Hearth Record

Ardent Hospice & Palliative Care Southern Illinois, Inc.

A hospice in O’Fallon, Illinois 62269

732 Sussex Way, Ste B, O’Fallon, Illinois 62269. (618) 607-8110.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 14 hospices serving ZIP code 62269 had 3.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 25, 2024: an initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 25, 2024: initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 328 words

    “It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment includes a drug profile that contains the patient’s current prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, supplements; herbal remedies and other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, observation and interview. In 4 of 11 (36%) clinical records reviewed, it was revealed the agency did not ensure the drug profile contained the patient’s current prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, supplements; herbal remedies and other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. Clinical Record 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/18/2024 for the diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The hospice medication profile included the following medication orders, that were not listed on the facility medication profile: order dated 04/04/2024, acetaminophen 650 mg 2 tabs twice daily, for pain; and an order dated 01/18/2024 fluorouracil topical cream applied daily. Clinical Record 3 / Home Visit 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 03/28/2024 for the diagnosis of end-stage renal disease. During the home visit on 04/24/2024, it was observed that the patient was taking Norco 5/325 mg. However, it was not listed on the hospice medication profile. Clinical Record 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/27/2023 for the diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The facility medication profile contained the following medication orders that were not listed on the hospice medication profile: order dated 12/28/2023 for hyscomine 0.125 mg q every four hours, as needed; and order dated 3/3/2024 for tylenol suppository 650 mg. Clinical Record 9: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 2/12/2024 for the diagnosis of atherosclerotic heart disease. The initial nursing assessment dated 02/12/2024, documented the patient on continuous oxygen at 5 liters per minute. The oxygen was not listed on the medication profile. During an interview and joint record review with the Administrator and Alternate Administrator on 04/24/2024, it was confirmed the medication profiles did not contain all current prescriptions.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 199 words

    “It is required that the comprehensive assessment includes an initial bereavement assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals, focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 11 (27%) clinical records reviewed, it was revealed that the agency did not ensure an initial bereavement assessment was completed. Clinical Record 6: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/21/2023 for the diagnosis of atherosclerotic heart disease. Clinical record review indicated there was no evidence an initial bereavement risk assessment was completed. Clinical Record 9: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/12/2024 for the diagnosis of atherosclerotic heart disease. Clinical record review revealed there was no evidence an initial bereavement assessment was completed. Clinical Record 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/20/2024 for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Clinical record review revealed there was no evidence an initial bereavement risk assessment was completed. During an interview and joint record review with the Administrator and Alternate Administrator on 4/24/2024, it was confirmed an initial bereavement assessment was not completed.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 379 words

    “It is required that the Interdisciplinary Group, in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician (if any), reviews, revises, and documents the individualized care plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 11 (27%) clinical records reviewed, it was revealed that the agency did not ensure the individualized plan of care (POC) was revised as frequently as the patient’s condition required. Clinical Record 6: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/21/2023 for the diagnosis of atherosclerotic heart disease. The patient died on 1/27/2024. A nursing visit dated 01/25/2024 stated in part, “Patient continuing to decline. No food or boost since 01/20/2024. Symptoms remain palliated.” The initial plan of care was dated 12/21/2023. There was no evidence the plan of care was reviewed and revised since admission. Clinical Record 8: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/18/2023 for the diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The initial plan of care dated 12/18/2023 included the following relevant goals: “Agitation. Patient will have lessened signs of anxiety or agitation and dyspnea. Patient will be able to breathe comfortably.” On 01/01/2024, there was an on-call nursing visit for complaints of shortness of breath, which stated in part, “Possibly COVID.” On 01/02/2024, an on-call nursing visit stated in part, “Agitation and yelling out.” The nursing visit on 01/04/2024 stated in part, “Patient in recliner agitated and restless. PPS 20%. Continues with decline.” On 01/05/2024, an on-call nursing visit stated the patient was “actively dying.” The plan of care was dated 12/18/2023. There was no evidence the plan of care was reviewed and revised since admission. Clinical Record 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/20/2024 for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. A nursing visit dated 01/26/2024 stated in part, “Patient has had a decline since 01/23/2024, she is no longer able to ambulate or assist with transfers, appetite has decreased significantly and only takes bites of offered meals.” There was no evidence the plan of care was reviewed and revised since admission. During an interview and joint record review with the Administrator and Alternate Administrator on 4/24/2024, it was confirmed the care plans had not been updated with the changes identified in the comprehensive assessments.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 172 words

    “It is required that written patient care instructions for a hospice aide are prepared by a RN (registered nurse) who is responsible for the supervision of the hospice aide. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 4 (25%) clinical records reviewed in which hospice aide services were accepted, it was revealed that the agency did not ensure the registered nurse provided specific instructions for the hospice aide. Clinical Record 4: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/31/2024 for the diagnosis of cerebral infarction. The initial nursing assessment and plan of care dated 01/31/2024 included an order for Keppra 500 mg for seizures. The hospice aide care plan dated 03/27/2024 included the relevant task of showering and assisting with dressing. The aide care plan did not notify the aide of the seizure precautions. During an interview and joint record review with the Administrator and Alternate Administrator on 04/24/2024, it was confirmed the RN did not include seizure precautions on the aide care plan.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 137 words

    “It is required that a patient clinical record contains correct clinical information that is available to the patient’s attending physician and hospice staff. Each patient’s record includes, at a minimum, any advance directives. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 11 (9%) clinical records reviewed, it was revealed that the agency did not ensure the clinical record contained advanced directives. Clinical Record 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/27/2023, for the diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The clinical record did not include any advance directives, code status or physician orders for life sustaining treatment. During an interview and joint record review with the Administrator and Alternate Administrator on 04/24/2024, it was confirmed the clinical record did not include advance directives or indicate code status.”

    Rule L0677. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 25, 2024Initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 6, 2024.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 31% at home, 68% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 7 owners or officers are people: Martha Susan Compton (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Martha Susan Compton (corporate officer, 100%); Martha Susan Compton (corporate director, 100%); Martha Susan Compton (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Martha Susan Compton (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Patrick Nakashima-Moran (managing employee (under contract), 2%); Patrick Nakashima-Moran (corporate officer, 2%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
  • 94.2% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 14 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 62269, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.