Hearth Record

Covenant at Home

A hospice in Saginaw, Michigan 48602

515 N Michigan Ave, Saginaw, Michigan 48602. (989) 799-6020.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

12 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 25 hospices serving ZIP code 48602 had 11.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 30, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

12 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jan 30, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care12 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 14 of 19 charts reviewed (Patient #1-#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment takes into consideration the imminence of death. Patient’s #1-#14: There was no evidence in patient record that the comprehensive assessment takes into consideration the imminence of death.”

    Rule L0528. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 534 words

    “Upon patient record review, 14 of 19 record reviewed (Patient #1-#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #1-#14: The record indicated multiple medications on the medication profile. There was no evidence in the record of drug side effects and or drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring that was done on admission and consistently with new medication orders. Patient #1: The record indicated on the medication profile acetaminophen 1,000mg po Q8hours prn fever/pain and acetaminophen 650mg po Q4hours prn fever/pain. There was no evidence in the record of maximum allowable dose in 24 hours. COS. In addition: The record indicated on the medication profile morphine10mg - 40mg po Q2hours prn dyspnea/pain. There was no evidence the prescriber included direction on a frequency range and the standing orders and or Policy Number: H3.40 Medication Regimen Management does not include direction on a frequency range and or an established procedure to include decision making. The decision making cannot be left to a non prescriber. Patient #2: Upon home visit, the medication profile indicated Albuterol (Ventolin HFA) 108 (90 base) mcg/ACT HFA Inhaler 2 puffs by inhalation every 6 hours as needed for COPD. This medication was not on the facility medication profile. COS. Patient #4: The record indicated on the medication profile Morphine 10mg - 40mg po Q2hours prn dyspnea/pain. There was no evidence the prescriber included direction on a frequency range and the standing orders and or Policy Number: H3.40 Medication Regimen Management does not include direction on a frequency range and or an established procedure to include decision making. The decision making cannot be left to a non prescriber. Patient #5: The record indicated on the medication profile Morphine 10mg - 40mg po Q2hours prn dyspnea/pain. There was no evidence the prescriber included direction on a frequency range and the standing orders and or Policy Number: H3.40 Medication Regimen Management does not include direction on a frequency range and or an established procedure to include decision making. The decision making cannot be left to a non prescriber. Patient #7: The record indicated on the medication profile Morphine 10mg - 40mg po Q2hours prn dyspnea/pain. There was no evidence the prescriber included direction on a frequency range and the standing orders and or Policy Number: H3.40 Medication Regimen Management does not include direction on a frequency range and or an established procedure to include decision making. The decision making cannot be left to a non prescriber. Patient #12: The record indicated in the IDT noted on 01/22/25 the patient was using OTC Bio freeze to his neck. There was no evidence of this medication on the medication profile, In addition, the record indicated on the medication profile hydrocortisone Topical 1 % gel 1 application 3 times daily for itching. There was no amount of medication or a site location as to where the medication should be applied. COS.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 199 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 records reviewed (Patient #4, #9, #13, #14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient #4: The record indicated the patients hospice start of care was on 01/02/25. There was no evidence of a bereavement assessment at the time of the survey. COS. Patient #9: The record indicated the patients hospice start of care was on 11/05/24. There was no evidence of a bereavement assessment at the time of the survey. COS. Patient #13: The record indicated the patients hospice start of care was on 12/17/24. There was no evidence of a bereavement assessment at the time of the survey. COS. Patient #14: The record indicated the patients hospice start of care was on 06/26/24. There was no evidence of a bereavement assessment at the time of the survey. COS.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 114 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 records reviewed (Patient #4) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #4: The record indicated the patient was admitted on 01/02/25 and was a full code. There was no evidence of an individualized written plan of care based on this problem identified in the comprehensive assessment. COS.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 468 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 records reviewed (Patient #1, #4, #5, #6, #7, #12) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1: The record indicated an order for acetaminophen 1,000mg po Q8hours prn fever/pain and acetaminophen 650mg po Q4hours prn fever/pain. There was no evidence in the record of maximum allowable in 24 hours. COS. In addition: The record indicated an order for morphine10mg - 40mg po Q2hours prn dyspnea/pain. There was no evidence the prescriber included direction on a frequency range. The standing orders and or Policy Number: H3.40 Medication Regimen Management does not include direction on a frequency range and or an established procedure to include decision making. The decision making cannot be left to a non prescriber. Patient #4: The record indicated an order for morphine10mg - 40mg po Q2hours prn dyspnea/pain. There was no evidence the prescriber included direction on a frequency range. There was no evidence the prescriber included direction on a frequency range and the standing orders and or Policy Number: H3.40 Medication Regimen Management does not include direction on a frequency range and or an established procedure to include decision making. The decision making cannot be left to a non prescriber. Patient #5: The record indicated an order for morphine10mg - 40mg po Q2hours prn dyspnea/pain. There was no evidence the prescriber included direction on a frequency range. There was no evidence the prescriber included direction on a frequency range and the standing orders and or Policy Number: H3.40 Medication Regimen Management does not include direction on a frequency range and or an established procedure to include decision making. The decision making cannot be left to a non prescriber. Patient #6: The record indicated an MD order on 01/03/25 for a foley catheter: #16-#18 foley catheter with 5-30cc balloon straight drainage prn change catheter monthly or prn may irrigate with 30-60ml normal saline prn. There was no evidence of what type of solution to put in the balloon. COS. Patient #7: The record indicated an order for morphine10mg - 40mg po Q2hours prn dyspnea/pain. There was no evidence the prescriber included direction on a frequency range. There was no evidence the prescriber included direction on a frequency range and the standing orders and or Policy Number: H3.40 Medication Regimen Management does not include direction on a frequency range and or an established procedure to include decision making. The decision making cannot be left to a non prescriber. Patient #12: The record indicated an order for hydrocortisone Topical 1 % gel 1 application 3 times daily for itching. There was no amount of medication or a site location as to where the medication should be applied. COS.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 14 of 19 records reviewed (Patient #1-#14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient #1-#14: The record indicated the patient was receiving supplies that were necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness. None of the supplies such as adult wipes, under pads, briefs, diapers, gloves, toothettes, and/or gloves were documented in the plan of care. All were COS.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 records reviewed (Patient #1) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #1: The record indicated the IDG did not ensure the intervention written in the plan of care on 5/3/24 which stated the aide supervisory visit will be done Q14 days or less. The aide supervisory visit was missed on 01/22/25.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 96 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 records reviewed (Patient #1) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient #1: The record indicated there was an aide supervisory visit due and completed on 01/08/25. There was no evidence of an aide supervisory visit’s on 01/09/25 through 01/22/25.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. The annual report for 2024 did not meet the 5%, it was currently documented at 3.25%.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 19 records reviewed (Patient #15) did not evidence that each patient record contains physician orders. Patient #15: The record indicated the patient entered a non contracted facility and was discharged. There was no evidence of a discharge order on the chart prior to the discharge on 07/10/24.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 96 words

