Hearth Record

Islands Hospice

A hospice in Honolulu, Hawaii 96813

820 Mililani St, Suite 400, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813. (808) 550-2552.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 6 hospices serving ZIP code 96813 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 10, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jan 10, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 188 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 29 (Patient #3, 5, 7, 11) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 03: The medication profile includes Hydrocortisone 2.5% “apply to affected area BID as needed for rash” it does not include an application site. The medication profile includes Lidocaine patch 4% “apply one patch TP to affected area daily, PRN pain” it does not include an application site. Patient 05: The medication profile includes Miralax 17G/scoop oral powder 1 timer per day as needed for constipation, it does not include a mixing diluent. Patient 07: The medication profile includes Calmoseptine 0.44-20.6% topical ointment, “apply to affected area” it does not include an application site. Patient 11: The medication profile includes Clotrimazole-Betamthasone 1.0-05% apply topically BID to affected area, do not include an application site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 299 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 29 (Patient #8, 9, 11, 13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 08: The patient was admitted on 12/9/24 with a primary diagnosis of chronic kidney disease, stage V with evidence of significant weight loss, malnutrition and dysphagia. The plan of care does not include a problem statement with interventions and goals for the nutritional deficiencies. (Plan of care updated on site.) Patient 09: The patient was admitted on 11/14/24 with a primary diagnosis of cerebral palsy with a history of seizure disorder requiring levetiracetam for management, the plan of care does not include seizure precautions or interventions and goals for assessing the neurological condition. The patient is identified as deaf and non-verbal, the plan of care does not include interventions and goals for other means of communication. (Plan of care updated on site.) Patient 11: The patient was admitted on 10/18/24 for neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Body dementia, she has evidence of agitation, screaming and hallucinations. The plan of care does not include a problem statement with intervention and goals related to the neurological condition and symptom management. (Plan of care updated on site.) Patient 13: The patient was admitted on 8/21/24 with a primary diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the colon, with a secondary condition of a colostomy. The plan of care does not include a problem statement with interventions and goals related to the altered bowel or colostomy care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 279 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 29 (Patient #3, 4, 5, 7, 11, 12) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 03: Medication orders on 2/19/24 for Hydrocortisone 2.5% “apply to affected area BID as needed for rash” does not specify an application site. Orders on 8/27/24 for Lidocaine patch 4% “apply one patch TP to affected area daily, PRN pain” it does not include an application site. (Order correction entered on site.) Patient 04: The patient record includes documentation entered by the nurse practitioner on 10/29/24 that the patient has a deep tissue injury to the left heel being covered with a foam dressing, the record does not include wound care orders for the left heel. (Order correction entered on site.) Patient 05: Medication orders on 11/17/24 for Miralax 17G/scoop oral powder 1 timer per day as needed for constipation, does not include a mixing diluent. (Order correction entered on site.) Patient 07: Medication orders on 12/16/24 for Calmoseptine 0.44-20.6% topical ointment, “apply to affected area” does not include an application site. Medication orders on 12/19/24 for Cephalexin 500mg PO 3 times a day for 7 days have not been discontinued. (Order correction entered on site.) Patient 11: Medication orders on 10/18/24 for Clotrimazole-Betamthasone 1.0-05% apply topically BID to affected area, it does not include an application site. (Order correction entered on site.) Patient 12: Orders for wound care to coccyx on 10/5/24 do not indicate frequency of wound care, indications for PRN care, or who will provide wound care. (Order correction entered on site.)”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 199 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 29 (Patient #2, 4, 13, 19) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 02: Upon admit it is noted that the patient utilizes a walker for ambulation the plan of care includes instructions for safe ambulation using a walker, this is not listed in the DME. (Corrected and updated on site.) Patient 04: The patient record includes orders for oxygen 1-5LPM as needed for dyspnea as needed, the record does not include an oxygen concentrator or tanks in the DME supplies. The patient record includes orders for wound care to the sacrum and rt buttock to include a foam dressing, the supplies are not included in the plan of care. (Corrected and updated on site.) Patient 13: The patient has a stoma and requires colostomy supplies which are not included on the plan of care. (Corrected and updated on site.) Patient 19: The patient records indicates that the patient is incontinent of bladder and bowel, the plan of care does not include incontinent supplies. (Corrected and updated on site.)”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 313 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 29 (Patient #2, 6, 7, 21) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 02: The patient was admitted to hospice on 5/31/24 with a diagnosis of mandibular cancer, her weight at the time of admit was documented as 105 lbs. Her current weight is entered as 74.8lbs and the patient has difficulty with chewing/swallowing foods due to disfigurement and pain related to the hospice diagnosis, the plan of care does not include a problem statement with interventions and goals to address the nutrition of the patient. (Plan of care updated on site.) Patient 06: The patient record indicates evidence of progressive and increasing edema as noted on 12/31/24 of 1+ edema upon assessment, 2+ edema as assessed and documented on 1/3/25 and 3+ pitting edema assessed and documented on 1/6/25, the plan of care has not been updated to include a problem statement with intervention and goals to address the problem. (Plan of care updated on site.) Patient 07: Upon admit on 12/12/24 it was identified that the patient has bilateral upper and lower body edema, patient continues to show evidence of increasing edema as noted on 1/6/25 with 3+ pitting edema documented, the plan of care does not include a problem statement with interventions and goals for the management of the edema. (Plan of care updated on site.) Patient 21: The patient is admitted to services with a primary diagnosis of chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure and a secondary diagnosis of atrial fibrillations and is prescribed Eliquis 5 mg by mouth twice a day. The plan of care does not include a cardiovascular problem statement with interventions and goals and does not include safety precautions for bleeding risks. (Updated on site.)”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 29 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 10: Frequency orders for skilled nursing is entered as 1 visit per week and 1 PRN, the patient was seen on 12/29/24, 12/31/24, 1/2/25 and 1/3/25”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 206 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 29 (Patient #5, 8, 15) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 05: The hospice aide task assignment for nail care, oral care, perineal care, skin care and providing companionship does not include a frequency. Patient 08: The hospice aide task assignment for linen changes, nail care, oral care, skin care, perineal care, provide companionship and cleaning surrounding area does not include a frequency for the task. Patient 15:The hospice aide task assignment for nail care, oral care, perineal care, skin care and providing companionship does not include a frequency.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. The documentation of volunteer hours does not provide evidence that the agency volunteer services equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 29 (Patient #19) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 19: The patient was admitted on 1/26/24, the initial comprehensive nursing assessment was not signed and authenticated by the RN until 1/31/24.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 29 (Patient #24) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary • The patient’s clinical record, if requested Patient 24: The patient elected to revoke the hospice benefit on 10/24/24, the record does not include evidence the hospice discharge was provided to the attending physician.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • N/a (42 CFR 418.110(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 170 words

