Hearth Record

Evertrue Hospice

A hospice in Brentwood, Missouri 63144

1150 Hanley Industrial Court, Brentwood, Missouri 63144. (314) 446-2539.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 16 hospices serving ZIP code 63144 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 21, 2025: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 5, 2024: recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies
  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 352 words

    “Based on the policy review, employee education record review, clinical record review, and interview, the hospice provider failed to ensure the hospice aide (Aide B) had successfully completed the basic skills test prior to the provision of patient care in one of one record reviewed (Record/Patient #12). This deficient practice has the potential to affect the provision of competent aide services for all of the provider’s patients. Findings included: Review of the providers undated policy titled, “;Competency Program,” showed in part, the providers competency program would:- Assess staff competency prior to assuming the duties for which they were hired, by a supervisor or peer that has also been assessed and meets the criteria for performing those skills;- Assure that each direct service staff member has demonstrated competency in any new task before being assigned to that task; and- Validation of skills competency is conducted annually thereafter. Review of the providers undated policy titled, “;Coordination of Services – Hospice Aide Training and Competency,” showed that, in part, an individual may furnish aide services on behalf of the provider when that individual has successfully completed a competency evaluation program that includes, but is not limited to:- Completion of a bed and sponge bath; and- Washing of the hair while the patient is in bed. Review of the providers employee education files showed that the provider failed to provide a complete aide basic skills test for Aide-B. The basic skills test failed to include documentation that Aide-B successfully completed;- A bed and sponge bath; and- Washing of the hair while the patient is in bed. RECORD/PATIENT #12: Review of the hospice aide visit note, dated 05/30/2024, showed that Aide-B provided a complete bed bath and shampoo of the patients hair during his/her visit. During an interview on 06/04/2024 at 2:18 PM, the hospice administrator stated:- The bed and sponge bath, and washing of the hair while the patient was in bed had not been documented as successful on Aide-Bs basic skills test; and- It was the providers practice to perform aide competency testing that include all of the elements on the aide basic skills test.”

    Rule L0618. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 565 words

    “Based on policy review, record review, observation, and interview, the hospice provider failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) prepared complete written care instructions for the hospice aide in two of four applicable records (Records/Patients #1 and #4). This deficient practice has the potential to affect all patients who receive aide services from the provider. Findings included: RECORD/PATIENT #4: Review of the clinical record showed the patient was admitted to hospice services on 09/29/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions following cerebral infarction (stroke). The patient had comorbidities including, but not limited to, a history of edema (swelling) in the feet. The patient resided in a skilled nursing facility. Review of the plan of care dated 05/24/2024 showed, in part, the following:- ACE wraps to BLE (bilateral lower extremities) on in AM, off at HS (hour of sleep); and- Surgical shoe to left foot. The aide assignment sheet dated 05/28/2024 failed to contain: - Directions for the management of the ACE wraps to the BLE during the bathing process; and- The use of the surgical shoe to the left foot. During an interview on 06/05/2024 at 10.21 AM, the administrator stated that they would expect the aide assignment sheet to contain directions for the aide management of the ACE wraps during the bathing process and the use of the surgical shoe. Review of the Hospice providers policy titled, “Coordination of Services- “;Named Hospice” Aide,” copyright date of 2016, showed in part, the following: - All aide services will be provided by qualified personnel in accordance with the states occupational certification regulations, where applicable, federal regulations and the organizations policies/job descriptions; - All aide services will be provided under the direction of a registered nurse with sufficient education and experience in the scope of services offered; - Written patient care instructions must be prepared by a registered nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a “;named Hospice” aide; - A named Hospice aide provides services that are ordered by the interdisciplinary group, included in the plan of care, permitted to be performed under state law, and consistent with the “;named Hospice” aide training. RECORD/PATIENT #1: Review of the clinical record showed that the patient was admitted to Hospice services on 02/06/2024 with an admitting terminal diagnosis of Huntington’s disease (a progressive, genetic condition that affects the cells in your brain that regulate voluntary movement and memory). The patient resided in a long-term care facility. Review of the Hospice aide assignment, dated 02/06/2024, showed under the skin care section: apply barrier cream as directed was check marked with a frequency of every visit. It failed to include the location and the indication for application of the barrier cream. Observation on 06/04/ 2024, beginning at 8:10 AM, during the patients home visit, showed during the patients shower the dressing on the coccyx (tailbone) fell off. Hospice aide A, dried the patient off, applied barrier cream to the open abrased area to the coccyx, and stated he/she would tell the nurse it fell off. Per interview conducted during the patients home visit Hospice aide-A stated that he/she believed that applying barrier cream to the open wound on the coccyx was listed on the aide assignment sheet. During an interview on 06/05/2024 at 10:35 AM the administrator acknowledged the location and indication for barrier cream application was missing from the aide assignment sheet.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 342 words

