St Catherine Hospice
A hospice in Garden City, Kansas 67846
602 N 6th Street, Garden City, Kansas 67846. (620) 272-2519.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 19 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 8of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
19 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 7 hospices serving ZIP code 67846 had 10.5.
The last inspection on record was on Feb 27, 2026: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.
2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
19 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jan 16, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission19 deficiencies
-
Quality assessment & performance improvement (42 CFR 418.58)
The inspectors’ words, 143 words
“Observed in Data Session. The surveyor noted the HCO was not able to demonstrate the operation of its QAPI program as evidenced by the HCO was not able to produce the documentation of the program at the time of survey. This observation was reviewed with the Chief Nursing Officer. Observed in Data Session. The hospice surveyor noted the QAPI program did not include indicators that were related to improved palliative outcomes as evidenced by the organization was not able to produce this documentation at the time of survey This observation was reviewed with the Chief Nursing Officer. Observed in Data Session. The surveyor noted the HCO did not have an effective, ongoing, organization wide, data-driven QAPI program as evidenced by the HCO was not able to produce this documentation at the time of survey. This observation was reviewed with the Chief Nursing Officer.”
-
Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. Upon review of all tracer activities, it was noted that there was a pattern of staff failing to follow established organization policy and the governing body/leadership did not ensure that the Conditions of Participation for 418.100, 418.56, and 418.58 were met per policy as determined through observations, documentation, and staff interviews.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 198 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to document a patient specific comprehensive assessment that identified the patient’s need for hospice services. On review of RRHV#1 the documentation noted the patient with a wound to the coccyx yet there was no wound assessment conducted as part of the comprehensive assessment or reassessment. On review of RRHV#3 during home observation there was discussion of a wound to the coccyx, and also documentation in the record of a wound that healed, yet there was no documentation of an assessment of the wound. In RRNHV#5 there was no documentation of vital signs in the initial comprehensive assessment and reassessment yet vital signs are required documentation per organization policy 14721832 for comprehensive assessment and reassessment. Further, the patient had documentation of weight loss and poor appetite yet no assessment of weight or mid arm circumference, and a history of diabetes and no assessment of the endocrine system on admission. In RRNHV#8 there were no vital signs documented on the initial comprehensive assessment as required. There was documentation of multiple skin tears but no documentation of a wound assessment. These observations were reviewed with the RN.”
-
Patient outcome measures (42 CFR 418.54(e)(2))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the patient record was complete, promptly and accurately documented. On review of RRHV#3 there was documentation on the plan of care noting the patient was not on any high risk medications yet the patient was on opioids. Per the RN opioids were considered by the organization to be a high risk medication. This observation was reviewed with the RN.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 310 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of reflect the patient and family goals that were Individualized, specific, measurable, and time-bound. In review of the records almost all goals were noted to not be individualized to the patient’s needs as most of the goals were to noted at the end of the certification period or throughout the certification period. In RRHV#1 an example was an Oxygen safety goal that noted Patient/caregiver will understand ordered oxygen therapy including administration, safety, and care of equipment by return demonstration and reporting any increased needs t/o cert period and Patient/caregiver will demonstrate safe and appropriate use of bedside rails as well as understanding of instruction by return demonstration and report and concerns or needs t/o cert period. In RRHV#2 an example of a non-specific goal that was not measurable or time-bound was Patient/caregiver/family will demonstrate understanding of and ability to manage respiratory symptoms at end of life and Patient/caregiver will demonstrate home colostomy management as evidenced by ability to manage ostomy by end of cert period. In RRHV#3 an example of a goal was MSW will listen, support and be present for patient, caregivers and family. In RRHV#4 an example was Patient/caregiver/family: caregiver and family will verbalize understanding of diagnosis, prognosis, and the appropriate management of the symptoms of terminal diagnosis by asking appropriate questions t/o disease process. In RRNHV#5 a goal was Patient/caregiver/family: patient, caregiver and family will verbalize understanding of medication regimen by/within: by end of first cert period. Patient/caregiver will demonstrate understanding and effective home management of skin conditions: redness by keeping patient clean dry and frequent repositioning was a goal in RRNHV#10 that was not specific and time-bound. Goals that were not specific, measurable, and time-bound were noted throughout all records reviewed. These observations were reviewed with the RN.