Gentiva
A hospice in Newnan, Georgia 30265
2525 Highway 34 East, Newnan, Georgia 30265. (770) 502-1104.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 9 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean2
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
9 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 30 hospices serving ZIP code 30265 had 2.5.
The last inspection on record was on Aug 26, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Aug 26, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 361 words
“Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patient #2,#3,#4,#6,#13,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient#2: During home visit it was noted that assisted living has medication profile indicated patient receiving alprazolam 0.5mg 1 by mouth BID as needed for agitation or anxiety. However, the agency medication profile indicates to take every 6 hours. The assisted living medication profile indicates patient taking Haloperidol 1mg every 6 hours as needed for agitation. However, the agency medication profile indicates dose is 0.5mg every 6 hours. It was also noted that assisted living medication list indicates patient taking the following: Anti-diarrhea 2mg, AZO D-mannose 500mg, Bisacodyl 10mg suppository, Cranberry 450mg, Diphenhydramine 25mg, escitalopram oxalate 10mg, Antacid anti-gas 20ml, Geri-Tussin 100/5ml, ibuprofen 200mg, methimazole 5mg, milk of magnesia , ondansetron 4mg, risperidone 1 mg, senna+docusate, trazodone 50mg. There is no evidence of these on the agency medication profile. Patient#3: During home visit it was noted there was no senna in home. However, the medication profile indicates this is a scheduled daily medication. Patient#4: During home visit caregiver indicates giving Humalog insulin on a sliding scale and uses a math calculation to determine dose, and giving glargine insulin as needed. However, medication profile states insulin glargine 26 unit daily and Humalog 26 units 3 times a day. Patient#6: Medication order 5/4/26 states all medications to be given via PEG except Zofran. However, for ASA 81mg, Celexa 10mg, oxycodone 5mg senna 8.6, and cetirizine 10mg the medication profile indicates route is oral with alternate route PEG. Patient#13: Medication profile indicates Tylenol extra strength 500mg take 2 every 8 hours as scheduled routine medication. However, the instruction states as needed every 8 hours. Patient#14: The medication profile indicates fentanyl patch 1 every 72 hours. However, there is no evidence of instructions for where to apply or if rotation of sites is needed.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 176 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #2,#6,#13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient#2: The plan of care indicates interventions are active for bleeding precautions. However, this patient is no longer on anticoagulant and bleeding precautions were removed from aide plan of care but not nursing plan of care. Patient#6: Oxygen safety problems, goals, and interventions are noted on the plan of care. However, there is no evidence in record that the patient is ordered or uses oxygen. Patient#13: The aide plan of care states patient is on skin precautions. There is no evidence of skin precautions on the main plan of care. The record indicates patient is bedbound, incontinent, and has foot drop.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 249 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #2,#3,#6) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient#2: During home visit it was noted that assisted living has medication order indicated patient receiving alprazolam 0.5mg 1 by mouth BID as needed for agitation or anxiety. However, the agency medication order indicates to take every 6 hours. The assisted living medication order indicates patient taking Haloperidol 1mg every 6 hours as needed for agitation. However, the agency medication order indicates dose is 0.5mg every 6 hours. It was also noted that assisted living medication orders include patient taking the following: Anti-diarrhea 2mg, AZO D-mannose 500mg, Bisacodyl 10mg suppository, Cranberry 450mg, Diphenhydramine 25mg, escitalopram oxalate 10mg , Antacid anti gas 20ml, Geri-Tussin 100/5ml, ibuprofen 200mg, methimazole 5mg, milk of magnesia , ondansetron 4mg, risperidone 1 mg, senna+docusate, trazodone 50mg. There is no evidence of medication order for these in hospice record. Patient#3: Metronidazole is noted as active on the medication order for foot wound. However, updated wound care order did not include this medication. Patient#6: Nurse documentation 7/28/26 indicates patient has a PEG tube. Review of record revealed physician order 08/04/26 ordered Isosource 1.5 for nutrition and indicated all meds to be given via PEG tube except Zofran which may be administered sublingual. This order was not intended for this patient as this patient does not have a peg tube.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 156 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #1,#3,#5) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient#1: The record indicates per aide plan of care that patient is given a shower. There is no evidence of shower safety equipment on supply order for plan of care. The patient has a diagnosis of Parkinson and has had multiple falls including a recent fall with femur fracture. Patient#3: The record indicates patient has a foley. There is no evidence of foley supplies noted on supply order for plan of care. Patient#5: The record indicates per aide plan of care that patient is given a shower. There is no evidence of shower safety equipment on supply order for plan of care. Patient has foley, is a fall risk , uses wheelchair or rollator at all times.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
