Hearth Record

Kindred Hospice

A hospice in Arlington Heights, Illinois 60005

85 West Algonquin Road, Suite 100, Arlington Heights, Illinois 60005. (847) 439-0348.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 21 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

21 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 19 hospices serving ZIP code 60005 had 8.5.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 13, 2026: a follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

21 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

21 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 13, 2026: follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care4 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 192 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 5 (Patients #2,#4,#5) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 2: The medication profile contains Creon frequency of every 15 minutes and conflicting instructions to take 15 minutes prior to meal. The medical record contained nursing documentation since 5/29/26 identifying intermittent use of oxygen. There was no evidence of oxygen on the medication profile. Patient 4: The medication profile contained duplicative listing of lorazepam with differing frequencies. Patient 5: The medication profile contained Naloxone with instructions to repeat administration if no response after 2-3 minutes. The instructions do not include a maximum number of doses allowed or instructions for handling if ineffective. The medical record contains nursing documentation 7/2/26 identifying the nurse obtained an order for Zofran to treat nausea. There was no evidence of Zofran on the medication profile.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 156 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 5 (Patients #2,#5) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying use of intermittent oxygen since 5/29/26. There was no evidence of an order for oxygen rate, frequency, and delivery method. The record also contained an order for Creon with frequency every 15 minutes and conflicting instructions to take 15 minutes prior to meal. Patient 5: The medical record contains nursing documentation 7/2/26 identifying the nurse obtained an order for Zofran to treat nausea. There was no evidence of a physician order in the record. The record also contained an order for Naloxone with instructions to repeat administration if no response after 2-3 minutes. The order does not contain instructions for maximum doses allowed or instructions for handling if ineffective.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 4: The medical record contains nursing documentation starting 6/16/26 identifying nurse is covering lower extremities with abdominal pads and kerlix for weeping edema. There was no evidence of an order for edema treatment as described.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient 3: The medical record contained an order for nursing visits twice weekly. There was no evidence of visit completed the week of 6/21/26. Coordination notes stated visits were not completed due to scheduling conflict.”

    Rule L0773. Standard-level.

May 21, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care17 deficiencies
  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    “Condition of Participation: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. L536”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 187 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #1,3,8) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 1: Active medication profile has Colace and MiraLAX listed as PRN for constipation. No evidence that instructions were included for which medication should be given first in the event of constipation Patient 3: The RN documentation indicated that the patient was using oxygen at 2LNC on 05/18 & 04/30 and 3LNC on 04/23 and 05/06/26. No evidence that an order was included on the active medication profile. Patient 8: The active medication profile has 2 orders for Tylenol, one tablet form and one suppository form. both written to be given for fever greater than 99.1. No evidence that instructions were given on when to use the tablet form and when to use the suppository form.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 210 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #6) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient 6: Aide documentation on 04/15/26 stated that the patient fell. Resulting in a bruise on her left eye and a wound on her left buttock. Aide documented that the nurse was notified of those findings. No evidence that the RN performed a follow-up assessment on the patients injury. The RN completed an assessment on 4/16/26 without mention of what was previously reported or that an investigation was completed at that time. No evidence that the RN addressed the patients fall until 04/23/26 when the ALF nurse notified the nurse of the fall. Aide documentation on 05/13/2026 indicated that the patient had 2 bed sores and was having trouble breathing while being cared for in the bed. No evidence that the RN performed a follow-up assessment on the patient’s injury. The RN completed an assessment on 05/14/26,without mention of what was previously reported or that an investigation was completed.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #14) did not have evidence that the hospice follows the individualized plan of care developed in in collaboration with the attending physician (if any), the patient or representative, and the primary caregiver in accordance with the patient’s needs if any of them so desire. Patient 14: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient fall 04/18/2026 resulting in skin tears to the bilateral upper arms. There was no evidence of physician notification regarding the fall in the medical record. The fall report did not indicate that the physician was notified.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 123 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 10: Active plan of care has outcomes and goals related to oxygen safety and the need for a safety plan to keep the patient safe/possibly needing adult protective services. No evidence that either of those problems were related to the patients needs during the time of service.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 165 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #1,3,8) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1: The plan of care has orders for Colace and MiraLAX listed as PRN for constipation. No evidence that instructions were included on either order for which medication should be given first in the event of constipation. Patient 3: The RN documentation indicated that the patient was using oxygen at 2LNC on 05/18 & 04/30 and 3LNC on 04/23 and 05/06/26. No evidence that a physician order was received for oxygen at the time that the record was surveyed. Patient 8: The care plan has 2 orders for Tylenol, one tablet form and one suppository form. Both written to be given for fever greater than 99.1. No evidence that instructions were given on when to use the tablet form and when to use the suppository form.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 99 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #2,4) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 2: The medical record indicated that the patient uses a high back wheelchair for mobility. No evidence that a high back wheelchair was included on the current DME supply list. Patient 4: The medical record indicated that the staff uses a Hoyer lift with transfers. No evidence that a Hoyer lift was included on the current DME supply list.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #13) did not have evidence that the IDG in collaboration with the attending physician reviewed, revised and documents the individualized plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires but no less frequently then every 15 calendar days. Patient 13: The medical record showed that patient changed their attending physician on 09/08/2025 to a community physician. No evidence that IDG was conducted in collaboration with the attending physician since that time.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #16) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 16: The medical record indicated that the patient was discharged due to extended prognosis. No evidence that discharge planning goals and interventions were added to plan of care prior to the scheduled day of discharge.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 96 words

