Hearth Record

Bay Nursing, Inc.

A hospice in Romeo, Michigan 48065

255 N Bailey St, Romeo, Michigan 48065. (586) 752-1111.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 25 hospices serving ZIP code 48065 had 7.5.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 16, 2026: a complaint inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jan 16, 2026: complaint inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner2 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 192 words

    “It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care, in accordance with CMS §418.24–the elements of the hospice care election statement. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and document review. In 1 of 5 (20%) clinical records reviewed it was revealed that the agency did not ensure that the MSW Initial psychosocial assessment was completed or attempted to be completed within 5 calendar days after the election of hospice benefit. CLINICAL RECORD 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/07/2025. The review period was 10/07/2025 to 01/08/2026. There was no documented evidence of an initial psychosocial assessment documented within 5 days of the patient’s election of the hospice benefit. There was no documented explanation in the clinical notes for the reason for the delay. The Clinical Director was interviewed on 01/15/2026 and she agreed that the initial psychosocial assessment was not completed within 5 days of the patient’s election of the Hospice benefit. She had no additional information to provide.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 235 words

    “It is required that the hospice discharge summary provided to a facility receiving a hospice patient for care—or to the patient’s community attending physician upon hospice discharge—includes at least the following: 1. A summary of the patient’s hospice stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management; 2. The patient’s current plan of care; 3. The patient’s latest physician orders; 4. Any other documentation that will assist in the post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the receiving facility or the attending physician. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 1 (100%) clinical record reviewed of a patient that transferred to a hospital, it was revealed that the hospice did not ensure that a discharge summary was completed to include a summary of the patient’s hospice stay that documented treatments, symptom management, pain management, the plan of care, latest physician orders, and any other documentation that would assist in the post-discharge continuity of care. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient transferred to a hospital on 11/08/2025 to seek aggressive treatment. Documentation that the patient’s medication list, history and physical and discharge summary had not been forwarded to the receiving facility. There was no discharge summary completed. During an interview and joint review of clinical records on 01/15/2026 with the Director of Clinical Services, it was confirmed that the discharge summary was not documented with the required elements.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Jan 15, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies
  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 674 words