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence construction, maintenance, and safety equipment at the facility is provided consistent with the 2012 editions of the LSC of the National Fire Protection Association and NFPA 99. The provisions of the adopted edition of the Life Safety Code do not apply in a State if CMS finds that a fire and safety code imposed by State law adequately protects patients in hospices. (Reference inpatient kitchen) Existing Construction According to 19.3.2.5.3* Section 9: The kitchen located at the agency in patient facility (Maui) does not meet the following conditions: *A switch meeting all of the following is provided: a. A locked switch, or a switch located in a restricted location, is provided within the cooking facility that deactivates the cooktop or range. b. The switch is used to deactivate the cooktop or range whenever the kitchen is not under staff supervision. c. The switch is on a timer, not exceeding a 120- minute capacity, that automatically deactivates the cooktop or range, independent of staff action.”

    Rule L0827. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 10, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies cited
Nov 29, 2023Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 26, 2009.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 87.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 71% at home, 3% in assisted living, 15% in a nursing facility, 5% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% in an inpatient hospice, 5% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.2 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.7%
Visits near death87.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Aden 201701, LLC owns 100% directly since May 18, 2021.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Christopher Lackner (corporate officer, 100%); Christopher Lackner (corporate director, 100%); Kevin Michael Webb (corporate officer, 100%); Nicole R Smith (corporate director); Nicole R Smith (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Christopher Lackner (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Aden 201701, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%May 18, 2021

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 76% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 79% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 95.97% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 43.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 6 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 96813, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 6 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 96813
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Bristol Hospice - Hawaii, LLC3
Islands Hospice This hospice11
St Francis Hospice9
Navian Hawaii5
Malama Ola Health Services LLC7
Kaiser Permanente Care at Home, Oahu Hospice3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.