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #7,12) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 7: The plan of care has orders for Massage Therapy to be completed once a week for 5 weeks starting March 1st, 2026. No evidence that the patient received a visit from the massage therapist during that time. Patient 12: On 4/29/2026 a physician order was placed for a volunteer evalution referral. No evidence that the evaluation had occurred at the time of survey.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that the IDG shares information on a on-going basis with non-hospice healthcare providers furnishing services unrelated to the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 3: RN documentation on 04/23/2026 indicated that the patient was receiving wound care via an outside provider. No evidence that collaboration with the outside agency had occurred at the time that the chart was surveyed.”

    Rule L0558. Standard-level.

  • Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence in QAPI reports that the hospice maintains a coordinated agency-wide program for the surveillance, identification, prevention, control, and investigation of infectious and communicable diseases that is an integral part of the hospice’s Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement program. Patient 3: Medical record indicated that the patient had a UTI in May 2026. No evidence that a surveillance report was completed at the time of survey.”

    Rule L0580. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 206 words

    “Upon patient record review 3 of 19 (Patient #1,4,6) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 1: Aide POC has shaving and nail care to be completed at each visit. No evidence that those task were completed on the visits that occurred on May 4th, 5th, 6th, and 8th. Aide documented that per frequency those task did not need to be completed. Patient 4: Aide POC has frequency ordered as 2 times weekly. No evidence that the patient received 2 visits for the week of 03/02/26. No evidence that these visits were missed at the request of the patient/CG or that an order was received to decrease visits for the week. Patient 6: Aide POC has frequency ordered as 5 times weekly. No evidence that the patient received 5 visits for the weeks of 03/23/26, 04/06/26, and 04/13/26. No evidence that these visits were missed at the request of the patient/CG or that an order was received to decrease visits for the week.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. Upon observation volunteer annual percentage for 3.2% for the year 2025.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Advance Directives. Patient 3: The plan of care identified the patient as a DNR. No evidence that of any Advance Directives uploaded to the medical record.”

    Rule L0677. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    “Upon patient client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #15,16) did not evidence that each patient record contains physician orders. Patient 15: No evidence that a discharge order was placed at the time of discharge. Patient discharged due for cause. Patient 16: No evidence that a discharge order was placed at the time of discharge. Patient discharged due to extended prognosis.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #16) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient 16: No evidence that a discharge summary was completed at the time of survey.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 13, 2026Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care4 deficiencies cited
May 21, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care17 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 5, 2002.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.6% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 20% at home, 58% in assisted living, 21% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.9%
Visits near death93.6% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Curo Health Services LLC runs it.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Ruksana Papa (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jennifer Elizabeth Tyler (other role (CMS gives no detail)); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Kristen A Wright (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 1, 2016
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPLimited partner100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 18, 2018
Curo Health Services LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Jul 11, 2018
Odyssey Healthcare Holding CompanyOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 1, 2016
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies99%Feb 1, 2016
Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLCLimited partner99%Feb 1, 2016
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Gp, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies1%Feb 1, 2016
Odyssey Healthcare Gp, LLCGeneral partner1%Feb 1, 2016

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 76% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 80% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 97.7% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 67.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 19 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 60005, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8.5; this one had 21.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.