Gentiva I
A hospice in Southfield, Michigan 48033
25925 Telegraph Rd, Suite 102, Southfield, Michigan 48033. (248) 356-5070.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 15 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 3of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
15 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 40 hospices serving ZIP code 48033 had 8.
The last inspection on record was on Aug 27, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
15 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Aug 27, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care15 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 177 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patients #5,#6,#7,#8) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications. Patient 5: The medication profile contained ammonium lactate topical cream with no area defined for administration. Patient 6: During home visit medication reconciliation, the facility and hospice medication profiles did not match. The facility profile had an Advair inhaler active which was discontinued by hospice on 9/25/25, levsin every 4 hours PRN compared to hospice every 6 hours PRN, lorazepam 0.25 mg compared to hospice 0.5 mg, mirtazapine 15 mg compared to hospice 7.5 mg, and Tylenol 650 mg scheduled daily that was not on the hospice profile. Patient 7: During home visit medication reconciliation, the facility and hospice medication profiles did not match. The facility profile had Senna-S compared to hospice regular Senna, and Robitussin that was discontinued by hospice 5/6/26. The hospice medication profile also contained two differing frequencies for scheduled morphine. Patient 8: The medication profile contained calmoseptine topical ointment with no area defined for administration.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 141 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #8,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 8: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying the patient required a mechanical soft diet. The plan of care identified the diet as regular. Patient 10: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of a condom catheter at night. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to the catheter use included in the plan of care.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 215 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patients #5,#6,#7,#8) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 5: The medical record contained an order for ammonium lactate topical cream with no area defined for administration. The record also contained nursing documentation upon recertification 7/1/26 identifying patient use of a CPAP. There was no evidence of an order for CPAP use and parameters. Patient 6: During home visit medication order reconciliation, the facility and hospice orders did not match. The facility record had an active order for Advair inhaler which was discontinued by hospice on 9/25/25, levsin every 4 hours PRN compared to hospice every 6 hours PRN, lorazepam 0.25 mg compared to hospice 0.5 mg, mirtazapine 15 mg compared to hospice 7.5 mg, and Tylenol 650 mg scheduled daily that was not in the hospice record. Patient 7: During home visit medication order reconciliation, the facility and hospice orders did not match. The facility record contained an order Senna-S compared to hospice regular Senna, and an active Robitussin order that was discontinued by hospice 5/6/26. Patient 8: The medical record contained an order for calmoseptine topical ointment with no area defined for administration.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 125 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #1,#11) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of a hospital bed, full rails, over bed table, and oxygen. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care. Patient 11: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification assessment 7/27/26 identifying patient use of a shower chair, wheelchair, and Hoyer Lift, and the record contained an order for nebulized medication. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
The inspectors’ words, 288 words
“Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patients #1,#2,#7,#8,#11,#14) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 1: The plan of care identified the patient as both full code and DNR. There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to eliminate the full code status when the DNR order was signed 4/26/26. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation 6/17/26 identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to include problems, goals, and interventions related to oxygen safety. Patient 7: The care plan contained interventions related to Macrobid use for a UTI in June. There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to resolve the issue after treatment. The medical record also contained nursing documentation 7/18/26 identifying patient fell resulting in a right hip fracture causing the patient to be bedbound. There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to identify the injury and related needs. Patient 8: The plan of care included an added diagnosis for DNR code status. There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to remove the Advance Directive identification from none to DNR. Patient 11: The plan of care included problems, goals, and interventions related to a wound on the left buttocks. There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to resolve the issues when the wound was healed 8/3/26. Patient 14: The medical record contained an order 8/10/26 for oxygen. There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to include problems, goals, and interventions related to oxygen safety.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 131 words
“Upon client record review, 4 of 19 (Patients #1,#5,#6,#12) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 1: The medical record contained an order for nursing visits twice weekly. There was no evidence of a second visit completed the week of 6/28/26. Patient 5: The medical record contained an order for social work visits twice monthly effective 7/20/26. There was no evidence of a second visit completed in July. Patient 6: The medical record contained an order for volunteer visits once weekly effective 8/3/26. There was no evidence of volunteer visits completed. Patient 12: The medical record contained an order for volunteer visits once weekly. There was no evidence of a volunteer visit completed since 7/27/26.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #5) did not have evidence that the IDG documents the sharing of information between all disciplines providing care and services in all settings, whether the care and services are provided directly or under arrangement. Patient 5: The medical record contained a bereavement risk assessment identifying the wife as a high risk for bereavement. There was no evidence in the record of the collaboration with the IDG regarding the anticipatory bereavement needs.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
“Upon observation and home visits, 1 of 4 (Patient #7), there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. The nurse was observed placing a dirty stethoscope around her neck after use on the patient and clean vital signs equipment were returned to the same area of barrier that they had been placed when dirty.”
