Four Seasons the Care You Trust
A hospice in Flat Rock, North Carolina 28731
571 South Allen Road, Flat Rock, North Carolina 28731. (828) 692-6178.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 12 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 5of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
12 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 3 hospices serving ZIP code 28731 had 9.
The last inspection on record was on Jul 8, 2024: a complaint inspection by the state.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Dec 20, 2023: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission12 deficiencies
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(1))
“Observed in Individual Tracer. In 1 of 2 records reviewed, the surveyor noted that 3 pain assessments were not completed and documented as defined by the organization’s policy. Two of the pain assessments did not contain a pain score as required. The organization’s policy states that the pain assessment will include a score. Two of the assessments did not include a pain scale score. This finding was discussed with the Director of Accreditation.”
-
Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))
The inspectors’ words, 264 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 8 patient records reviewed, for active patients in home hospice, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that the comprehensive assessment was not completed within five calendar days of the election of hospice care. For RRNHV#11, the chaplain completed his initial assessment 10 days late. There was no documentation to explain the delay. For RRNHV#12, the chaplain documented an initial phone call to the patient 13 days after the election of hospice care at which time the patient refused spiritual care. For RRNHV#13, the chaplain called the patient on day 2 after admission and left a message. There was no other documentation in the record until the spiritual assessment was documented 2 months later. For RRNHV#14, the chaplain’s initial assessment was completed on day 6 after the election of the benefit. There was no documentation as to why the visit was delayed. Findings were verified by the Team Leader assisting with record review. Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 12 patient records reviewed, The hospice’s interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the patient’s attending physician, if any, did not complete the comprehensive assessment no later than five calendar after the election of hospice care. During review of the record associated with hospice home visit 6 and hospice record 3, it was noted that the social worker did not make a visit within five days of the admission in record 3 and the chaplain did not make a visit with in five days in the record associated with hone visit 6. This was confirmed by the Team Lead.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. In 1 of 4 bereavement records reviewed, the pre-bereavement assessment had not been documented as required by the organization’s Bereavement Risk Assessment Policy. This finding was validated by the Grief Services Coordinator at the time of the observation.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 312 words
“Observed in Record Review. The written plan of care was not based on the patient’s goals and the time frames, settings, and services required to meet those goals. During review of the record associated with hospice home visit 5 it was noted that goals were not in place for findings in the comprehensive assessment. For example, the patient had an arm wound documented at admission but there were no goals or interventions related to wound in the initial plan of care, and the patient had decreased nutritional intake and nausea and vomiting assessed but there were no nutritional goals or interventions in the initial plan of care. This was confirmed by the team leader. Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 12 patient records reviewed, The written plan of care was not based on the patient’s goals and the time frames, settings, and services required to meet those goals. During review of the record associated with hospice home visit 5 and hospice record associated with home visit 6 it was noted that goals related to pain were not appropriate. In the record associated with home visit 5 the patient reported a pain level of 8 at admission with a patient goal of a pain level five. The only goal related to pain for the initial assessment stated that the patient will continue to report that her pain is well controlled with a date of two weeks hence. There was no documentation that the patient had reported her pain to be well controlled and the patient’s pain was still at an 8 on the second visit two days later. In the record associated with home visit 6 the patient’s pain was rated at a 6 on admission, and the goal stated that the patient’s pain would be at the patient’s goal of 4 in 15 days. This was confirmed by the team leader.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 425 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 12 patient records reviewed, The plan of care includes all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following:
interventions to manage pain and symptoms.

During review of the record associated with hospice home visit 5 it was noted that although the patient consistently reported moderate to severe pain, the only intervention in the care plan stated assess for pain and initiate pain interventions as needed. There were no specific interventions as to pharmacological or non pharmacological approaches. In the record associated with home visit 6 it was noted that although the patient had a new PEG tube requiring dressing changes, there were no interventions or goals in the care plan related to the tube. In record 1 the patient was noted to have oral thrush and was on Diflucan at admission but there was nothing in the plan of care relating to oral thrush management. In record 5 it was noted that the patient had a diagnosis of ALS and had dyspnea at 3 on admission but there was nothing in the plan of care for dyspnea until one month after admission. This was confirmed by the team leader. Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 12 resident records reviewed, The organization did not implement interventions to reduce falls based on the patient’s assessed risk. In the records associated with records 2 and 3 there were no interventions related to falls based on falls risk assessment. For example, in record 3 the fall risk was scored at 7, but there was no fall care plan for 28 days after admission, and in record 2 the fall risk was scored at 8, but there was no fall care plan until 2 and 1/2 months after admission. This was confirmed by the team lead. Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 3 patient records reviewed, for patients located in the inpatient hospice house, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that for RRIPU#2, the patient was admitted to the hospice house GIP for pain and agitation. Agitation was not included in the care plan, but the patient was receiving pharmacological interventions. Additionally, a foley catheter was inserted but not added to the care plan. For RRIPU#3, the patient had a foley inserted and her breast tumor erupted and became an open area requiring dressing changes. Both were being addressed and cared for but had not been added to the plan of care. Findings were verified by the Team Leader assisting with record review.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
“Observed in Record Review. It was noted by the nurse surveyor that for RRIPU#3, the patient had a foley inserted and her breast tumor erupted and became an open area requiring dressing changes. Both were being addressed and cared for but had not been added to the plan of care. Findings were verified by the Team Leader assisting with record review.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 98 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 12 patient records reviewed, The organization did not provide the patient with care, treatment, or services according to the patient’s individualized plan of care. During review of records 4 and 6 it was noted that visits were not provided according to orders. In record 4 nursing visits were ordered for 1x week but no visits were provided in the first week after the admission visit. In record 6 nursing was ordered once per week but no visits were provided in a one week period. this was confirmed by the team lead.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
