Hearth Record

Gentiva I

A hospice in South Portland, Maine 04106

310 Broadway, South Portland, Maine 04106. (207) 245-1648.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 16 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

16 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 10 hospices serving ZIP code 04106 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Dec 11, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

16 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

16 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Dec 11, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care16 deficiencies
  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that the hospice informed and provided written information to the patient concerning its policies on advance directives, including a description of applicable state law. Patient 7: There was no evidence that patient received policy on advanced directives.”

    Rule L0503. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 19 (Patient #10, #12) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient 10: No evidence of an initial comprehensive spiritual assessment. Patient 12: No evidence of an initial comprehensive spiritual assessment.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 282 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #4, #6, #7, #8) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 4: The medication profile contained active instructions to administer Doxycycline effective 11/13/25 after agency investigation the course of antibiotics was completed but not removed from medication profile. Corrected. Patient 6: The medication profile contained an order for Atropine with inappropriate administration route of eye for excess secretions. Corrected Patient 7: During medication reconciliation, the facility and hospice medications did not match. The facility medication profile contained order for Lorazepam 0.25ML (0.5MG) to be administered every 4 hours as needed. However, the hospice medication profile contained order for Lorazepam 0.5ML to be administered every 4 hours as needed. The facility medication profile contained order for Lorazepam 0.25ML (0.5MG) to be administered at bedtime. However, the hospice medication profile contained order for Lorazepam 1MG to be administered at bedtime. The facility medication profile contained order for Metoprolol Tartrate 50mg to be administered twice daily. However, the hospice medication profile contained order for Metoprolol Succinate ER 50mg to be administered once daily. The facility medication profile contained order for Mirtazapine 15mg to be administered at bedtime. However, the hospice medication profile contained order for Mirtazapine 7.5mg to be administered at bedtime. Patient 8: The medication profile contained an order for aspercream with no administration location identified. Corrected with order clarification.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #12) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 12: The initial bereavement assessment was completed on 10/2/25 with start of care 9/25/25.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 237 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #6, #7, #8) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 6: The medication profile contained an order for Atropine with inappropriate administration route of eye for excess secretions. Corrected onsite with updated physician’s order. Also, on 10.24.25 RN documented UA was ordered but no evidence of order. Patient 7: During medication reconciliation, the facility and hospice medications did not match. The facility medication profile contained order for Lorazepam 0.25ML (0.5MG) to be administered every 4 hours as needed. However, the hospice medication profile contained order for Lorazepam 0.5ML to be administered every 4 hours as needed. The facility medication profile contained order for Lorazepam 0.25ML (0.5MG) to be administered at bedtime. However, the hospice medication profile contained order for Lorazepam 1MG to be administered at bedtime. The facility medication profile contained order for Metoprolol Tartrate 50mg to be administered twice daily. However, the hospice medication profile contained order for Metoprolol Succinate ER 50mg to be administered once daily. The facility medication profile contained order for Mirtazapine 15mg to be administered at bedtime. However, the hospice medication profile contained order for Mirtazapine 7.5mg to be administered at bedtime. Patient 8: The medication profile contained an order for aspercream with no administration location identified. Corrected with order clarification.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #2, #6) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 2: Nursing documentation upon admission identified patient use of raised toilet seat and shower chair. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected onsite with order. Patient 6: Nursing documentation identified patient use of hospital bed and over the bed table. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected onsite with order.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 10: Order to discontinue SW frequency on 10/27/25, however SW tasks to be completed remain on the plan of care. Corrected on site by updating the plan of care.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #1, #9) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 1: Order for chaplain visit frequency of two visits a month. There was no evidence of second visit made in November. Patient 9: Request made for volunteer visit frequency of two visits a month and entered onto POC. There was no evidence of second visit made in November. Corrected on site with missed visit note.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 172 words

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 14 (Personnel #6) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the following competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient: (This standard applies to all Hospice Aides providing care/service who are directly employed by the hospice or through a contractual agreement.) ·Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other hospice staff. ·Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration ·Safe transfer techniques and ambulation. ·Normal range of motion and positioning ·Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include-- ·(A) Bed bath ·(B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath ·(C) Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed ·(D) Nail and skin care ·(E) Oral hygiene ·(F) Toileting and elimination The other subject areas in this section may be evaluated through written examination, oral examination or after observation of a Hospice Aide with a patient. Personnel 6: Upon review of personnel file, there was no evidence of competency assessment on obtaining temperature, pulse and respirations.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 227 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #1, #3, #6) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 1: Order for aide visit frequency of one time a week, however the aide care plan indicates aide to provide a shower and shampoo on the second visit weekly. Corrected on site with updated aide care plan. Patient 3: RN documentation that aide feeds patient, however there is no task to feed patient on aide care plan. Corrected on site by updating aide care plan. Patient 6: Order for aide visit frequency of twice weekly, however the aide care plan indicates aide to provide a shower on the second and third visit weekly. Corrected with updated aide care plan.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #5) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 5: Order for aide visits two times weekly. There was no evidence of second visit made week of 11/23/25.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. Agency volunteer utilization rate for 2024 was 4.39%. Year to date 3.45%.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(1))

    “Upon personnel record review, 2 of 14 (Personnel #7, #9) did not have evidence the hospice employees and contract employees have received orientation on the hospice philosophy. Personnel 7: Upon review of the personnel file, there was no evidence of contracted therapist having received hospice philosophy orientation. Personnel 9: Upon review of the personnel file, there was no evidence of contracted therapist having received hospice philosophy orientation.”

    Rule L0661. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #6, #13) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient 6: The election form identified the patient elected to receive the Notification of Hospice Non-Covered items upon admission 6/18/24 but was not furnished until 7/2/25. Patient 13: The election form identified the patient elected to receive the Notification of Hospice Non-Covered items upon admission 3/27/25 but was not furnished until 4/3/25.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(C))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #6) did not have evidence that the written policies and procedures for managing controlled drugs was provided and discussed. Patient 6: There was no evidence patient was provided written policies and procedures for managing controlled drugs. Patient had orders for Lorazepam and Morphine since 7/2/24.”

    Rule L0697. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #5) did not have evidence that the hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider (nursing facility or hospice) is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in the hospice plan of care. Patient 5: Wound order written on 12/5/25 did not identify location of wound or facility responsibility. Correct onsite with order clarification.”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 11, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care16 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 4, 2023.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 14.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 98.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 10% at home, 72% in assisted living, 3% in a nursing facility, 14% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends14.6%
Visits near death98.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • New Century Hospice Inc. owns 100% directly since Aug 1, 2021.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); Ann-Marie Carter (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%); William C Ervin (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
New Century Hospice Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Aug 1, 2021
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 11, 2018
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 11, 2018
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Hospice Development Company 2, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 1, 2021
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Dec 22, 2022

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 88% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 83.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 10 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 04106, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 16.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.