    “It is required that the hospice designates a registered nurse member of the IDG to provide coordination of care, ensure continuous assessment of each patient’s and family’s needs, ensure the implementation of the interdisciplinary plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 5 of 14 (36%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that services were provided as ordered on the Plan of Care. CLINICAL RECORD 1: The patient was recertified for hospice services on 11/19/2024. The Plan of Care (POC) dated 11/24/2024-01/22/2025 included orders for Skilled Nursing (SN) with a frequency of 2w8, 1w1(2 visits per week for 8 weeks and one visit for one week) with 4 as needed visits for symptom management. An interim order was documented by the Registered Nurse on 11/24/2024 for a revised SN visit frequency of 1w3 (one visit per week for 3 weeks) from 11/24/2024 through 12/01/2024. SN visits were documented weekly from 11/26/2024 through 01/07/2025, in other words, after 12/01/2024 the visit frequency did not return to two visits weekly as ordered. The clinical record lacked documentation of missed visits or documentation of communication to the physician of missed SN visits. CLINICAL RECORD 2: The patient was recertified for hospice services on 12/10/2024. The Plan of Care (POC) dated 12/12/2024-03/11/2025 included orders for Spiritual Counselor (SC) 1m4 (one visit per month for 4 months) with 2 as-needed visits. Additionally, there was an order documented by the Registered Nurse (RN) on 01/08/2025, which stated, “Per request, additional weekly chaplain visits requested by patient for anxiety. New frequency effective week of 01/06/2025 through 03/01/2025. Monthly frequency to resume on 02/07/2025 through 03/11/2025 based on patient status”. This visit frequency orders were reviewed with the Clinical Manager who said the SC visits should have been weekly starting on 01/06/2025, to continue until February when the team would re-evaluate. There were no documented SC visits in the record from 12/12/2024 through 01/15/2025. There was no documentation of missed visits or documentation of communication to the physician of missed SC visits in the clinical record. CLINICAL RECORD 4: The patient was recertified for hospice services on 12/12/2024. The Plan of Care (POC) dated 12/16/2024- 02/13/2025 included orders for a Spiritual Counselor (SC) 1m3 (one visit per month for 3 months) with 2 as-needed visits. There were no documented visits from 12/16/2024 to 12/31/2024. There was no documentation of missed visits or communication to the physician of missed SC visits. CLINICAL RECORD 7: The patient elected hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice service on 10/21/2024. The Plan of Care (POC) dated 10/21/2024-01/18/2025 included orders for Skilled Nursing (SN) with a visit frequency of 2w13 (two visits per week for 13 weeks) with 4 as needed visits for symptom management. An interim order was documented by the SN on 12/03/2024 which stated, “Verbal Order received to decrease skilled nursing visit frequency related to slow progression of patient decline. New visit frequency 1wk3 (one per week for 3 weeks), effective date 11/24/2024 thru 12/1/2024. Visit frequency will be adjusted as patient status warrants.” There were no documented SN visits were present in the record for 12/03/2024 through 01/07/2025. CLINICAL RECORD 8: The patient was recertified for hospice care on 11/20/2024. The Plan of Care (POC) dated 11/24/2024-02/21/2025 included orders for Skilled Nursing (SN) with a visit frequency of 2w13 (two visits per week for 13 weeks) with four as-needed visits for symptom management. Weekly SN visits were documented in the clinical record from 11/27/2024 through 01/09/2025. There were no subsequent orders documented in the record to decrease the SN visit frequency, nor was there documentation that the physician was notified of missed visits. The Administrator and Clinical Supervisor (Personnel Record 2) were interviewed on 01/14/2025. The Administrator stated, “Visit frequencies in these patients were not followed. The current computer system does not ensure that visits are plotted and made following the visit frequency orders. We are changing to a new medical record in February, which will help clinicians stay within ordered frequencies.””

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 542 words

    “It is required that counseling services include an organized program for providing bereavement services delivered by or under the supervision of a qualified professional with experience or education in grief or loss counseling. The bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved per a bereavement plan of care that includes the types of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 2 of 2 (100%) bereavement patient records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the bereavement services, for the bereaved survivors, was provided in accordance with the agency policy. Agency Policy #2-010.1, Bereavement Services, stated in part, “8. Within two weeks after the death of a patient, a sympathy card will be sent to the bereaved. 9. After three weeks, a bereavement letter or phone call offering support and outlining the hospice bereavement services. 10. Within three to five weeks after the patient’s death, a bereavement assessment will be completed by the bereavement counselor following the family and caregiver. This assessment will identify grief issues. [Name/Title] will render a professional judgment as to whether the bereaved is experiencing normal grief, moderate grief, or a severe grief reaction. 11. If a person is noted as experiencing normal grief, the bereavement counselor will contact the bereaved person for ongoing assessment and support at 3, 6, and nine months after the patient’s death and at the anniversary of the patient’s death. 12. In addition to the services outlined above, persons deemed to be experiencing moderate or severe grief will be followed by the bereavement program with increased services and contact offered at intervals defined in the plan of care.” CLINICAL RECORD 13: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/29/2024. On 12/01/2024, there was a documented Bereavement Risk Assessment identified as “Low Risk” completed by the Medical Social Worker (MSW). The documented patient’s death was on 12/10/2024. The MSW documented three communication notes after the patient’s death. On 12/13/2024 and 12/20/2024, the MSW documented attempts to reach the bereaved by phone. On 01/08/2025, the MSW documented, “No return call.” The clinical record lacked documentation of a re-assessment of the bereaved risk and there was no additional documentation on offered, declined, or completed bereavement services. CLINICAL RECORD 14: The patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 10/21/2024. On 10/24/2024, there was a documented Bereavement Risk Assessment identified as “Low Risk” completed by the Medical Social Worker (MSW). The documented patient’s death was on 10/25/2024. There was a note entered on 10/30/2024 by the MSW that stated, “Sympathy Card sent to the patient’s family”. There was no bereavement risk re-assessment documented in the record following the patient’s death, and no further documentation of bereavement services was present in the record after the Sympathy Card was mailed. The Bereavement Coordinator (Personnel Record 6) was interviewed on 01/15/2025, and the selected Bereavement records were reviewed. The Bereavement Coordinator stated, “(she) was unaware of the interventions and care planning outlined in the policy for low, moderate, and high-risk bereaved.” She said, “I tried calling the bereaved after death to get consent for bereavement services, but I have had a hard time contacting them by phone.””

