Hearth Record

Good Samaritan Society - Hospice

A hospice in Hastings, Nebraska 68901

300 S. 1st Ave., Hastings, Nebraska 68901. (402) 460-5868.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 6 hospices serving ZIP code 68901 had 5.5.

The last inspection on record was on Dec 2, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Dec 2, 2025: recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies
  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1)(i)-(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 316 words

    “Based on record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview, the hospice failed to have qualified social worker (SW) as a member of the hospice interdisciplinary group (IDG) which had the potential to affect all 16 current hospice patients. The sample size was 14. Findings are: A. Review of the agency policy and procedure titled Social Services, Hospice-Enterprise, last reviewed/revised 10/1/24, revealed:1. Social services are provided by a qualified social worker, licensed in the state. 2. The social worker will be a member of the interdisciplinary group (IDG) and will participate in the development, implementation, and revision of the plan of care. 3. The social worker will contribute to the comprehensive assessment and ongoing updates to the comprehensive assessment based on the needs of the patient. B. Review of the agency policy and procedure titled, Interdisciplinary Group (IDG), Hospice-Enterprise, last reviewed/revised 4/8/25, revealed:1. The hospice provides comprehensive care and services through the efforts of an IDG that established the plan of care (POC). 2. The core members of the IDG include a SW, registered nurse, counselor, and physician.3. The IDG meets at least every 15 days to revise the POC.4. The IDG coordinates care, ensures continuous assessment of the patient and family, implements the POC. C. Review of hospice’s current personnel roster revealed one SW listed. SW-G was to begin employment on 12/1/25. D. During an interview on 12/1/25 at 12:00 PM, the Administrator and the Clinical Manager revealed:1. SW-G began employment 12/1/25.2. Last full-time date of employment, for SW-L (previous SW), was 6/27/253. SW-L became employed as an “as needed” (PRN) employee on 6/28/25 and resigned the PRN position effective 10/2/25.4. SW- L did not regularly participate in the IDG team meetings, in the development, implementation, and revision of the plan of care for hospice patients during the PRN time frame. 5. The hospice did not have a SW employee from 10/3/25 through 11/30/25.”

    Rule L0541. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 294 words

    “Based on record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview, the agency failed to ensure new and/or revised medication orders were included on the current Client Medication Report (the form used to list all current and active patient medications) for 2 of 14 (Patient 4 & 5) patient records reviewed. The census was 16. Findings are:A. Review of the the policy and procedure titled Provider Orders and Notification, Home Health- Enterprise, reviewed/revised 5/27/25, revealed complete provider orders, including all medication and treatment orders are documented in the electronic medical record. B. Review of the policy and procedure titled Medication Management, Hospice- Enterprise, reviewed/revised 1/27/25, revealed the Medication Profile/Medication Reconciliation was to include prescription, over- the- counter drugs, herbal remedies, and other alternative treatments. The hospice must ensure the patient’s medication list is current at each reconciliation. C. Review of Patient 4’s clinical record revealed:1. A Client Coordination note dated 11/13/25. The note revealed the patient had started an allergy medication (name of medication not specified).2. The current Client Medication Report provided on 11/18/25, did not include any allergy medication in the list of medications. D. Review of Patient 5’s clinical record revealed:1. A Skilled Nurse Visit Note Report dated 11/4/25. The note revealed the patient’s Miralax (a bowel management medication) was decreased to three times per week. 2. A physician communication note dated 11/4/25 requesting to change the frequency of Miralax. The physician approved Miralax 17 grams by mouth Monday, Wednesday and Friday.3. The current Client Medication Report provided on 11/18/25, did not include the change in the Miralax frequency. E. During an interview on 11/18/25 at 4:30 PM, the Administrator and the Clinical Manager confirmed updated/revised medications for Patient 4 and 5 were not included on these patient’s current Client Medication Report.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 764 words