-
Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 16 (Personnel #7) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the following competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient: ·Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration Personnel 7: There was no evidence of skills competency demonstrated obtaining temperature, pulse, and respirations.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 159 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #1,#7,#11) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are specific to the patient’s needs. Patient 1: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying the patient requires a maximum assist of two for transfers. The aide care plan contained a task to transfer without instructions for assistance needed. Patient 7: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying a right elbow wound resolved 7/30/26 and coccyx wound resolved 8/5/26. The aide care plan contained instructions regarding the wounds without evidence of updates after their resolution. The aide care plan also contained instructions regarding patient ability to walk independently despite nursing documentation that the patient has been bedbound since a hip fracture 7/18/26. Patient 11: The medical record contained nursing documentation 8/3/26 identifying a left buttocks wound resolved. The aide care plan contained instructions regarding the wound without evidence of an update after the resolution.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 115 words
“Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #12) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 12: The medical record contained an order for aide visits four times weekly effective 8/11/26. There was only evidence of one visit completed and a missed visit the week of 8/11/26 that stated the aide was off on medical leave. There was no evidence of agency attempt for substitution or rescheduling to meet the ordered frequency.”
-
Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. The program’s annual volunteer utilization rate for 2025 was 3.83%.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 16 (Personnel #5) did not have evidence that a skills competency assessment, specific to each discipline had been conducted for all personnel including volunteers initially during orientation. Personnel 5: There was no evidence of a skills competency in the personnel file.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))
“Upon patient client record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #11,#16) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Advance Directives. Patient 11: The plan of care identified the patient as DNR. There was no evidence of supporting documentation that the patient’s DNR was uploaded into the record. Patient 16: The medical record contained social worker documentation identifying the patient had a DNR in place. There was no evidence of supporting documentation that the patient’s DNR was uploaded into the record.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #6) did not have evidence that the hospice provided the following information: • The most recent hospice plan of care specific to each patient • Hospice election form and any Advance Directives specific to each patient • Physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness specific to each patient Patient 6: During a home visit observation, there was no evidence of an election form signature page, CTIs prior to current benefit period, or updated plan of care since 7/15/26.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2026 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 15 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 17, 1994.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 45% at home, 44% in assisted living, 8% in a nursing facility, 2% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% elsewhere.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 14.5 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 7.6% |
| Visits near death | 96.0% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLC owns 99% directly since Jul 1, 2001; Odyssey Healthcare Gp, LLC owns 1% directly since Jul 1, 2001.
- 8 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (other role (CMS gives no detail), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%); Gurdeep Kaur (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Michelle Gustaw (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Odyssey Healthcare Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jul 1, 2001 |
| Charlotte Midco, LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Falcon Hospice, LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Charlotte Buyer, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Curo Health Services LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Odyssey Healthcare Holding Company | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jul 1, 2001 |
| Kah Hospice Company, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Ch Services Group Holdings Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Ch Services Holdings Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | 99% | Jul 1, 2001 |
| Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 60% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Humana Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Centerwell Health Services Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Odyssey Healthcare Gp, LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | 1% | Jul 1, 2001 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 81% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 94.07% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 73.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 40 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 48033, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 15.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Gentiva I This hospice | 15 |
| Assured Hospice Care, Inc. | 4 |
| Corewell Health Children’s Patch Program | 8 |
| Hospice of Southeastern Michigan, Inc. | 8 |
| Universal Hospice Care | 37 |
| St Marie’s | 2 |
| Parrish Palliative and Hospice Care, LLC | 6 |
| Henry Ford Hospice | 2 |
| Michigan Palliative and Hospice Care | Not given |
| Mclaren Hospice | 1 |
| Angela Hospice Home Care, Inc. | 9 |
| Advisacare Hospice | 38 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.