Hearth Record

Beacon of Hope Hospice

A hospice in Davenport, Iowa 52806

1020 West 35th Street, Davenport, Iowa 52806. (563) 391-6933.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 10 hospices serving ZIP code 52806 had 7.5.

The last inspection on record was on May 5, 2025: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 25, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies
  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 173 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patients #6 and 7) did not contain evidence that a Registered Nurse had been designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs: Patient #6: On the 03/27/24 home visit the nurse documented, “Wound/pressure ulcer left buttock. Nurse cleansed with Normal Saline, applied Zinc Oxide, and documented that this daily wound treatment should be provided by the ALF personnel”. There was no mention of the Hospice nurse having followed-up, related to this wound, on the next sequential home visit on 03/30/24. That SN visit had documented, “Integument not assessed at this visit.” Patient #7: An RN entered the following entry into the 04/18/24 IDG Meeting note, “At the 04/08/24 home visit the patient had a small scab to right great toe resultant of nail clipping.” This patient has a diagnosis of Diabetes. On the next SN visit made on 04/16/24, the nurse did not address this area of skin concern. The documentation under the Integumentary section was limited to, “No problems noted or verbalized.””

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 115 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patients #1 and 2) did not contain evidence that the Plan of Care included all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs: Patient #1: During Surveyor-attended home visit on 04/23/24, it was noted that the patient had the following DME in the home: 1) Hospital bed; and 2) Bed-side table. These DME were not included on the POC. Patient #2: During Surveyor-attended home visit on 04/23/24, it was noted that the patient had the following DME in the home: 1) Hospital bed; 2) Bed-side table; and 3) Nebulizer. These DME were not included on the POC.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not contain evidence that the revised Plan of Care included information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment: Patient #3: This patient reports having had a colostomy since 11/2023. The most recent IDG POC includes, “Family members to complete colostomy care”, without any details of this Physician-ordered colostomy care process/frequency, no problems, goals, and interventions for the colostomy.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 242 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patients #1, 3, 6, and 8) did not contain evidence that the IDG had ensured that care and services were provided in accordance with the Plan of Care: Patient #1: The Spiritual Counselor was making home visits at a frequency of 2x per month. There was no IDG-ordered frequency on the 03/31/24 updated POC. Patient #3: The Hospice POC included a Chaplain visit frequency of 2x per month. There was only (1) Chaplain visit made the month of 02/2024. The Hospice POC effective 01/10/24 included an order for a Hospice nurse to, “prefill medication boxes every Wednesday.” This was not provided/documented on the 04/03 or 04/10/24 nursing visits. Patient #6: On the 03/27/24 home visit the nurse documented, “Wound/pressure ulcer left buttock. Nurse cleansed with Normal Saline, applied Zinc Oxide”. The nurse documented that this daily wound treatment should be provided per ALF personnel in the absence of the Hospice nurse. On the 04/05/24 and 04/10/24 visits the nurse documented that she had completed a wound dressing change. However, there were no details of such dressing change. Just “see POC.” There were no wound orders on the POC to provide such wound care. Patient #8: A verbal order was obtained for the Chaplain to make an evaluation visit between 02/23 to 02/27/24. A Chaplain note was made on 02/28/24 that, “the patient is to be evaluated”. There was no further documented evidence of this occurring.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 162 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #6) did not contain evidence that the IDG documented the sharing of information between all disciplines providing care and services in all settings, whether the care and services are provided directly or under arrangement: Patient #6: The Hospice received a phone call from the SNF on 04/04/24 pm. that the patient had fallen. SNF staff had administered the patient Morphine, and had re-located patient into her bed. However, they stated that they had some concern as to whether the patient may have fractured a hip. The Hospice RN made a home visit, noting that the patient was asleep upon her arrival, but awakened easily. Patient denied hip pain but did complain of lower back pain. The Hospice nurse conducted a physical assessment of the patient’s lower back and hips, which included discussion of further pain management. However, there was no documented evidence that the Hospice had notified the Medical Director of such patient event.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 146 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #14) did not contain evidence that the Hospice had offered Bereavement counseling that included: • Making Bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the Bereavement Plan of Care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the Bereavement Plan of Care • Ensuring that Bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a Bereavement Plan of Care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery: Patient #14: Death on 11/08/2023. The Bereavement POC included, “Contact the bereaved within 14 days, to arrange for a phone call or visit within the first two months.” The first documented contact made to the bereaved was not conducted until 01/05/2024.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not contain evidence that the Hospice Aide had provided care/services only as: • Ordered by the Interdisciplinary Group • Included in the Plan of Care Patient #3: The Aide POC assigned the tasks of: 1) Denture care; and 2) Oral care every visit. These assigned tasks were not provided/documented on the 04/12, 04/16, and 04/19/24 Aide home visits.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 113 words

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 12 (Personnel #8) did not contain evidence that a Registered Nurse had made an annual on-site visit, to the location where a patient was receiving care, in order to observe and assess each Aide while he/she is performing care. The supervising nurse must assess an Aide’s ability to demonstrate initial and continued satisfactory performance in meeting specific outcome criteria that include all CMS-required content, as follows: Personnel #8: An RN made an annual on-site visit on 01/17/23 to a home where this Aide was providing care/service. The tool used by the RN did not include the evaluation of the Aide’s: Compliance with infection control policies and practices.”

    Rule L0633. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #12) did not contain evidence that the Hospice had forwarded a Transfer Summary, and a copy of the patient record if requested, to the receiving Hospice upon transferring this patient to the receiving Hospice provider: Patient #12: Transferred to a different Hospice provider on 01/11/24. There was not documented evidence of Beacon of Hope Hospice having forwarded a Transfer Summary to the receiving Hospice. It had only been sent to the SNF where the patient had been residing.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not contain evidence that the Discharge Summary included all CMS-required content: Patient #11: Revoked on 03/26/2024. The DC Summary did not contain the following CMS-required content: • A summary of the patient’s stay, including treatments, symptoms and pain management • The patient’s current Plan of Care • The patient’s latest Physician orders”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not contain evidence that the Hospice had provided the SNF with the following required documents/information: Patient #1: During surveyor-attended home visit on 04/23/24, it was noted that there was not documented evidence that the following required documents had been provided to the SNF: Physician Certification and Re-certification of the terminal illness.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 5, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Apr 25, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 16, 1996.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 92.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 33% at home, 19% in assisted living, 48% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.2%
Visits near death92.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • National Hospice Management, Inc. owns 100% directly since May 31, 1997.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Christine L Kaplan (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); William John Moriconi (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Kristin A Wurzburger (managing employee (under contract)); Tracey Sulzberger (corporate officer); Tracey Sulzberger (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Kandy M Mecum (corporate officer); William John Moriconi (corporate officer, 0%); William John Moriconi (corporate director, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
National Hospice Management, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%May 31, 1997

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 79% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 74% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 93.37% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 67.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 10 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 52806, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7.5; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.