Authoracare Collective
A hospice in Greensboro, North Carolina 27405
2504 Summit Ave, Greensboro, North Carolina 27405. (336) 621-2500.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 13 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
13 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 14 hospices serving ZIP code 27405 had 9.
The last inspection on record was on Dec 17, 2025: a complaint inspection by the state.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Sep 12, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 97 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 33 (Patient #8) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #8 - Medication profile contains Diazepam 5mg/ml give 2.5 mg (0.5 ml) every 6 hours injection - did not specify if IM, SQ or IV.”
-
Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 110 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 33 (Patient #13, 29) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient #13 - Patient has wound to L heel and L ankle - no measurements of wound effective 08/21/25 x 3 weeks. Patient #29 - Patient has wound to sacrum - wound measured and assessed on 08/23/25 then no documentation as of 09/09/25 of wound assessment or measurements.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 158 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 33 (Patient #11, 12, 29, 30) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient #11 - Aide 3 x a week and does not identify for personal care. Patient #12 - Aide 2 x a week and does not identify for personal care. Patient #29 - Aide 2 x a week and does not identify for personal care. Patient #30 - Aide 2 x a week and does not identify for personal care.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 135 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 33 (Patient #8, 11, 18, 29) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #8 - SN visit note on 09/07/25 “foley catheter with 50cc output” but no related orders for the care and management of the Foley catheter. Patient #11 - Order to change indwelling 14F or 16F catheter per agency protocol. Patient #18 - SN visit note 08/18/25 patient is on O2 at 2.5 L/M there is no order in the chart for this. Patient #29- Wound care to sacrum did not have modifier for PRN dressing changes. Patient has Foley Catheter but no related orders for the care and management of the Foley catheter.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 120 words
“Upon client record review, 3 of 33 (Patient #)14, 17, 26 did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #14 - SN visit 07/03/25 “clean wound by soaking gauze with wound cleanser and leaving in place 5-10 minutes, place calcium alginate cut to size, cover and secure” there is no order in the chart for this. Patient #17 - SN visit 08/30/25 “instructed to give Miralax when patient is constipated” there is no order in the chart for this. Patient #26 - SN visit note “patient has a peripheral IV in R forearm that flushes well” no order in chart for peripheral IV or flushes.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 217 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 33 (Patient #11, 16, 25, 26) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #11 - Aide care plan did not include oxygen safety or Foley Catheter care. Patient #16 - Aide care plan tasks contain Shower every visit, bed bath every visit and partial sponge bath every visit. No documentation patient is functionally or cognitively able to make decision. Patient #25 - Aide care plan does not include oxygen safety. Patient #26 - Aide care plan includes task - perineal care as needed, shampoo as needed and change bed linen as needed. Prepare snacks and offer fluids but patient is NPO.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 114 words
“Upon patient record review 2 of 33 (Patient #12, 16) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #12 - Aide care plan task: ear care and nail care to be provided 1 x week. Aide provided 2 x week, week of 07/08/25 and 08/12/25. Patient #16 - Aide care plan task: shampoo every visit - did not provide shampoo 08/12/25, 08/19/25 or 08/26/25 and did not document reason for omitting shampoo.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 105 words
“Upon patient record review 2 of 33 (Patient #12, 21) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient #12 - RN completed aide supervisory visit on 07/15/25 then again on 08/05/25 (20 days between Aide Supervisory visits) Patient #21 - RN completed aide supervisory visit on 08/21/25 - no other Aide Supervisory visits as of 09/08/25.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
The inspectors’ words, 122 words
“Upon patient client record review, 3 of 33 (Patient #18, 29, 31) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #18 - RN completed Aide Supervisory visit on 08/04/25 and 08/18/25 but patient is not receiving aide visits. Patient #29 - RN documented on 09/09/25 patient on oxygen 4L/M in narrative of note but section where vital signs are documented, RN documented oxygen at 2L/M. Patient #31 - RN documented patient has Foley Catheter but patient has condom catheter.”
-
Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))
“Upon client record review, 1 of 33 (Patient #20) did not have evidence that the hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider (nursing facility or hospice) is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in the hospice plan of care. Patient #20 - SNF resident admitted 07/30/25 with wound care to sacral wound. There is no documented evidence of which provider is to provide wound care to the patient.”
-
N/a (42 CFR 418.110(i))
The inspectors’ words, 126 words
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the inpatient facility has adequate supply of hot water at all times and include plumbing fixtures with control valves that automatically regulate the temperature of hot water used by patients per facility policy, “Utilities Management Plan IPU-M90.” Location A: Patient room water temperatures were noted > than the range of 110-116. 1/3/25 119 F, 1/10/25, 118 F, 1/17/25 117 F, 1/24/25 119 F, 1/30/25 118 F, 2/6/25 119 F, 2/21/25 118 F and 3/7/25 118 F. All rooms and the break room are checked weekly per the temperature log. The log does not designate which rooms were high, facility noting highest temperature checked for all rooms. Facility did not note if and when the temperature of the water was corrected.”
