Hearth Record

Cherokee Regional Hospice

A hospice in Cherokee, Iowa 51012

212 E Bow Drive, Mailing Address-300 Sioux Valley Drive, Cherokee, Iowa 51012. (712) 225-6459.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 5 hospices serving ZIP code 51012 had 11.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 17, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 17, 2024: recertification inspection by the state3 deficiencies
  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 732 words

    “Based on clinical record review, hospice policy, and staff interview, the hospice failed to ensure hospice nurse members of the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) updated the comprehensive assessment with changes to the patient assessment wound assessment for 3 of 5 patients reviewed with wounds (Patients #9, #13, and #14). Failure of the IDG to update the comprehensive assessment placed the patient at risk for ineffective staff collaboration and communication regarding patient’s wound status and effectiveness of treatments and interventions. Findings include: 3. Patient #14 had a hospice admission date of 10/15/23 and date of death on 11/16/23 and received hospice services while residing in a private residence. Clinical record review revealed the following: a. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 10/18/23, performed by Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN) included documentation of a new skin tear on the right forearm, which measured 0.5 cm length by 0.5 cm width by 0.1 cm depth. The documentation lacked assessment of the wound bed. b. The skilled nurse visit note, dated 10/23/23 performed by Staff D, RN included documentation of the skin tear with measurements of 0.5 cm length by 0.5 cm width by 0.1 cm depth. The documentation lacked assessment of the wound bed. The hospice failed to complete comprehensive weekly assessments of the patient’s wound. The above findings shared with the Administrator/Clinical Manager and Social Worker. According to agency policy, Wound Care Home Health/Hospice dated December 2023, revealed in pertinent part: If the patient has a wound the nursing assessment will include the characteristics of the wound (e.g. measurement in centimeters to include length, width and depth, location, odor, drainage, color and condition of surrounding tissue),the type of wound (e.g. pressure ulcer, venous stasis ulcer, malignant, diabetic foot ulcer, skin tear/friction, rash, or infected). The nurse will assess and evaluate the condition of the wound at least on a weekly basis with documentation of the assessment in the patient’s record. According to agency policy, Interdisciplinary Group dated December 2023, in pertinent part, the primary responsibility of the IDG is to provide and supervise care and services delivered in the patient’s place of residence or on an inpatient basis. These cares and services are necessary to meet the patient and family-specific needs identified in the comprehensive assessment that are related to the terminal illness and related conditions. In an interview on 7/10/24 at 8:40 AM, the Administrator reported that wounds are comprehensively assessed on a weekly basis. Patient #9 had a hospice admission date of 6/4/24 and received hospice services while residing in a private home. Clinical record review revealed the following: The IDG note on 6/11/24 included that the patient had a wound to his left great toe present at admission with daily wound care. The left great toe wound lacked a weekly comprehensive assessment. The Skilled Nurse Visit (SNV) note on 6/7/24 performed by Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN), identified that the patient had a new skin tear to his right elbow staged at 2 (wound stage is used only with pressure ulcer wounds). The SNV note on 7/1/24 performed by Staff D assessed the left great toe wound at a stage 2. The patients left great toe wound lacked a weekly comprehensive assessment. Both of the patients non-pressure ulcer wounds were assessed at a stage 2. 2. Patient #13 had a hospice admission date of 2/22/24 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home until his death on 3/8/24. Clinical record review revealed the following: The SNV note on 2/22/24 performed by Staff D included documentation of a left groin surgical wound at a stage 2 and left 5th toe amputation surgical wound. Neither wound was comprehensively assessed at this admission visit. The SNV note on 2/26/24 performed by Staff D included assessment of the groin surgical site and left 5th toe amputation surgical site with each assessment charted as NA (not applicable) for the wound bed. The measurement of each was the same, 1 cm (centimeter) length x 0.1 cm width x 0.1 cm depth, which indicated that the surgical sites were open wounds and have a wound bed. The SNV note on 3/6/24 performed by Staff D assessed the left groin surgical incision has healed. The left 5th toe surgical amputation was not comprehensively assessed. The patients 2 surgical wound sites lacked comprehensive weekly assessments. The patients left groin surgical incision site was incorrectly staged as a pressure ulcer.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 923 words

