Hearth Record

Lifechoice Hospice and Palliative Care

A hospice in Palatine, Illinois 60074

800 E Northwest Hwy, Suite 526, Palatine, Illinois 60074. (847) 777-8888.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 27 hospices serving ZIP code 60074 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 24, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 24, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care6 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 309 words

    “Upon patient record review, 8 of 14 (Patient #1,2,4,5,6,7,8,10) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #1- 3/11/25 Miralax order did not indicate how to mix the powder for administration on the medication profile. Patient #2- 10/23/24 Orders for Lidocaine patch do not indicate where to apply the patch, Miralax order did not indicate how to mix the powder for administration on medication profile. Patient #4- 12/26/24 Acetaminophen 650mg RS Q4PRN, 2/28/25 Tylenol ES 500mg QD and Tylenol PM 500mg QHS, no evidence indicating “Not to Exceed 4000mg or max daily dose”on medication profile. This was corrected on site. Patient #5- Duplicate orders for Sertraline 50mg ordered 3/29/25 and 4/21/25 on medication profile. This was Corrected on Site. Patient #6- 7/5/24 Orders for Tylenol 500mg 2 tabs BID and Acetaminophen 650mg RS Q4 PRN, no evidence indicating “Not to Exceed 4000mg or max daily dose”on medication profile. This was corrected on site. Patient #7- 1/22/25 Acetaminophen 650mg RS Q4PRN, Acetaminophen 325mg 1 tab QD and Acetaminophen 325mg 2 tab BID, no evidence indicating “Not to Exceed 4000mg or max daily dose”on medication profile. This was corrected on site. Patient #8- 3/11/25, Acetaminophen 500mg 2 tabs 3x/day and Acetaminophen 650mg RS Q4 PRN, no evidence indicating “Not to Exceed 4000mg or max daily dose”on medication profile. This was corrected on site. Patient #10- 12/4/24 Acetaminophen 325mg 2 tab Q8 PRN and Acetaminophen 650mg RS Q4 PRN, no evidence indicating “Not to Exceed 4000mg or max daily dose”on medication profile. This was corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 283 words

    “Upon patient record review, 8 of 14 (Patient #1,2,4,5,6,7,8,10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1- 3/11/25 Miralax order did not indicate how to mix the powder for administration on the medication profile. Patient #2- 10/23/24 Orders for Lidocaine patch do not indicate where to apply the patch, Miralax order did not indicate how to mix the powder for administration on plan of care. Patient #4- 12/26/24 Acetaminophen 650mg RS Q4PRN, 2/28/25 Tylenol ES 500mg QD and Tylenol PM 500mg QHS, no evidence indicating “Not to Exceed 4000mg or max daily dose” on plan of care. This was corrected on site. Patient #5- Duplicate orders for Sertraline 50mg ordered 3/29/25 and 4/21/25 on medication profile. This was Corrected on Site. Patient #6- 7/5/24 Orders for Tylenol 500mg 2 tabs BID and Acetaminophen 650mg RS Q4 PRN, no evidence indicating “Not to Exceed 4000mg or max daily dose”on plan of care. This was corrected on site. Patient #7- 1/22/25 Acetaminophen 650mg RS Q4PRN, Acetaminophen 325mg 1 tab QD and Acetaminophen 325mg 2 tab BID, no evidence indicating “Not to Exceed 4000mg or max daily dose”on plan of care. This was corrected on site. Patient #8- 3/11/25 Acetaminophen 500mg 2 tabs 3x/day and Acetaminophen 650mg RS Q4 PRN, no evidence indicating “Not to Exceed 4000mg or max daily dose”on plan of care. This was corrected on site. Patient #10- 12/4/24 Acetaminophen 325mg 2 tab Q8 PRN and Acetaminophen 650mg RS Q4 PRN, no evidence indicating “Not to Exceed 4000mg or max daily dose”on plan of care. This was corrected on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #2,9) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient #2- SN visits on 4/11/25 and 4/16 indicated patient was bed bound with use of hoyer lift and utilizes a broda chair for mobility, no evidence of DME orders on plan of care. This was corrected on site. Patient #9- 4/19/25 orders for oxygen administration, no evidence of DME on plan of care. This was corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #2- On 4/11 and 4/16, SN visit indicated patient was bed bound and used a broda chair for mobility, no evidence of problems, goals, intervention updated on the plan of care.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 353 words

    “Upon patient record review 7 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,6,7,9,10) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #1- On 3/16/25 the aide began giving the patient a bed bath at each visit, but the aide plan of care did not contain this type of bath to perform. Aide visits on 4/9, 4/10, 4/12, 4/14, 4/15 and 4/17 indicated to “assist with feeding”, however no evidence that the task was completed. Aide visits 4/10 and 4/15 indicated on the care plan to perform “bed bath”, however the task was not completed and the aide documented in the summary “patient given an peri wash”. Patient #2-4/21/25 Aide checked task for bed bath “patient/caregiver refused”, however documented in the narrative that a complete bed bath was given. Patient #3-4/14/25 Aide check task for feeding assistance as “no needs”, however documented in the narrative that patient was fed. Patient #6-Aide visits 4/8, 4/11, 4/15 and 4/18/25 the aide checked the task of toileting as “patient/caregiver refused”, however commented “Assisted patient to toilet and incontinence product changed”. The aide checked “completed upon arrival” for change linen, however change linen was not an ordered task. Aide visit 4/11/25 had the tasks completed for Peri Care, Hair care and Skin care, however in the visit comments the aide stated “Family refused any care on the patient”. Patient #7-Aide visits completed 4/11, 4/14, 4/15 and 4/18 indicated linen change was completed, however the task is only ordered 1x/week. Patient #9-Aide visits completed 4/1, 4/4, 4/9, 4/12, 4/16 and 4/18/25 the aide did not complete the ordered tasks for Oral Care, Back Rub, Tidy patient area and Feeding assistance, no evidence of why the task was not completed. Patient #10-Aide visits completed on 4/3, 4/4 and 4/6/25 the aide did not complete the ordered tasks for shampoo hair and provide companionship, no evidence of why the tasks were not completed.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #9) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice aides report: • Changes in the patient’s medical, nursing, rehabilitative, and social needs to a registered nurse, as the changes relate to the plan of care and quality assessment and improvement activities • Hospice aides must also complete appropriate records in compliance with the hospice’s policies and procedures Patient #9-Aide visits on 4/16 and 4/19/25 indicated the patient has pain during the visit, no evidence of pain reported to RN. 4/18/25 Aide visit indicated “patient with rash on vulva, spreading to butt”, no evidence of reporting to the RN.”

    Rule L0628. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 24, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care6 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 25, 2019.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 46% at home, 33% in assisted living, 17% in a nursing facility, 4% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.7%
Visits near death94.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 7 owners or officers are people: Alexander Roshko (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Alexander Roshko (corporate officer, 100%); Alexander Roshko (corporate director, 100%); Alexander Roshko (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Alexander Roshko (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Vrati Parikh (managing employee (under contract)); Alena Galitskaya (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 86% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 97.94% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 74.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 27 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 60074, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 6.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.