Sep 2, 2025: complaint inspection by the state2 deficiencies
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 322 words
“Based on agency policy, observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the agency failed to include an accurate list of medications for 1 of 2 patients with an observation visit conducted. (patient #1)Findings included: A policy, Medication: Management & Administration (revised 02/20/2025) received on 09/02/2025 at 4:49 PM from the Quality and Compliance Coordinator stated, “A registered nurse maintains a current medication profile and reviews all patient medications… A medication profile includes but is not limited to 1) all current medications…”Patient #1 was admitted on 04/09/2024 with a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm (cancer) of the esophagus. The plan of care for 08/02/2025-09/30/2025 included orders for skilled nurse visits 1 time a week for 9 weeks with 8 PRN (as needed). During a home visit conducted on 09/02/2025 at approximate 11:45 AM with registered nurse (RN) #7 a comprehensive medication review revealed the following:1. The patient had been prescribed Lidocaine 4% topical (for pain) patches for pain apply 1 time daily and were not included in the plan of care.2. The plan of care included Metoprolol Succinate ER 50mg (treats blood pressure) 0.5 tablet daily. The prescription bottle was dated 08/05/2025, the patient stated that he had taken 1 tablet daily “for a long time.”3. The plan of care included an order for Pantoprazole 40mg (reduces acid) 1 tablet daily. The patient stated that they do not remember ever taking that.4. The patient reported taking acetaminophen (treats pain/fever) 500mg as needed for pain for as long as he can remember. Acetaminophen was not included in the plan of care.An interview conducted on 09/02/2025 at approximately 4:05 PM with registered nurse #7 revealed that a comprehensive medication review is conducted at every nurse visit, medications should be added, discontinued, or changed as ordered by a physician. During an interview conducted on 09/02/2025 at approximately 4:45 PM the senior director of home hospice stated, “We would expect [documentation software name] to be up to date.””
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
The inspectors’ words, 277 words
“Based on agency policy, observation, and staff interviews, the agency failed to perform hand hygiene after handing personal items and failed to sanitize reusable equipment before placing it in the clinical bag for 1 of 2 patients with observations conducted. (patient #1)Findings included: A policy, Infection Control-Standard Precautions (revised 04/17/2025) received on 09/03/2025 at4:49 PM from the Quality and Compliance Control Coordinator stated, “Perform hand hygiene: After contact with patient’s intact skin (when taking a blood pressure or pulse) … After contact with inanimate objects in the immediate vicinity of the patient… Non-critical objects such as stethoscopes; BP [blood pressure] cuffs; pulse ox; etc... Should be disinfected after patient care…” Patient #1 was admitted on 04/09/2024 with a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm (cancer) of the esophagus. The plan of care for 08/02/2025-09/30/2025 included orders for skilled nurse visits 1 time a week for 9 weeks with 8 PRN (as needed). During a home visit conducted on 09/02/2025 at approximately 11:45 AM registered nurse (RN) #7 failed to perform hand hygiene after handling the patient’s medication bottles then removing vital sign equipment from the clinical bag and failed to sanitize the blood pressure cuff and pulse oximeter before returning it to the clinical bag.During an interview conducted on 09/02/2025 at 4:04 PM RN #7 stated, “I normally wipe it [equipment and bag] down when I get back to the car. I normally perform hand hygiene before entering the bag.”During an interview conducted on 09/02/2025 at approximately 4:45 PM the senior director of home hospice stated the expectation is, “To clean her equipment [after patient use] and [before entering the clinical bag] wash hands or use gel [hand sanitizer].””
All 3 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2025 | Complaint inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Sep 12, 2025 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 11 deficiencies cited |
| Sep 2, 2025 | Complaint inspection by the state | 2 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 14, 1985.
- Ownership: non-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.6% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 51% at home, 14% in assisted living, 21% in a nursing facility, 7% in a skilled nursing facility, 2% in an inpatient hospice, 4% elsewhere.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 11.3 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 8.7% |
| Visits near death | 96.6% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- The Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital owns 50% directly since Oct 1, 1984.
- 24 owners or officers are people: Andrew Edward Barrow (corporate director); Mary Lee Wood Copeland (corporate director); Rebekah Loy (corporate officer); Tiffany D Morris (corporate director); Juan-Carlos Monguilod (managing employee (on the payroll)); Timothy Finnegan (corporate director); Ajay Bhardwaj (corporate director); Christopher Cornue (corporate director); Leigh Spencer Williams (corporate officer); Leigh Spencer Williams (corporate director); Leigh Spencer Williams (managing employee (on the payroll)); Barbara Ellen Pancoast (corporate director); Mary Clare Toomey (corporate director); Ike David Kibee (corporate director); Elizabeth Brantley Bostian (corporate director); Phanta Iman Lansden (corporate director); Devin Griffith (managing employee (on the payroll)); Sendil K Krishnan (corporate director); Ryan Addison Newkirk (corporate director); Mark Gordon (corporate director); Laura Wilson Murray (corporate director); Kristen W Yntema (corporate officer); Kristen W Yntema (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Ronald P Johnson (corporate director).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital | Owns 5% or more directly | 50% | Oct 1, 1984 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 86% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 91% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 99.67% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 77% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 14 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 27405, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 9; this one had 13.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Authoracare Collective This hospice | 13 |
| Trellis Supportive Care | 13 |
| Hospice of the Piedmont Inc. | 12 |
| Ancora Compassionate Care | 0 |
| Firsthealth Hospice | 8 |
| Medi Home Health and Hospice | 0 |
| Tillery Compassionate Care | 0 |
| Hospice of Scotland County | 3 |
| Amedisys Hospice | 10 |
| Liberty Home Care and Hospice | 11 |
| Gentiva | 18 |
| Continuum Home Care & Hospice | 8 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.