    “Based on policy review record review, observation, and interview the hospice provider failed to ensure the hospice aide followed the aide assignment/aide plan of care (POC) in 1 of 4 applicable records reviewed (Record/Patient #1). This deficient practice has the potential to affect all patients receiving aide services. Findings included: Review of the hospice providers policy titled, “Coordination of Services- “;Named Hospice” Aide”, copyright date of 2016, showed in part, “;Named Hospice” aide provides services that are ordered by the interdisciplinary group and included in the plan of care. RECORD/PATIENT #1: Review of the clinical record showed that the patient was admitted to hospice on 02/06/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of Huntington’s disease (a progressive, genetic condition that affects the cells in your brain that regulate voluntary movement and memory). The patient resided in a long-term care facility. Review of the hospice aide assignment (aide POC), dated 02/06/2024, showed under the skin care section: apply barrier cream as directed was check marked with a frequency of every visit. It failed to show that the aide was to provide wound care to the open coccyx (tailbone) wound. Observation on 06/04/2024, beginning at 8:10 AM, during the patients home visit, showed during the patients shower the dressing on the coccyx (tailbone) fell off. Hospice aide A, dried the patient off, applied barrier cream to the open abraded (also known as an abrasion, a superficial break in the skin’s layers; caused by scraping, pressure, or impact) area to the coccyx, and stated he/she would tell the nurse it fell off. Per interview conducted during the patients home visit hospice aide-A stated that he/she believed that applying barrier cream to the open wound on the coccyx was listed on the aide assignment sheet. During an interview on 06/05/2024 at 10:35 AM the administrator stated that: - The licensed nurse should be doing the wound care, not the aide; and - If the wound was not open (no break in the skin) and the aide wanted to apply the protectant cream (barrier cream) then yes, they could.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 200 words

    “Based on policy review, employee education file review, and interview, the hospice provider failed to complete an initial and annual skills competency for the chaplain and the social worker disciplines in two of four employee files reviewed (Chaplain-A and Social Worker-A). This deficient practice has the potential to affect the provision of competent services for all of the provider’s patients. Findings included: Review of the providers undated policy titled, “;Competency Program,” showed in part, the providers competency program would:- Assess staff competency prior to assuming the duties for which they were hired, by a supervisor or peer that has also been assessed and meets the criteria for performing those skills;- Assure that each direct service staff member has demonstrated competency in any new task before being assigned to that task; and- Validation of skills competency is conducted annually thereafter. Review of the providers employee education files showed that the provider failed to provide initial and annual competency evaluation(s) for Chaplain A and Social Worker A. During an interview on 06/04/2024 at 2:18 PM, the hospice administrator stated that they had not performed competency evaluations on chaplains or social workers in the past and would initiate the process in the future.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

All 4 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 21, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Sep 24, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Apr 29, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Jun 5, 2024Recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 10, 2007.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 16.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 91.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 17% at home, 25% in assisted living, 57% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day16.2 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.3%
Visits near death91.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Lutheran Senior Services owns 100% directly since Oct 1, 2007.
  • 23 owners or officers are people: Lisa Sombart (corporate director); David A Anderson (corporate director); Ronald D Schaefer (corporate officer); Ronald D Schaefer (managing employee (on the payroll)); Adam Marles (corporate officer); Adam Marles (corporate director); Adam Marles (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kristine Krumwiede (managing employee (on the payroll)); Christopher Sommer (corporate director); Elise Mccline (corporate director); Norman A Toon (corporate director); Brent Beumer (corporate director); Chadwick Sneed (corporate officer); Chadwick Sneed (managing employee (on the payroll)); Megan Meadows (corporate director); Diane R Drollinger (corporate director); Daniel S Brown (corporate director); Frederick M Kuhlmann (corporate director); Roy Christell (corporate director); Paul Tice (corporate director); Julie Bantle (corporate director); Jeffrey Dunn (corporate director); Harry Mueller (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Lutheran Senior ServicesOwns 5% or more directly100%Oct 1, 2007

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 80% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 83% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 90.58% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 23.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 16 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 63144, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 4.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.