Agape Hospice Care of Cherokee County, LLC
A hospice in Woodstock, Georgia 30188
100 Londonderry Court Ste 120, Woodstock, Georgia 30188. (404) 763-1456.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 6 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 3 immediate jeopardy citations, CMS’s most serious finding (needs attention)
- 3of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean5
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
- Immediate jeopardy
- CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3.
What did inspectors find?
6 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 52 hospices serving ZIP code 30188 had 2.
The last inspection on record was on Jul 16, 2026: a recertification inspection by the state.
Patients in immediate jeopardy, CMS’s most serious finding: Patients’ rights (42 CFR 418.52), Mar 13, 2026
Patients in immediate jeopardy, CMS’s most serious finding: Organizational environment (42 CFR 418.100), Mar 13, 2026
Patients in immediate jeopardy, CMS’s most serious finding: Federal, state, local laws & regulations (42 CFR 418.116), Mar 13, 2026
3 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
6 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Condition-level, immediate jeopardy. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Mar 13, 2026: recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies
-
Patients’ rights (42 CFR 418.52)
The inspectors’ words, 96 words
“Based on review of agency policy titled “On Call for Patient Care-Addendum,” “Plan of Care Process, “ review of on call log, clinical record reviews, and staff and family interviews, it was determined the hospice failed to protect and promote the exercise of patient’s rights by not providing effective pain management and symptom control for one patient (P) (P3) of five patients reviewed. Findings include: Cross reference to L0512 relating to facility failure to provide effective pain management and symptom control for conditions related to the terminal illness and at the end of life for P3.”
-
Organizational environment (42 CFR 418.100)
The inspectors’ words, 236 words
“Based on review of agency policies, clinical record reviews, personnel record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined the agency’s governing body failed to ensure the nursing services were made available within one hour of notification during afterhours (time when agency office is closed) and during regular business hours to meet patients’ needs for five patients (P) (P1, P2 , P3, P4, P5) of five sampled patients from agency on-call report.It was determined the agency’s governing body failed to provide all persons providing hands-on care directly to patients had a current certification in basic cardiac life support (BCLS) or cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) certification. Specifically, the hospice failed to ensure that two clinical employees, certified nurse aide (CNA) AA, licensed practical nurse (LPN) BB, of eight clinical employees sampled maintained current BCLS or CPR certifications.It was determined the governing body failed to ensure patient’s rights were maintained by effectively managing pain and controlling symptoms for conditions related to the terminal illness and at the end of life for one patient (P3) of five sampled patients. Findings included: Findings include:Cross reference to L0651 relating to nursing services made available within one hour of notification; persons providing hands-on care had a current certification in basic cardiac life support (BCLS) or cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) certification Cross reference to L0512 relating to effectively managing pain and controlling symptoms for conditions related to the terminal illness and at the end of life.”
-
Federal, state, local laws & regulations (42 CFR 418.116)
The inspectors’ words, 392 words
“Based on policy titled “On Call of Patient Care-Addendum,” clinical record reviews, on-call log, and staff interview, it was determined the agency failed to comply with the nursing services one- hour response time of a patient experiencing a crisis situation or change in condition for five patients (P) (P1, P2, P3, P4, P5) of five patients sampled from the agency’s on-call report. Findings included: Review of policy titled “On Call of Patient Care-Addendum” dated 12/27/2023, revealed the following:“PROCEDUREB. On-site nursing services available within one hour of notification where the terminally ill and the patient with an advanced and progressive disease who has contracted for nursing services experiences a symptom-management crisis situation.” 1. Review of on call log for P1 revealed that agency was called on 03/01/2026 at 5:07 AM, and the nurse arrived at patient’s home at 6:31 AM. 2. Review of on call log for P2 revealed that on 03/01/2026, the agency was called at 6:09 PM and the nurse arrived at patient’s home at 7:16 PM. 3. Review of on- call log for P3 revealed that on 02/08/2026 the agency was called at 2:49 PM and at 5:10 PM. There is no documentation of a nursing visit made on 02/08/2026. On 02/09/2026 at 3:38 AM the agency was called again and the nurse arrived on 02/09/2026 at 5:08 PM. 4. Review of on- call log for P4 revealed that on 02/08/2026 the agency was called at 11:53 AM and the nurse arrived at 1:07 PM. 5. Review of on call log for P5 revealed that on 03/01/2026 at 6:19 PM the agency was called and the nurse arrived at 7:55 PM. On 03/10/2026 at 2:00 PM, during an office interview, the Director of Clinical Operations (DCO) confirmed P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, had a delay in nursing services during agency after hours. DCO acknowledged the problem with not meeting the one-hour window for arrival at patient’s homes after on call received and was identified as a problem in December 2025. On 03/10/2026 at 3:30 PM, during an office interview, the agency the agency Assistant Vice President (AVP) confirmed the agency had a problem with not meeting the one-hour window for arrival at patient’s homes after on call received and was identified as a problem in December 2025. He also confirmed the agency had been operating in this manner for years.”
