Superior Hospice
A hospice in Mansfield, Louisiana 71052
511 Jenkins Street Suite B, Mansfield, Louisiana 71052. (318) 872-2000.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 9 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 8of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean2
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
9 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 10 hospices serving ZIP code 71052 had 1.5.
The last inspection on record was on Sep 3, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
9 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Sep 3, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission7 deficiencies
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 125 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 12 of 12 patient records reviewed, the Hospice Organization failed to ensure that the POC goals had time frames for achieving goals. For example, duringthe RRHV#1, RRHV#2 and RRHV#3 the Hospice Surveyor identified that several of the goals did not include a time frame for achieving the goal. Examples include: RRHV#3: Patient’/Caregiver understands need to report changes in pain level to hospice staff. Pain is managed at a level acceptable to the patient. RRHV#2 : Patient’/Family will seek help from care team as appropriate/when destress.Patient’/Family will demonstrate effective coping skills. RRHV#1:Pain is managed at a level acceptable to the patient. Patient/family are supported during withdrawal of life support. These findings were review, confirmed and discussed with the Director of Nursing.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 331 words
“Observed in Record Review. the Hospice Agency did not ensure the completion of physician orders. For example; during the RRHV#1 the Hospice Surveyor noted incomplete physician orders: Lateral right upper buttock Stage III wound: Cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply saline-soaked collagen dressing to the wound bed, cover with 4x4 gauze, and apply a bordered foam dressing daily and as needed if saturated, until healed; however, the SN visit frequency was scheduled of twice weekly. The order did not identify who was responsible for performing the wound care when the Hospice SN was unavailable, such as a family member or caregiver. This finding was review and confirmed with the Director of Nursing. Observed in Regulatory Review. In 6 of 12 patient records reviewed, the patient receiving duplicative therapy without clear indication for use. For example, in RRNHV #3 the patient medication profile indicates that there were two PRN medications order for pain; however, no perimeters for when the patient should take which was given. For example: Tylenol 8 hour 650mg Extended Release 1 tab every 8 hours PRN PEG TUBE Pain and Morphine Concentrate 100 mg/5ML (20 MG/ML oral solution every 2 hours/PRN Pain. This finding was reviewed and discussed with the Director of Nursing. Observed in Record Review. the Hospice organization failed to ensure complete provider order to the Plan of Care. For example, during the HV#2 the patient’s daughter stated that the patient is giving Isosource 1.5 cal unflavored via PEG Tube three time daily. No order for this intervention in the current plan of care. This finding was reviewed and discussed with the Director of Nursing. Observed in Record Review. In 6 of 12 , the HCO failed to ensure physician’s order for medications, treatments, and/or procedures. For example, during the RRHV#3, the Hospice Surveyor noted that there was no order for changing the patient’s Suprapubic Catheter and/or who or when it is to be changed. This finding was review and discussed with the Director of Nursing.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
“Observed in Record Review. the Hospice Organization failed to ensure order for supplies. For example during the review of RRHV#2, this Hospice Surveyor noted that was no order for patient’s nutrition or related supplies to care for PEG tube. Also, during the review of this same record, this Hospice Surveyor noted that was no order for patient’s Suprapubic Catheter and/or related supplies to care for it. These findings were reviewed, confirmed and discussed with the Director of Nursing.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 132 words
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, the organization failed to provide the patient with care, treatment, or services according to the patient’s individualized plan of care. For example: during the HVRR #1 the Hospice Surveyor identified that physician’s order for wound care was as follows: Lateral right upper buttock Stage III wound: Cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply saline-soaked collagen dressing to the wound bed, cover with 4x4 gauze, and apply a bordered foam dressing daily and as needed if saturated, until healed. However, during the HV#1 the Hospice Surveyor observed that the SN did not apply saline-soaked collagen dressing to the wound bed, but rather the collagen was applied dry to the wound bed. This finding was discussed and reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
The inspectors’ words, 151 words
“Observed in Pharmacy. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, the SN did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes. For example; Prior to initiating wound care, the SN donned two pairs of gloves. The SN removed the patient’s soiled dressing and then removed one pair of gloves before cleansing the wound with wound cleanser and 4x4 gauze pads. After cleansing the wound, the nurse discarded the used gauze and immediately applied the new wound dressing.Following the dressing application, the SN placed the unused wound care supplies back into the supply/storage box while wearing the same gloves that had been used while cleansing the wound and the subsequence application of the new wound dressings.The SN then removed the gloves before removing the disposable bed pad from the patient’s bed and underneath the patient prior to the start of the wound care.These findings were reviewed and discussed with the Director of Nursing.”
-
Clinical records (42 CFR 418.104)
The inspectors’ words, 150 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 12 patient records reviewed, the patient record was inaccurate or contains errors (i.e. conflicts with other documentation). For example, in a visit note completed the last week in August, there was documentation that the patient had no pain in the narrative section; but in another section for the same visit note, it was documented that the patient reported pain, indicating a pain level of 3. Additionally, the it was also documented in the same note that, based on information provided by the caregiver, that the patient’s pain was relieved by rest and prescription pain medication. Review of the medication profile revealed that Morphine was the only medication ordered for pain management. However, during this Hospice Surveyor’s home visit, the patient’s caregiver stated that the patient was not receiving any medication for pain. These findings were reviewed and discussed with the Director of Nursing.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 223 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 12 patient records reviewed, the Hospice failed to ensure that the current medication profile was accurate. For example, during the medication reconciliation section of HV#1, the Hospice Surveyor identified that the following medications were listed on the medication list provided to this surveyor; however, they were not present in the home at the time of the visit and/or the patient’s daughter stated that they had been discontinued by the patient’s physician:a. Amitriptyline 25 mg, one tablet by mouth at bedtimeb. Atorvastatin 20 mg, one tablet by mouth dailyc. Eliquis 5 mg, by mouth twice dailyd. Ferrous Sulfate 324 mg (65 mg elemental iron), delayed-release tablet, one tablet by mouth three times weeklye. Levothyroxine 125 mcg, one capsule by mouth dailyf. Metformin 1,000 mg, one tablet by mouth twice dailyg. MiraLAX 17 grams, by mouth dailyh. Tramadol 50 mg, one tablet by mouth every 8 hoursi. Vitamin C 500 mg, one tablet by mouth dailyj. Zinc Gluconate 50 mg, one tablet by mouth dailyAdditionally, according to the patient’s daughter, the patient was taking the following medication, which was not included on the medication profile:a. Vitamin D: The patient’s daughter was unable to provide the dosage but stated that she administers the medication to the patient once weekly.These findings were reviewed and discussed with the Director of Nursing.”
