Hearth Record

Premier at Home Hospice & Palliative Care, LLC

A hospice in Southfield, Michigan 48075

18000 W 9 Mile Rd, Ste 340, Southfield, Michigan 48075. (586) 738-1701.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 41 hospices serving ZIP code 48075 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 5, 2024: an initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jan 5, 2024: initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner8 deficiencies
  • Arrangement with Other Facilities (42 CFR 418.113(b)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 185 words

    “It is required that the hospice implements emergency preparedness (EP) policies and procedures, based on the emergency plan, the risk assessment, and the communication plan. The policies and procedures address, arrangements with facilities and other providers to receive patients to maintain the continuity of care to patients. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review and interview. A review of the agency’s emergency preparedness binder and plan revealed no documented evidence that the agency had made arrangements with another facility or provider to receive patients in the event of an emergency. During an interview, the Executive Director /Director of Nursing stated he did not realize that he needed this and would work on how best to approach this. A review of the Emergency Preparedness Binder on 01/04/2024 revealed no documentation of relation with another hospice to provide care for patients in the event of an emergency in which staff is not sufficient for the need. Interview with the Executive Director/Administrator who stated that he did not realize that he needed this. He stated that he would think about how best to approach this.”

    Rule E0025. Standard-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 339 words

    “It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group [IDG], in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care, in accordance with CMS §418.24–the elements of the hospice care election statement. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 6 (33%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure the initial comprehensive assessment was completed no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Agency policy 4.18 Comprehensive Assessment stated in part, “The comprehensive assessment of the patient is completed by a designated member of the IDG, in consultation with the patient’s attending physician no later than five (5) calendar days after the patient elects the hospice benefit.” Clinical Record 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/26/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of senile degeneration of brain. The initial plan of care dated 10/26/2023 included an order for Medical Social Worker (MSW) services beginning date 10/26/2023. Clinical record review revealed the initial MSW visit was documented on 11/15/2022, 20 days after the patient elected the hospice benefit and 15 days outstanding. There was no documentation of missed visit(s) or communication from the MSW that any attempt was made to complete the psychosocial assessment before day 20. Clinical Record 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/21/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The initial plan of care dated 11/21/2023 included an order for Medical Social Worker services beginning date 11/21/2023. Clinical record review revealed the initial MSW visit was documented on 11/30/2022, 9 days after the patient elected the hospice benefit and 4 days outstanding. There was no documentation of missed visit(s) or communication from the MSW that any attempt was made to complete the psychosocial assessment before day 20. During an interviewed on 01/03/2023, Executive Director /Director of Nursing stated he did not see documentation of a phone contract before the visit dates.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 337 words

    “It is required that the patient’s pain is assessed as part of a comprehensive assessment. The documented assessment of the patient’s pain includes the patient’s/family’s goals for pain management and their satisfaction with the current level of pain control. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 6 (17%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure the documented assessment of the patient’s pain includes the patient’s/family’s goals for pain management and their satisfaction with the current level of pain control. Agency policy 4.42 Pain and Symptom Management stated in part, “If a patient’s pain score is above their acceptable rating or the patient states that their pain level is not acceptable, the pain will be reassessed within twenty-four (24) hours to ensure it has come down to an acceptable level.” Clinical Record 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/26/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of senile degeneration of brain. The initial plan of care dated 10/26/2023 included an intervention that the patient’s pain was to be controlled as tolerable. The initial comprehensive assessment dated 10/26/2023 included documentation that the patient’s pain level was 6 on a 0/10 scale and the patient was using Tylenol for pain control. The assessment did not include documentation if a level 6 pain was acceptable to the patient, but did document education provided about the timing of medication to keep pain controlled. The next nursing assessment visit was documented on 11/09/2023. The clinical record did not include documentation or communication with the patient to follow-up with the increased pain level reported at the 10/26/2023 nursing visit or to assess the effectiveness of the Tylenol at reducing the patient’s pain. Agency staff did not follow the agency’s policy to reassess pain within 24 hours to ensure it has come to an acceptable level for the patient. During an interview and review of records, the Executive Director /Director of Nursing agreed that staff should have follow-up sooner to reassess the patient’s pain.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 177 words

    “It is required that hospice aides are assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse who is a member of the Interdisciplinary Group. Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide are prepared by a RN who is responsible for the supervision of the hospice aide. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 5 (20%) clinical records reviewed with aide services provided, the agency did not ensure the Registered Nurse prepared a patient specific aide plan of care assignment with clear and specific instructions for the aide. Clinical Record 1: The aide care plan of care assignment developed by the RN and dated 12/13/2023 assigned the aide the tasks of “Partial bed bath (patient assist) if shower refused. A shower stand-by assist.” The aide plan of care did not include specific instructions for the aide with guidelines for when to perform each type of bath. During an interview and record review, the Executive Director /Director of Nursing agreed the aide care plan did not provide clear instruction.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Services (42 CFR 418.100(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 283 words