    “Based on record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview, the hospice failed to ensure the Hospice Aide Plan of Care included patient specific interventions for 4 of 11 (Patient 3, 5, 10, and 12) patients reviewed who received hospice aide (HA) services. The sample size was 14. The census was 16. A. Review of the agency policy and procedure titled Aide Services, Hospice-Enterprise, reviewed/revised 9/2/25, revealed:1. The Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) identifies the need for aide services.2. The Registered Nurse (RN) arranges HA services, prepares written instructions, assigns care, and supervises the HA. B. The hospice did not have a policy specific to the development and revisions to the HA plan of care. C. Review of Patient 3’s clinical record revealed:1. The patient’s start of care was 10/30/24.2. The Hospice Certification and Plan of Care Update for the certification periods of 8/26/25 through 10/24/25 and 10/25/25 through 12/23/25 included orders for HA one time per week for assistance with personal care, hygiene, and activities of daily living (ADLs). 3. The Aide Care Plan Report (the HA plan of care/assignment form) for the certification period of 10/25/25 through 12/23/25, included the task of routine catheter cares every visit. 4. A skilled nurse (SN) Visit Note Report dated 9/26/25 revealed the patient’s foley catheter was discontinued this date. 5. The HA Care Plan Report was not revised once the patient’s foley catheter was discontinued. D. Review of Patient 5’s clinical record revealed:1. The patient’s start of care was 4/25/25.2. The Hospice Certification and Plan of Care Update for the certification periods of 7/24/25 through 10/21/25 and 10/22/25 through 12/20/25 included orders for HA one time per week for assistance with personal care, hygiene, and ADLs. 3. The Aide Care Plan Report (the HA plan of care/assignment form) for the certification period of 10/22/25 through 12/20/25, included the task shower every visit. 4. A SN Visit Note Report dated 9/2/25 reveals the patient is bed bound.5. A SN Visit Note Report dated 9/16/25 reveals the patient is only out of bed to be weighed.6. A HA Visit Note Reports dated 9/3/25, 9/8/25, 9/15/25, 10/6/25, and10/20/25 revealed the HA performed a bed bath, not a shower. 7. The Aide Care Plan Report had not been updated to include bed bath. E. Review of Patient 10’s clinical record revealed:1. The patient’s start of care was 3/1/25.2. The Hospice Certification and Plan of Care Update for the certification period 10/27/25 through 12/25/25 included orders for HA two times per week for 8 weeks then one time per week for one week for assistance with personal care, hygiene, and ADLs.3. The Aide Care Plan Report for the certification period of 10/27/25 through 12/25/25, included stand by assistance for ambulation to bathroom, toileting assistance as needed. 4. A Client Coordination Note dated 10/28/25, revealed a note by the HA indicated the patient is becoming weaker, more difficulty ambulating to the bathroom, and okayed trying a bedside commode. 5. A Client Coordination Note dated 10/31/25, revealed a note by the HA indicated the patient is reportedly using the bedside commode with the help of the caregiver due to continued weakness and instability to use commode independently. 6. The Aide Care Plan Report had not been updated with the new intervention of the bedside commode or increased assistance with transfers. F. Review of Patient 12’s clinical record revealed:1. The patient’s start of care was 2/11/25. 2. The Hospice Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 2/11/25 through 5/11/25 included orders for HA one time per week. 3. The Aide Care Plan Report for the certification period of 2/11/25 through 3/31/25, included interventions to transfer client from bed to chair, chair to bed, assist to beside commode every visit, and tub bath/bed bath every visit. 4. The Hospice IDG Comprehensive Assessment and Care Plan Update Report dated 2/19/25, indicated the patient has residual right-sided hemiparesis. 5. A SN Visit Note dated 2/24/25 revealed the patient is a maximal assist using a Hoyer lift (a full body mechanical lift device) for transfers. 6. The Aide Care Plan Report does not include information regarding the patient’s maximal assist level, use of a Hoyer lift for transfers or the patient’s right-sided hemiparesis. G. During an interview on 12/1/25, the Administrator and the Clinical Manager confirmed the HA Care Plan for Patient 3, 5, 10, and 12 did not include patient specific interventions to aid the HA in providing services to the hospice patients and also confirmed the hospice did not have a policy specific to developing and updating a hospice aide plan of care.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    The inspectors’ words, 258 words

