Hearth Record

Legacy Hospice of the South - Batesville

A hospice in Batesville, Mississippi 38606

183 Highway 51 South, Batesville, Mississippi 38606. (662) 578-8177.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 20 hospices serving ZIP code 38606 had 1.5.

The last inspection on record was on May 21, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 21, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 119 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #4,6) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #4: There is evidence of an order on 4//21/26 for Fluconazole 200 mg daily for 5 days. The medication remains on the medication record. Patient #6: Upon observation the hospice medication record noted Depakote 500 mg at HS. The facility medication record noted Depakote 125 mg BID.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 100 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient #10: There is evidence in the medical record the patient was admitted on 1/4/26. The bereavement assessment was completed on 1/15/26.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 160 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #5,10.11) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #5: There is evidence in the medical record the patient was admitted with Alzheimer’s Disease and Dysphagia following cerebral infarction. There is not evidence of a Altered Neurological or Swallowing care plan. Patient #10: There is evidence on the initial nursing comprehensive assessment in the Spiritual section, “spiritual distress observed or reported”. Spiritual distress was not added to the plan of care. Patient #11: There is evidence the patient was admitted with Cerebral Palsy and Seizures. Seizures is not on the plan of care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 162 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #4,5,6,12) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #4: There is evidence of an order on 4/21/26 for Fluconazole 200 mg daily for 5 days. The medication remains on the plan of care. Patient #5: There is evidence of a wound order on 5/11/26 “cleanse wound with soap and water, pat dry, apply barrier cream and apply foam dressing daily and as needed.” The order does not indicate who will change the dressing. Patient #6: Upon observation the hospice medication order noted Depakote 500 mg at HS. The facility medication record noted Depakote 12 mg BID. Patient #12: There is evidence of a wound order on 1/15/26 “cleanse wound, pat dry, apply barrier cream and apply border dressing.” The order does not indicate who will change the dressing or the frequency.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 211 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #2,3,7,8,9) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #2: There is evidence of an order for Zofran 4 mg q 6 hr PRN on 4/24/26. Goals and interventions for nausea and vomiting were not added to the plan of care. Patient #3: There is evidence of an order for MiraLAX 17 gm/dose mixed with 4-6 oz of fluid on 5/18/26. The plan of care was not updated with constipation goals and interventions. Patient #7: There is evidence in the certification of terminal illness on 4/8/26 stating the patient has decreased eating 50%. Goals and interventions for nutrition were not added to the plan of care. Patient #8: There is evidence in the medical record the patients primary diagnosis is Lewy body disease. The plan of care does not include goals and interventions for altered neurological. Patient #9: There is evidence the patient is admitted with Lung Cancer. The certification of terminal illness on 4/28/26 noted the patient is having dyspnea with exertion. There is no evidence of goals and interventions for altered respiratory on the plan of care.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 182 words

    “Upon patient record review, 9 of 19 (Patient #1,2,4,7,8,9,10,11,14) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #1,2,4: There is evidence in the medical record the patient is taking ASA 81 mg daily. Bleeding precautions is not included on the aide plan of care. Patient #7,8,9,10,11,14: There is evidence in the medical record the patient has fall risk on the plan of care. Fall precautions is not on the aide plan of care.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 97 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #9) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #9: There is evidence the aide plan of care lists shampoo every visit. The aide visit frequency is 5x week. On 5/5/26, 5/6/26 and 5/7/26, the aide indicated “no” not required this visit on each note for shampoo.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 115 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 19 (Patient #6,7) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient #6: There is evidence in the medical record of aide visit frequency 2x week. There was no supervision by the RN 3/27/26 thru 5/12/26. Patient #7: There is evidence in the medical record of aide visit frequency 2x week. There was no supervision by the RN 4/14/26 thru 5/13/26.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. No evidence that the agency utilized volunteers for at least 5% of the total patient care hours in 2025. The total usage of volunteers for 2025 was 2.85%”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 21, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 17, 2006.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 72% at home, 9% in assisted living, 16% in a nursing facility, 3% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.4%
Visits near death93.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Legacy Operating Company LLC owns 100% directly since Nov 1, 2019.
  • 9 owners or officers are people: James G Corbin (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Clay Jones (managing employee (on the payroll)); Clay Jones (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Sydney Dees (managing employee (on the payroll)); Andrew P Lofaso (managing employee (on the payroll)); Andrew P Lofaso (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Lewis Clark Blair (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Jessie M Cockrell (managing employee (under contract)); Katie N Sanders (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Bcdi Legacy Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Nov 10, 2025
LH Holding Company LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Nov 1, 2019
Bcdi Legacy Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Nov 10, 2025
Bcdi Legacy Topco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Nov 10, 2025
Legacy Operating Company LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Nov 1, 2019
Bcdi Legacy Investor, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies96.71%Nov 10, 2025
BAIN Capital Double Impact Fund III, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies76.82%Nov 10, 2025
Bcip Double Impact II, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies6.27%Nov 10, 2025

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 81% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 87% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 77% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 20 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 38606, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 1.5; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.