient/caller until 6/25/24 at 10:48 am when a visit was conducted.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 records (Patient #6) did not have evidence the plan of care includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #6: The record contained an order for A&D topical ointment, apply to affected area daily. There was not evidence of a specific location. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 119 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 records (Patient #1,#4) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #1: The record indicated that the patient developed a UTI with antibiotics starting on 7/12/24. There was not evidence that infection/UTI was added to the plan of care, noting progress towards outcomes and goals. Patient #4: The spiritual care counselor provided an initial evaluation and then the patient/representative declined these services. The care plan continued to have goals and interventions specifically related to the services of a spiritual care counselor; These were not resolved. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 125 words

    “Upon client record review, 3 of 14 records (Patient #3,#4,#9) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #3: The visit frequency for the skilled nurse for the benefit period beginning 5/30/24 was 1 every 2w2, 1w7. The record indicated that visits were conducted on 5/31/24, 6/7/24 and 6/10/24. Patient #4: The visit frequency for the skilled nurse for the benefit period beginning 5/18/24 was 2 every 2w2, 1w7. The record indicated that visits were conducted on 5/22/24, 5/24/24, 5/29/24 and 5/31/24. Patient #9: The visit frequency for the spiritual care counselor was 2 every 2m2, 2m1, 1m1, effective 6/20/24. The record indicated that the first visit occurred on 7/2/24.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 181 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 records (Patient #5,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #5: The aide plan of care indicated for bed bath, may wash in bathroom sitting on toilet and partial sponge bath, may wash in bathroom sitting on toilet. Corrected on site. Patient #10: The aide care plan dated 5/7/24 indicated for skin care every visit; Apply dime sized amount to left and right groin area (dry skin) smoothed to a thin lather without evidence of a product to use. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 172 words

    “Upon patient record review 5 of 14 records (Patient #4,#5,#6,#8,#9) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care Patient #4: The aide visit frequency was 2w13. For the week of 6/30/24-7/6/24, the record indicated only 1 visit, and no evidence of a missed visit document. Patient #5: The aide visit frequency was 5w13. For the week of 6/30/24-7/6/24, the record indicated only 4 visits, and no evidence of a missed visit document. Patient #6: The aide visit frequency was 5w13. For the week of 6/30/24-7/6/24, the record indicated only 4 visits, and no evidence of a missed visit document. Patient #8: The aide visit frequency was 5w12. For the week of 6/30/24-7/6/24, the record indicated only 4 visits, and no evidence of a missed visit document. Patient #10: The aide visit frequency was 2w1,3w8 effective 6/5/24. The record indicated only 1 visit for week 1 of the aide visit order.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 records (Patient #6) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient #6: The benefit election statement (on admission, 2/26/24) indicated that the patient/representative wished to receive the Patient Notification of Hospice Non-Covered Items, Services, and Drugs. Requests for updated notifications were made on 3/11/24, 5/17/24, and 5/24/24. The record indicated that the date that all of these documents were furnished was May 2024 (No day).”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 195 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 3 of 14 records (Patient #1,#2,#9 ) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Patient #1: There was not a visit frequency for the aides and there was not evidence that that an aide conducted a visit however an aide supervisory visit was conducted on 7/12/24, and all questions related to the aide were answered as if the patient was receiving visits by an aide. This included but was not limited to, “Did the patient receive a visit by the aide in the past 14 days?” The name of the aide was documented, “Was the client satisfied with the care?” “Was the aide care plan reviewed?” Patient #2: The record indicated that the last aide visit was 4/16/24. Aide supervisory visits were still conducted until 6/3/24, with all questions answered as if an aide was still providing care. Patient #9: The medication profile indicates Oxygen 3L/min via nasal cannula continuously. Documentation by the nurse on 6/21/24, 6/27/24, and 7/2/24 indicated that the patient was not on oxygen.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 records (Patient #11) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary • The patient’s clinical record, if requested Patient #11: The patient was discharged for no longer meeting hospice criteria. There was not evidence that a copy of the hospice discharge summary was sent to the attending physician.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 24, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 19, 1997.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 90.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 75% at home, 8% in assisted living, 16% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.2 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.5%
Visits near death90.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLC owns 99% directly since Jul 1, 2011; Odyssey Healthcare Gp, LLC owns 1% directly since Jul 1, 2001.
  • Curo Health Services LLC runs it.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); Karen Kennedy (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 1, 2001
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Holding CompanyOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 1, 2001
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLCOwns 5% or more directly99%Jul 1, 2011
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Gp, LLCOwns 5% or more directly1%Jul 1, 2001
Curo Health Services LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)Jul 11, 2018

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 76% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 79% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.53% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 70.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 26 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 08854, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.