Hearth Record

In-Home Care Connection Hospice Services

A hospice in Princeton, Illinois 61356

680 W Peru St, Princeton, Illinois 61356. (815) 993-5374.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 7 hospices serving ZIP code 61356 had 3.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 12, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 12, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 208 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 records reviewed (Patient #2, #3, #5, #8) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #2: The MAR indicated barrier cream, apply to skin as needed to prevent skin breakdown. The record did not indicate the site location as to where to apply the skin barrier. COS. Patient #3: The MAR indicated Norco one to two tabs po Q4hours prn pain and Tylenol ES 500mg one tab Q6hours prn fever and/or one to two tabs prn for pain/fever. The record did not indicate a max dose of 4000mg daily. COS. Patient #5: The MAR indicated eyelid cleaning scrubs-scrub bilateral eyelids @ night with scrub pads provided by family. There was not evidence of what ingredients these scrub pads included. COS. Patient #8: The MAR indicated Oxygen @ 2 - 10L per NC Continuous for SOB. There was no evidence of parameters for the liter flow. COS.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 191 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 records reviewed (Patient #5, #13) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient #5: The record indicated a UA with C&S was ordered on 5/28/24, Macrobid was ordered and delivered on 5/29/24. There was no evidence of follow up on the C&S report as of 06/10/24. COS. Patient #13: The record indicated on 2/27/24 the RN made a visit and the following was noted the patient was lethargic, sleeping most of the time, disoriented, heart rate 101. Atropine and oxygen was added. It was also noted she was minimally eating and only drinking a little. The reason for the visit was her oxygen level had a desaturation down to 52%. There was no evidence in the record of a nursing follow up visit on 2/28/24, 2/29/24 and or on 3/1/24 until the time of death @ 14:14 on 3/1/24.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 168 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 records reviewed (Patient #5, #6) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #5: The record indicated the patient had signs and symptoms of a UTI, an antibiotic was ordered and a UA with a C&S. The record identified a problem from the nurses updated comprehensive assessment. There was no evidence of interventions and or goals for this problem. COS. Patient #6: The record indicated the patient had a Speech evaluation ordered on 3/18/24 that resulted in an order for a pureed diet, puddings due to severe oropharyngeal dysphagia. There was no evidence of a plan of care for the dysphagia. COS.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 179 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 records reviewed (Patient #2, #3, #5, #8) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #2: The MD order indicated barrier cream, apply to skin as needed to prevent skin breakdown. The order did not indicate the site location as to where to apply the skin barrier. COS. Patient #3: The MD order indicated Norco one to two tabs po Q4hours prn pain and Tylenol ES 500mg one tab Q6hours prn fever and/or one to two tabs prn for pain/fever. The record did not indicate a max dose of 4000mg daily. COS. Patient #5: The MD order indicated eyelid cleaning scrubs-scrub bilateral eyelids @ night with scrub pads provided by family. There was not evidence of what ingredients these scrub pads included. COS. Patient #8: The MD order indicated Oxygen @ 2 - 10L per NC Continuous for SOB. There was no evidence of parameters for the liter flow. COS.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 171 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 record reviewed (Patient #13, #14) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #13: The record indicated on 2/27/24 the RN made a visit and the following was noted the patient was lethargic, sleeping most of the time, disoriented, heart rate 101. Atropine and oxygen was added. It was also noted she was minimally eating and only drinking a little. The reason for the visit was her oxygen level had a desaturation down to 52%. There was no evidence in the record of the care plan being revised to note the progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care for imminent death. Patient #14: The record indicated there was a change in condition on 11/23/23. There was no evidence of the plan of care being revised to note the progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care for imminent death.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 records reviewed (Patient #6) did not have evidence that the IDG documents the sharing of information between all disciplines providing care and services in all settings, whether the care and services are provided directly or under arrangement. Patient #6: The record indicated the patient who was in a skilled nursing facility had a Speech consult with new orders for a dietary change. There was no evidence in the hospice record that the IDG shared this information between all disciplines. COS.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 records reviewed (Patient #11) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient #11: The record did not indicate the discharge summary included the current plan of care, latest physician orders and or if any other documents were requested by the VA Physician and or VA Facility.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 166 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 records reviewed (Patient #6) did not have evidence that the hospice provided the following information: • The most recent hospice plan of care specific to each patient • Hospice election form and any Advance Directives specific to each patient • Physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness specific to each patient • Names and contact information for hospice personnel involved in hospice care of each patient • Instructions on how to access the hospice’s 24-hour on-call system • Hospice medication information specific to each patient • Hospice physician and attending physician (if any) orders specific to each patient Patient #6: The record at the facility did not have evidence of any integrated hospice plan of care, Physicians CTI, Names and contact information for the hospice personnel involved in hospice care, instructions on how to access the hospice’s 24 hour on call system, hospice medication information and or hospice physician and attending physician orders specific for this patient. COS.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 12, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 17, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 39% at home, 20% in assisted living, 41% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.1%
Visits near death93.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 7 owners or officers are people: Joseph E Park (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Christopher Welch (owns 5% or more directly, 25%); Joseph E Park (owns 5% or more directly, 25%); Denise Welch (owns 5% or more directly, 25%); Shaunee Powers (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kim Woolley (owns 5% or more directly); Paul Bonucci (managing employee (under contract)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 90% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 84.05% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 66.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 7 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 61356, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 7 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 61356
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
In-Home Care Connection Hospice Services This hospice8
Vitas Healthcare Corporation of Illinois6
Rock River Hospice and Home0
Serenity Hospice and Home0
Hospice Compassus - Northwest Illinois3
OSF Hospice3
Compassus-Chicago2

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.