Hearth Record

Accentcare Hospice & Palliative Care of Pasco Coun

A hospice in Wesley Chapel, Florida 33544

2644 Cypress Ridge Blvd Ste 104, Wesley Chapel, Florida 33544. (813) 364-0311.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 9 hospices serving ZIP code 33544 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 21, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 18, 2025: recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies
  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,193 words

    “Based on agency policy’s, observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to develop a patient-centered plan of care for unlicensed staff members related to the type of assistive devices to be utilized during transfers for 6 of 23 patients reviewed who required assistance with transfers (Patients # 2, #3, # 4, #10, # 22, # 23). Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to develop a patient-centered plan of care for unlicensed staff members related to the type of assistive devices to be utilized during transfers for two (#2 and #22) of three sampled residents. Findings included: On 6/16/25 at 12:45 p.m. Resident #2 was observed at home with Staff E, Chaplain. The resident used a walker to ambulate and was able to move from a standing position to a sitting position. The resident was able to converse with the staff member appropriately, with some short-term memory concerns as evidence by the continuation of asking writer and staff if we had received the resident’s self-published pamphlet containing religious scriptures.Review of Resident #2s Patient Information Report revealed the resident’s start of care was 12/10/24 and the terminal diagnoses included senile degeneration of brain not elsewhere classified.Review of Resident #2s Aide Care Plan Report dated 6/16/25 at 10:11 a.m. showed staff were to “Use Assistive Devices for Transfers” every visit. The details related to the use of an assistive device was blank and did not reveal the type of assistive device staff were to utilize while assisting the resident during a transfer.Review of Resident #2’s Home Health Aide (HHA) visit note reports dated 5/27, 6/4, 6/9, and 6/16/25 revealed staff had used assistive devices for transfers however did not reveal the type device utilized.Review of the Registered Nurse (RN) subsequent with supervisory visit note, dtated 6/12/25 revealed the resident ambulated with “assistive device”.Review of Resident #2s Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) Comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Update report, dated 6/17/25 showed the reason for the meeting was as needed “prn”. Staff E documented the reason for the care plan discussion was “code status”.Review of Resident #2s recurring Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) Comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Update report, dated 6/10/25, showed team members (Chaplain, Physician, RN, and Social Work) had reviewed the plan of care. Review of Resident #22s Patient Information Record revealed the start of care was 4/5/25 with a primary diagnosis of senile degeneration of brain not elsewhere classified.Review of Resident #22s Aide Care Plan Report revealed the Home Health Aide (HHA) was to visit the resident twice weekly for 13 weeks. The report showed the HHA was to ‘Use Assistive Devices For Transfers” every visit and did not reveal the type of assistive device the aide was to utilize during a transfer.Review of Resident #22s recurring Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) Comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Update report, dated 6/12/25 showed the patient ambulated with walker, was agitated with care but easily redirected. The RN review showed no updates to the Aide Care Plan had occurred in the past 2 weeks.Review of Resident #22s Hospice Certification and Plan of Care for the Certification Period of 4/5/25 to 7/3/25 revealed the resident had functional limitations for bowel/bladder incontinence, endurance, and ambulation. Based on policy, observation, medical record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to have an individualized care plan for hospice aides to follow on three patients (#3, #4 and #23) out of 23 sampled patients.Findings included:Reviewed Policy and procedure titled, “Hospice aide Plan of Care”, #2112 Protocol, revised 06/10/2024…hospice aide: reviews aide plan of care before every visit. If there are any concerns, call the assigned RN case manager, TD, or RN supervisor for clarification.hospice aide: Delivers care according to the Aide Care Plan. 1. During observation on 06/16/2025 at 12:00 PM of Staff A revealed the aide utilized a gait belt (belt that provides support and handles for caregivers to hold, allowing for safe assistance of the patient with activities such as standing, walking or transferring between surfaces.) to assist Patient #4 out of seat and pivoted patient into a wheelchair to take him to the shower. 1. Reviewed the medical record for patient #4 revealed that the patient had fall precaution, bathing – shower seated every visit. No care plan category seen on assisted devices such as a gait belt or wheelchair noted. No care plan category on transfer noted. During an interview on 06/16/2025 at 11:58 AM with Staff A inquired about the transfer of patient, and she stated, “it is on the care plan in the tablet”. surveyor asked her to see the aide care plan in which it was not on there and she disclosed that she had this patient for a long time and just knows. During an interview on 06/16/2025 at 2:22 PM with Staff K regarding assistive devices on aid care plan and she disclosed that it is on the details of the care plan next to the use of assistive devices for transfer, review of patient #4 aide care plan and she stated it should be added to the details. 2. Reviewed the medical record for patient #3 revealed that the patient has fall precautions every visit, use of assistive devices for transfer every visit and bed bath every visit and bathing shower every visit. No category seen on the mode of transfer of patient nor what assistive devices used for transfer on the aide care plan. During an interview on 06/16/2025 at 2:22 PM with Staff K inquired about patient #3 aide care plan and was informed that the nurse would put either bed bath or shower not both and that in the details they would put what assistive device. She disclosed that it is not on the aide care plan for patient #3. During an interview on 06/18/2025 at 2:41 PM with Staff C regarding Patient #3 aide plan of care and she disclosed that it looks like the patient is one person assist but the aide would not know how to transfer the patient, no assistive devices listed. 3. Review of the medical record for Patient #23 revealed that the patient has fall precautions with safe transfer listed, functional limitations with max assist bed to chair, paraplegia and the aide care plan does not have how the patient transfers from bed to chair and no list of assistive devices to use. During an interview on 06/18/2025 at 2:11 PM with Staff B regarding aide plan of care and was informed that she reviews all new admission for transfer status. Review of patient #23 aide plan of care in which she stated, “We just noticed that it doesn’t say the way that they transfer only that they are maximum assist.” Findings included:A review of the Aide Hospice visit notes dated 6/6/2025, 6/9/2025, 6/13/2025 and 6/16/2025 for patient #10 by Staff M, Hospice Aide/CNA revealed, “Service: use assistive devices for transfers, completed: Yes”.An interview was conducted on 6/17/2025 at 11:00 a.m. with the Director of Clinical Operations regarding transfers on the Aide Care Plan Reports, she stated “a note on what kind of assistive devices should be listed in the details space for each patient by the supervising registered nurse”.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 231 words