    “Based on hospice staff interview, clinical record review, and agency policy, the agency failed to include the patients progress towards outcomes and goals specified in the plan of care (POC) for aide services at Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) meetings for 7 of 7 patients reviewed with aide services (Patients #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #10, and #14). Failure of the hospice to ensure that the IDG include progress towards patients goals and outcomes placed patients at risk to not receive care and services based on their current assessed needs. Findings include: 4. Patient #5 had a hospice admission date of 6/16/23 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed the following: a. The POC, dated 6/10/24 to 8/8/24, included orders for skilled nursing and hospice aide services. b. The IDG meeting notes, dated 5/21/24, 6/4, 6/18/24 and 7/2/24, lacked documentation of the patients progress towards outcomes and goals specified in the POC for hospice aide services. The hospice failed to note the patients progress towards outcomes and goals specified in the POC for hospice aide services. 5. Patient #7 had a hospice admission date of 3/20/24 and received hospice services while residing in a private home setting. Clinical record review revealed the following: a. The POC’s, dated 3/20/24 to 5/18/24, 5/18/24 to 7/4/24 and 7/5/24 and 7/17/24, included orders for skilled nursing and hospice aide services. b. The IDG meeting notes, dated 5/21/24, 6/4, 6/18/24 and 7/2/24, lacked documentation of the patients progress towards outcomes and goals specified in the POC for hospice aide services. The hospice failed to note the patients progress towards outcomes and goals specified in the POC for hospice aide services. 6. Patient #10 had a hospice admission date of 6/27/24 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed the following: a. The POC, dated 6/27/24 to 9/24/24, included orders for skilled nursing and hospice aide services. b. The IDG meeting notes, dated 7/9/24, lacked documentation of the patients progress towards outcomes and goals specified in the POC for hospice aide services. The hospice failed to note the patients progress towards outcomes and goals specified in the POC for hospice aide services. 7. Patient #14 had a hospice admission date of 10/15/23 and date of death of 11/16/23 and received hospice services while residing in a private home residence. Clinical record review revealed the following: a. The POC, dated 10/15/23 to 12/23/23, included orders for skilled nursing and hospice aide services. b. The IDG meeting notes, dated 10/25/24 and 11/8/24, lacked documentation of the patients progress towards outcomes and goals specified in the POC for hospice aide services. The hospice failed to note the patients progress towards outcomes and goals specified in the POC for hospice aide services. The above findings shared with the Administrator/Clinical Manager. According to agency policy, Interdisciplinary Group dated December 2023, in pertinent part, The IDG will be composed of other periodic members of the IDG are those individuals providing care to the patient, which may include but are not limited to Hospice Aide. The IDG members provide the care and services offered by hospice. The IDG in its entirety must supervise the care and services provided. The IDG will be active in the Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program by implementing and reporting on QAPI activities. A committee formed from the IDG will make an annual program evaluation of the hospice’s total operation. This assessment shall address services provided directly or under contract, on indicators related to palliative outcomes, end-of-life support systems, adverse patient events, problem prone and safety areas, and the hospice’s processes of care and operations. Providing input into eliminating problems, which become apparent as a result of QAPI studies. Supervising care provided utilizing conferences, evaluations, and discussions, as well as direct observations, and access to inservices and continuing education. In an interview on 7/10/24 at 8:20 AM, when asked which member of the IDG is responsible for coordination and supervision of hospice aide services, the Administrator reported that she is responsible for this. 1. Patient #4 had a hospice admission date of 6/19/24 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed the following: The POC dated 6/19/24 to 9/16/24 included orders for nursing and aide services. The IDG meeting note on 7/2/24 did not include the patients progress towards outcomes and goals specified in the POC. The hospice failed to note the patients progress towards outcomes and goals specified in the POC for hospice aide services. 2. Patient #6 had a hospice admission date of 5/1/24 and received hospice services while residing in a private residence. Clinical record review revealed the following: The POC dated 5/1/24 to 7/29/24 included orders for nursing and aide services. The IDG meeting notes on 5/7/24, 5/21/24, 6/4/24, 6/18/24, and 7/2/24 did not include the patients progress towards outcomes and goals specified in the POC. The hospice failed to note the patients progress towards outcomes and goals specified in the POC for hospice aide services. 3. Patient #8 had a hospice admission date of 5/9/24 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed the following: The POC dated 5/9/24 to 8/6/24 included orders for nursing and aide services. The IDG meeting note on 5/21/24, 6/4/24, 6/18/24, and 7/2/24 did not include the patients progress towards outcomes and goals specified in the POC. The hospice failed to note the patients progress towards outcomes and goals specified in the POC for hospice aide services.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 822 words