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 411 words
“Based on review of agency policy titled “Plan of Care Process, “policy titled “On Call of Patient Care-Addendum,” review of on call log, clinical record reviews, and staff and family interviews, it was determined the hospice agency failed to provide effective pain management and symptom control for conditions related to the terminal illness and at the end of life for one Patient (P) (P3) of five patients reviewed. Findings included: Review of agency policy titled “On Call of Patient Care-Addendum,” dated 12/27/2023, revealed the following:“Procedure B:On-site nursing services are available within one hour of notification where the terminally ill and the patient with an advanced and progressive disease who has contracted nursing services experiences a symptom-management crisis situation.” Review of agency policy titled “Plan of Care Process,” dated 9/1/2021, revealed the following:“V1. The POC includes, but is not limited to:A. Interventions to manage pain and symptoms and identified issues/problems.D. Drugs and treatments necessary to meet the needs of the patient.” Review of on call log for P3 revealed that on 02/08/2026 at 1:51 PM, the agency received a call from the Assisted Living Facility (ALF) where P3 resides, stating that P3 is not doing well. Review of on call log for P3 revealed that on 02/08/2026 at 5:10 PM, the facility called again stating that “Ekit (Emergency medication kit) needs to be sent to [Name]”. Review of on call log for P3 revealed that on 02/09/2026 at 3:17 PM, the facility called the agency stating, Patient (P3) ceased breathing. Review of care coordination note dated 02/08/2026, ALF requesting Comfort Kit medications (same as E-Kit). On 02/09/2026 at 3:17 AM, agency was called to report P3 had ceased breathing. Review of the death visit note, the nurse arrived on 02/09/2026 at 5:08 AM. Review of death visit note revealed P3 expired on 02/09/2026 at 5:27 AM. Review of the document titled “pharmacy patient dispense history” revealed Comfort Kt for P3 arrived on 02/10/2026, the day after P3 expired. On 03/10/2026 at 2:00 PM , an office interview was conducted with Director of Clinical Operations (DOCO) who confirmed that P3 had a delay in nursing services during (after business hours). DOCO also confirmed that P3’s records failed to reveal that the nurse made a visit on 02/08/2026. On 3/12/2026 at 1:58 PM, during a phone interview, the family of P3 stated” P3 never received a Comfort Kit before she died, and the hospice never notified me that P3 had a change in condition.””
-
Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))
The inspectors’ words, 657 words
“Based on review of agency policies, clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the agency governing body failed to ensure the nursing services were made available within one hour of notification during afterhours (time when agency office is closed) and during regular business hours to meet patients’ needs for five patients (P) (P1 P2 P3 P4 P5) of five sampled patients from agency on-call report, failed to provide all persons providing hands-on care directly to patients had a current certification in basic cardiac life support (BCLS) or cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) certification. Specifically, the hospice failed to ensure that two clinical employees, certified nurse aide (CNA) AA, licensed practical nurse (LPN) BB, of eight clinical employees sampled maintained current BCLS or CPR certifications. The agency’s governing body failed to guarantee all patients’ rights were maintained by effectively controlling pain and managing symptoms related to terminal illnesses for one patient (P3) of five sampled patients. Findings included: 1. Review of agency policy titled “On Call of Patient Care-Addendum” dated 12/27/2023 revealed the following:“ProcedureB. On-site nursing services available within one hour of notification where the terminally ill and the patient with an advanced and progressive disease who has contracted for nursing services experiences a symptom-management crisis situation;” Review of the on-call log for P1 revealed that agency was called on 03/01/2026 at 5:07 AM, and the nurse arrived at patient’s home at 6:31 AM. Review of the on-call log for P2 revealed that on 03/01/2026, the agency was called at 6:09 PM and the nurse arrived at patient’s home at 7:16 PM. Review of the on-call log for P3 revealed that on 02/08/2026 the agency was called at 2:49 PM and again the agency was called at 5:10 PM. On 02/09/2026 at 3:38 AM the nurse arrived on 02/09/26 at 5:08 AMReview of the on-call log for P4 revealed that on 020/8/2026 the agency was called at 11:53 AM and the nurse arrived at 1:07 PM. Review of the on-call log for P5 revealed that on 03/01/2026 at 6:19 PM the agency was called and the nurse arrived at 7:55 PM. On 03/10/2026 at 2:00 PM during an office interview the Director of Clinical Operations (DCO) confirmed P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 had a delay in nursing services during agency after hours. DCO admitted the problem with not meeting the one-hour window for arrival at patients’ homes after on call received and was identified as a problem in December 2025. On 03/10/2026 at 3:30 PM during an office interview the agency the agency Assistant Vice President (AVP) admitted the agency had a problem with not meeting the one-hour window for arrival at patients’ homes after on call received and was identified as a problem in December 2025. He also confirmed the agency had been operating in this manner for years. 2. Review of policy titled “Administrative Policy Manual Personnel Records,” dated 05/01/2025, revealed the following:“PROCEDURE:V. Personnel record contents for Hospice employees may include but not be limited to:N. Copy of CPR certification, if required.” The HR file for CNA AA, with a hire date of 12/04/2023, failed to reveal a current BCLS or CPR certification. The HR file for LPN BB, with a hire date of 10/20/2020, failed to reveal a current BCLS or CPR certification. Surveyors informed the Director of Clinical Operations (DCO) of the missing current BCLS or CPR documentation for the above-mentioned employees on 03/10/2026, 03/11/2026, and 03/12/2026, and surveyors requested evidence of current BCLS or CPR certifications from the DCO on 03/10/2026, 03/11/2026, 03/12/2026, and the documents were not provided as of 03/12/2026 at 5:06 PM. According to review of the employees’ schedules, CNA AA and LPN BB were still seeing patients as of 03/12/2026. During an in-office interview on 03/12/2026 at 5:06 PM, the DCO revealed that no further documentation was available for CNA AA and LPN BB. The DCO confirmed the HR files lack required documentation. Cross reference L0512- patient’s rights”