    “Based on record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview, the hospice failed to provide a minimum of 5 percent of the total direct patient care services by volunteers for October 2024 through August 2025 and failed to have available volunteer usage reporting for January 2024 through August 2024. The census was 16. Findings are: A. Review of the agency policy and procedure Volunteer Services and Documentation, Hospice-Enterprise, last reviewed/revised 3/6/25, revealed:1. Volunteers provide administrative and/or direct care/support greater than or equal to 5% of the total patient care hours of all paid employees.2. Volunteer hours are compiled on a regular basis.3. The agency determines the time spent by volunteers and estimates the financial savings due to their time and services. B. Review of the Hospice Volunteer Hours Reports for 2024 and 2025 revealed:1. The 2024 report from January 2024 through August 2024 did not include any total staff visit hours to calculate the volunteer usage percentage.2. The 2024 report from October 2024 through December 2024 did not meet the required 5% of total direct patient care services by volunteers.3. The 2025 report from January 2025 through August 2025 did not meet the required 5% of total direct patient care services by volunteers. C. During an interview on 12/1/25 at 11:00 AM, the Administrator and the Volunteer Coordinator confirmed the hospice failed to provide a minimum of 5 percent of total direct patient care services by volunteers for October 2024 through August 2025 and failed to have available volunteer usage reporting for January 2024 through August 2024.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114(b)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 244 words

    “Based on record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview, the hospice failed to have a qualified social worker (SW) with a Master of Social Work (MSW) degree and/or a Bachelor of Social Work (BSW) with a supervising MSW. This failure had the potential to affect all 16 of the hospice patients on census. The sample size was 14. Findings are: A. Review of the agency policy and procedure titled Social Services, Hospice-Enterprise, last reviewed/revised 10/1/24, revealed:1. Social services are provided by a qualified social worker (MSW, BSW), licensed in the state. 2. The policy does not indicate that if a BSW is employed by the hospice, the BSW will be supervised by a qualified MSW. B. Review of hospice’s current personnel roster revealed one SW listed. SW-G was to begin employment on 12/1/25. SW-G is a BSW. C. Review of SW-G’s personnel file revealed:1. Date of hire was 12/1/25.2. SW-G is a licensed SW in the State of Nebraska, and holds a BSW degree. D. During an interview on 12/1/25 at 12:00 PM, the Administrator and the Clinical Manager revealed:1. SW-G to began employment 12/1/25. SW-G is a BSW.2. SW-L (previous MSW) last full-time date of employment was 6/27/25.3. SW-L became employed on an “as needed” (PRN) employee on 6/28/25 and resigned the PRN position effective 10/2/25.4. The hospice did not have any SW employee from 10/3/25 through 11/30/25.5. The hospice currently does not have a MSW to provide supervision to SW-G.”

    Rule L0787. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 2, 2025Recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 31, 1996.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 945 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 0.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 36% at home, 19% in assisted living, 10% in a nursing facility, 33% in a skilled nursing facility, 3% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day945.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends0.2%
Visits near death93.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Sanford owns 100% directly since Jan 1, 2019.
  • 21 owners or officers are people: Mark Allen Lundeen (corporate director, 0%); Marnie Lynn Ventling-Herrmann (corporate director, 0%); Tony Lee Morrison (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); James Edward Cain (corporate director, 0%); Brent Gerard Teiken (corporate director, 0%); Joel Adam Fluit (corporate officer, 0%); Dana James Dykhouse (corporate director, 0%); Michael Rogers (corporate officer, 0%); Andrew Stewart North (corporate director, 0%); Aimee Nicole Middleton (corporate officer, 0%); Stephanie Marie Herseth Sandlin (corporate director, 0%); William Joseph Gassen (corporate officer, 0%); William Joseph Gassen (corporate director, 0%); Wesley Owen Engbrecht (corporate director, 0%); Nathan Thomas Schema (corporate officer, 0%); Carrie C Edwards (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); David Jonathan Shulkin (corporate director, 0%); Neil Leslie Gulsvig (corporate director, 0%); Lauris Nelson Molbert (corporate director, 0%); Nicholas Wayne Olson (corporate officer, 0%); Julie B Fletcher (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan SocietyOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 1, 2019
SanfordOwns 5% or more directly100%Jan 1, 2019

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 73% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 90.35% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 54.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 6 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 68901, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5.5; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 6 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 68901
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Good Samaritan Society - Hospice This hospice5
Eventide Hospice1
Endless Journey, LLC0
Aseracare Hospice8
Aseracare Hospice11
St. Croix Hospice6

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.