Hearth Record

Hospice Services Inc.

A hospice in Phillipsburg, Kansas 67661

424 Eighth Street, PO Box 116, Phillipsburg, Kansas 67661. (785) 543-2900.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 22 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

22 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 2 hospices serving ZIP code 67661 had 11.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 8, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

22 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

22 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 10, 2023: recertification inspection by the state22 deficiencies
  • Establishment of the Emergency Program (EP) (42 CFR 418.113)

    The inspectors’ words, 612 words

    “Based on review of agency documents, and interview it was determined the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to maintain an up-to-date comprehensive emergency preparedness program plan (EPP). The cumulative effect of this deficient practice has the potential to place patients and staff at risk for harm during an emergency or disaster. Findings Include: 1. The Hospice failed to develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan (EPP) that must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years. (Refer to E0004) 2. The Hospice failed to develop and maintain an emergency preparedness program plan (EPP) based on a facility and community-based all hazards risk assessment (Refer to tag E0006) 3. The Hospice failed to develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan (EPP) that addressed patient population. (Refer to E0007) 4. The Hospice failed to develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan (EPP) that included a process for cooperation and collaboration with local, tribal, regional, State, and Federal emergency preparedness officials. (Refer to E0009) 5. The Hospice failed to develop and implement policies and procedures, based on the emergency plan. (Refer to E0013) 6. The Hospice failed to develop and implement emergency preparedness (EPP) policies and procedures to follow up with on duty staff and patients to determine services that are needed and failed include a policy to inform State and local officials of any on-duty staff or patients that they are unable to contact. (Refer to E0016) 7. The Hospice failed to develop and implement policies and procedures to track the location of on-duty staff and sheltered patients in the agencys care during an emergency. (Refer to E0018) 8. The Hospice failed to develop and implement emergency preparedness program (EPP) policies and procedures to inform State and local emergency preparedness officials about homebound home health patients in need of evacuation. (Refer to tag E0019) 9. The Hospice failed to develop and implement policies and procedures for a means to shelter in place for patients, staff, and volunteers. (Refer to E0022) 10. The Hospice failed to develop and implement policies and procedures for a system of medical documentation. (Refer to E0023) 11. The Hospice failed to develop and implement policies and procedures for the use of volunteers in an emergency or other emergency staffing strategy. (Refer to E0024) 12. The Hospice failed to develop and implement policies and procedures for the development of arrangements with other providers to receive patients in the event of limitations or cessation of operations. (Refer to E0025) 13. The Hospice failed to develop and implement policies and procedures to describe its role in providing care at alternate care sites during an emergency. (Refer to E0026) 14. The Hospice failed to have a communication plan that included all of the names and contact information for hospice employees, entities providing services under arrangement, patients’ physicians, and other hospices. (refer to E0030) 15. The Hospice failed to develop an emergency officials contact list. (Refer to E0031) 16. The Hospice failed to develop and implement emergency preparedness program (EPP) policies and procedures for a communication plan that included methods of sharing information and medical documentation. (Refer to E0033) 17. The Hospice failed to develop and maintain an emergency preparedness program (EPP) training and testing program that is based on the emergency plan, its risk assessment and the communication plan. (Refer to E0036) 18. The Hospice failed to provide initial and annual training of the emergency preparedness policies and procedures to new and existing staff and individuals providing services under arrangement. (Refer to E0037) 19. The Hospice failed to participate in a full-scale community-based emergency preparedness program (EPP) exercise or conduct an annual facility-based functional exercise in the past 2 years. (Refer to E0039)”

    Rule E0001. Condition-level.

  • Develop EP Plan, Review and Update Annually (42 CFR 418.113(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 99 words

    “Based on interview and document review the Hospice failed to develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan (EPP) that must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years. Failure to develop, maintain, review and update at least every 2 years places patients at risk for harm or injury during an emergency situation. Findings Include: On 11/09/23 between at 12:00 PM and 1:00 PM, the Administrator was interviewed about the EPP. The Administrator stated that there was no documented review or update for the EPP. Review of the EPP failed to show a review or update to the plan.”

