Hearth Record

Hospice of New Jersey, LLC

A hospice in Bloomfield, New Jersey 07003

400 Broadacres Drive, 1st Floor, Bloomfield, New Jersey 07003. (973) 893-0818.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 18 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

18 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 22 hospices serving ZIP code 07003 had 4.5.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 2, 2025: a follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

18 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

18 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 2, 2025: follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care2 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 96 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 5 (Patient #1, 2) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1: 4/24/25 order: Insert cath and change as prescribed (specify cath and balloon size, type and frequency). 22 French Supra Pubic Cath. Balloon size not specified. Patient #2: 4/30/25 order: Insert catheter and change as prescribed (specify cath and balloon size type and frequency) - Foley catheter change every 30 days #16. Balloon size not specified.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 91 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 5 (Patient #1, 3) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #1: Shave ordered 2x/week. Performed 3x (May 12, 15, 16); 1x only (May19); 1x only (May 29th) Patient #3: Shampoo ordered 2x/wk. Performed 3x; (May19, 21, 23); May 26, 29, 30)”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

Apr 17, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care16 deficiencies
  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    “Condition of participation: Interdisciplinary group, care planning, and coordination of services. The hospice must designate an interdisciplinary group or groups as specified in paragraph (a) of this section which, in consultation with the patient’s attending physician, must prepare a written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must specify the hospice care and services necessary to meet the patient and familyspecific needs identified in the comprehensive assessment as such needs relate to the terminal illness and related conditions.”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level.

  • Hospice aide and homemaker services (42 CFR 418.76)

    “Condition of participation: Hospice aide and homemaker services. All hospice aide services must be provided by individuals who meet the personnel requirements specified in paragraph (a) of this section. Homemaker services must be provided by individuals who meet the personnel requirements specified in paragraph (j) of this section.”

    Rule L0607. Condition-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 19 (Patient #6,#12) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient 6 and 12:There is no evidence that a spiritual care comprehensive assessment was completed on the patient.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 532 words

    “Upon patient record review, 11 of 19 (Patient #1,#3,#4,#5,#6,#8,#9,#10,#11,#13,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 1:The medical record includes SN documentation on 12/11/24 of O2 in use at 3LPM via NC and SN contact with physician for orders for breathing treatments and lidocaine patch for symptom management. The initial CTI dated 12/3 with notation of requirement by patient of oxygen supplementation at 5 lpm. There is no evidence that the medication profile includes entries for oxygen, breathing treatments or lidocaine patches. Patient 3:The medical record includes SN documentation on 7/11/24 that Nystatin powder and supplemental oxygen was ordered. On 1/8/25 Nystatin cream was ordered to treat breast fungal infection. There is no evidence that medication profile includes orders for Nystatin powder, nystatin cream or oxygen. The medication profile includes an entry for Acetaminophen 325 mg 1 tab q 4 hours PRN with no indication for use. Patient 4:The medication profile includes entries for PRN acetaminophen and lorazepam and an entry for oxygen 2-4 LPM via NC. There is no evidence the entries include the indication for use for acetaminophen and lorazepam and no titration instructions for oxygen. Updated on site. Patient 5 and 11:The medication profile includes entries for Acetaminophen 650 PO Q6 Hrs. PRN and Acetaminophen 650 PO every 6 Hrs. PRN. This is a duplicate entry and there is no indication that the entries include parameters for a daily max dose. Patient 6: The medication profile includes entries for Oxygen, Voltaren Gel and Systane eye drops. There is no evidence that the entries include the route of administration and titration instructions for oxygen and the location for administration and indication for use of Voltaren gel and Systane Ophthalmic drops. Patient 8:The medical record includes SN documentation on admission that the patient requires O2 2LPM NC continuous for dyspnea. There is no evidence that the medication profile includes an entry for oxygen. Patient 9:The medication profile includes entries for Morphine, hyoscine and lorazepam and oxygen. There is no evidence that the entries include an indication for use for morphine, hyoscine and lorazepam and no route or titration instructions for oxygen. Patient 10:The medical record includes SN documentation on 1/17/25 that patient has scopolamine patch order for increased secretions and that enteral feedings are required for nutrition. There is no evidence that the medication profile includes entries for scopolamine and enteral feedings. Patient 13:The medication profile includes entries for oxygen and albuterol treatments. There is no evidence that the entries include flow rate and route for oxygen and the indication for use for the PRN Albuterol Sulfate Nebulizers. Patient 14:The medical record includes SN documentation on 12/30/24 that Nystatin cream was ordered due to redness under bilat breast and 01/07/25 the SN documented a non productive cough and Robitussin ordered. There is no evidence that the medication profile includes entries for Nystatin Cream and Robitussin.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 96 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #2,#4) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 2 and 4: There is no evidence that a bereavement risk assessment was completed within 5 days.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 228 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #1,#3,#7,#12,#14) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient 1:The medical record includes nursing documentation on admission of a deep tissue injury to left heel. There is no evidence of assessment and measurements of wound from 12/3/24 through 1/21/25 and 1/21/25 through 3/21/25. Patient 3:The medical record includes nursing documentation on admission of a stage II pressure ulcer to the sacrum. There is no evidence of assessment and measurements of wound from admission to present. Patient 7:The medical record includes nursing documentation on admission of a pressure ulcer to the sacrum. There is no evidence of assessment and measurements of wound from admission to present. Patient 12:The medical record includes nursing documentation on admission of a stage III pressure ulcer to the sacrum. There is no evidence of assessment and measurements of wound from admission to present. Patient 14:The medical record includes nursing documentation on admission of a skin tear to elbow measuring 1x2 skin tear to right knee Measuring 3x2. There is no evidence of assessment and measurements of wound from admission to present.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 604 words

