Hearth Record

Aseracare Hospice

A hospice in York, Nebraska 68467

1719 N Lincoln Ave, York, Nebraska 68467. (308) 624-3939.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 4 hospices serving ZIP code 68467 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 3, 2026: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 3, 2026: complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency
  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 338 words

    “Based on record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview, the agency failed to document follow-up with a complainant, according to the agency’s own policy and procedure and expectations, for 1 of 4 hospice complaints reviewed (complaint received by the agency on 3/7/26 for Patient 5). The census was 96; 49 at the parent and 47 at the multiple location. Findings are: A. Review of the agency policy and procedure titled Patient Grievances and Complaints, revised 3/19/26 revealed: 1. The agency was to have a process in place a procedure for the provision of a response to the patient or designee. 2. The policy and procedure provides a mechanism for receiving, reviewing, and resolving patient/caregiver complaints. 3. The agency was to communicate the resolution of the complaint to the patient and/or caregiver that initiated the complaint process verbally and follow-up via an individualized, scenario-specific recovery letter. B. Review of the agency grievance/complaint log revealed: 1. A Client Complaint Report with a complaint received on 3/7/26 at 12:45 PM from a family member of Patient 5. 2. The report indicated the family member requested a follow-up call. 3. There was no documentation on the complaint investigation and follow-up notes that a follow-up phone call was made to the complainant. C. Review of Patient 5’s clinical record revealed there was no documentation that a follow-up phone call was made to the complainant regarding a complaint made on 3/7/26. D. During an interview on 6/2/26 at 1:30 PM, the Area Vice President of Operations, and the Area Vice President of Clinical Services confirmed: 1. There was no documentation in the complaint investigation notes that a follow-up phone call was made to the family member of Patient 5 regarding the complaint made on 3/7/26. 2. The agency expectation is that follow-up is to be done with all complainants. 3. The staff did not follow the agency policy and procedure and agency expectations to complete and document follow-up with the family member of Patient 5 when they filed a complaint on 3/7/26.”

    Rule L0554. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Feb 28, 2025: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care10 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient #7: The patient was admitted on 11/25/24. The initial psychosocial comprehensive assessment was 12/6/24 beyond the 5 calendar days.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 203 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #2,10,11,13) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #2: There is an order on 11/21/24, to remove all oxygen DME as the patient is not on oxygen. Oxygen 2L/min remained on the medication record. Additionally, during the home visit it was observed, the patient was taking Duloxetine 30 mg daily. The hospice medication record indicated Duloxetine 40 mg daily. (corrected on site) Patient #10: There is an order on 1/7/25 for Oxygen 2L PRN SOB no route is indicated on the medication record. (corrected on site) Patient #11: The hospice medication record indicates Pravastatin daily. During the home visit the patient caregiver stated Pravastatin was discontinued in July 2024. (corrected on site) Patient #13: There is an order on 2/25/24 for Oxygen supplies. The patient is using oxygen but oxygen is not on the medication record. (corrected on site)”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 132 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #3, 7) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #3: The medication record indicates on 1/2/25 the patient was on Warfarin. The plan of care did not include bleeding precautions. (corrected on site) Patient #7: The 11/25/24 admission note by the RN indicated the patient had second round of antibiotics 2 weeks ago. Infection was not added to the plan of care until 12/31/24.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 168 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #1,8,10,13) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1: There is evidence in the record on 10/16/24 of an order for Oxygen 2L/min via NC continuous. On 2/11/25 and 2/25/25, the nurses’ notes indicate the Oxygen was at 4L/min. Patient #8: There is an order 1/7/25 to cleanse wound with wound spray, pat dry, apply Xeroform, cover with Opti foam. Hospice nurse to complete 2x week and facility nurse all other times. The order does not indicate how often or the location of the wound. (corrected on site) Patient #10: There is an order on 1/7/25 for Oxygen 2L PRN SOB no route is listed in the order. (corrected on site) Patient #13: There is an order on 2/25/25 for Oxygen supplies. There is no order for oxygen and the patient is using oxygen. (corrected on site)”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 99 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #5,8) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #5: The medical record indicates the care plan was updated with Infection on 11/6/24. The antibiotic was discontinued on 11/28/24 however, the problem was not discontinued from the care plan until recertification update on 1/22/25. Patient #8: There is new order 1/7/25 for wound care. The plan of care was not updated to include wounds. (corrected on site)”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 19 (Patient #1,11) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services provided are based on all assessments of the patient and family needs. Patient #1: There is evidence in the patient record on 10/22/24 the patient requested a volunteer. No volunteer is available. Patient #11: There is evidence in the patient record on 1/16/25 the patient requested a volunteer. No volunteer is available.”

    Rule L0556. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. During home visit with Patient #3, the RNCM was observed returning dirty equipment into her nurse’s bag. The hospice bag technique indicates to clean equipment before returning to the bag.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 152 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #3) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #3: There is evidence on the medication record 1/2/25 the patient is on Warfarin. Bleeding precautions is not on the Aide care plan. (corrected on site)”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 156 words

    “Upon patient record review 3 of 19 (Patient #3,6,14) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #3: The aid care plan indicates a bath on Thursdays. The week of 2/2/25 the patient did not have a bath on Thursday. The aid visited on Monday and Wednesday. Patient #6: The aid care plan indicates assist with shower weekly on Wednesday. The week of 2/9/25 the patient did not have a shower on Wednesday. The aid visited on Monday and Thursday. Patient #14: The aid care plan indicates assist with bath (only) on Wednesdays; assist with dressing, shampoo, nail care on Thursdays. The week of 2/9 and 2/16 the aide completed all services on Wednesdays.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. The volunteer cost savings percentage for 2024 was 1.4%”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 3, 2026Complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency cited
Mar 11, 2026Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Feb 28, 2025Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care10 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 1, 2010.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 16.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 21% at home, 13% in assisted living, 65% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day16.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.7%
Visits near death96.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Homecare Preferred Choice, Inc. owns 100% directly since Jun 1, 2020.
  • 11 owners or officers are people: Marcus Macip (corporate officer); Marcus Macip (corporate director); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer); Bridget R Kaigler (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Joni Babineaux (corporate officer); Kristina J Braud (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Holly Hines (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jeanne Shingleton (corporate officer); Chad W Vieth (managing employee (under contract)); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 14, 2025
Amedisys Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 1, 2020
Amedisys Hospice, L.L.C.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 1, 2020
Amedisys Holding LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 1, 2020
Homecare Preferred Choice, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jun 1, 2020

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 76% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 79% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 84.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 4 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 68467, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 4 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 68467
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Aseracare Hospice This hospice11
Eventide Hospice1
Aseracare Hospice6
St. Croix Hospice6

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.