    “Based on record reviews and interviews, the provider did not ensure the Hospice Aide followed the Plan of Care for 1 (#21) out of 23 patients reviewed. Findings included:A record review dated 4/9/2025 for patient #21, Aide Care Plan Report section titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) services revealed, “Nail Care-Clean Nails every visit”.A review of the Complaint Report dated 4/9/2025 for patient #21 revealed, “Staff F, Hospice Health Aide (HHA) cut patient fingernails too short. Blood was noted on approximately 80% fingernails during an assessment. Nurse was notified”.A Visit Note Report for patient #21 from Staff O, Registered Nurse (RN), dated 4/9/2025 revealed, “spoke to Medical Technician for facility, HHA had cut patient fingernails and left them bleeding. This nurse was unable to bandage fingers due to location”. Supervisory Functions on page 7 of 9 from same Visit Note Report for patient #21 revealed, “Is patient/family satisfied with the care delivered? Answer: No.”An interview was conducted with the Administrator on 6/17/2025 at 10:10 a.m. on review of the complaint report, she stated, “this hospice aide was re-educated on following the plan of care as written and to reach out if any questions”.An interview was conducted on 6/17/2025 at 1:00 p.m. with the Director of Clinical Operations regarding the actions of Staff F, she stated “the Aides are to only clean the fingernails, they are not to cut fingernails or toenails”.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 21, 2025Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Jun 18, 2025Recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 17, 2020.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 57% at home, 33% in assisted living, 8% in a nursing facility, 1% in an inpatient hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8%
Visits near death93.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Seasons Hospice & Palliative Care of Pasco County Holdings, Inc. owns 100% directly since Dec 21, 2020.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: John Guess (corporate officer, 0%); Brittany Stockton (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Heather Siscel (corporate officer); Andrew Johnston (corporate officer, 0%); John Hanna (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Dena Schwartz-Doty (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Horizon Acquisition Co Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 21, 2020
Horizon Group Holdings Intermediate 2, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 21, 2020
Horizon Group Holdings Intermediate 1, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 21, 2020
Horizon Group Holdings, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 21, 2020
Seasons Hospice & Palliative Care of Pasco County Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Dec 21, 2020
Accentcare, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 21, 2020
Pluto Acquisition I Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 21, 2020
Seasons Rollover Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies15.4%Dec 21, 2020
Advent International Gpe VIII-B, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies15.1%Dec 21, 2020
Advent International Gpe VIII-A LPOwns 5% or more through other companies11.2%Dec 21, 2020
Advent International Gpe Viii-B-3, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies6.3%Dec 21, 2020
Advent International Gpe VIII-H, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies5.5%Dec 21, 2020
Advent International Gpe Viii-B-1, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies5.4%Dec 21, 2020
Advent International Gpe VIII-I, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies5.1%Dec 21, 2020
Advent International Gpe VIII-J LPOwns 5% or more through other companies5%Dec 21, 2020

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 81% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.38% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 68.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 9 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 33544, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 2.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 9 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 33544
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Accentcare Hospice & Palliative Care of Pasco Coun This hospice2
Lifepath Hospice16
Suncoast Hospice1
Hph Hospice21
Haven Hospice46
Gulfside Hospice, Inc.5
Vitas Healthcare Corporation of Florida62
Accent Care Hospice & Palliative Care of Hillsboro8
Suncoast Hospice of Hillsborough, LLC0

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.