Hearth Record

Visiting Nurses Hospice

A hospice in Lawrence, Kansas 66044

200 Maine Ste C (3rd Floor), Lawrence, Kansas 66044. (785) 843-3738.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 visit on record, nothing cited. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 22 hospices serving ZIP code 66044 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 9, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 visit on record, nothing cited. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

0 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 17, 2023: recertification inspection by the state3 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 338 words

    “Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the agency failed to complete an initial comprehensive assessment within five days of the election of hospice benefits for 1 (Patient 9) of 19 patients reviewed. This deficient practice has the potential to place patient at risk for not receiving care and services in a timely manner. Findings Include: Review of an agency policy titled, “;Care Planning Process,” revised 05/04/20, revealed, “;Procedure 1. At the time of the initial, comprehensive assessment, the Home Health Team Manager/case manager, along with other involved clinicians, develop the patient plan of care based upon the patients identified needs and review it with the patient and/or family/caregiver(s).” A review of Patient 9s “;Hospice Certification and Plan of Care,” dated 10/10/23, revealed the agency admitted Patient 9 on 10/05/23, with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of lower lobe right bronchus or lung (lung cancer) and secondary malignant neoplasm of the brain (brain cancer). A review of Patient 9s “;Medical Social Worker Visit,” dated 10/05/23, revealed Patient 9 accepted a spiritual assessment from the agency chaplain. A review of Patient 9s entire clinical record revealed no evidence the chaplain assessed Patient 9 within five days of Patient 9s election of the hospice benefit. During an interview on 11/17/23 at 10:30 AM, the Hospice Manager (HM) stated that the agency process was a nurse and social worker admitted a patient and determined if the patient wanted a spiritual assessment from the agency chaplain. Per the HM, if the patient accepted a spiritual assessment, the agency chaplain would assess the patient within five days. The HM confirmed the agency chaplain did not contact Patient 9 within five days of the admission date to complete a spiritual assessment. During an interview on 11/17/23 at 2:15 PM, the Chaplain stated that he had been notified Patient 9 accepted a chaplain visit for an initial assessment of spiritual care needs but lost track of following up and did not complete the assessment within five days of Patient 9s admission to the agency.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 349 words

    “Based on interview, record reviews, and policy review, the agency failed to complete an initial bereavement assessment for 3 (Patients 9, 12, and 16) of 19 patients reviewed. This deficient practice has the potential to place the patient’s family and loved ones at risk for the unmet needs to cope with the death and loss of their loved one. Findings Included: Review of an agency policy titled, “;Hospice Bereavement Services,” revised in February 2018, revealed, “;7. A bereavement file will be maintained on each family/caregiver/unit of care. Each file will contain the following information: A. Initial bereavement assessment B. A bereavement plan of care C. All bereavement clinical notes and other pertinent information regarding the bereaved D. Psychosocial assessment of the Hospice patient indicating bereaved family members and bereavement risk factors.” A review of Patient 9s “;Hospice Certification and Plan of Care,” dated 10/10/23, revealed the agency admitted Patient 9 on 10/05/23, with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of lower lobe right bronchus or lung (lung cancer) and secondary malignant neoplasm of the brain (brain cancer). A review of Patient 9s clinical record revealed no evidence of a completed initial bereavement assessment. A review of Patient 12s “;Hospice Certification and Plan of Care,” dated 08/28/23, revealed the agency admitted Patient 12 on 08/22/23, with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and protein-calorie malnutrition. A review of Patient 12s clinical record revealed no evidence of a completed initial bereavement assessment. A review of Patient 16s “;Hospice Certification and Plan of Care,” dated 03/13/23, revealed the agency admitted Patient 16 on 03/10/23, with diagnoses that included acute on chronic congestive heart failure and acute respiratory distress. A review of Patient 16s clinical record revealed no evidence of a completed initial bereavement assessment. During an interview on 11/17/23 at 10:30 AM, the Hospice Manager stated that the agency policy was staff should complete an initial bereavement assessment during the patients agency admission visit. The Hospice Manager confirmed the agency did not complete an initial bereavement assessment for Patients 9, 12, or 16, and acknowledged the agency did not follow its policy.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 452 words

