Hearth Record

Harbor Hospice

A hospice in Muskegon, Michigan 49441

1050 West Western Avenue, Suite 400, Muskegon, Michigan 49441. (231) 728-3442.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 15 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

15 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 20 hospices serving ZIP code 49441 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 13, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

15 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

15 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 13, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission15 deficiencies
  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(2))

    “Observed in Document Review. In review of the patient handbook as part of the admission packet it was noted that the organization did not inform the patient of and provide the patient with written information about its policies on advance directives, including a description of any state law concerning advance directives. This was noted in review of the admission handbook provided to the surveyor as well as in review of documents in home visits #1, 2 and 3. This was discussed with and confirmed by the Quality Director.”

    Rule L0503. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 287 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 3 patient records reviewed, it was noted that stated goals were not measurable or specific. For example, in IPU record review #1 a goal was stated as follows: Pain to be managed to satisfaction through end of life. Anxiety will be managed to patient satisfaction. In IPU record review #2 a goal was stated as follows: Pt will achieve and maintain optimal physical comfort. This was discussed with the IPU director. Observed in Record Review. In 7 of 20 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the stated goals on the plan of care were not specific or measurable. For example, in record review for home visit #6 the goals were stated as follows: Pt will report satisfaction with pain control and verbalize satisfaction with pain level. In record review #1 there was a goal stated as , Pt will have optimal breathing pattern through end of life and will be free of complications related to aspiration. In record review #3 goals were stated as Pt will have optimal breathing pattern and optimal urinary pattern. In record review #3 there were goals stated as Pt will have adequate cardiac function and verbalize acceptable comfort of respiratory status. In record review #5 the goals were stated as Pt will have optimal skin integrity maintained and Pain issues will be met to patient satisfaction. In record review #7 a goal was stated as pt will verbalize satisfaction of treatment for nausea and pt will verbalize satisfaction with nutrition and hydration and control of blood sugars through end of life. In record review #9 a goal was stated as pt will have optimal sleep. This was confirmed by the Director of Clinical Services.”

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 185 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 20 patient records reviewed, it was noted that in review of record for home visit #3 there were no wound care orders on the plan of care for a patient with three wounds. Review of five skilled nurse visit notes indicated that the nurse was cleansing the wound with wound cleanser and applying xeroform gauze twice weekly. There was only an order to cleanse wound #1 with wound cleanser and the dressing was To be determined based on wound healing with no frequency for changing the dressing. In another example for record review #2 there were no orders for wound care in which the nurse documented providing wound care with xeroform dressing. This was confirmed by the Director of Clinical Services. Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, for patients who were discharged it was noted that there were no discharge orders. This was noted in discharge record review #1 who revoked care and for discharge record #2 who elected to transfer to another hospice. This was confirmed by the Director of Clinical Services.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d ))

    The inspectors’ words, 137 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 20 patient records reviewed, It was noted that in review of record for home visit #3 there was no documentation during the IDT meetings for the last two months that included revisions in the plan of care for a patient with three wounds which deteriorated to include purulent drainage and foul odor. In another example, it was noted in review of record for home visit #5 the plan of care was not updated to include a new development of cellulitis in bilateral lower legs for which an antibiotic was prescribed. In another example, in record review for home visit #6 it was noted that the plan of care was not updated to include sleeping issues for which sleep medication was increased. This was confirmed by the Director of Clinical Services.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 20 patient records reviewed, it was noted that in review of record for home visit #2 the aide did not communicate with the RN regarding the fact that the patient declined personal care tasks for more than two months. This was discussed with the Director of Patient Care.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Education (42 CFR 418.60(c))

    “Observed in Document Review. During review of patient education materials in the admission packet and patient handbook it was noted that there was no education provided for respiratory hygiene practices. This was confirmed by the Quality Director.”

    Rule L0582. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 12 patient records reviewed, where hospice aide services were provided it was noted in review of record for home visit # 3 the aide plan of care/task sheet did not include any direction regarding the fact that the patient had dressings on both lower extremities. This was discussed with the Director of Patient Care who was present on the visit.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 12 patient records reviewed, for those patients that had hospice aide services provided it was noted that in record review #1 there had been no supervisory in 40 days. In another example for record review #11 it was noted that there had been no supervisory visit documented for a period of 15 days and a period of 23 days. This was confirmed by the Director of Quality assisting with record review.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(3)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 12 patient records reviewed, where hospice aide services were provided it was noted that the supervising nurse did not assess if assigned tasks were being completed. For example, in review of record for home visit #2 and in discussion with the patient it was noted that none of the hands on care activities had been completed in review of notes for the past two months. For example, bathing, skin care, peri-care were assigned tasks however the aide documented that the patient refused these care tasks on every visit. This was discussed with the Director of Quality and Director of Patient Care.”

