Hearth Record

Elara Caring

A hospice in Topeka, Kansas 66610

3745 SW Wanamaker Rd, Ste A, Topeka, Kansas 66610. (785) 228-0400.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

10 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 11 hospices serving ZIP code 66610 had 3.5.

The last inspection on record was on Dec 20, 2023: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

10 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Dec 20, 2023: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care10 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 272 words

    “Upon patient record review, 8 of 19 (Patients #1,#4,#6,#8,#9,#10,#12,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications. Patient 1: The medication profile contained oxygen with no delivery method and polyethylene glycol oral powder with no instructions for a diluent. Corrected on site. Patient 4: The medication profile contained oxygen with no delivery method. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The medication profile contained oxygen with no delivery method and polyethylene glycol oral powder with no instructions for a diluent. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The medication profile contained hydrocortisone with a route of g-tube. There was no evidence in nursing documentation that the patient had a g-tube. The medication profile also contained aspirin, amlodipine, atorvastatin, Compazine, immodium, lisinopril, oxycodone-acetaminophen, tacrolimu, and Ventolin with route identified as none. Corrected on site. Patient 9: The medication profile contained duplicative daily furosemide listed with 20 mg dose dated 12/7/23 and 40 mg dose dated 10/26/23. The medication profile contained oxygen with no delivery method. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The medication profile contained MiraLax oral powder with no instructions for a diluent. Corrected on site. Patient 12: The medication profile contained Calmoseptine topical ointment with no area defined for administration, atropine for excessive secretions with route eye, MiraLax oral powder with no instructions for a diluent, and oxygen with no delivery method. Corrected on site. Patient 14: The medication profile contained atropine for secretions with route eye, hydrocortisone topical cream with no area defined for administration, polyethylene glycol oral powder with no instructions for a diluent, and oxygen with no delivery method. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 110 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 10: The medical record and nursing documentation upon admission identified patient diagnosis and difficulty with dysphagia. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to dysphagia included in the plan of care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 294 words

    “Upon patient record review, 8 of 19 (Patients #1,#4,#6,#8,#9,#10,#12,#14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1: The medical record contained orders for oxygen with no delivery method and polyethylene glycol oral powder with no instructions for a diluent. Corrected on site. Patient 4: The medication profile contained an order for oxygen with no delivery method. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The medical record contained order for oxygen with no delivery method and polyethylene glycol oral powder with no instructions for a diluent. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The medical record contained an order for hydrocortisone with a route of g-tube. There was no evidence in nursing documentation that the patient had a g-tube. The record also contained orders for aspirin, amlodipine, atorvastatin, Compazine, immodium, lisinopril, oxycodone-acetaminophen, tacrolimu, and Ventolin with route identified as none. Corrected on site. Patient 9: Furosemide was listed twice with differing doses to be taken daily. The medical record contained an order for oxygen with no delivery method. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The medical record contained an order for MiraLax oral powder with no instructions for a diluent. Corrected on site. Patient 12: The medical record contained order for Calmoseptine topical ointment with no area defined for administration, atropine for excessive secretions with route eye, MiraLax oral powder with no instructions for a diluent, and oxygen with no delivery method. Corrected on site. Patient 14: The medical record contained orders for atropine for secretions with route eye, hydrocortisone topical cream with no area defined for administration, polyethylene glycol oral powder with no instructions for a diluent, and oxygen with no delivery method. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 173 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patients #5,#6,#7,#12) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation 11/21/23 identifying patient use of a Hoyer lift for transfers. There was no evidence of an order for a lift included in the plan of care. Patient 6: The medical record contained nursing documentation 11/20/23 identifying patient use of a wheelchair. There was no evidence of an order for a wheelchair included in the plan of care. Patient 7: Upon home visit observation, it was identified that the patient uses a Broda chair. There was no evidence of an order for a Broda included in the plan of care. Patient 12: The medical record contained nursing documentation 10/10/23 identifying patient use of a Hoyer lift for transfers. There was no evidence of an order for a lift included in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #6) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 6: The medical record contained an ordered nursing frequency of twice weekly. There was no evidence of a second visit completed the weeks of 10/22/23 and 10/29/23.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 190 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #5,#7) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation 11/21/23 identifying patient use of a Hoyer lift for transfers. There was no evidence of instructions for transfer with Hoyer on the aide care plan. Patient 7: Upon home visit observation, it was identified the patient required a Hoyer lift for transfers. There was no evidence of instructions for transfer with Hoyer on the aide care plan.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 191 words