The inspectors’ words, 258 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #4,#7,#8,#10) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient#4: Nurse documentation on 8/4/26 indicates patient spouse tells nurse that 1/2 cough syrup is water. She thinks their son did it as he has a drug problem. There is no evidence of updated plan of care problems, goals, or interventions regarding medication safety and education caregiver. Patient#7: The record indicates on 8/2/26 patient went to ER for seizure like activity. Medication order in chart indicates hospice MD ordered lorazepam for signs and symptom of seizures. No evidence of update to plan of care for problems, goals, or interventions related to seizure precautions and education. Patient#8: IDG note on 7/23/26 nurse documentation indicates patient having multiple episodes of chest pain. There is no evidence plan of care updated to address this. Patient#10: Nurse documentation on PRN visit 8/1/26 indicates patient fell down the stairs in home. She was found by daughter with blood on her head due to skin tear. Patient had bruising to right knee and left shoulder. Patient now residing upstairs in the home with bathroom available to her. There is no evidence of home safety problem, goals, or interventions updated on plan of care. There is no evidence of safety measure put in place to prevent patient from accessing stairs as she resides upstairs or for continuous supervision of patient as patient previous left alone.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 122 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that the IDG shares information on a on-going basis with non-hospice healthcare providers furnishing services unrelated to the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient#7: Nurse documents that patient was sent to ER 8/2/26 for possible seizure like activity. There is no evidence of any follow-up by agency with the ER visit documented in the chart. There is no evidence of discharge papers or ER report noted in patient chart. Patient went to ER for evaluation and returned home. However, patient did not discharge from hospice. There is no evidence in the record of the communication/sharing of information with the IDG and the ER regarding the visit for seizure activity.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 179 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #5,#9) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient#5: Skin precautions are noted on the main plan of care. There is no evidence of this noted on the aide plan of care. Patient#9: The aide plan of care states patient has functional /mobility limitations. There is no evidence on the aide plan of care to specify the functional limitations of left hemiparesis.”
-
Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. The annual report indicates volunteer hours for 2025 were 3.31%. The agency put a PIP in place on 7/1/26. The volunteer percentage for July of 2026 is 1.82%.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
The inspectors’ words, 112 words
“Upon patient client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #3,#6) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient#3: MSW entered a missed visit note on 3/19/26. The note states missed visit was 3/13. However patient admitted 3/15. Patient#6: Nurse documentation on 7/28/26 indicates patient has a PEG tube. Further review of record revealed this patient does not have a peg tube and this was documented in the wrong chart.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2026 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 9 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 6, 2008.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.1% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 57% at home, 37% in assisted living, 5% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 9.3 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 4.9% |
| Visits near death | 97.1% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 6 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); Kassie Kelly (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Charlotte Midco, LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Falcon Hospice, LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Charlotte Buyer, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Curo Health Services LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Kah Hospice Company, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Ch Services Group Holdings Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Ch Services Holdings Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 1, 2022 |
| Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 60% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Humana Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Aug 11, 2022 |
| Centerwell Health Services Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 40% | Aug 11, 2022 |
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 79% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 79% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 98.88% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 67% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 30 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 30265, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2.5; this one had 9.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Gentiva This hospice | 9 |
| Amedisys Hospice Care of Newnan | 7 |
| Adoration Hospice | 8 |
| Affinis Hospice | 0 |
| Hospice Atlanta | 15 |
| West Georgia Hospice | 0 |
| Pruitthealth Hospice-Macon | 2 |
| Vitas Healthcare Corporation of Georgia | 10 |
| Heritage Hospice, Inc. | 1 |
| Brightmoor Hospice, LLC | 23 |
| Harbor Grace Hospice, Inc. | 8 |
| Compassus-Fayetteville | 1 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.