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 366 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 11 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. On review of RRHV#1 there was documentation that a wound to the coccyx was covered with a Mepilex dressing yet there was no order for Mepilex nor was the dressing reflected in the plan of care. In RRHV#2 there was nursing documentation that the patient had increased pain that required an increased dosage of fentanyl and the social worker documented working on getting the patient Meals on Wheels. Neither of the issues noted in the record were reflected on the plan of care. In RRNHV#5 there was documentation of dysphagia and thickened liquids yet there were no orders for thickened liquids nor were the issues reflected on the plan of care. In RRNHV#6 the documentation noted oxygen use but no oxygen orders. There was also documentation of dysphagia and transitioning to end of life yet the issues were not reflected on the care plan. In RRNHV#7 the documentation noted a foley catheter but no orders for the catheter nor a urinary care plan to guide the care. In RRNHV#8 the documentation noted wound treatment of antibiotic cream with tegaderm but no physicians order for the treatment. In RRNHV#9 there was oxygen use but no oxygen orders. There was documentation of generalized edema that was not reflected on the care plan. In RRNHV#10 there was no order for oxygen but documentation of its use in the record. Further, there was documentation of wound care treatments yet no physicians order for the treatment provided. In RRNHV#12 the documentation noted increased fentanyl from one to two patches yet no physicians order noted in the record for the increase, nor was the increase in pain reflected in the plan of care. In RRNHV#13 the documentation noted a UTI with antibiotics orderd but no infection care plan to guide the care. In RRNHV#14 the patient was admitted at the end of life and documentation noted not swallowing yet the issue was not reflected in the plan of care. These observations were reviewed with the RN.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
The inspectors’ words, 138 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care revisions were based on information from updates to the patient’s comprehensive assessment and addressed the patient’s progress to goals and outcomes. On review of RRHV#2 and RRHV#3 there was no documentation on the patient’s progress toward goals and outcome noted in the record. The plan of care goals and interventions remained the same and unupdated from admission and continued IDT to IDT meeting. In RRNHV#5 all of the goals were noted to be completed by the end of the 1st certification period, yet the patient was in the 2nd benefit period. There was no progress toward goals and outcomes and the goals had not been updated based on the comprehensive assessment. These observations were reviewed with the RN.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure collaboration in the care of the patient and coordinate the efforts to support the goals outlined in the plan of care. On review of RRNHV#12 the documentation noted a change in the patients condition yet there was no documentation that the physician was informed of the change. This observation was reviewed with the RN.”
-
Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(1))
“Observed in Data Session. The surveyor noted the hospice did not use patient care indicator data in the design of its quality assessment and improvement program as evidenced by the HCO was not able to produce this documentation at the time of survey. This observation was reviewed with the Chief Nursing Officer.”
-
Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(3))
“Observed in Data Session. The surveyor noted the governing body did not approve the frequency and detail of data collection as evidenced by the HCO was not able to produce this documentation at the time of survey. The last documented QAPI plan presented by the organization was dated for fiscal year 2021. This observation was reviewed with the Chief Nursing Officer.”
-
Performance improvement projects (42 CFR 418.58(d)(2))
“Observed in Data Session. The surveyor noted the organization failed to document what performance improvement projects were being conducted, the reasons for conducting and the measurable progress achieved as evidenced by the HCO was not able to produce this documentation at the time of survey. There was documentation of an action plan in response to an audit from 2025 yet no further performance improvement plans and no documentation of performance improvement from 2023, 2024. This observation was reviewed with the Chief Nursing Officer.”
-
Executive responsibilities (42 CFR 418.58(e)(2))
“Observed in Data Session. during data management discussion the surveyor noted performance improvement was not organization wide as evidenced by there was no documentation of an ongoing Quality Assessment Performance Improvement program for the hospice. This observation was reviewed with the Chief Nursing Officer.”
-
Executive responsibilities (42 CFR 418.58(e)(3))
“Observed in Data Session. The surveyor noted the hospice governing body did not designate one or more individuals to be responsible for the QAPI program as evidenced by the HCO was not able to produce this documentation at the time of survey. The organization noted that a former employee was responsible for the QAPI program but there had not been someone named as responsible since that time. This observation was reviewed with the Chief Nursing Officer.”
