Eden Hospice at the Inland Northwest LLC
A hospice in Ponderay, Idaho 83852
676 N Triangle Drive, Ponderay, Idaho 83852. (208) 946-6873.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 18 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 8of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean2
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
18 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 3 hospices serving ZIP code 83852 had 6.
The last inspection on record was on Jul 24, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
18 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jul 24, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care18 deficiencies
-
Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(1))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence that during the initial assessment visit in advance of furnishing care, the hospice provided the patient and/or family with verbal (meaning spoken) and written notice of the Patient’s Rights and Responsibilities in a language and manner that the patient understands. There was no evidence the Patient’s Rights and Responsibilities were provided and explained to Patient#4. Agency had form that the box was checked that the patient confirmed not provided or explained.”
-
Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(2))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that the hospice informed and provided written information to the patient concerning its policies on advance directives, including a description of applicable state law. Patient 4: There was no evidence that patient received policies on advanced directives. Agency had form that the box was checked that the patient confirmed not provided or explained.”
-
Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(3))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that the hospice obtained the patient’s or representative’s signature confirming that they received a copy of the Patient’s Rights and Responsibilities. Patient 4: No evidence of patient signature that patient received copy of the Patient’s Rights and Responsibilities. Agency had form that the box was checked that the patient confirmed not provided or explained.”
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(8))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that the patient received information about the scope of services that the hospice will provide and specific limitations on those services. Patient 4: There was no evidence patient received information about the scope of hospice services. Agency had form that the box was checked that the patient confirmed not provided or explained.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 195 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #2,#7,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 2: The medication profile contained Lokelma powder packet with no instructions for a dilutant when preparing medication. During medication reconciliation, the facility and hospice medications did not match. The facility medication profile contained Acetaminophen suppository, Bio freeze Gel 4%, Glucagon Emergency Kit, Guaifenesin ER tab, Hydrocortisone Cream 1%, Nasal Spray, PreserVision AREDS, Thiamine, Tussin DM, Loperamide tab, and Vitamin B12 tab. There was no evidence of these medications on the hospice medication profile. The hospice med profile contained Haloperidol, Hyoscyamine, Lorazepam, and Morphine which were absent from the facility medication profile. Patient 7: Medication profile contained duplicate orders for oxygen 3-6L/min to be delivered continuously. Patient 14: Oxygen and Vashe wound cleanser and triple antibiotic ointment were all duplicated on the medication profile.”
-
Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 113 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #18) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient 18: RN documented on visit dated 5/8/2026 that patient had a fall the night before with emergency services called to assist patient from the floor. However, there was no documentation of assessment for injury following the fall or communication with the IDG. No visit made on 5/9/2023. Patient expired on 5/10/2026.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 152 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #3,#7,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 3: Admission nurse documented patient is high risk for aspiration; however, there was no evidence of problems, interventions and goals for aspiration risk. Patient 7: Patient admitted with anticoagulant Xarelto; however, there was no problems, interventions and goals for bleeding precautions. Patient 10: The nursing documentation since admission identified patient as having dysphagia and a foley catheter. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to the issues included in the plan of care.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 193 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #2,#7,#14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 2: The medical record contained order for Lokelma powder packet with no instructions for a dilutant when preparing medication. During medication reconciliation, the facility and hospice medications did not match. The facility medical record contained orders for Acetaminophen suppository, Bio freeze Gel 4%, Glucagon Emergency Kit, Guaifenesin ER tab, Hydrocortisone Cream 1%, Nasal Spray, PreserVision AREDS, Thiamine, Tussin DM, Loperamide tab, and Vitamin B12 tab. There was no evidence of orders for these medications in the hospice medical record. The hospice medical record contained orders for Haloperidol, Hyoscyamine, Lorazepam, and Morphine which were absent from the facility medical record. Patient 7: Medical record contained duplicate orders for oxygen 3-6L/min to be delivered continuously. Order written on 6/8/26 with oxygen delivery via nasal canula and updated order written on 7/22/26 with delivery via mask due to patient decline. Patient 14: Medical record contained duplicate orders for oxygen and Vashe wound cleanser and triple antibiotic ointment.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 199 words
“Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patient #2,#3,#4,#6,#9,#13) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 2: During home visit, observed patient had walker, raised toilet seat, over bed table and shower chair. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care order. Patient 3: Patient observed having walker, wheelchair and 1/2 rails; however, there was no evidence of the DME items on the plan of care order. Patient 4: During home visit, observed patient had wheelchair and over bed table; however, there was no evidence of DME on the plan of care order. Patient 6: Admission documentation identified patient having walker and electric scooter with no evidence of DME on the plan of care order. Patient 9: Documentation identified patient having a bedside commode and wheelchair with no evidence of DME on the plan of care order. Patient 13: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of Hoyer lift. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #5) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 5: Patient has foley catheter; however, care plan for urinary incontinence remains active from admission.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 324 words
