Hearth Record

Gentiva

A hospice in Saint Louis, Missouri 63141

12125 Woodcrest Executive Drive, Suite 300, Saint Louis, Missouri 63141. (314) 275-6100.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 25 hospices serving ZIP code 63141 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 7, 2026: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Feb 1, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 162 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #3,5,13) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 3: An order for Miralax 17g daily by mouth was entered on 11/03/2023 No evidence that a diluent was added to MAR. Patient 5: Duplicate drug therapy: Milk of magnesium 400mg/5ml 30ml daily PRN for constipation. Bisacodyl 10mg daily PRN for constipation. No evidence that instructions were given on which medication should be given first for constipation. Patient 13: Duplicate drug therapy: Lactulose 10g/15ml 15ml daily PRN for constipation. Bisacodyl 10mg daily PRN for constipation. No evidence that instructions were given on which medication should be given first for constipation.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 198 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #1,4,8,9,11) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 1: No evidence that an initial bereavement risk assessment was completed within 5 days of admit. Admitted on 03/05/2023, assessment completed on 04/04/2023. Patient 4: No evidence that an initial bereavement risk assessment was completed within 5 days of admit. Admitted on 07/28/2022, assessment completed on 08/12/2022. Patient 8: No evidence that an initial bereavement risk assessment was completed within 5 days of admit. Admitted on 09/05/2023, assessment completed during survey. Patient 9: No evidence that an initial bereavement risk assessment was completed within 5 days of admit. Admitted on 01/27/2023, assessment completed on 02/04/2023. Patient 11: No evidence that an initial bereavement risk assessment was completed within 5 days of admit. Admitted on 01/27/2023, assessment completed on 02/04/2023.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 206 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #1,2,3,6,11) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 1: Wounds were inactivated on 01/04/2023. No evidence that wound care orders were removed from the active plan of care. Patient 2: Patient identified as a risk for falls upon admit and ongoing via RN assessments. No evidence that risk for falls was added to the plan of care. Patient 3: History of seizures. Currently on Keppra 500mg daily. No evidence of risk for seizures was added to the plan of care. Patient 6: Patient identified as a risk for falls upon admit and ongoing via RN assessments. No evidence that risk for falls was added to the plan of care. Patient 11: Patient identified as a risk for falls upon admit and ongoing via RN assessments. No evidence that risk for falls was added to current plan of care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #3) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 3: An order for Miralax 17g daily by mouth was entered on 11/03/2023. No evidence that a diluent was added at that time.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #1,9) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: Wounds were inactivated on 01/04/2023. No evidence wound supplies were removed from the active plan of care. Patient has active foley catheter supply orders on the current plan of care. No evidence that patient has a foley catheter in place. Patient currently has an external catheter that is not listed on the current plan of care. Patient 9: Wound care supplies on current plan of care. Wound care discontinued on 07/2023.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #8) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 8: Plan of care has patient listed as full code with interventions listed for the SW to address the patient being a full code. Patient has a DNR signed by the medical director on 10/03/2023 uploaded to the chart.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #7,11) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 7: Chaplain was refused at the time of admit. Chaplain services were started with 01/05/2024 with a frequency of once a month. No evidence that the family requested chaplain services and family has refused all chaplain visit attempts since those services were started. Patient 11: No evidence that patient received a visit from the social worker for the month of September 2023. Current plan of care has frequency ordered as once a month for the SW.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #15) did not have evidence that the hospice forwarded a summary and a copy of the patient record, if requested, to a facility when transferring the patient to that facility. Patient 15: No evidence that transfer summary and patient record was sent to receiving hospice.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 143 words

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #4,12) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient 4: Plan of care has Chaplain frequency as 2 times a month. No evidence that 2 visits occurred for the month of November 2023. Missed visit note entered, stating that the chaplain was unable to make the visit. No evidence that the visit was refused by the patient or the caregiver. Patient 12: Plan of care has Chaplain frequency as 4 times a month. No evidence that 4 visits occurred for the month of January 2024. No evidence that an order to decrease visits was obtained or a missed visit note saying that the family refused the visit.”

    Rule L0773. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 7, 2026Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Feb 1, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 31, 1994.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 28% at home, 15% in assisted living, 49% in a nursing facility, 8% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.4%
Visits near death93.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Curo Health Services LLC owns 100% directly since Mar 1, 2022.
  • Curo Health Services LLC runs it.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); Paul A Metcalf (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Michelle Maloney (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate director, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 11, 2018
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Jul 11, 2018
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Dec 22, 2022

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 78% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 77% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 96.3% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 68.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 25 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 63141, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.