May 14, 2025: complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency
-
Professional management responsibility (42 CFR 418.100(e))
The inspectors’ words, 287 words
“Based on clinical record review, review of policy titled “Professional Boundaries,” and staff and family interviews, it was determined the agency failed to obtain consent from family member of patient prior to taking patient out of facility for one patient (P) (P#1) of three sampled patients. The findings include: Review of policy titled “Professional Boundaries,” effective March 2013, reveals the following:Policy: Employees of (facility) work very closely with patients and their families during end-of-life care. Facility employees will maintain professionalism. Review of chaplains’ note dated 5/6/2025 at 8:09 AM reveals that chaplain (CH) AA failed to obtain consent from P#1’s family before he took the patient out for a car ride. On 5/12/25 at 2:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with CH AA. The CH AA said it was a mistake that he did not obtain consent from the P#1’s family before he took P#1 out. On 5/13/25 at 12:45 p.m., an interview was conducted with Director of Clinical Operation (DCO) BB, who said that the staff of the memory care where the patient was living, called her and reported what the CH AA did. The DCO BB called the CH AA and investigated the incident. The DCO BB said that she called the P#1’s family, and they were terribly upset, because the CH AA did not get permission from them before he took the P#1 out for a car ride. On 5/13/25 at 6:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with the P#1’s family member. She verbalized her concern that the CH AA took her mother out for a car ride without their consent. She also said that her brother was upset and immediately removed their mother from their agency and placed her in another hospice agency.”
All 7 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2026 | Recertification inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Jun 24, 2026 | Recertification inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Jun 10, 2026 | Recertification inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Apr 29, 2026 | Recertification inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Mar 13, 2026 | Recertification inspection by the state | 5 deficiencies cited |
| May 14, 2025 | Complaint inspection by the state | 1 deficiency cited |
| Oct 8, 2024 | Complaint inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 5, 2019.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- Cited for CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. to patients’ health or safety in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 91.8% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 27% at home, 69% in assisted living, 1% in a nursing facility, 3% elsewhere.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 11.5 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 6% |
| Visits near death | 91.8% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Sage Hospice Holdings, L.L.C. owns 100% directly since Sep 1, 2020.
- Three Oaks Hospice, Inc. runs it.
- 15 owners or officers are people: Jeffrey Desalvo (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Edwin Johnston Cox (managing employee (on the payroll)); David C Gasmire (corporate director); Andrew R Calkins (corporate director, 0%); Andrew R Calkins (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Jill Zinney (managing employee (on the payroll)); Owen Davis (corporate director, 0%); Kelly A Priegnitz (corporate director, 0%); Scott Johnson (corporate officer); Phillip Campbell (corporate director, 0%); Jeffrey S Goodman (corporate officer); Lisa M Pekar (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Andrea F Bohannon (corporate officer, 0%); Andrea F Bohannon (corporate director); Ross J Taylor (corporate officer, 0%).
- A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cypress Purchaser, LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jun 5, 2025 |
| Cypress Midco, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jun 5, 2025 |
| Three Oaks Hospice, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jun 5, 2025 |
| Three Oaks Hospice, Inc. | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | 100% | Jun 5, 2025 |
| Cypress Parent Holdings, LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jun 5, 2025 |
| Sage Hospice Holdings, L.L.C. | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Sep 1, 2020 |
| Sage Hospice Intermediate Holdings, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Sep 1, 2020 |
| Martis Partners IV Cypress Aggregator LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 85.7% | Jun 5, 2025 |
| Martis Partners IV Three Oaks Co-Invest, LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 11.8% | Jun 5, 2025 |
| Martis Partners IV, LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 8.5% | Jun 5, 2025 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 84% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 97.22% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 51.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 52 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 30188, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2; this one had 6.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Agape Hospice Care of Cherokee County, LLC This hospice | 6 |
| Wellstar Community Hospice | 13 |
| Hospice Atlanta | 15 |
| Georgia Mountain Hospice, Inc. | 4 |
| Pruitthealth Hospice and Palliative Care-Atlanta | 0 |
| Gentiva | 10 |
| Pruitthealth Hospice-Calhoun | 1 |
| Vitas Healthcare Corporation of Georgia | 10 |
| Pruitthealth Hospice-Gainesville | 2 |
| Heritage Hospice, Inc. | 1 |
| Compassus-Kennesaw | 5 |
| Dynamic Hospice | 4 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.