Hearth Record

Gentiva

A hospice in Batesville, Mississippi 38606

104 Court Street, Batesville, Mississippi 38606. (662) 578-4072.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 20 hospices serving ZIP code 38606 had 1.5.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 16, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 16, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient 7: No evidence that a spiritual assessment was completed within 5 days of election of hospice care. Patient was admitted on 08/19/2024, no evidence that an assessment had been completed at the time of survey. COS.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 192 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #1,2,8) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 1: Clonazapam/Klonipine 1mg twice a day listed on the current medication profile at the SNF. No evidence that medication was added to the hospice active medication profile. COS. Patient 2: Robitussin and Lorazepam listed on the hospice active medication profile . No evidence that those medications were being taken by the patient or listed on the active medication profile for the SNF. COS. Patient 8: The record indicates duplicate drug therapy for Ferosul and Lantanopost on the current medication profile. Ferosul 325mg (65mg iron) daily one ordered for 05/24/2024 and the other ordered on 09/16. Latanopost 0.005% eye drops 1 drop for each eye at bedtime daily one ordered for 05/24/2024 and the other ordered on 09/16. Corrected on site”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 259 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #3,4,6,10,13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 3: Patient currently takes Wellbutrin and Cymbalta as anti-depressants. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to depression included in the plan of care. COS. Patient 4: Patient currently takes Keppra 250mg daily for seizures, Remeron and Seroquel 25mg for anti-depressant. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to seizures and depression included in the plan of care. COS. Patient 6: The record indicates that the patient has a current diagnosis of Diabetes, blood sugar checks 3 times a day, and currently takes insulin/metformin. No evidence that problems, goals, and interventions related to endocrine/blood sugars on the current POC. COS. Patient 10: Patient currently takes Xarelto 20mg and has a related diagnosis of heart failure and currently suffers from anxiety. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to anxiety, cardiac status, and risk for bleeding included in the plan of care. COS. Patient 13: Patient currently has Major depressive disorder listed as a related diagnosis. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to depression included in the plan of care. COS.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 130 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #1,2,3,5,7) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient 1,2,3,5,7: The plan of care has volunteer orders for weekly tuck in visits and PRN visits. No evidence that a number was added to the specify the amount of PRN visits. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #8) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 8: The record indicates that the current supply list has wound care supplies and active orders for wound care treatments. The RN documentation indicated that the patient’s wound was healed on 07/22/2024 and there was no updated order to deactivate the wound care.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 140 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #2,5,6) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 2: RN documentation stated that the patient uses a hoyer lift to get patient out of the bed to the chair. No evidence that a hoyer lift was added on the equipment plan of care. Patient 5: RN documentation stated that the patient uses a wheelchair for mobility. No evidence that a wheelchair was added to the equipment plan of care. Patient 6: RN documentation stated that the patient uses a rollator/walker to help with mobility and a nebulizer was used for oxygen treatments. No evidence that a nebulizer or the rollator/walker was added on the equipment plan of care.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #9,11) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 9: Plan of care has RN frequency ordered as twice weekly. No evidence that 2 visits occurred during the week of 08/25/24 with only one visit on 08/27. Patient 11: Plan of care has RN frequency ordered as twice weekly. No evidence that 2 visits occurred during the week of 09/25/24 with only one visit on 10/02.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 217 words

    “Upon patient record review 3 of 19 (Patient #1,4,14) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 1: Aide plan of care indicates for linens to be changed and shampoo to be completed weekly. The aide documentation shows that the hospice aide provided hair care at both visits for the week of 09/08/24. Aide plan of care has orders to complete 3 visits weekly. No evidence that patient received 3 visits during the week of 07/14, 09/01, 09/15, and 10/06. Patient 4: Aide plan of care has orders to complete 3 visits weekly. No evidence that patient received 3 visits during the week of 09/01/24 and 09/15/24. For the week of 09/01, only 2 visits occurred, on 09/04 and 09/06. For the week of 09/15, only 2 visits occurred on 09/16 and 09/18. Patient 14: Aide plan of care indicates hair care to be completed weekly. Aide documentation shows that the hospice aide provided hair care at every visit instead of weekly as ordered for the following weeks: 8/4/24, 8/11/24,8/18/24, 8/25/24, 9/15/24, 9/22/24, & 10/6/24.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #1) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 1: No evidence that the RN performed supervised visits every 14 days. The record shows that the last supervised visit was completed on 09/25/24.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #9) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient 9: Patient’s family elected to receive notice of non-covered items at the time of admission on 07/20/2024. No evidence that the list of non-covered items had been provided at the time of survey.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 134 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #1,3,11) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 1: Missed visit note entered on 10/07/2024 by the RN. No evidence that the date of the visit included in the note. Patient 3: Missed visit note entered on 10/09/2024 by the aide. No evidence that the date of the visit or who was notified of the missed visit was included in the note. Patient 11: Mississippi Physician Orders for Sustaining treatment missing the required signature date for the signing MD. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 16, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 9, 2003.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 16.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 65% at home, 11% in assisted living, 19% in a nursing facility, 6% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day16.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.8%
Visits near death96.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Curo Health Services LLC owns 100% directly since Mar 1, 2022.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); Amy Hendrix (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%); Edwin L Linder (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Mar 1, 2022
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 83% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 96.19% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 85.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 20 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 38606, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 1.5; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.