    Rule L0633. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 138 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 20 patient records reviewed, it was noted that in record review for home visit #4, record review #2, record review #4 and record review #5 the hospice aide documented in multiple visit notes that all of the bath types were completed to include bed bath, partial bath, shower, etc. This was confirmed by the Director of Clinical Services. Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 20 patient records reviewed, It was noted that in review of record for home visit #3 there had been no documentation of wound measurements since the start of care two months ago for a patient with three wounds, with one that was documented as having tunneling. Agency policy is to document wound measurements monthly and as needed. This was confirmed by the Director of Clinical Services.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, who had been discharged from hospice care it was noted that there was no documentation of a discharge summary. This was noted in discharge record #1 for a patient who revoked hospice care and in discharge record #2 for a patient who was elected to be transferred to another hospice. This was confirmed by the Director of Clinical Services.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

  • Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 6 home visits conducted, it was noted that in home visit #2 an oxygen tank was leaning against a grandfather clock unsecured in the living room. In another example, in home visit #6 there were two small oxygen tanks standing upright and unsecured in the living room. This was confirmed by the Director of Patient Care present on the visit.”

    Rule L0702. Standard-level.

  • Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114(a))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 5 of 10 HR files reviewed, it was noted that primary source verification had not been obtained. For example, in review of one Medical Director file, 2 hospice aide files and 2 RN files there had been no verification from primary source since the last renewal in 2023. The record contained only copies of the physical license sent to the staff member. This was confirmed by the HR staff member assisting with the review.”

    Rule L0784. Standard-level.

  • N/a (42 CFR 418.110(d)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Document Review. The organization did NOT have a written interim life safety measures (ILSM) policy or assessment. This was verified by the Residence Manager and Quality Director. The surveyor discussed the Life Safety deficiency with the organization, and it was determined that the following ILSMs will be implemented until the deficiency has been resolved and according to the organization’s ILSM policy:”

    Rule L0827. Standard-level.

  • N/a (42 CFR 418.110(e))

    The inspectors’ words, 91 words

    “Observed in Document Review. The Annual Fire Alarm Inspection and Test documentation from April 2025 and May 2024 did NOT include an INVENTORY of notification appliances (speakers, horns, chimes, and strobes). The report only included a statement that all horn/strobes passed. This was verified by the Residence Manager and Quality Director. Observed in Document Review. The Quarterly test of the dry fire sprinkler low-air supervisory was NOT completed the 2nd and 3rd Quarter of 2024, or the 1st Quarter of 2025. This was verified by the Residence Manager and Quality Director.”

    Rule L0828. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 13, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission15 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 29, 1985.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 11.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 82.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 56% at home, 15% in assisted living, 19% in a nursing facility, 1% in an inpatient hospice, 8% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends11.7%
Visits near death82.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Harbor Hospice Foundation owns 80% directly since Jan 29, 2017; Trinity Home Health Services owns 20% directly since Jan 29, 2017.
  • 14 owners or officers are people: Susan Houseman (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); John T Foss (corporate director, 7%); Connie Learman (corporate director, 7%); David D Wingard (corporate officer, 7%); Kathy Moore (corporate officer, 7%); Kerry Akred (corporate director, 7%); Cheryl Metz (corporate director, 7%); Mishelle M Comstock (corporate director, 7%); Curtiss Babcock (corporate officer, 7%); Jayne Marie Green (corporate director, 7%); Amanda R Bennett (corporate director, 7%); Susan Houseman (corporate director); Gerald A Harriman (managing employee (on the payroll)); Roger Morgenstern (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Harbor Hospice FoundationOwns 5% or more directly80%Jan 29, 2017
Trinity Home Health ServicesOwns 5% or more directly20%Jan 29, 2017

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 91% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 94% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 86.67% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 52.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 20 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 49441, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 15.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.