    “Based on interview, record reviews, and policy review, the agency failed to provide services as ordered in the Hospice Certification and Plan of Care (POC) for 3 (Patients 1, 7, and 10) of 19 patients reviewed. This deficient practice place patients at risk for unmet care needs and services. Findings Include: Review of an agency policy titled, “;Care Planning Process,” revised 05/04/220, revealed, “;4. The care planning decisions should be reflected in the specific services which will be provided and the associated actions planned and implemented to meet individualized patient problems and goals.” A review of Patient 1s “;Hospice Certification and Plan of Care,” dated 09/27/23, revealed the agency admitted Patient 1 on 01/24/23, with diagnoses that included Alzheimers disease and elevated white blood cell count. Per the Hospice Certification and Plan of Care, Patient 1 discipline orders included “;Skilled Nursing; 2 wk [week] 8 wk 7 PRN [as needed]” beginning the week of 09/21/23. A review of Patient 1s clinical record revealed no evidence the agency provided two skilled nursing visits to Patient 1 during the week of 09/21/23. A review of Patient 7s “;Hospice Certification and Plan of Care,” dated 08/28/23, revealed the agency admitted Patient 7 on 08/25/23, with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of prostate and secondary malignant neoplasm of bone. Per the Hospice Certification and Plan of Care, Patient 7 discipline orders included “;Skilled Nursing; 1 wk 1wk; 2-3 wk 12 wk; 2 wk 1 wk” beginning the week of 08/25/23. A review of Patient 7s clinical record revealed no evidence the agency provided at least two skilled nursing visits to Patient 7 during the week of 09/03/23. A review of Patient 10s “;Hospice Certification and Plan of Care,” dated 10/27/23, revealed the agency admitted Patient 10 on 10/25/23, with diagnoses that included mild protein-calorie malnutrition and dementia. Per the Hospice Certification and Plan of Care, Patient 10 discipline orders included “;Skilled Nursing: 2 wk 13 wk 7 PRN” beginning the week of 10/25/23. A review of Patient 10s clinical record revealed no evidence the agency provided two skilled nursing visits to Patient 10 during the week of 10/25/23. During an interview on 11/17/23 at 9:50 AM, the Hospice Manager (HM) stated that the agency expectation was services should be provided as ordered by the patients physician and documented in the patients plan of care. The HM confirmed the agency was to provide Patient 1 two nursing visits during the week of 09/21/23, Patient 7 two nursing visits during the week of 09/03/23, and Patient 10 two nursing visits during the week 10/25/23, and the agency did not provide these visits as ordered in the patients POCs. The HM acknowledged the agency did not follow its policy.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 9, 2024Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Nov 17, 2023Recertification inspection by the state3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 1, 1992.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 78% at home, 11% in assisted living, 10% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.2%
Visits near death97.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 18 owners or officers are people: Kristen Allen (corporate director, 0%); Melinda Ward (corporate officer, 0%); Melinda Ward (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Melinda Ward (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Patrick Brown (corporate director, 0%); Karyn Davis (corporate director, 0%); Mardi Bowlin (corporate director, 0%); Patricia D Neis (corporate director, 0%); Ernesto Hodison (corporate director, 0%); Pamela Morgan (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Nami L Stone (corporate director, 0%); Caitlin Elmore (corporate director, 0%); Jodi M Palmer (corporate director); Steve Ramirez (corporate director, 0%); Nikki Byer (corporate director, 0%); David Thomas (corporate director, 0%); Robert Gillespie (corporate director, 0%); James E Kline (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 83% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 96.71% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 86% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 22 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 66044, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 3.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.