Amedisys Hospice
A hospice in Shreveport, Louisiana 71106
425 Ashley Ridge Blvd Suite 240, Shreveport, Louisiana 71106. (318) 868-8788.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 17 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 8of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean2
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
17 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 14 hospices serving ZIP code 71106 had 1.5.
The last inspection on record was on Apr 24, 2024: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
17 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Apr 24, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care17 deficiencies
-
Arrangement with Other Facilities (42 CFR 418.113(b)(5))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence of contracts/agreements with other facilities/agencies/hospices to receive patients in the event the hospice cannot provide care to their patients during an emergency. Corrected on site.”
-
Primary/Alternate Means for Communication (42 CFR 418.113(c)(3))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Plan communication plan must includes a primary and alternate means for communicating with hospice’s employees. Corrected on site.”
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(4))
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #6, #18) did not have evidence that the patient chooses a health care provider, including an attending physician. Patients #6, #18: Patients are on Medicaid, no evidence of ability to choose a health care provider- including an attending physician.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 163 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #8,#12, #15) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #8: Medication profile dated 1/14/2024 included Voltaren cream 1% topical gel 1inch PRN apply to the area with pain, no evidence of an area to apply. Corrected on site. Patient #12: Medication profile dated 6/29/2023 included Miralax 17GM powder daily oral PRN constipation, there was no evidence of a diluent. Corrected on site. Patient #15: Medication profile dated 4/4/2023 included polyethylene glycol 17 GM daily PO, no evidence of a diluent. Dated 4/4/2023 Beni fiber Dextran oral powder 3GM/3.6GM “per instructions” PRN daily for constipation, No evidence of a diluent.”
-
Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))
The inspectors’ words, 113 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient #13: No evidence of the comprehensive no less frequently than every 15 days. SN visit 3/11/2024, next visit 3/29/2024, 18 days.”
-
Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 134 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #16) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient #16: SN visits 4/12/23, 4/19/23 and 4/25/23 did not have an assessment of wounds that were reported by SNF staff on bil feet, lt ankle and lt breast “covered with foam dressings by facility staff”. On call/triage nurse documented on 4/19/2023 Pt to hospital with wounds per daughters request, No admit, returned back to facility. Requests follow up in am for SOC (pt. was never discharged). Next SN visit made on 4/25/2023.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 149 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #2,#4,#16) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #2: On SOC SN assessment found high risk of falls, No evidence of problem/goals/interventions for falls on POC. Corrected on site. Patient #4: On SOC SN assessment, noted chair bound, mas assist with ambulation and transfers, unsteady on feet. Comorbidity noted past fall with pelvic fracture, no evidence of problem/goals/interventions for falls on POC. Corrected on site. Patient #16: Patient taking Eliquis. No evidence on the POC of problems/goals/interventions or risk of bleeding.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 219 words
“Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #5,#8,#12,#15, #16) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #5: Order dated 3/7/2024 included cleanse wound with iodine cleanser, apply thera-honey, Opti foam dressing and cover with cover derm. There was no evidence of the frequency of this order. Corrected on site. Patient #8: Order dated 1/14/2024 included Voltaren cream 1% topical gel 1inch PRN apply to the area with pain, no evidence of an area to apply. Corrected on site. Patient #12: Order dated 6/29/2023 included Miralax 17GM powder daily oral PRN constipation, there was no evidence of a diluent. Corrected on site. Patient #15: Order dated 4/4/2023 included polyethylene glycol 17 GM daily po, no evidence of a diluent. Dated 4/4/2023 Beni fiber Dextran oral powder 3GM/3.6GM “per instructions” PRN daily for constipation, No evidence of a diluent. Patient #16: Pt resides in SNF. SN notes dated 4/12/2023 included “staff notified of pt. developing blisters to bil. feet, facility covered with foam dressings”. 4/19/2023 and 4/25/2023 included staff notified of pt. developing blisters to bil. feet and lt. breast. Pus draining from lt. ankle, facility covered with foam dressings. No evidence of orders in hospice record.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
The inspectors’ words, 142 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #2, #6, #16) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #2: Diagnosed with Covid19 on 4/8/2024. No inclusion in the POC of problems/goals/interventions for Covid19. IDG on 4/18/2024 did include isolation precautions for patient. Patient #6: Pt coughing up blood, no evidence of this new problem in an updated POC. Patient #16: Pt resides in SNF. SN notes dated 4/12/2023 included “staff notified of pt. developing blisters to bil. feet, facility covered with foam dressings”. 4/19/2023 and 4/25/2023 included staff notified of pt. developing blisters to bil. feet and lt. breast. Pus draining from lt. ankle, facility covered with foam dressings. No evidence problem/goals/interventions of wounds added to POC.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
“Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #6) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #6: SN provided PRN visit for coughing up blood, SN documented “instructed patient to dc medications and just use comfort meds”. No evidence of a physician order to dc medications.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
The inspectors’ words, 96 words
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. Patient #1: After sanitizing hands removed BP cuff and pulse ox from clean bag. After using them and placing on barrier reached back into clean bag for thermometer and stethoscope without re-sanitizing hands. Not following policy PCP-002 “always perform hand hygiene before entering bag”. Patient #3: SN wore same gloves for removing items from clean bag, using on pt. during pt. care, and cleansing items and placing back into clean bag.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 343 words
