Hearth Record

Tone Hospice and Palliative Care, Inc.

A hospice in Farmington Hills, Michigan 48331

33742 W 12 Mile Rd, Suite A2, Farmington Hills, Michigan 48331. (248) 522-9572.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 18 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

18 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 36 hospices serving ZIP code 48331 had 7.5.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 11, 2025: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

18 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

18 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 11, 2025: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care6 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #2) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #2: Patient was prescribed Miralax, however, the order did not include directions for reconstitution.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 158 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 5 (Patient #1, 3) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #1: Patient is on hospice with a primary diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. There are no interventions or goals for the primary diagnosis. The patient has been prescribed a bowel management program but has no interventions or goals for GI/Constipation. Patient #3: The patient is on Eliquis. There are no interventions or goals for use of anti coagulants or for bleeding precautions. There are no interventions or goals for pain, despite patient being on Cymbalta, Tegretol, Lidocaine, and Norco for neuropathic pain.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon client record review, 3 of 5 (Patient #1,2,3) did not have evidence that the IDG in collaboration with the attending physician reviewed, revised and documents the individualized plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires but no less frequently then every 15 calendar days. Patients 1, 2, and 3 did not have signatures from the chaplain on any IDG notes so no evidence of collaboration by a discipline actively seeing patient to evidence their involvement to update/revision of POC.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide qualifications (42 CFR 418.76(a))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 14 (Personnel #10) did not have evidence that Hospice Aide Services are provided by a qualified individual in accordance with the appropriate state’s regulations, the hospice’s policies and procedures and/or job descriptions and the ACHC Glossary of Personnel Qualifications as defined by the Medicare Conditions of Participation. Personnel #10: The Hospice Aide did not have evidence in the personnel record of qualifications in accordance with state regulations for CHHA’s.”

    Rule L0609. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 189 words

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 14 (Personnel #10) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the following competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient: (This standard applies to all Hospice Aides providing care/service who are directly employed by the hospice or through a contractual agreement.) ·Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other hospice staff. ·Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration ·Safe transfer techniques and ambulation. ·Normal range of motion and positioning ·Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include-- ·(A) Bed bath ·(B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath ·(C) Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed ·(D) Nail and skin care ·(E) Oral hygiene ·(F) Toileting and elimination The other subject areas in this section may be evaluated through written examination, oral examination or after observation of a Hospice Aide with a patient. Personnel #10: The competency skill checklist specified that the aide was observed doing a sponge, tub, OR shower bath and also observed shampooing in a sink, tub OR bed. The requirement is that each example is reviewed”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. For the last 12 months reporting, as well as for the year 2024, the volunteer percentage reached 4.3%.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

Jan 31, 2025: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care12 deficiencies
  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    “Condition of Participation: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. L536”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level.

  • Hospice aide and homemaker services (42 CFR 418.76)

    “Condition of Participation: Hospice Aide and Homemaker Services. L607”

    Rule L0607. Condition-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 144 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 10 (Patient #1, 4) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient #1 - did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the spiritual needs related to the terminal. The spiritual component completed by the RN did not include a history of any religious affiliation and support, spiritual beliefs or traditions. Patient #4 - did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the spiritual needs related to the terminal. The spiritual component completed by the RN did not include a history of any religious affiliation and support, spiritual beliefs or traditions.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 188 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 10 (Patient #3, 4, 6) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #3 - Medication profile contained O2 at 3-6L/M per nasal cannula continuous did not include titration instructions for oxygen. Nystatin cream 2 x day for burning sensation - did not contain site, Calmosepline 1 x day for wound care - did not contain site. Patient #4 - Medication profile contained Cosopt solution 2 times a day - did not contain number of drops or if applied to one or both eye(s). Patient #6 - Medication profile contained Degludec 10 solution 1 x day subcutaneous - did not contain units/ml or dosage to give (10 solution unsure if that is 10U). SN initial comprehensive assessment documentation has patient on oxygen but not on medication profile.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 373 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 10 (Patient #1, 2, 3, 6, 7) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #1 - The medical record includes documentation on admission that the patient is at risk for falls, is incontinent of bowel and bladder and needs assistance with ADL. There is no evidence that the plan of care includes problems, goals and interventions for the management of the risk of falls, assistance with ADL’s or the potential for skin breakdown. Patient #2 - The medical record includes documentation that the patient is at risk for skin breakdown due to inability to reposition self and incontinence of bowel and bladder. There is no evidence that the plan of care includes problems, goals and interventions to maintain skin integrity. Patient #3 - The medical record includes documentation on admission that the patient is at risk for falls, is incontinent of bowel and bladder and needs assistance with ADL. There is no evidence that the plan of care includes problems, goals and interventions for the management of the risk of falls, assistance with ADL’s or the potential for skin breakdown. Patient #6 - The medical record includes documentation on admission that the patient is at risk for falls, is incontinent of bowel and bladder and needs assistance with ADL. Patient has a Foley catheter. There is no evidence that the plan of care includes problems, goals and interventions for the management of the risk of falls, assistance with ADL’s, management of Foley or the potential for skin breakdown. Patient #7 - The medical record includes documentation on admission that the patient is at risk for falls, is incontinent of bowel and bladder and in bed most of the day. There is no evidence that the plan of care includes problems, goals and interventions for the management of the risk of falls or the potential for skin breakdown.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 155 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 10 (Patient #3, 4, 6) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #3 - Orders for O2 at 3-6L/M per nasal cannula continuous did not have parameters for 3-6L i.e. titrate to keep O2 saturations above 90%. Nystatin cream 2 x day for burning sensation - did not contain site, Calmosepline 1 x day for wound care - did not contain site. Patient #4 - Orders for Cosopt solution 2 times a day - did not contain number of drops or if applied to one or both eye(s). Patient #6 -Orders for Degludec 10 solution 1 x day subcutaneous - did not contain units/ml or dosage to give (10 solution unsure if that is 10U). SN initial comprehensive assessment states patient on oxygen but on POC.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 144 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 10 (Patient #1, 6, 7) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient #1 - The medical record includes SN documentation that the patient requires a hospital bed and walker. There is no evidence that a hospital bed is included on the plan of care as DME. Patient #6 - The medical record includes SN documentation that the patient requires a Foley catheter. There is no evidence that Foley supplies is included on the plan of care as medical supplies. Patient #7 - The medical record includes SN documentation that the patient requires a hospital bed and walker. There is no evidence that a hospital bed is included on the plan of care as DME.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 10 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #7 - IDG on 01/03/25 and 01/16/25 did not include changes that have taken place since the initial assessment, information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes or reassessment of the patient’s response to care. IDG form blank.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 144 words