    “Upon patient record review, 12 of 19 (Patient #1,#2,#3,#4,#5,#6,#8,#9,#10,#11,#13,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 1:SN documentation on admission that the patient requires oxygen therapy and breathing treatments for dyspnea, has a primary diagnosis of Nutritional deficiency with an altered diet of pureed, requires feeding and has poor nutrition and hydration. There is no evidence that the plan of care includes problems, goals and interventions for the safety and use of oxygen and altered nutrition and hydration. Patient 2: SN documentation on admission that the patient is noted to be at risk of aspiration. There is no evidence that the plan of care includes problems, goals and interventions to manage the risk of aspiration. Patient 3: SN documentation on admission that the patient requires oxygen therapy and breathing treatments for dyspnea, has a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer’s and has a fungal rash to the breast. There is no evidence that the plan of care includes problems, goals and interventions for the safety and use of oxygen, the neurological management of Alzheimer’s disease or the management of an active fungal infection. Patient 4 and 6:The medical record includes SN documentation on admission that the patient requires oxygen therapy and breathing treatments for dyspnea and has a primary diagnosis of Senile Dementia. There is no evidence that the plan of care includes problems, goals and interventions for the safety and use of oxygen or the neurological management of Senile Dementia. Patient 5:SN documentation on admission that the patient requires oxygen therapy for dyspnea. There is no evidence that the plan of care includes problems, goals and interventions for the safety and use of oxygen. Patient 8:The medical record includes a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer’s, documented comorbidity of Cardiac disease to include placement of pacemaker and Atrial fibrillation and is at risk of for aspiration. There is no evidence that the plan of care includes problems, goals and interventions for the management of Alzheimer’s, cardiac disease and the risk of aspiration. Patient 9:SN documentation on admission that the patient requires oxygen therapy and breathing treatments for dyspnea and has a primary diagnosis of Cancer. There is no evidence that the plan of care includes problems, goals and interventions for the safety and use of oxygen or the management of the primary diagnosis of Cancer. Patient 10:SN documentation on admission that the patient requires enteral feeding via an NG tube and that the patient is at risk for falls. There is no evidence that the plan of care includes problems, goals and interventions for enteral feedings and the management of the risk for falls. Patient 11:SN documentation on admission that the patient has a history of Gastrointestinal bleeding and is currently on anticoagulation therapy. There is no evidence that the plan of care includes problems, goals and interventions to manage the risk of bleeding. Patient 13: SN documentation on admission that the patient requires oxygen therapy for dyspnea and is at risk for falls. There is no evidence that the plan of care includes problems, goals and interventions for the safety and use of oxygen and the management of the risk for falls. Patient 14:There is no evidence of problems, goals and interventions for urinary incontinence and the management of the Pickwick system though documented by SN.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 553 words