    “Based on hospice staff interview, clinical record review, and agency policy, the hospice failed to document all required components of hospice aide supervision including demonstrating competency with assigned tasks for 7 of 7 patients reviewed with aide services (Patients #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #10, and #14). Failure to ensure the supervision of hospice aides by registered nurses (RN) to maintain documentation of all required components of aide supervision increased the risk of agency staff not meeting the patients personal care needs. Findings include: 4. Patient #5 had a hospice admission date of 6/16/23 and received hospice services while residing in a private home setting. Clinical record review revealed: a. The IDG meeting notes, dated 5/21/24, 6/4, 6/18/24 and 7/2/24, included orders for hospice aide and skilled nursing services. b. The skilled nurse visit notes, dated 5/13/24, 6/3, 6/17, 6/24 and 7/7/24, included documentation the nurse supervised the hospice aide and the aide followed the care plan. The visit notes lacked documentation the required components of demonstrating competency with assigned tasks were completed. The hospice failed to complete all required components of hospice aide supervision. 5. Patient #7 had a hospice admission date of 3/20/23 and received hospice services while residing in a private home setting. Clinical record review revealed: a. The IDG meeting notes, dated 5/21/24, 6/4, 6/18/24 and 7/2/24, included orders for hospice aide and skilled nursing services. b. The skilled nurse visit notes, dated 5/13, 5/23, 5/31/24, 6/17, 6/24 and 7/3/24, included documentation the nurse supervised the hospice aide and the aide followed the care plan. The visit notes lacked documentation the required components of demonstrating competency with assigned tasks were completed. The hospice failed to complete all required components of hospice aide supervision. 6. Patient #10 had a hospice admission date of 6/27/27 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed: a. The Interdisciplinary Group meeting notes, dated 7/9/24, included orders for hospice aide and skilled nursing services. b. The skilled nurse visit notes, dated 7/1/24, included documentation the nurse supervised the hospice aide and the aide followed the care plan. The visit notes lacked documentation the required components of demonstrating competency with assigned tasks were completed. The hospice failed to complete all required components of hospice aide supervision. 7. Patient #14 had a hospice admission date of 10/15/23 and date of death of 11/16/23 received hospice services while residing in a private home setting. Clinical record review revealed: a. The Interdisciplinary Group meeting notes, dated 10/25/23 and 11/8/23, included orders for hospice aide and skilled nursing services. b. The skilled nurse visit notes, dated 10/30/23, 11/1 and 11/15/23, included documentation the nurse supervised the hospice aide and the aide followed the care plan. The visit notes lacked documentation the required components of demonstrating competency with assigned tasks were completed. The hospice failed to complete all required components of hospice aide supervision. According to agency policy, Hospice Aide and Homemaker Service dated December 2023, in pertinent part, the IDG RN will make supervisory visits at the patient’s place of residency at least every 14 days while hospice aide services are being provided. The supervisory visit will allow the nurse to evaluate the hospice aide’s ability to provide assigned duties. In an interview on 7/15/24 at 8:57 AM, Staff B, RN, reported that Aide supervision is done every 14 days and it is documented in our regular visit note. It can be done in a follow up note as well. Patient #4 had a hospice admission date of 6/19/24 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed the following: The POC dated 6/19/24 to 9/16/24 included orders for nursing and aide services. The Skilled Nurse Visit (SNV) on 7/1/24 included supervision of the hospice aide and was missing the required supervision of competency of the aide in completing assigned tasks. The supervision documentation failed to include demonstrating competency with assigned tasks. 2. Patient #6 had a hospice admission date of 5/1/24 and received hospice services while residing in a private residence. Clinical record review revealed the following: The POC dated 5/1/24 to 7/29/24 included orders for nursing and aide services. The SNV with hospice aide supervision performed by Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN) on 5/13/24, 5/20/24, 6/3/24, 6/9/24, 6/24/24, and 7/2/24 were missing the required supervision of competency of the aide in completing assigned tasks. The supervision documentation failed to include demonstrating competency with assigned tasks. 3. Patient #8 had a hospice admission date of 5/9/24 and received hospice services while residing in a nursing home. Clinical record review revealed the following: The POC dated 5/9/24 to 8/6/24 included orders for nursing and aide services. The SNV with hospice aide supervision performed by Staff C, RN on 5/28/24, 6/11/24, 6/26/24, and 7/1/24 were missing the required supervision of competency of the aide in completing assigned tasks. The supervision documentation failed to include demonstrating competency with assigned tasks.”

    Rule L0633. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 17, 2024Recertification inspection by the state3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 1, 1994.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 23 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 10.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 99% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 36% at home, 6% in assisted living, 58% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day23.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends10.8%
Visits near death99.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • St. Luke’s Health System, Inc. runs it.
  • 11 owners or officers are people: Tyler Gerstandt (corporate officer); Kellen Ludvigson (corporate director); Clay Leavitt (corporate director); Wesley A Parker (managing employee (on the payroll)); Leslie William Todd (corporate director); Sheila Trapp (corporate director); Kerry Marie Hurd (corporate director); Sarah Cook (corporate director); Gary W Jordan (managing employee (under contract)); Brandon Henke (corporate director); Tonya Oolman (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 90% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.15% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 84.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 5 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 51012, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 11; this one had 3.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 5 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 51012
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Cherokee Regional Hospice This hospice3
Sanford Home Health and Hospice Sheldon17
Unitypoint Hospice11
Care Initiatives Hospice - Sioux City11
St Croix Hospice0

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.