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 260 words

    “A hospice aide provides services ordered by the Interdisciplinary Group. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 11 (18%) clinical records reviewed, in which aide services were accepted, it was revealed that the agency did not ensure the hospice aide provided the visit frequency services as ordered by the Interdisciplinary Group. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient elected hospice benefit on 01/03/2025. The Plan of Care (POC) dated 01/03/2025 to 04/02/2025 included Hospice Aide orders with a frequency of 2w12 (two times a week for 12 weeks). Only one HA visit was documented in the record for the week of 01/03/2025. There was no documentation of missed visits or documentation of communication with the physician regarding missed aide visits. CLINICAL RECORD 11: The patient elected hospice benefit on 11/29/2024. The Plan of Care (POC) dated 11/29/2024 to 02/26/2025 included visit frequency orders for Hospice Aide of 2w12 (two times a week for 12 weeks). There were no documented aide visits during the first week of care (11/29/2024 to 11/30/2024). The record did not include documentation of missed visits for the aide services, nor was there documented communication to the physician regarding missed visits. The Administrator and Clinical Supervisor (Personnel Record 2) were interviewed on 01/14/2025. The Administrator stated, “Visit frequencies in these patients were not followed. The current computer system does not ensure that visits are plotted and made following the visit frequency orders. We are changing to a new medical record in February, which will help clinicians stay within ordered frequencies.””

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    The inspectors’ words, 195 words

    “It is required that hospice volunteers provide day-to-day administrative or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals five percent (5%) of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review and interview. The agency did not ensure that hospice volunteers provided administrative or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals five percent (5%) of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff. The organization’s documentation of volunteer cost savings was reviewed with the Administrator/Volunteer Coordinator (Personnel Record 1). The agency’s utilization of volunteer services was 2.1% for the calendar year 2024, below the minimum of 5%. The Administrator/Volunteer Coordinator was interviewed on 01/15/2025, and stated, “The agency has not utilized volunteer services enough and will increase the pool of volunteers and the number of volunteer hours.” The agency did not ensure that hospice volunteers provided administrative or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals five percent (5%) of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 174 words

    “It is required that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice per hospice regulation §418.26 (i.e., no longer terminally ill), the hospice forwards to the patient’s attending physician a copy of the hospice discharge summary and the patient’s record, if requested. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 1 (100%) clinical record reviewed where the patient revoked or was discharged from hospice services, the agency did not ensure that a discharge summary was provided to the patient’s attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 11: The patient elected hospice benefit on 11/29/2024. On 12/19/2024, the record documented that the patient was transferred to and admitted to the hospital. The patient/caregiver signed the hospice revocation document (present in the record) on 12/19/2024. There was no documentation in the record that a discharge summary was provided to the patient’s attending physician. The Administrator was interviewed on 01/14/2025 and confirmed that a discharge summary was not sent to the attending physicians for this patient.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 16, 2026Complaint inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner2 deficiencies cited
Jan 15, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 11, 2022.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 33% at home, 48% in assisted living, 19% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.6%
Visits near death95.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Debra J Frantz Denler (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Debra J Frantz Denler (corporate officer, 100%); Debra J Frantz Denler (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Debra J Frantz Denler (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Janaina M Zilli (managing employee (under contract), 30%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 93.1% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 54% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 25 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 48065, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7.5; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.