    “Upon patient record review, 8 of 19 (Patient #1,#3,#5,#8,#9,#11,#13,#14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1:The medical record includes SN documentation on 12/11/24 of O2 in use at 3LPM via NC and SN contact with physician for orders for breathing treatments and lidocaine patch for symptom management. The initial CTI dated 12/3 with notation of requirement by patient of oxygen supplementation at 5 lpm. There is no evidence that the plan of care includes orders for oxygen, breathing treatments or lidocaine patches. Patient 3:The medical record includes SN documentation on 7/11/24 that Nystatin powder and supplemental oxygen was ordered. On 1/8 Nystatin cream was ordered to treat breast fungal infection. there is no evidence that the plan of care includes orders for Nystatin powder, nystatin cream or oxygen. The plan of care includes an order for Acetaminophen 325 mg 1 tab q 4 hours PRN with no indication for use. SN documentation in narrative on 1/21/25 that wound care is being provided as follows: Cleanse with mild soap and water, pat dry, apply xeroform and cover wit Meri plex daily and PRN, however there is no evidence that the plan of care includes wound care orders. Patient 4:There are orders for PRN acetaminophen and lorazepam and for oxygen 2-4 LPM via NC. There is no evidence the entries include the indication for use for acetaminophen and lorazepam and no titration instructions for oxygen. Updated on site. Patient 5 and 11:The medication profile includes entries for Acetaminophen 650 PO Q6 Hrs. PRN and Acetaminophen 650 PO every 6 Hrs. PRN. This is a duplicate entry and there is no indication that the entries include parameters for a daily max dose. Patient 6: There are orders for Oxygen, Voltaren Gel and Systane eye drops. There is no evidence that the orders include the route of administration and titration instructions for oxygen and the location for administration and indication for use of Voltaren gel and Systane Ophthalmic drops. Patient 7:The medical record includes SN documentation that the patient is currently using Remedy antifungal zinc oxide for wound care. There is no evidence of an order for Remedy antifungal zinc oxide. Patient 8:The medical record includes SN documentation on admission that the patient requires O2 2LPM NC continuous for dyspnea. There is no evidence that the plan of care includes an order for oxygen. Patient 9:The plan of care includes orders for Morphine, hyoscine and lorazepam and oxygen. There is no evidence that the orders include an indication for use for morphine, hyoscine and lorazepam and no route or titration instructions for oxygen and has no indication for admin and O2 with no route or titration instructions Patient 13:The plan of care includes an order for oxygen and albuterol treatments. There is no evidence that the orders include flow rate and route for oxygen and the indication for use for the PRN Albuterol Sulfate Nebulizers. Patient 14:The medical record includes SN documentation on 12/30/24 that Nystatin cream was ordered due to redness under bilat breast and 01/07/25 the SN documented a non productive cough and Robitussin ordered. There is no evidence that the plan of care includes orders for Nystatin Cream and Robitussin.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 116 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #3,#8) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 3:The medical record includes SN documentation on admission that the patient requires a rolling walker for ambulation. There is no evidence that the plan of care includes a rolling walker as an equipment need of the patient. Patient 8:The medical record includes SN documentation on admission that the patient requires the use of a hospital bed. There is no evidence that the plan of care includes a hospital bed as an equipment need of the patient.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 149 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #1,#11) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 1: The medical record includes an order on 03/02/24 for x-ray to right thumb due bruising. There is no documented evidence of SN follow up with IDG team. Patient 11: The medical record includes SN documentation on 2/10 that bloodwork and a urine C/S was ordered with no clinical symptoms noted for reason labs obtained. On 2/12 the MSW noted daughter wanted urine test asap to r/o UTI. Documentation by the SN of refusal for labs to be drawn by patient on 2/12 and that a subsequent lab draw to be completed on 2/14. There is no follow up documentation of labs obtained or follow up by SN.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 357 words