    Rule E0004. Standard-level.

  • Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment (42 CFR 418.113(a)(1)-(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 111 words

    “Based on interview and document review the Hospice failed to develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan (EPP) that is based on and includes a documented, facility and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach and include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment. This deficient practice has the potential to place patients at risk for harm or injury during an emergency situation. Findings Include: On 11/09/23 between at 12:00 PM and 1:00 PM. the Administrator was interviewed about the EPP. The Administrator stated that there was no Risk Assessment for the EPP. Review of agency documents failed to show a Risk Assessment for the Emergency Preparedness Program.”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level.

  • EP Program Patient Population (42 CFR 418.113(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 111 words

    “Based on interview and document review the Hospice failed to develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan (EPP) that addressed patient population, the services the facility has the ability to provide in an emergency; and continuity of operations including the delegation of authority and succession plan. This deficient practice has the potential to place patients at risk for harm or injury during an emergency situation. Findings Include: On 11/09/23 between at 12:00 PM and 1:00 PM, the Administrator was interviewed about the EPP. The Administrator stated that the Patient Population was not addressed within the EPP. Review of facility documents failed to show Patient Population was addressed the Emergency Preparedness Program.”

    Rule E0007. Standard-level.

  • Local, State, Tribal Collaboration Process (42 CFR 418.113(a)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 152 words

    “Based on interview and document review the Hospice failed to develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan (EPP) that included a process for cooperation and collaboration with local, tribal, regional, State, and Federal emergency preparedness officials’ efforts to maintain an integrated response during a disaster or emergency situation. This deficient practice has the potential to place patients at risk for harm or injury during an emergency situation. Findings Include: On 11/09/23 between at 12:00 PM and 1:00 PM, the Administrator was interviewed about the EPP. The Administrator stated that there was no process for cooperation and collaboration with local, tribal, regional, State and Federal emergency preparedness officials to maintain an integrated response during a disaster for the EPP. Review of agency documents failed to show a process for cooperation and collaboration with local, tribal, regional, State and Federal emergency preparedness officials to maintain an integrated response during a disaster for the EPP.”

    Rule E0009. Standard-level.

  • Development of EP Policies and Procedures (42 CFR 418.113(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 123 words

    “Based on interview and policy review the Hospice failed to develop and implement policies and procedures, based on the emergency preparedness plan (EPP) set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section, that must be reviewed at least every 2 years. The hospice’s failure to develop policies and procedures based on the emergency plan leaves them unprepared for emergency situations. Findings Include: On 11/09/23 between at 12:00 PM and 1:00 PM, the Administrator was interviewed about the EPP. The Administrator stated that there were no policies and procedures based on the EPP. Review of agency documents failed to include policies and procedures based on the EPP.”

    Rule E0013. Standard-level.

  • Hospice Follow up for Staff (42 CFR 418.113(b)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 194 words

    “Based on interview and policy review the Hospice failed to develop and implement emergency preparedness (EPP) policies and procedures to follow up with on duty staff and patients to determine services that are needed and failed include a policy to inform State and local officials of any on-duty staff or patients that they are unable to contact in the event that there is an interruption in services during or due to an emergency. This deficient practice has the potential to place patients at risk for harm during an emergency situation. Findings Include: On 11/09/23 between at 12:00 PM and 1:00 PM, the Administrator was interviewed about the EPP. The Administrator stated that there were no procedures to follow up with on duty staff and patients to determine services that are needed, in the event that there is an interruption in services during or due to an emergency for the EPP. Review of agency documents failed to show procedures to follow up with on duty staff and patients to determine services that are needed, in the event that there is an interruption in services during or due to an emergency for the Emergency Preparedness Program.”

    Rule E0016. Standard-level.

