Corewell Health Children’s Patch Program
A hospice in Southfield, Michigan 48033
26901 Beaumont Blvd, Suite 169, Southfield, Michigan 48033. (947) 522-1495.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 8 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- Not available CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean2
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
8 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 40 hospices serving ZIP code 48033 had 8.
The last inspection on record was on Feb 22, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Feb 22, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner8 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 272 words
“It is required that the comprehensive assessment includes consideration of symptoms and symptom severity, including skin integrity. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, observation, and interview. In 1 of 14 (7%) records reviewed it was revealed that the hospice agency did not ensure the comprehensive assessment included skin integrity. Clinical Record 2: The hospice benefit election date was 06/14/2022. The initial RN comprehensive assessment dated 06/14/2022 included in the subsection integumentary stated in part, “Wounds.” The narrative sub-section indicated in part “Receives all medications and nutrition via G-tube.” The patient received RN assessments on 06/24/2022, 06/30/2022, 07/8/2022, and 07/22/2022. The sub-section integumentary stated in part, “no problems identified” on each of the assessments. The RN assessment completed on 07/29/2022, in the sub-section narrative stated in part, “He continues to have healing pressure sores on his heels and had a new stage one (1) pressure sore on his buttocks. Mom was instructed to keep the patient positioned off the back and leave it open to air as much as possible.” During the home visit conducted with the RN (staff 3) in the presence of the Charge Lead RN (staff 1) an interview was conducted with the mother, who is also the caregiver. The mother confirmed the patient did have wounds to his heels on admission that both she and the hospice RN managed. The wounds to the heels were currently resolved. A joint record review and interview with the Charge Lead Nurse (staff 1) on 02/21/2024 confirmed the clinical record did not contain documentation of a skin assessment from admission on 06/14/2022 for forty-six (46) days until 07/29/2022.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 260 words
“It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment includes a drug profile that contains the patient’s current prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, supplements, herbal remedies, and other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. The drug profile is updated per the hospice policy and procedure, but, at minimum, at the time of each comprehensive assessment and/or when new medication is added or changes are made to existing medication. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review and observation. In 1 of 3 (33%) home visit observations conducted where medication reconciliation was completed it was revealed that the hospice agency did not ensure the medication profiles were updated accurately to reflect the patient’s current medication regimen. Clinical Record 2: The hospice benefit election date was 6/14/2022. The home visit was conducted on 02/21/2024 in the presence of the Charge Lead RN. The medication profile dated 02/21/2024, stated in part, “Baclofen twenty thousand 20,000 micrograms (mcg) per twenty (20) milliliters (ml). Administer twenty-six (26) points (.) six (6) (26.6) micrograms (mcg) every hour. The order date was 6/22/2022. The current regimen for the patient per the caregiver, as well as a paper copy of a physician’s order provided by the infusion provider, stated “Baclofen twenty thousand 20,000 micrograms (mcg) per twenty (20) millimeters (ml). Administer twenty-eight (28) point (.) six (6) (28.6) micrograms (mc) every hour. The order date was 1/17/2024. A joint record review, interview, and observation with the charge lead nurse (staff 1) on 02/21/24 confirmed the hospice agency’s medication profile did not reflect the current medication regimen.”
-
Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a))
The inspectors’ words, 263 words
“It is required that the hospice designates a registered nurse member of the IDG to provide coordination of care, ensure continuous assessment of each patient’s and family’s needs, and ensure the implementation of the interdisciplinary plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 14 (14%) records reviewed it was revealed that the hospice agency did not ensure the coordination of care was provided by the registered nurse as part of the hospice interdisciplinary group (IDG). Clinical Record 1: The hospice benefit election date was 01/5/2024. The initial plan of care dated 01/5/2024-04/3/2024 stated in part, “Physical therapy (PT) effective 01/7/2024 one (1) week times (X’s) one (1)”. The record contained no evidence that the patient received a physical therapy visit. In addition, the record did not contain any evidence that the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) was notified that the intervention of physical therapy was not being provided. Clinical Record 6: The hospice benefit election date was 12/12/2023. The patient had a nasogastric (NG) tube on admission. The physician order dated 12/12/2023 stated, “Caregiver and hospice RN to change NG tube every twenty-one (21) days and as needed (PRN). The record contained no evidence that the NG tube had been changed as of 02/20/2024. A joint record review and interview with the Charge Lead Nurse (staff 1) on 02/20/24 confirmed the hospice agency did not ensure coordination of patient care. The Charge Lead RN stated, “I can see the coordination is not reflected in our documentation, but I know we are providing the coordination.””