    “Upon patient record review, 9 of 19 (Patient #1,#2,#4,#5,#7,#10,#11,#12,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 1:The aide plan of care does not include a frequency for the task of turning and repositioning to be performed. Patient 2:The patient is noted to be at risk for falls and aspiration. The aide plan of care does not include Fall and aspiration precautions. Patient 4:The patient is noted to be at risk for falls and requires oxygen as needed. The aide plan of care does not include Fall and oxygen precautions. Patient 5:The aide plan of care does not include a frequency for the task of shave to be performed. Patient 7:The patient is noted require oxygen as needed and a bed bath is assigned 3 times weekly. The aide plan of care does not include oxygen precautions and there is no task of dressing and undressing assigned. Patient 10:The patient is noted to be at risk for falls. The aide plan of care does not include Fall precautions. Patient 11:The aide plan of care includes the BED Bath 5x weekly and shower 2x weekly. Patient visit frequency is 5 times weekly. Patient 12:The patient is noted to require oxygen as needed. The aide plan of care does not oxygen precautions. Patient 14:The aide POC with bed bath noted that patient/CG is able to make decision of if bath is to be provided. Paid care givers in home 24/7 and patient is unable to make decisions due to dementia.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 211 words

    “Upon patient record review 4 of 19 (Patient #4,#7,#8,#13) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 4:The aide plan of care includes task of bed bath assigned 3 times weekly. The aide documentation notes that task was completed 4 times the week of 4/7. Patient 7:The aide plan of care includes a visit frequency of 5 times per week and the task of bed bath ordered 3 times weekly. The aide documentation notes that the patient was seen 6 times the week of 3/16 and that the bed bath was completed 6 times. Patient 8:The aide plan of care includes the task of shampoo hair to be completed 1 time weekly. The aide documentation notes that the task of shampoo hair was completed 3 times the week of 3/17, on 3/17, 3/18 and 3/19. Patient 13:The aide plan of care includes visit frequency of 5 times weekly. The week of 3/31, 3 visits are documented by aide and one note by RN on 3/4 that patient refused visit.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 103 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #8) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 8: There is no evidence in the clinical record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))

    “Upon patient client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #5, 6) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Advance Directives. Patient 5 and 6:The patient representative signed the EOB as POA. There is no evidence in the medical record includes a copy of the POA documentation.”

    Rule L0677. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 152 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #3,#4,#11,#12) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 3:The medical record includes documentation by the SN that the patient requires a soft diet and the plan of care includes an order for diet as regular as tolerated. Patient 4:The medical record includes documentation by the SN that the patient requires a pureed diet with thin liquids and the MSW notes diet as pureed with thickened liquids. The diet ordered and the plan of care is reg as tolerated Patient 11 and 12: The SN documentation includes the unapproved abbreviations of DCD for dressing type and OD as frequency respectively.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 152 words

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #7,#10) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient 7:The medical record includes documentation that the patient requires wound care. The patient is in a facility and there is no evidence of a wound care order on the plan of care. Patient 10:The medical record includes documentation that the patient requires enteral feedings. The patient is in a facility and there is no evidence of an enteral feeding order on the plan of care. The medical record includes SN documentation on 3/21/25 and 3/26 that patient is using oxygen at 3LPM via nasal cannula. The plan of care includes an order for oxygen to be delivered at 2 LPM via nasal cannula as needed for dyspnea.”

    Rule L0773. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 2, 2025Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care2 deficiencies cited
Apr 17, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care16 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 25, 1995.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 86.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 44% at home, 11% in assisted living, 45% in a nursing facility, 1% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.3%
Visits near death86.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Care Hospice, Inc. owns 100% directly since Jun 1, 2020.
  • 9 owners or officers are people: John B Hunter (owns 5% or more through other companies, 23.78%); Robert Wolf (corporate officer); Owen Davis (corporate director); Kelly A Priegnitz (corporate director); Chris Beall (corporate director); Grant Brown (corporate officer); John B Hunter (corporate officer); John B Hunter (corporate director); John B Hunter (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Care Hospice, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jun 1, 2020
Care Hospice Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 1, 2020
Care Hospice Acquisition, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 1, 2020
Care Investor Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 1, 2020
Capricorn Healthcare & Special Opportunities II, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies56.93%Jun 1, 2020
Leavitt Equity Partners I, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies8.81%Jun 1, 2020
Maranon Mezzanine Fund II, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies5.28%Jun 1, 2020

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 69% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 71% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 94% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 51.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 52 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 22 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 07003, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4.5; this one had 18.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.