“Upon patient record review, 7 of 19 (Patient #1,#3,#4,#5,#6,#7,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 1: Aide care plan does not contain task or instructions for bathing type of bed bath or shower. Patient uses a wheelchair for mobility; however, the aide care plan does not contain tasks or instructions for transfers to and from the wheelchair. Patient 3: Patient uses a wheelchair for mobility; however, the aide care plan does not contain tasks or instructions for transfers to and from the wheelchair. Patient 4: Aide care plan contains tasks for partial sponge bath, bed bath and shower to be provided every visit with patient ability to choose between the types. However, patient unable to make choices related to documented confusion. Patient 5: Patient identified as having a shower chair, walker and power wheelchair; however, there was no tasks or instructions on the aide care plan for use of these DME items. Patient 6: The aide care plan did not contain tasks or instructions for patient’s use of walker and electric scooter. Patient 7,10: The aide care plan did not contain tasks or instructions for foley catheter care. Patient 10: Aide care plan contained instructions to apply antifungal cream; however, the medical record contains order for antifungal powder and not the antifungal cream.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 150 words
“Upon patient record review 3 of 19 (Patient #2,#3,#11) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 2: Aide observed taking patient’s vital signs (temperature, pulse and blood pressure); however, there was no evidence of this task on the aide care plan. Patient 3: During home visit, observed aide providing a bed bath; however, the aide care plan contains task for a shower. Patient 11: Aide care plan contained task for RN delegation of task to wrap bilateral lower legs with tubigrip bandage or ace wrap from feet to below knees due to edema; however, there was no evidence of aide training and competencies to perform this task.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 12 (Personnel #7) did not have evidence that the hospice employees have received orientation on their specific job requirements. Personnel 7: There was no evidence that employee received orientation specific to volunteer coordinator role.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))
“Upon personnel record review, 2 of 12 (Personnel #5,#8) did not have evidence that a skills competency assessment, specific to each discipline had been conducted for all personnel including volunteers initially during orientation. Personnel 5: Initial competencies were incomplete with skills marked as “never done”. Personnel 8: There was no evidence of initial competencies completed.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))
“Upon patient client record review, 7 of 19 (Patient #2,#4,#9,#10,#15,#16,#18) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Advance Directives. Patient 2,4,9,10,15,16,18: Patient was identified on admission of choice to be DNR/comfort measures only; however, there was no evidence of POST form in the medical record.”
-
Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(C))
“Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that the written policies and procedures for managing controlled drugs was provided and discussed. Patient 4: There was no evidence that patient received policy and procedures for managing controlled medications or that it was explained. Agency had form that the box was checked that the patient confirmed not provided or explained.”
-
Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(3))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence that when the hospice provides durable medical equipment under contract, then the DMEPOS provider is accredited by a CMS approved accreditation organization. Accreditation cycle of DMEPOS provider was effective 3/4/2023 and valid for up to 36 months. Accreditation expired 3/4/2026 with no evidence of current accreditation.”
-
Laboratory services (42 CFR 418.116(b)(2))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence there is a copy of the CLIA certificate for the laboratory used for specimen testing. CLIA certificate expired on 7/13/2026.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2026 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 18 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 24, 2023.
- CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 86.8% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 78% at home, 18% in assisted living, 3% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% elsewhere.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 11.2 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 5.6% |
| Visits near death | 86.8% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Empres Hospice, LLC owns 100% directly since Jul 1, 2022.
- Eden Healthcare Management, LLC runs it.
- 7 owners or officers are people: Jonathan Clifton (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Michael G Meza (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Jordan W Wright (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); William P Diehl (managing employee (under contract)); Jamie Brown (corporate officer); Brent Weil (corporate officer); Michael J Miller (corporate officer).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Empres Healthcare Group Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jul 1, 2022 |
| Empres Home and Hospice LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jul 1, 2022 |
| Greatbanc Trust Company | Other role (CMS gives no detail) | 100% | Jul 1, 2022 |
| Empres Hospice, LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Jul 1, 2022 |
| Eden Healthcare Management, LLC | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | 100% | Jan 1, 2023 |
| Empres Healthcare Group, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Trust | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jul 1, 2022 |
| Midcap Financial Trust | Holds 5% or more security interest | Jul 1, 2022 | |
| Empres Financial Services LLC | Other role (CMS gives no detail) | Jul 1, 2022 |
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 81% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 90% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 89.3% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 8 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 3 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 83852, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 18.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Eden Hospice at the Inland Northwest LLC This hospice | 18 |
| Bonner Community Hospice | 2 |
| Auburn Crest Hospice | 6 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.