The inspectors’ words, 414 words
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 6 home visits conducted, it was observed by the Nurse Surveyor that the organization did not implement the infection prevention and control activities it had planned per policy “Hand Hygiene Policy During RRHV#2 the Social Worker did not hand sanitize upon entry into the patient’s room or before and after assisting the patient with sending an email on the patient’s own tablet. Finding was verified by the Spiritual Care Team Leader who was present on the home visit. Observed in Individual Tracer. The organization did not implement the infection prevention and control activities it has planned. During hospice home visit 5 it was observed that the nurse did not cleanse her hands before entering the nursing bag per policy. This was confirmed by the team leader. Observed in Individual Tracer. The organization did not implement the infection prevention and control activities it has planned. During hospice home visit 5 it was observed that the nurse did not cleanse her hands after doffing gloves per policy. This was confirmed by the team leader. Observed in Individual Tracer. The organization did not implement the infection prevention and control activities it has planned. During hospice home visit 5 it was observed that the nurse cleansed her hands, then grasped the would solution bottle that was kept in the patient’s home before donning gloves on two occasions. This did not follow organizational policy. This was confirmed by the team leader. Observed in Individual Tracer. The organization did not reduce the risk of infections associated with medical equipment, devices, and supplies. During hospice home visit 5 it was observed that the nurse her notebook computer directly on the patient’s table. She then placed patient pill bottles on the computer during the pill box fill. The nurse did not cleanse the computer per policy upon leaving the patient’s home. This was confirmed by the team leader. Observed in Individual Tracer. The organization did not implement infection prevention and control activities when doing the following: Cleaning and performing disinfection of medical supplies and devices. During hospice home visit 5 it was observed that sani-wipe disinfecting wipes were used to clean equipment used to take vital signs. The nurse removed one sani-wipe from its package and used it to clean equipment prior to use. The wipe was left open during the visit was then used to clean equipment after use. The wipe was no longer wetting the equipment. This was confirmed by the team leader.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 140 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 8 patient records reviewed, for active patients, It was noted by the surveyor that for RRNHV#13, one Hospice Aide Supervisory visit was completed 15 days apart, not the required 14 days. Finding was verified by the Team Leader assisting with record review. Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 12 patient records reviewed, The registered nurse did not supervise the hospice aide during an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days. During review of records 4 and 6 it was noted that aide supervision was not documented every 14 days or less. For example in record 4 there was no supervisory visit documented for 4 1/2 weeks and in record 6 there was no supervision documented for 8 1/2 weeks. This was confirmed by the team lead.
”
-
Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(A))
“Observed in Individual Tracer. The surveyor reviewed the information provided to hospice patients at the time of admission. The surveyor noted that the organization does not a provide a copy of its written policies and procedures on the management and disposal of controlled medications to the patient or the patient’s representative and family when controlled medications are ordered. This finding was discussed with the Director of Accreditation.”
-
Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 140 words
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 6 home visits conducted, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that for RRHV#1, the patient did not have a completed individualized emergency plan in her home folder. There was some general information related to emergency planning but nothing regarding what to do if care, treatment, or services are disrupted by a natural disaster or emergency. Finding was verified by the Director of Hospice Clinical Services who was present during the home visit. Observed in Individual Tracer. The organization did not document procedures to follow if care, treatment, or services are disrupted by a natural disaster or an emergency. During hospice home visits 5 and 6 it was observed that there was no emergency plan in place at the patient’s home or in the patient record. This was confirmed by the Team Leader.”
-
Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. During a review of contracted services, the surveyor noted that the contracts for durable medical equipment (DME) and therapy did not include the following: a stipulation that the outside agency will complete criminal background checks on contracted employees who provide direct patient care or have access to patient records. This finding was discussed with the Director of Accreditation at the time of the observation.”
All 3 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2024 | Complaint inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Apr 23, 2024 | Complaint inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Dec 20, 2023 | Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission | 12 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 1, 1988.
- Ownership: non-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 87.7% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 51% at home, 19% in assisted living, 29% in a nursing facility, 1% in a hospital, 1% in an inpatient hospice.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 11.1 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 7.7% |
| Visits near death | 87.7% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 23 owners or officers are people: Paula Wagner (corporate director); Ken D Adams (corporate director); Mary Coffey (corporate director); Millicent Grace Burke-Sinclair (managing employee (on the payroll)); Navin Anthony (corporate director); Heather Halford (managing employee (on the payroll)); Richelle Nugent Hooper (managing employee (on the payroll)); Koral Alman (corporate director); Ruth Mize Thomson (managing employee (on the payroll)); William D Mckibbin (corporate director); Cory Donohue (corporate director); Carol Hunter (corporate director); Tina Gentry (corporate director); Paige Dickens Wheeler (managing employee (on the payroll)); Nancy Bouvet (corporate director); Daryl Crouse (corporate director); Victoria Flanagan (corporate director); Susan Kersbergen (corporate director); Jason Bradshaw (corporate director); Monica Byrd Watts (managing employee (on the payroll)); Natasha Michaels (corporate director); Leeann Tucker (corporate director); Malinda Vera Cruz (corporate director).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 88% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 92% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 99.67% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 46.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 3 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 28731, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 9; this one had 12.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Four Seasons the Care You Trust This hospice | 12 |
| Hospice of the Carolina Foothills | 9 |
| Carepartners Home Care & Hospice | 9 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.