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 268 words
“It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care reflects patient and family goals, and identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 2 of 14 (14%) records reviewed revealed the hospice agency did not ensure the plan of care contained all problems, goals, and interventions necessary for the palliation of the patient. Document 1: Policy# 7161, titled Hospice-Plan of Care (revised 02/9/2021) sub-section seven (7), stated in part, “The plan of care may include the following: (d) reflects patient and family goals. (e) Identified planned interventions based on problems identified on the initial and updated comprehensive assessments.” Clinical Record 1: The hospice benefit election date was 01/5/2024. The Certificate of Terminal Illness (CTI) stated in part, “Patient may die at any time of aspiration.” The initial RN assessment narrative note completed on 01/5/2024 stated in part, “Struggles with secretions. (Patient name) is orally fed, but can only tolerate soft foods. Patient is at high risk for aspiration”. The Plan of Care dated 01/5/2024-04/3/2024 contained no aspirations-related goals or interventions. Clinical Record 2: The hospice benefit election date 06/14/2022. The initial RN assessment narrative dated 6/14/2022 stated in part, “Receives all medications and nutrition via G-tube.” The plan of care dated 6/14/2022- 09/11/2022 did not contain any problems/goals or interventions related to the G-Tube site care. A joint record review and interview with the Charge Lead RN (staff 1) on 02/20/2024 confirmed the plans of care did not contain the relate goals or interventions.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 207 words
“It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care includes all medical supplies and appliances necessary to meet the needs of the patient. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 1 of 14 (7%) records reviewed it was revealed that the hospice agency did not include all appliances necessary to meet the patient’s needs in the care plan. Document 1: Policy# 7161 titled, Hospice-Plan of care (revised 02/9/2021), sub-section seven (7) stated in part, “The plan of care may include the following: (f) Includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness, including the following: medical supplies and appliances”. Clinical Record 7: The hospice benefit election date was 10/10/2023. The initial RN comprehensive assessment dated 10/10/2023 sub-section equipment and supplies stated in part, “Ventilator.” Sub-section eligibility criteria stated in part, “Vent dependent with no respiratory drive.” Sub-section narrative stated in part, “Ventilator DME provider (name) were present, and assessed parents in setting up vent with the connection.”. “ The plan of care dated 10/10/2023- did not contain the ventilator or contain ventilator settings. The sub-section DME stated in part, “Pediatric supplies”. The medication section stated in part, “Oxygen one (1) liter ventilator”.”
-
Services (42 CFR 418.100(c)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 208 words
“It is required that the hospice is primarily engaged in providing the following care and services in a manner consistent with accepted standards of practice that include occupational therapy and speech-language pathology services. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, interview and personnel record review. A review of personnel records and contracted vendors revealed the hospice agency did not ensure occupational therapy and speech therapy services were made available either under an arrangement or provided directly by staff, to patients under the hospice agency’s care. Document 3: Policy# 7663556, titled Scope of Services (last review 02/27/2023), sub-section (F) stated in part, “An interdisciplinary Group of professionals will develop a plan of care, which will include the following services as appropriate: six (6) therapists (physical, occupational, and speech)”. A joint personnel record review and document review with the Administrator/Director of Nursing (staff 10) on 02/21/2024 confirmed the hospice agency did not have an occupational therapist or speech therapist on staff or under a contractual arrangement. A document review of personnel records and contracted vendors revealed the hospice agency did not ensure occupational therapy services and speech therapy services were made available either under an arrangement or provided by staff to patients under the hospice agency’s care.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 388 words
“It is required that a patient’s clinical record includes, at a minimum physician orders. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 4 of 14 (29%) records reviewed it was revealed that the hospice agency did not ensure the patient’s clinical record contained all physician orders. Document 2: Policy# 9897, titled Content of Record (no revision date), stated in part, “The patient’s clinical record includes four (4) point (.) eleven (11) (4.11) appropriate, current, and signed medical orders by the physician, in compliance with regulatory and accrediting bodies.” Clinical Record 2: The hospice benefit election date was 6/14/2022. The initial RN assessment was dated 6/14/2022. The subsection integumentary stated in part, “wounds.” The narrative sub-section stated in part, “Receives all medications and nutrition via G-tube.” The record did not contain any physician orders for wound care or G-tube site care as of 2/22/2024, the date of review. Clinical Record 3: The hospice