Hearth Record

Crescent Hospice

A hospice in Augusta, Georgia 30907

621 NW Frontage Road, Suite 101, Augusta, Georgia 30907. (706) 447-2461.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

12 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 24 hospices serving ZIP code 30907 had 4.5.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 8, 2025: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

12 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 8, 2025: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care12 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 186 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #2,5,8) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 2: Polyethylene glycol 3350 on the active medication profile does not have instructions on how to dilute. COS - Order written to included instructions on how to dilute. Patient 5: The RN documentation indicated that the patient is using oxygen at 2LNC. No evidence on medication profile for the oxygen at 2LNC. The current medication profile is for oxygen 4LNC. COS - New order written to update during survey. Patient 8: The RN documentation indicated that the patient is titrating oxygen at 4LNC, 4.5LNC, and 6LNC. No evidence on medication profile for the oxygen by titrated. The current medication profile is for oxygen is 5LNC. COS - New order written to update during survey.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 121 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient 1: No evidence that a comprehensive assessment was completed every 15 days between the following dates: 12/20/2024 and 01/07/2025, 25 days between assessments, and 02/17/2025-03/07/2025, 18 days between assessments.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 139 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #7,9) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient 7: The record indicates that patient developed a wound to the right buttock on 06/24/2025. No evidence that the wound was measured for the weeks of 07/07/2025 and 07/21/2025. Agency policy is for wounds to be measured weekly. Patient 9: The record indicates that patient was admitted with a wound to the sacrum. No evidence that the wound was measured for the weeks of 06/16/2025, 07/07/2025, and 07/21/2025. Agency policy is for wounds to be measured weekly.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 143 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #2) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 2: The medical record indicated that the patient was admitted with a foley catheter and takes Enoxaparin injections as a blood thinner for history of pulmonary embolus. No evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to risk for bleeding, Genito/urinary system, or risk for infection due foley catheter included in the plan of care. The medical record indicated that the patient was admitted with a foley catheter.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 284 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #2,5,7,8) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 2: Plan of care has an active order for Polyethene glycol that does not have instructions on how to dilute. The record indicated the patient was admitted with indwelling Foley catheter. No evidence of related orders for the care and management of the Foley catheter. COS- New order written add instruction of how to dilute polyethene glycol and for foley catheter management. Patient 5: The RN documentation indicated that the patient is using oxygen at 2LNC. No evidence that an order was received for the oxygen at 2LNC. The current order is for oxygen 4LNC. COS-New order written for oxygen titration order during survey.The medical records indicated that patient had a foley catheter at the time of admit. No evidence that an order was received to identify who was responsible for performing care/maintenance of the foley catheter, hospice staff or facility staff. COS -New physician order to identify who was responsible for performing care/maintenance of the foley catheter during survey. Patient 7: The medical record indicated that the patient had wounds to the left and right buttocks. No evidence that an order was received for wound care to be provided to those wounds and frequency for the wound care to be provided. Patient 8: The RN documentation indicated that the patient is titrating oxygen at 4LNC, 4.5LNC, and 6LNC. No evidence that an order was received for the oxygen by titrated. The current order is for oxygen 5LNC. New order written to update during survey.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 157 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1,3,4) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The clinical documentation indicated that the patient uses a rolling walker to help with altered mobility. No evidence that a rolling walker was included on the current DME list. COS - order written to add rolling walker to the current DME list. Patient 3: No evidence that supplies related to foley catheter insertion or maintenance was included in the current supply list. COS - order written to add foley catheter to the current supply list. Patient 4: The medical record indicated that the patient uses a walker for help with altered mobility. No evidence that a walker was included on the current DME list. COS - order written to add walker to the current DME list.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services provided are based on all assessments of the patient and family needs. Patient 10: The initial social worker evaluation performed on 06/02/2025 indicated that the patient agreed with a plan of care that included “one visit a month and PRN visits” There was no evidence of a follow-up or any additional scheduled visits by the social work provider. No evidence that patient/CG declined further visits.”

    Rule L0556. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 158 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #10) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 10: The aide POC has active DNR precautions. The medical record indicated that the patient’s current code status is full code. COS - Aide plan of care undated to remove DNR precautions.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 161 words

    “Upon patient record review 3 of 14 (Patient #4,7,9) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 4: No evidence that the RN completed a supervisory visit every 14 days. The record indicated that an aide supervisory visit was conducted on 07/03/2025 and not completed again until the start of survey. Patient 7: No evidence that the RN completed a supervisory visit every 14 days. The record indicated that an aide supervisory visit was conducted on 06/17/2026 and not completed again until 07/08/2025. Patient 9: No evidence that the RN completed a supervisory visit every 14 days between the following dates: 05/20/2025 and 06/04/2025 (15 days), and 07/01/2025 and 07/30/2025 (29 days).”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. No evidence that the agency utilized volunteers at least 5% of the total patient care hours in 2024. The total usage of volunteers for 2024 was 1.71%.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #5) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 5: RN documentation stated that the patient admission diagnosis was cerebral infarction. The medical director stated in the CTI that the patients admit diagnosis was Chronic subdural hematoma.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 149 words

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that the hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider (nursing facility or hospice) is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in the hospice plan of care. Patient 2: The medical records indicated that patient had a foley catheter at the time of admit and a wound to the sacrum. No evidence that an order was received to identify who was responsible for performing wound care, the hospice staff or facility staff. No evidence that the order received from the physician for the foley catheter included the size, change frequency, and who was responsible for performing care/maintenance of the foley catheter, hospice staff or facility staff. COS -New physician order both the foley catheter and wound care received during survey.”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 8, 2025Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care12 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 13, 2006.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 100% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 81% at home, 14% in assisted living, 4% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.5%
Visits near death100.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Care Hospice, Inc. owns 100% directly since Dec 10, 2021.
  • 11 owners or officers are people: John B Hunter (owns 5% or more through other companies, 9.42%); Jesse Reo Moore (corporate officer); Jesse Reo Moore (managing employee (on the payroll)); Sharon M Palmer (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jessica Hutcheson (managing employee (on the payroll)); Bart K Valdez (corporate officer); Bart K Valdez (managing employee (on the payroll)); Grant Brown (corporate officer); Grant Brown (managing employee (on the payroll)); Dana K Reid (corporate officer); Dana K Reid (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Care Hospice, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Dec 10, 2021
Care Hospice Acquisition, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 10, 2021
Hospice Care Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 10, 2021
Hospice Care Holdings, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 10, 2021
Hospice Care Intermediate I, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 10, 2021
Hospice Care Intermediate II, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 10, 2021
Thl Equity Fund VIII Investors (Hospice Care), L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies29.16%Dec 10, 2021
Thomas H. Lee Parallel Fund VIII, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies27.44%Dec 10, 2021
Thomas H. Lee Equity Fund VIII, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies15.07%Dec 10, 2021

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 95.2% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 81.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 24 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 30907, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4.5; this one had 12.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.