“Upon patient record review, 8 of 19 (Patient #2, #4, #9, #11, #12, #13, #16, #17) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #2: SOC SN assessment found pt. to be high fall risk, no evidence of fall precautions on aide POC/assignment. Pt diagnosed with Covid19 4/8/2024, no evidence of Covid19 precautions added to aide assignment/POC. Corrected on site. Patient #4: Pt has history of falls, SON assessment at SOC identified unsteady gait, max assist, needs assist for ambulation and transfers, no evidence on the aide assignment of falls risk/precautions. Corrected on site. Patient #9: On SN SOC assessment pt. found to be high risk for falls, no evidence on the aide POC/assignment of fall precautions. Corrected on site. Patient #11: On SN SOC assessment pt. found to have dysphagia, pt. on O2, no evidence on the aide POC/assignment with oxygen or aspiration precautions. Corrected on site. Patient #12: Patient is taking Eliquis, no evidence on the aide POC/assignment for bleeding precautions. Patient #13: Patient is on Aspirin, No evidence of bleeding precautions on the aide POC/assignment sheet. Corrected on site. Patient #16: On SN SOC assessment pt. found to be aspiration risk, and was taking Eliquis. No evidence of bleeding or aspiration precautions on the aide POC/assignment sheet. Patient #17: On SN SOC pt. high risk for falls, on O2. No evidence of O2 or fall precautions on the aide POC/assignment sheet.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))
“Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #13) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient #13: Supervisory visits occurred 3/11/2024 and 3/29/2024, 18 days between visits.”
-
Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))
The inspectors’ words, 108 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that before the recertification period for each patient, the medical director or physician designee must review the patient’s clinical information and provide written documentation that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less. Patient #3: CTI completed by Medical director for BP1, dated 8/18/2023 and signed 8/23/23 included “Mrs. R. is Mr. M. a 89 year old, included pronouns He, Him, His, with a diagnosis of CVA, Vasc. Disease, Liver disease,etc..” Pt is a 79 year old female with Severe Protein malnutrition. The document has been amended, corrected on site.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))
“Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #16) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient #16: No evidence of diagnosis, significant health history, brief description of services provided and ongoing needs, status at time of transfer, pain and symptom management, presence of advance directives, and end of life decisions.”
-
Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 101 words
“Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that the hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider (nursing facility or hospice) is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in the hospice plan of care. Patient #3: Order dated 4/22/2024 included Cleanse pressure ulcer wound with wound cleanser, apply collagen alginate,cover with border dressing, change daily and PRN for soiling or dislodgment. there was no evidence on who was to perform this treatment, patient resides in SNF. Corrected on site.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 123 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that the hospice provided the following information: • The most recent hospice plan of care specific to each patient • Hospice election form and any Advance Directives specific to each patient • Physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness specific to each patient • Names and contact information for hospice personnel involved in hospice care of each patient • Instructions on how to access the hospice’s 24-hour on-call system • Hospice medication information specific to each patient • Hospice physician and attending physician (if any) orders specific to each patient Patient #2: During HV to SNF there was no evidence of physician certification in patients record. Corrected on site.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2024 | Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 17 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 27, 1995.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 11% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.5% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 48% at home, 14% in assisted living, 38% in a nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 11.0 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 11% |
| Visits near death | 94.5% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Amedisys Holding LLC owns 100% directly since May 7, 2012.
- 14 owners or officers are people: Lisa Miciotto (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Lisa Miciotto (managing employee (on the payroll)); Marcus Macip (corporate officer); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer); Bridget R Kaigler (managing employee (on the payroll)); Bridget R Kaigler (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Joni Babineaux (corporate officer); Kristina J Braud (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kristina J Braud (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Jeanne Shingleton (corporate officer); Marilyn V Hirsch (corporate officer); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer); Robert K Saucier (managing employee (under contract)); Richard Sipes (managing employee (under contract)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unitedhealth Group Incorporated | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Aug 14, 2025 |
| Amedisys Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Feb 20, 2015 |
| Amedisys Holding LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | May 7, 2012 |
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 80.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 8 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 14 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 71106, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 1.5; this one had 17.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Christus Hospice Shreveport-Bossier | 0 |
| Amedisys Hospice This hospice | 17 |
| Willis Knighton Hospice of Louisiana | 4 |
| Lifepath Hospice Care Services, LLC | 0 |
| Allegiance Healthcare, LLC | 0 |
| Passages Hospice | 0 |
| Hospice of Natchitoches, Inc. | 0 |
| The Carpenter Hospice of Northwest Louisiana, LLC | 1 |
| Gentiva | 16 |
| Compassus-Ruston | 6 |
| Bristol Hospice-NW Louisiana | 2 |
| Premier Hospice | 2 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.