    “Upon patient record review 4 of 19 (Patients #1,#5,#6,#7) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care Patient 1: The aide care plan contained tasks to record BM dates every visit and obtain weight at the beginning of each month. There was no evidence the aide recorded BMs or obtained weights all December visits completed on 12/1/23, 12/4/23, 12/7/23, 12/11/23, and 12/14/23. Patient 5: The medical record contained an ordered aide visit frequency of twice weekly. There was no evidence of a second visit completed the week of 11/19/23. Patient 6: The aide care plan contained tasks to obtain weights twice monthly. There was no evidence the aide obtained weight in November. Patient 7: The aide care plan contained tasks to shower weekly during first visit of the week and bed bath alternate visit. There was no evidence the aide completed a shower in December. During home visit interview, the aide stated the first visit of the week was a companion visit and bed baths were given on Fridays.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 15 (Personnel #3) did not have evidence that the hospice employees have received orientation on their specific job requirements. Personnel 3: There was no evidence of orientation in the personnel file.”

    Rule L0662. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that the hospice provided the following information: • The most recent hospice plan of care specific to each patient • Physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness specific to each patient • Hospice medication information specific to each patient Patient 7: Upon home visit observation, the facility did not have the CTI and plan of care in the hospice binder and the hospice could not provide evidence these documents were sent to facility.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    “Upon personnel record review, 2 of 15 (Personnel #13,#15) did not have evidence the hospice obtained a criminal background check on all contracted individuals who have direct patient care and access to patient records. Personnel 13,15: There was no evidence of criminal background checks included in the personnel files.”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 20, 2023Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care10 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 4, 1997.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 20% at home, 30% in assisted living, 50% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.7%
Visits near death96.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Great Lakes Acquisition Corp. owns 100% directly since Dec 12, 2016.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Daniel R Manley (corporate officer); Ananth P Mohan (corporate officer); Ananth P Mohan (corporate director); Rhonda M. Martin (runs it (operational or managerial control)); John Mcmahon (corporate officer); Katie L Monastiere (corporate officer, 0%); Joshua Gotbaum (corporate officer); Harvey Tepner (corporate officer); Crystal Shovlowsky (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Angel Stansbury (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
GL Holding Corp.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 12, 2016
Bw Homecare Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 12, 2016
Elara Holdings, L.L.C.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 30, 2019
Great Lakes Acquisition Corp.Owns 5% or more directly100%Dec 12, 2016
Bw GL Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 12, 2016
Bw Nhhc Holdco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 12, 2016
Gl Superholding Corp.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 12, 2016
Bw Nhhc Co-Invest, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies42.85%Jul 1, 2023
Kia Ix (Hh) Investor, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies40.27%Jul 1, 2023
Kelso Hh Co-Investment, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies19.2%Dec 30, 2019
Kelso Investment Associates Ix, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies15.68%Dec 30, 2019
Blue WOLF Capital Fund III L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies11.13%Jul 1, 2023
Bw III Homecare Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies11.13%Jul 1, 2023
Stepstone H Opportunities Fund, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies8.78%Dec 30, 2019
Stepstone K Strategic Opportunities Fund II L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies5.48%Dec 30, 2019
Ironsides Direct Investment Fund IV, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies4.94%Dec 30, 2019
Uss-Constitution Co-Investment Fund II, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies4.94%Dec 30, 2019
Kep VI LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies4.52%Dec 30, 2019

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 80% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 73.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 11 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 66610, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3.5; this one had 10.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.