benefit election date was 05/25/2022, and the patient was admitted to the hospice agency on a ventilator. The initial RN assessment sub-section stated, “Switched to a home vent on 04/21/2022”. The record did not contain any physician orders for the ventilator settings or coordination documentation between the hospice agency and the DME provider as to what the ventilator settings were.” The RN visit on 01/11/2024 stated in part, “Discussed with pulmonology the family’s desire to never use the ventilator again. DME company contacted. The ventilator was removed from the home”. The record did not contain a physician order to discontinue the ventilator. Clinical Record 6: The hospice benefit election date of was 12/12/2023. The patient had a nasogastric (NG) tube on admission where the RN stated in comprehensive assessment sub-section gastrointestinal the patient received seventy-three (73) milliliters (ml) of breast milk every three hours (did not specify route). There was no physician order for the amount of breast milk to be administered and the route. Clinical Record 13: The hospice benefit election date was 10/17/2023. The RN assessment completed on 11/16/2023 stated in part, “Parents continue to straight cath (name).” The record did not contain a physician’s order for straight catheterization. A joint record review and interview with the Charge Lead RN (staff 1) on 02/22/2024 confirmed the clinical records did not contain all of the physician’s orders.”
-
Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 245 words
“It is required that the hospice obtains a criminal background check on all hospice employees who have direct patient contact or access to patient records. Hospice contracts require all contracted employees with direct patient contact or access to patient records to obtain criminal background checks. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review and interview. A review of the agency’s contracts revealed multiple contracts were missing the criminal background clause of contracted employees with direct patient contact or access to the patient records to obtain criminal background checks. Contract 1: The agency contract for general inpatient and respite levels of care was titled, Service Agreement Between Hospice and Hospital, and had an effective date “blank.” Neither party signed the contract. The agreement did not contain the criminal background check clause. Contract 3: The agency contract for the Durable Medical Equipment Supplier agreement effective 2021 did not contain the criminal background check clause. A joint document review and interview with the Director of Nursing/Administrator (staff 10) on 02/22/2024 confirmed the contracts did not contain the criminal background check clause. A review of the agency’s contracts revealed multiple contracts were missing the criminal background clause of contracted employees with direct patient contact or access to the patient records to obtain criminal background checks. Specifically, the agreement between the Hospice agency and the GIP/Respite provider did not contain the criminal background check clause. In addition, the DME contract did not contain the criminal background check clause.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2024 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner | 8 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since May 7, 2021.
- Ownership: non-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 77% at home, 23% elsewhere.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Beaumont Health owns 100% directly since Sep 1, 2014.
- Corewell Health runs it.
- 20 owners or officers are people: Chad M Tuttle (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Kimberly Howe (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Shikha Rani Kalra (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Whitney Eckhoff (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Robert Skandalaris (corporate director, 0%); Barbara J Pilarski (corporate director, 0%); Marija J Grahovac (corporate director, 0%); Chad M Tuttle (corporate director, 0%); Mary Kosch (corporate director, 0%); Mona Makki (corporate director, 0%); Matthew E Cox (corporate officer, 0%); Lamont Yoder (corporate director, 0%); Robert James Welsh (corporate director, 0%); Warren E Rose (corporate director, 0%); Mark D Davidoff (corporate director, 0%); Nicholas P Gates (corporate director, 0%); Faye A Nelson (corporate director, 0%); Shane O’donnell (corporate director, 0%); Anthony Stallion (corporate director, 0%); Linda Little (corporate director, 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beaumont Health | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Sep 1, 2014 |
| Corewell Health | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Feb 1, 2022 |
| Corewell Health | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | 100% | Feb 1, 2022 |
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 40 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 48033, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 8.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Gentiva I | 15 |
| Assured Hospice Care, Inc. | 4 |
| Corewell Health Children’s Patch Program This hospice | 8 |
| Hospice of Southeastern Michigan, Inc. | 8 |
| Universal Hospice Care | 37 |
| St Marie’s | 2 |
| Parrish Palliative and Hospice Care, LLC | 6 |
| Henry Ford Hospice | 2 |
| Michigan Palliative and Hospice Care | Not given |
| Mclaren Hospice | 1 |
| Angela Hospice Home Care, Inc. | 9 |
| Advisacare Hospice | 38 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.