  • Procedures for Tracking of Staff and Patients (42 CFR 418.113(b)(6)(ii) and (v))

    The inspectors’ words, 127 words

    “Based on interview and policy review the Hospice failed to develop and implement policies and procedures to track the location of on-duty staff and sheltered patients in the agencys care during an emergency. This deficient practice has the potential to place staff and patients at risk for harm during an emergency situation. Findings Include: On 11/09/23 between at 12:00 PM and 1:00 PM, the Administrator was interviewed about the Emergency Preparedness Program (EPP). The Administrator stated that there were no policies and procedures to track the location of on-duty staff and sheltered patients in the agencys care during an emergency. Review of agency documents failed to show policies and procedures to track the location of on-duty staff and sheltered patients in the facilitys care during an emergency.”

    Rule E0018. Standard-level.

  • Homebound HHA/Hospice Inform EP Officials (42 CFR 418.113(b)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 154 words

    “Based on interview and policy review the Hospice failed to develop and implement emergency preparedness program (EPP) policies and procedures to inform State and local emergency preparedness officials about homebound hospice patients in need of evacuation. This deficient practice place patients at risk for harm during an emergency situation. Findings Include: On 11/09/23 between at 12:00 PM and 1:00 PM, the Administrator was interviewed about the EPP. The Administrator stated that there was no policy which addressed the procedures to inform State and local emergency preparedness officials about homebound Hospice patients in need of evacuation from their residences at any time due to an emergency situation based on the patient’s medical and psychiatric condition and home environment for the EPP. Review of agency documents failed to show a policy or plan which addressed the procedures to inform State and local emergency preparedness officials about homebound Hospice patients in need of evacuation from their residences.”

    Rule E0019. Standard-level.

  • Policies/Procedures for Sheltering in Place (42 CFR 418.113(b)(6)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “Based on interview and policy review the Hospice failed to develop and implement policies and procedures for a means to shelter in place for patients, staff, and volunteers. This deficient practice has the potential to place staff and patients at risk for harm during an emergency situation. Findings Include: On 11/09/23 between at 12:00 PM and 1:00 PM, the Administrator was interviewed about the Emergency Preparedness Program (EPP). The Administrator stated that there were no policies and procedures for a means to shelter in place for patients, staff, and volunteers. Review of agency documents failed to show policies and procedures for a means to shelter in place for patients, staff, and volunteers.”

    Rule E0022. Standard-level.

  • Policies/Procedures for Medical Documentation (42 CFR 418.113(b)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 142 words

    “Based on interview and policy review the Hospice failed to develop and implement policies and procedures for a system of medical documentation that preserves patient information, protects confidentiality of patient information, and secures and maintains availability of records. This deficient practice has the potential to result in disruption in the continuity of care and patient protected health information being mishandled. Findings Include: On 11/09/23 between at 12:00 PM and 1:00 PM, the Administrator was interviewed about the EPP. The Administrator stated that there were no policies and procedures for a system of medical documentation that preserves patient information, protects confidentiality of patient information, and secures and maintains availability of records. Review of agency documents failed to show policies and procedures for a system of medical documentation that preserves patient information, protects confidentiality of patient information, and secures and maintains availability of records.”

    Rule E0023. Standard-level.

  • Policies/Procedures-Volunteers and Staffing (42 CFR 418.113(b)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 185 words

    “Based on interview and policy review the Hospice failed to develop and implement policies and procedures for the use of volunteers in an emergency or other emergency staffing strategies, including the process and role for integration of State and Federally designated health care professionals to address surge needs during an emergency. Failure to address the use of volunteers in an emergency could adversely impact patient care during an emergency. Findings Include: On 11/09/23 between at 12:00 PM and 1:00 PM, the Administrator was interviewed about the Emergency Preparedness Program (EPP). The Administrator stated that there were no policies and procedures for the use of volunteers in an emergency or other emergency staffing strategies, including the process and role for integration of State and Federally designated health care professionals to address surge needs during an emergency. Review of agency documents failed to show policies and procedures for the use of volunteers in an emergency or other emergency staffing strategies, including the process and role for integration of State and Federally designated health care professionals to address surge needs during an emergency for the Emergency Preparedness Program.”

    Rule E0024. Standard-level.