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 records reviewed (Patient #3) did not have evidence that the hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider (nursing facility or hospice) is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in the hospice plan of care. Patient #3: The record indicated the patient had an active wound on his coccyx. There was no evidence listed in the intervention on 4/24/24 as to which nurse (hospice or facility nurse) would measure the wound weekly. COS.”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 142 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 records reviewed (Patient #3) did not have evidence that the hospice provided the following information: • The most recent hospice plan of care specific to each patient • Hospice election form and any Advance Directives specific to each patient • Physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness specific to each patient • Names and contact information for hospice personnel involved in hospice care of each patient • Instructions on how to access the hospice’s 24-hour on-call system • Hospice medication information specific to each patient • Hospice physician and attending physician (if any) orders specific to each patient Patient #3: The record indicated the patient was admitted to hospice services on 01/18/24. There was no evidence of certifications and or recertifications on the facility chart at the time of the surveyor’s home visit. COS.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 30, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care12 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 27, 1986.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 20.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 99.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 65% at home, 21% in assisted living, 14% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day20.2 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8%
Visits near death99.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 8 owners or officers are people: Diane Marie Glasgow (corporate director); Diane Marie Glasgow (managing employee (on the payroll)); Cory Niederstadt (managing employee (on the payroll)); Adam Tompa (corporate officer); Patrice Lanczak (corporate director); Michael Fiore (corporate director); Kevin S Albosta (corporate director); Matthew David Deibel (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 87% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.72% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 87.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 25 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 48602, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 11; this one had 12.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.