    “It is required that the hospice is primarily engaged in providing the following care and services in a manner consistent with accepted standards of practice, nursing services, medical social services, physician services, hospice aide, volunteer, and homemaker services, physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech-language pathology services, short-term inpatient care, counseling services, including spiritual counseling, bereavement counseling, and dietary counseling. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, observation, and interview. A joint contract review with the Executive Director /Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the agency did not have a contract for therapy services, including physical therapy, occupational therapy and speech-language pathology. During a joint review of agency contracts, the DON revealed the agency did not have a signed contract for therapy services. The DON stated that for patients that reside in a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF), the agency had an agreement with the SNF to provide therapy services if needed but it was not documented in a contract. The DON stated the agency did not have a contract to provide therapy services for patients that reside in their own home. The DON stated the one patient that lives in their own home did not require therapy services. Review of the active census revealed that currently the agency has one patient that resides in their own home and all other patients are residents of SNFs. A home visit observation (Clinical Record 1/Home Visit 1) was completed with the patient that resided at home and therapy needs were not identified for the patient. The DON acknowledged the need to obtain a therapy contract for all patients of the agency. A joint contract review with the administrator revealed no signed contract for therapy services.”

    Rule L0652. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 221 words

    “It is required that the designated IDG member provides the SNF/NF or ICF/IDF with the following information for each patient/resident, the most recent hospice plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, observation, and interview. In 2 of 2 (100%) home visit observations with patients that reside at a skilled nursing facility [SNF], the agency did not ensure that the facility was provided with the most recent plan of care. Agency policy 4.32 stated in part, “The hospice will provide the following information to the facility: Hospice plan of care, election forms, advance directives, and certifications.” Home Visit 2: During the home visit observation with the Registered Nurse, review of the hospice binder at the SNF revealed no documented evidence that the initial hospice plan of care and the updated plans of care were in the hospice binder and provided to the SNF. Home Visit 3: During the home visit observation with the Registered Nurse, review of the hospice binder at the SNF revealed no documented evidence that the initial hospice plan of care and the updated plans of care were in the hospice binder and provided to the SNF. During an interview on 01/04/2024, the Executive Director /Director of Nursing stated that he did not realize all the forms needed to be in the binder.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 213 words

    “It is required that the designated IDG [interdisciplinary group] member provides the SNF/NF or ICF/IDF with the following information for each patient/resident, the hospice election form and any advanced directives. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, observation, and interview. In 2 of 2 (100%) home visit observations with patients that reside at a skilled nursing facility [SNF], the agency did not ensure that the facility was provided with the hospice election form. Agency policy 4.32 stated in part, “The hospice will provide the following information to the facility: Hospice plan of care, election forms, advance directives, and certifications.” Home Visit 2: During the home visit observation with the Registered Nurse, review of the hospice binder at the SNF revealed no documented evidence that the patient’s hospice election of benefit form was in the hospice binder and provided to the SNF. Home Visit 3: During the home visit observation with the Registered Nurse, review of the hospice binder at the SNF revealed no documented evidence that the patient’s hospice election of benefit form was in the hospice binder and provided to the SNF. During an interview on 01/04/2024, the Executive Director /Director of Nursing stated he did not realize the election of benefit form needed to be in the binder.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3)(iii))

    The inspectors’ words, 208 words

    “It is required that the designated IDG member provides the SNF/NF or ICF/IDF with the following information for each patient/resident, physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, observation, and interview. In 2 of 2 (100%) home visit observations with patients that reside at a skilled nursing facility [SNF], the agency did not ensure that the facility was provided with the physician certification of terminal illness. Agency policy 4.32 stated in part, “The hospice will provide the following information to the facility: Hospice plan of care, election forms, advance directives, and certifications.” Home Visit 2: During the home visit observation with the Registered Nurse, review of the hospice binder at the SNF revealed no documented evidence that the physician certification of terminal illness was in the hospice binder and provided to the SNF. Home Visit 3: During the home visit observation with the Registered Nurse, review of the hospice binder at the SNF revealed no documented evidence that the physician certification of terminal illness was in the hospice binder and provided to the SNF. During an interview on 01/04/2024, the Executive Director /Director of Nursing stated he did not realize the forms needed to be in the binder.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 5, 2024Initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 12, 2024.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 24% at home, 10% in assisted living, 24% in a nursing facility, 42% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Jerell Mckitchen (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Jerell Mckitchen (corporate director, 100%); Anthony D Spearman (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Jerell Mckitchen (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 41 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 48075, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.