Hearth Record

Advanced Home Health and Hospice Kansas City

A hospice in Kansas City, Missouri 64114

9229 Ward Parkway, Ste 350, Kansas City, Missouri 64114. (913) 890-8448.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 47 hospices serving ZIP code 64114 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 17, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 17, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 217 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patient #6, 7, 8, 11, 16, 18) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #6 Medication profile contained Triamcinolone 0..5% topical cream 1 application every 6 hours for rash - did not specify site of application. Patient #7 Medication profile contains Ketoconazole topical 2 % apply 1 gm every 12 hours as needed for rash - did not specify site. Patient #8 Medication profile contained Timolol Maleate 0.5% ophthalmic solution 1 drop 1x day did not specify which eye. Patient #11 Medication profile contained Timolol Maleate 0.5% ophthalmic solution 1 drop 1x day did not specify which eye. Latanoprost 0.005% ophthalmic solution 1 drop 1x a day did not specify which eye. Patient #16 Medication profile contains Ketoconazole topical 2% apply 1 application 2 times a day as needed for rash - did not specify site. Patient #18 Medication profile contained Oxygen PRN, did not specify amount, route, rate and no modifier for PRN.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 114 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #8, 10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions Patient #8 Patient admitted on 05/30/25 with reddened area to buttock, there were no related problems, goals, interventions related skin integrity. Patient #10 Admitted 05/21/25 with G-tube, there were no related problems, goals, interventions related to the G-tube.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 204 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 19 (Patient #6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 16, 18) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments Patient #6 POC contained Triamcinolone 0..5% topical cream 1 application every 6 hours for rash - did not specify site. Patient #7 Medication profile contains Ketoconazole topical 2 % apply 1 gm every 12 hours as needed for rash - did not specify site. Patient #8 POC contained Timolol Maleate 0.5% ophthalmic solution 1 drop 1x day did not specify which eye. Patient #10 The record indicated the patient was admitted with a G-tube with no related orders for the care and management of the G-tube. Patient #11 POC contained Timolol Maleate 0.5% ophthalmic solution 1 drop 1x day did not specify which eye. Latanoprost 0.005% ophthalmic solution 1 drop 1x a day did not specify which eye. Patient #16 POC contains Ketoconazole topical 2 % apply 1 application 2 times a day as needed for rash - did not specify site. Patient #18 POC contained Oxygen PRN - did not specify amount, route, rate and no modifier for PRN.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 130 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #12, 14 15) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #12 On 05/22/25, the record indicated a call from ALF patient was refusing medications and pocketing food. There was no evidence the care plan was revised to include the changes in the patient. Patient #14 MSW documented on 06/25/25 of depression and loneliness. There was no evidence the care plan was revised to include the changes in the patient. Patient #15 On 06/03/25, the RN documented poor intake and increased weakness there was no evidence the care plan was revised to include the changes in the patient.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #10 SN documented “cleaned around PEG tube site and placed skin prep around site, placed new woven pad and secured with tape”. There are no orders for nurse to perform PEG tube site care.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 19 (Patient #8,14) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services provided are based on all assessments of the patient and family needs. Patient #8 SN documented patient is lonely on visit 06/18/25 and could benefit from a volunteer, no referral to Volunteer Coordinator. Patient #14 SN documented patient is lonely on visit 04/28/25 and could benefit from a volunteer, no referral to Volunteer Coordinator. In addition, the MSW documented that patient would like to have the Chaplain to visit, MSW stated she would reach out to the Chaplain - no documentation that the MSW discussed with Chaplain or made referral.”

    Rule L0556. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #15) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient #15 RN documented aide supervisory visit on 06/19/25 then again on 07/09/25.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #7 RN documented a LPN supervisory visit on 07/03/25, but LPN has not made any visits.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 17, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 2, 2022.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 99.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 25% at home, 68% in assisted living, 3% in a nursing facility, 3% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.3%
Visits near death99.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Lhm Man Hhh LLC owns 100% directly since Jul 1, 2024.
  • 3 owners or officers are people: Forest Arnett (corporate officer); Nicolle Marie Gunter (managing employee (under contract)); Amber Whitehill (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Advanced Health Care - Larry H Miller CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Lhm Man Hhh LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jul 1, 2024
The Gail Miller Gst TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies72.3%Jan 1, 2024
Karen Gail Miller Irrev Tr Fbo Zane MillerOwns 5% or more through other companies5.1%Jan 1, 2024
The Karen Gail Miller Irrevocable Trust for the Benefit of Stephen F.Owns 5% or more through other companies5.1%Jan 1, 2024
The Karen Gail Miller Irrevocable Trust for the Benefit of Roger L. MiOwns 5% or more through other companies5.1%Jan 1, 2024
The Karen Gail Miller Irrevocable Trust for the Benefit of Karen R. WIOwns 5% or more through other companies5.1%Jan 1, 2024

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.88% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 82.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 47 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 64114, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.