  • Arrangement with Other Facilities (42 CFR 418.113(b)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 139 words

    “Based on interview and policy review the Hospice failed to develop and implement policies and procedures for the development of arrangements with other providers to receive patients in the event of limitations or cessation of operations to maintain continuity of services for the patients. This deficient practice places patients at risk for the loss of care and services during an emergency situation. Findings Include: On 11/09/23 between at 12:00 PM and 1:00 PM, the Administrator was interviewed about the Emergency Preparedness Program (EPP). The Administrator stated that there were no policies and procedures for agreements with other agencies and facilities for the transfer of patients in the event of an emergency. Review of agency documents failed to show policies and procedures for agreements with other agencies and facilities for the transfer of patients in the event of an emergency.”

    Rule E0025. Standard-level.

  • Roles Under a Waiver Declared by Secretary (42 CFR 418.113(b)(6)(C)(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 137 words

    “Based on interview and policy review the Hospice failed to develop and implement policies and procedures to describe its role, under a waiver declared by the Secretary, in accordance with section 1135 of the Act, in providing care at alternate care sites during an emergency. This deficient practices places patients at risk for the loss of care and services during an emergency situation. Findings Include: On 11/09/23 between at 12:00 PM and 1:00 PM, the Administrator was interviewed about the Emergency Preparedness Program (EPP). The Administrator stated that there were no policies and procedures to describe its role in providing care at alternate care sites during an emergency. Review of agency documents failed to show policies and procedures to describe its role in providing care at alternate care sites during an emergency for the Emergency Preparedness Program.”

    Rule E0026. Standard-level.

  • Names and Contact Information (42 CFR 418.113(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 150 words

    “Based on interview and policy review the Hospice failed to develop and implement a communication plan which included all of the names and contact information for hospice employees, entities providing services under arrangement, patients’ physicians, and other hospices. This deficient practice has the potential to place patients, staff and others at risk for the loss of communication and contact during an emergency situation. Findings Include: On 11/09/23 between at 12:00 PM and 1:00 PM, the Administrator was interviewed about the Emergency Preparedness Program (EPP). The Administrator stated that there was not a communication plan which included all of the names and contact information for the hospice employees, entities providing services under arrangement, patients’ physicians and other hospices. Review of agency documents failed to show a communication plan which includes all of the names and contact information for the hospice employees, entities providing services under arrangement, patients’ physicians and other hospices.”

    Rule E0030. Standard-level.

  • Emergency Officials Contact Information (42 CFR 418.113(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 110 words

    “Based on interview and policy review the Hospice failed to develop an emergency officials contact list. Failure to have an emergency officials contact list during an emergency could lead to harm to both patients and staff if specific Federal, State, tribal, regional, and local emergency preparedness staff or other sources of assistance are not known if the need to contact them should arise. Findings Include: On 11/09/23 between at 12:00 PM and 1:00 PM, the Administrator was interviewed about the Emergency Preparedness Program (EPP). The Administrator stated that there was no emergency official contact list for the EPP. Review of agency documents failed to show an emergency officials contact list.”

    Rule E0031. Standard-level.

  • Methods for Sharing Information (42 CFR 418.113(c)(4)-(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 104 words

    “Based on interview and policy review the Hospice failed to develop and implement emergency preparedness policies and procedures to develop a communication plan that included method of sharing information and medical documentation. This deficient practice places patients at risk for the loss of continuity of care and services. Findings Include: On 11/09/23 between at 12:00 PM and 1:00 PM, the Administrator was interviewed about the Emergency Preparedness Program (EPP). The Administrator stated that there were no policies or procedures for sharing information and medical documentation for the EPP. Review of agency documents failed to show policies or procedures for sharing information and medical documentation.”

    Rule E0033. Standard-level.

  • EP Training and Testing (42 CFR 418.113(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 130 words

    “Based on documentation review and interview, the facility failed to develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training and testing program that is based on the emergency plan, its risk assessment and the communication plan. Failure to develop and maintain an EPP training and testing program has to potential to place staff and patients at risk harm during an emergency situation. Findings Include: On 11/09/23 between at 12:00 PM and 1:00 PM, the Administrator was interviewed about the Emergency Preparedness Program (EPP). The Administrator stated that there was no training and testing program based on the emergency plan, its risk assessment or the communication plan. Review of agency documents failed to show a training and testing program that is based on the emergency plan, its risk assessment and the communication plan.”

