Hearth Record

Accord Hospice

A hospice in Deerfield, Illinois 60015

400 Lake Cook Rd, Suite 223, Deerfield, Illinois 60015. (847) 780-4594.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 13 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

13 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 23 hospices serving ZIP code 60015 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 30, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

13 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

13 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jan 30, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care12 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 162 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #5, 15) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #5: Admitted with indwelling Foley catheter. No related problems, goals, interventions. Patient #10: Per initial SN assessment includes that patient needs supplemental continuous oxygen when up; at rest, she needs it from time to time. Further references that patient has history of SpO2 in 70’s. There is no related problems, goals, interventions. Patient 15: Patient has order for Oxygen 2-5 LPM NC with no related problems, goals, interventions. There is a Respiratory problem, but it does not include Oxygen and/or related education/safety precautions as intervention.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 184 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #1, 5, 6, 9, 11) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patients #5, 6: The POC only includes frequency of SC 3 prn as needed for the initial and ongoing frequency. This is not a detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs. Patient #1, 9, 11: The POC only includes frequency of MSW 3 prn as needed for the initial and ongoing frequency. This is not a detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #10: Per initial SN assessment includes that patient needs supplemental continuous oxygen when up; at rest, she needs it from time to time. Further references that patient has history of SpO2 in 70’s. There is no order for oxygen other than concentrator in DME.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #7: Patient admitted 11/6/24 and experienced conjunctivitis requiring Tobramycin eye drops 12/5 and again 12/15/24. There were no updates to problems, goals, interventions.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 206 words

    “Upon client record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #2, 7, 9, 16) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #2: Admitted 11/16/24. Order for music therapy volunteer 2x/mo since initial POC and thru 1/22/25. The notes in record are notes for massage therapy volunteer 11/26 and 12/10/24. There are no additional notes and there is no order to discontinue or evidence that further services were declined. Patient #7: SN Visits 12/16, 12/23, 12/30/24 - SN noted that hip bones and sacral bone covered with Duoderm to prevent any breakdown. No further reference in SN Visit notes 1/6, 1/13, 1/20/25 visits. There are no orders to start, change or stop the Duoderm treatment. Patient #9: A single volunteer visit is documented 12/9/24. There is no order to start or discontinue and no evidence that further visits were declined. Interview with staff state this was a training visit and actually should not have been documented in EMR as actual volunteer visit. Patient #16: Admitted 3/21-6/17/25 with MSW frequency of 1-2/month and duration of 90/qtr. Only 1 visit was made 3/21/24 with no update to orders/POC and no documented decline of further visits.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 174 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #17, 18, 19) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patients# 17. 18, 19: The bereavement services offered and/or care plan do not clearly reflect the individual needs of the bereaved. There is record of one call to unspecified bereaved, with voice mail left regarding condolences and services available. There is no additional documentation of attempts to assess individual needs/desires for services. There is no clearly identified and individualized bereavement care plan, although routine mailings are sent at intervals.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 185 words

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 15 (Personnel #7) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the following competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient: (This standard applies to all Hospice Aides providing care/service who are directly employed by the hospice or through a contractual agreement.) ·Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other hospice staff. ·Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration ·Safe transfer techniques and ambulation. ·Normal range of motion and positioning ·Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include-- ·(A) Bed bath ·(B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath ·(C) Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed ·(D) Nail and skin care ·(E) Oral hygiene ·(F) Toileting and elimination The other subject areas in this section may be evaluated through written examination, oral examination or after observation of a Hospice Aide with a patient. Personnel #7: Agency form does not specify types of bath and/or shampoos and does not specifically include nail care, toileting and elimination therefore no evidence of specific competency for these items for aide.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 199 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #2,14) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #2: Admitted 11/16/24. Aide care plan has frequency of 5x/week. Initial POC has 5x week frequency, but subsequent IDG/POC meetings have Freq 3x/wk since thru 1/22/25. Aide is following aide care plan for 5x week frequency. Patient #14: Patient SOC 11/14/24. 12/24/24 order for Oxygen 2-5 lpm via NC. The problems, goals and interventions were updated, but aide care plan was not updated to include Oxygen therapy, flow rate and/or relate safety precautions.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #6) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #6: IDG Meeting note entry 1/22/25: “Patient continues to have seizures, however, less frequently.” There was no additional documentation referencing seizure activity. Interview with staff pointed out that patient is actually on seizure medication for history of syncopal episodes, not seizures activity. Conclude that documentation was in error.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #15) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary • The patient’s clinical record, if requested Patient #15: There is no comprehensive discharge summary included in EMR to send to physician, if requested.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #15) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient #15: There is no comprehensive discharge summary included in the record.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

  • Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(A))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence a copy is provided of the hospice written policies and procedures on the management and disposal of controlled drugs to the patient or patient representative and family. There is no evidence that a copy is provided of the hospice written policies and procedures on the management and disposal of controlled drugs.”

    Rule L0695. Standard-level.

May 15, 2024: complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency
  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Based on staff interview, it was determined the Hospice failed to ensure counseling services were available for patients and families. This has the potential to affect all patients and families serviced by the Hospice with a current census of 124 patients. Findings include: 1. During the entrance interview conducted on 05/14/2024 with the Administrator and Director of Operations, the Administrator stated that currently the Hospice does not have a Chaplain or Spiritual Counselor on staff. 2. During an interview with the Director of Operations on 05/14/2024 at approximately 11:00AM, the Director of Operations stated and confirmed that the Hospice has not had a Chaplain or Spiritual Counselor since 12/11/2023.”

    Rule L0595. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 30, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care12 deficiencies cited
Aug 28, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
May 15, 2024Complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 11, 2013.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 3.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 86.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 22% at home, 54% in assisted living, 2% in a nursing facility, 22% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends3.8%
Visits near death86.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 7 owners or officers are people: Marina Geller (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Marina Geller (corporate officer, 100%); Angela Novakovsky (managing employee (on the payroll), 37.5%); Marina Geller (runs it (operational or managerial control), 37.5%); Joni Mantelman (corporate director, 15%); Yury Shklyar (managing employee (under contract), 5%); Murray Salzman (managing employee (under contract), 5%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 96.11% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 48.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 23 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 60015, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 13.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.