Dec 5, 2023: follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission2 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 94 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, The hospice nurse surveyor noted (ARR#3) that the nursing assessment indicated that the patient was receiving G-tube feedings; however, there was no evidence that the G-tube insertion site had been assessed. In (ARR#7), the nursing assessment indicated that the patient had a wound; however, there was no indication that the wound was assessed by a hospice nurse when admitted or since (24 days ago). The only information was that the facility staff had reported the wound. This was confirmed with director of nursing.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 469 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 10 patient records reviewed, The hospice nurse surveyor noted (ARR#1) that the medication orders included Acetaminophen, Norco and Morphine as needed for pain and did not indicate the order in which the medications were to be given or for what level of pain the medications were to be used. In (ARR#4), (ARR#6) and (DRR#2) both Tylenol and Morphine were ordered as needed for pain and did not indicate the type of pain or the order to use the medication. This was confirmed with the director of nursing. Observed in Record Review. In 10 of 10 patient records reviewed, The hospice nurse surveyor noted in ten of ten records reviewed that the plan of care and physician orders did not include oral diet orders for all 10 patients. In (ARR#3) the surveyor noted that the patient assessment indicated that the patient was NPO and receiving Jevity via G-tube. The plan of care did not include the NPO order. Also, the surveyor noted in (DRR#1), (DRR#2), (DRR#3), (ARR#6) and (ARR#7), the patient’s were at risk for aspiration; however, the plan of care did not include orders for pureed or thickened liquids were indicated. The surveyor noted that the EMR did not include a locator for diets. This was confirmed with the director of nursing. Observed in Record Review. In 6 of 10 patient records reviewed, The hospice nurse surveyor noted (ARR#3) that the nursing assessment indicated that the patient had a G-Tube; however, there were no orders or interventions on the plan of care for site care. In (ARR#4) the orders for wound care for wounds # 2, #3, and #4, did not indicate how often the wound care was to be done or who would perform the care when the nurse did not visit. In (DRR#2), the assessment indicated that the patient had a wound; however, there were no goals, interventions or wound care orders and the plan of care did not indicate who was to assess and/or perform the care of the wound for this patient in a SNF. I (DRR#3) there were no goals, interventions or wound care orders for a wound to the left toe and the plan of care did not indicate who was to perform wound care for this patient in a SNF. In (ARR#6), the surveyor noted that the plan of care and physician orders did not include goals or interventions for managing a non-stageable tunneling wound of the sacrum and there were no orders for the care of the wound. In (ARR#7) there were no goals, interventions or orders for wound care to a stage 2 wound to her thigh and it did not indicate who was responsible to perform the care for this patient in a skilled. This was confirmed with the director of nursing.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission | 7 deficiencies cited |
| Dec 5, 2023 | Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission | 2 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 1, 2008.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 88.2% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 49% at home, 2% in assisted living, 49% in a nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 12.8 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 4.5% |
| Visits near death | 88.2% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Healthcare Associates of Louisiana LLC owns 64% directly since Jun 26, 2007.
- Healthcare Associates of Louisiana LLC runs it.
- 14 owners or officers are people: Charles Gladney (owns 5% or more through other companies, 68.59%); Charles Gladney (owns 5% or more directly, 11%); Michael Couch (owns 5% or more through other companies, 11%); Matthew Lyon (owns 5% or more through other companies, 10.42%); William Bing (owns 5% or more through other companies, 10%); Charles Gladney (corporate director, 6%); Denis F Kamberov (owns 5% or more directly, 5%); Douglas C Sawyer (owns 5% or more directly, 5%); Robert Massingill (owns 5% or more directly, 5%); Robert Massingill (managing employee (on the payroll), 5%); Christopher S Snead (owns 5% or more directly, 5%); Nell Norwood (owns 5% or more directly); Darlene Richard (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Matthew Lyon (corporate director).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcare Associates of Louisiana LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | 64% | Jun 26, 2007 |
| Healthcare Associates of Louisiana LLC | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | 64% | Jun 26, 2007 |
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 80% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 82% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 82.35% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 45.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 8 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 10 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 71052, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 1.5; this one had 9.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Superior Hospice This hospice | 9 |
| Christus Hospice Shreveport-Bossier | 0 |
| Willis Knighton Hospice of Louisiana | 4 |
| Amedisys Hospice | 17 |
| Hospice of Natchitoches, Inc. | 0 |
| Lifepath Hospice Care Services, LLC | 0 |
| The Carpenter Hospice of Northwest Louisiana, LLC | 1 |
| Gentiva | 16 |
| Bristol Hospice-NW Louisiana | 2 |
| Allegiance Healthcare, LLC | 0 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.