    Rule E0036. Standard-level.

  • EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 136 words

    “Based on document review and staff interview, the Hospice failed to provide initial and annual training of the emergency preparedness policies and procedures that are consistent with their roles in an emergency to all new staff, existing staff and individuals providing services under arrangement. This includes any other individuals who provide services on an intermittent basis and would be expected to assist during an emergency. This deficient practice has the potential to place patients at risk for harm during an emergency situation. Findings Include: On 11/09/23 between at 12:00 PM and 1:00 PM, the Administrator was interviewed about the Emergency Preparedness Program (EPP). The Administrator stated that there was no training and testing program for the Emergency Preparedness Program. Review of agency documents failed to show a training and testing program for the Emergency Preparedness Program.”

    Rule E0037. Standard-level.

  • EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 121 words

    “Based on interview and document review the Hospice failed to participate in a full-scale community-based emergency preparedness program (EPP) exercise or conduct an annual facility-based functional exercise in the past 2 years. Failure to participate in or conduct an EPP exercise has the potential to place staff and patients at risk for harm during an emergency situation. Findings Include: On 11/09/23 between at 12:00 PM and 1:00 PM, the Administrator was interviewed about the Emergency Preparedness Program (EPP). The Administrator stated that there was no full-scale community-based emergency preparedness exercise conducted in the past 2 years for the Emergency Preparedness Program. Review of agency documents failed to show full-scale community-based emergency preparedness exercise which was conducted in the past 2 years.”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level.

  • Nursing services (42 CFR 418.64(b)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 145 words

    “Based on interview, record review, and agency policy review, the agency failed to ensure licensed practical nurse (LPN) staff were supervised at least every 30 days by a registered nurse (RN) for 1 (Patient 3) of 3 patients reviewed. Findings Include:Review of an agency policy titled, “;Supervision: Clinical Staff,” with an effective date of 09/2019, revealed, “;2. LPN staff shall be supervised: At least every patient every 30 days by a RN.”Review of Patient 3s record revealed LPN visits occurred on 09/08/23, 09/12/23, 09/15/23, 09/22/23, 09/26/23, 09/29/23, 10/07/23, 10/10/23, 10/13/23, 10/19/23, and 10/24/23 with no supervisory visits made within the 46 days that elapsed between the first and last identified visits. During an interview on 11/09/23 at 3:00 PM, the Administrator stated, “;I know we had trouble getting the supervisory visits coded correctly in the chart so some of the LPN supervisory visits were missed.””

    Rule L0591. Standard-level.

  • Inpatient care provided under arrangements (42 CFR 418.108(c)(5))

    “Based on interview and agency policy review, the agency failed to provide evidence of documented training for personnel who provided direct patient care in a contracted inpatient facility. Findings Include:A review of an undated agency policy titled, “;Written Agreements” revealed, “;[Facility name] provides basic orientation and ongoing training to agencies and providers contracted to provide direct patient care.” During an interview on 11/10/23 at 9:30 AM, the Administrator stated that she could not find any documentation for inpatient unit training.”

    Rule L0715. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 8, 2024Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Jul 4, 2024Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Nov 10, 2023Recertification inspection by the state22 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 9, 1992.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 15.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 3.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 89.6% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 36% at home, 64% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day15.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends3.7%
Visits near death89.6% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 11 owners or officers are people: Rachel Coomes (corporate officer, 100%); Rachel Coomes (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Rachel Coomes (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Douglas E Vahle (corporate director); Lloyd Kent Culberton (corporate officer, 0%); Lloyd Kent Culberton (corporate director, 0%); Kenton L Olliff (corporate director); Joel S Hiesterman (corporate officer); Joel S Hiesterman (corporate director); Troy Mac Phillips (managing employee (on the payroll)); Roxie S Dewitt (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 88% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 94% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 39.5% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 67661, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 11; this one had 22.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 2 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 67661
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Hospice Services Inc. This hospice22
Hospice & Palliative Care at Haysmed0

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.