    “Upon client record review, 4 of 10 (Patient #1, 2, 4, 5) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #1 - SN visit frequency 2xwk 1 PRN/wk - week 7 SN made 5 visits. SN visit frequency 03/31/24 2wk3, 1wk1 - wk 8 - 4 visits documented. Patient #2 - SN visit frequency effective 05/16/24 1wk + 1 PRN/wk - SN made 3 visits week 2 and 4. MSW visit frequency 1wk - 2 visit made wk 2, no visits made wk 3. Patient #4 - effective 05/26/24 SN visit frequency 1wk +1 PRN/wk - 3 visit made wk 4. Patient #5 - effective 12/16/24 SN visit frequency 2wk - only 1 visit completed wk 3. MSW visit frequency 1wk - no visit made wk 3 or 6.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 269 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 10 (Patient #1, 2, 3, 4, 6) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #1 - No tasks on aide care plan contained frequency of tasks. Aide care plan contained both shower and Bed bath but no documentation that patient was cognitively or functionally able to make decision. Patient #2 - Aide frequency effective 06/02/24 1-2 times week. No tasks on aide care plan contained frequency of tasks. Patient #3 - Aide frequency 1 x week and 2 PRN. No tasks on aide care plan contained frequency of tasks. Patient #4 - Aide frequency 1 x week and 2 PRN. No tasks on aide care plan contained frequency of tasks. Patient #6 - Aide frequency 1 x week and 2 PRN. No tasks on aide care plan contained frequency of tasks. Aide care plan contained both shower and Bed bath but no documentation that patient was cognitively or functionally able to make decision.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 226 words

    “Upon patient record review 5 of 10 (Patient #1, 2,3 4, 6) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #1 - Aide visit frequency 03/11/24 2 x week. Only 1 visit made week of 03/17/24 and 04/01/24, no visits made week of 03/24/24 - no documentation of reason for missed visits. Aide documented bed bath on 04/03/24 and shower on 03/18/24 - no other tasks addressed. Visit date 03/11/24 and 03/14/24 Aide documented visit time in home but aide visit note blank. Patient #2 - Aide visit note 06/04/24 and 06/07/24 Aide documented visit time in home but aide visit note blank. Patient #3 - Aide visit note on 09/11/24 contained provided bed bath but bed bath not ordered on care plan - no other task addressed on visit note. Visit notes blank for 09/14/24, 09/18/24 and 09/21/24. Patient #4 - Aide visit frequency 1 x week and 2 PRN but no visit made week of 07/07/24 - no documentation of reason for missed visit. Patient #6 - Aide visit note on 05/30/24 only addressed bed bath completed - no other tasks addressed.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 10 (Patient #1, 4) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient #1 - No Aide Supervisory visits documented from 02/22/24 through 04/03/24. Patient #4 - No Aide Supervisory visits documented from 06/26/24 through 07/13/24.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 11, 2025Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care6 deficiencies cited
Jan 31, 2025Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care12 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 30, 2025.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 6 owners or officers are people: Farida Bhinderwala (corporate officer, 100%); Nicole Sabatine (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Salim Akbar Bhinderwala (corporate officer, 100%); Salim Akbar Bhinderwala (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Farida Bhinderwala (owns 5% or more directly, 51%); Salim Akbar Bhinderwala (owns 5% or more directly, 49%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 36 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 48331, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7.5; this one had 18.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.