-
Licensed professional services (42 CFR 418.62(c))
“Observed in Data Session. The surveyor noted licensed professionals did not participate in the QAPI program as evidenced by there was no evidence of an ongoing QAPI program documented.”
-
Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(5))
“Observed in HR File Review. In 2 of 6 HR files reviewed, the organization failed to ensure staff competence was assessed and documented once every three years or more frequently as required by organization policy. On review of HR#3 for the Bereavement Coordinator and HR#5 for the Volunteer Coordinator there was no documentation of competency assessment. This observation was reviewed with the Chief Nursing Officer.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 2 home visits conducted, where medication reconciliation was observed, the organization failed to ensure the patient record reflect the patient’s care, treatment, and services. On observation at RRHV#3 there were medications that were noted on the skilled nursing facility medication profile that were not included on the Hospice plan of care. The medication not reflected on the hospice plan of care were, Quetiapine, Senna, Prostat supplement, and Carnation breakfast supplement. This observation was reviewed with the RN and Interim CNO.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, for live discharge, the organization failed to ensure if the patient revoked the election of hospice care or is discharged the patient’s physician was provided with a copy of the hospice discharge summary. On review of RRDC#1, and RRDC#2 there was no documentation that the discharge summary was sent to the patient’s physician. This observation was reviewed with the RN and MSW.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(i))
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the hospice discharge summary included all required elements. On review of RRDC#1, and RRDC#2 the hospice discharge summary only included a reason for discharge and did not include a summary of the patient’s stay, to include treatments, symptoms, and pain management, the patient’s current plan of care, and the latest physician’s orders. This observation was reviewed with the RN.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3)(iii))
The inspectors’ words, 93 words
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 1 home observations in a skilled nursing facility, the organization failed to provide all required information to the skilled nursing facility (SNF) to include the patient’s hospice election form and any advance directives, and the physician certification and recertification of the patient’s terminal illness. On review of RRHV#3 there was a binder provided to the SNF that contained the Plan of Care but lacked the patient hospice election, advance directives, and the certification/recertification of the patient’s terminal illness. This observation was reviewed with the Interim CNO.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2026 | Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission | No deficiencies cited |
| Jan 16, 2026 | Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission | 19 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 20, 1995.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 15.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 1.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 82.5% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 54% at home, 2% in assisted living, 24% in a nursing facility, 20% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 15.1 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 1.1% |
| Visits near death | 82.5% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Commonspirit Health owns 100% directly since Feb 1, 2019.
- Commonspirit Health and Commonspirit Mountain Region run it.
- 21 owners or officers are people: Shawna Rene Roark (corporate officer, 0%); Shawna Rene Roark (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Fred Dierksen (corporate director, 0%); Twilla Lee (corporate director, 0%); Darrin Figgins (corporate director, 0%); Bryan Kent Stucky (corporate director, 0%); Vivian Fankhauser (corporate director, 0%); Jeremy J Presley (corporate director, 0%); P-Jay Patel (corporate director, 0%); Mitch Melfi (corporate director, 0%); Tadd Richert (corporate officer, 0%); Tadd Richert (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Janice Thome (corporate director, 0%); Sheri Shapiro (corporate director, 0%); Katherine Brooks (corporate officer, 0%); Michael D Jackson (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Andrew Gaasch (corporate officer, 0%); Andrew Gaasch (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Merrill Ray Conant (corporate director, 0%); Ricarda Picar (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Ricarda Picar (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commonspirit Health | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Feb 1, 2019 |
| Commonspirit Health | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | 100% | Feb 1, 2019 |
| Commonspirit Mountain Region | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | 100% | Jan 1, 2013 |
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 89.56% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 23.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 8 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 7 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 67846, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 10.5; this one had 19.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| St Catherine Hospice This hospice | 19 |
| Hospice and Homecare of Reno County | 10 |
| Hospice of the Prairie | Not given |
| Hospice Services Inc. | 22 |
| Hospice & Palliative Care at Haysmed | 0 |
| Gentiva | 11 |
| Good Shepherd Hospice | 2 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.