Lifepath Hospice
A hospice in Temple Terr, Florida 33637
12470 Telecom Dr, Ste 400, Temple Terr, Florida 33637. (813) 877-2200.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 16 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 2of 5 family caregiver rating
- 9of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
16 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 6 hospices serving ZIP code 33637 had 4.5.
The last inspection on record was on Oct 23, 2024: a complaint inspection by the state.
4 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
16 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Dec 21, 2023: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission16 deficiencies
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 193 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 9 of 14 patient records reviewed, of active patients, the Surveyor noted patient Plan of care goals had not been patient specific or measurable. Examples include: patient will communicate having attained enhanced comfort, patient will have reduced symptoms of agitation, patient will be free and safe from falls and the patient will demonstrate comfortable breathing. Caregiver will report decreased burden, and Skin compromise will be addressed when detected and patients comfort will be maintained. This was evident in each record reviewed and was validated with the Compliance Team present during record reviews. Observed in Record Review. In 18 of 23 patient records reviewed, plan of care goals were not specific or measurable. Examples of patient goals included: comfort will be maintained; pain level will be at an acceptable level; will be oriented to the extent possible at each visit; will remain safe and free from falls for the next 14 days; will maintain nutritional intake via PEG to achieve comfort; skin will be kept intact; dyspnea will be controlled within limits of disease. This RFI was reviewed with hospice leaders at the Vice President, Director and Manager level.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 9 home visits conducted, and records reviewed the plan of care did not include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. In the record of RRIPU#1 an order did not specify the size for a foley catheter, nor the cubic centimeters volume of the balloon. This RFI was reviewed with hospice leaders at the Vice President, Director and Manager level.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 580 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 8 of 14 patient records reviewed, of active patients, the Surveyor noted therapeutic duplication of as needed medications without clear clinical indications for use. for example, in RRNHV #1 the patient had Lorazepam 0.5 mg every 4 hours as needed for agitation and anxiety, and Lorazepam 2 mg every 6 hours as needed for anxiety and restlessness. The patient also had both Bisacodyl and Senna ordered as needed for constipation. RRNHV #2 the patient had both Polyethylene Glycol and Senna ordered as needed for constipation. The patient also had Home Oxygen 2-5 lpm as needed with no clear indication of what would trigger a flow rate change. RRNHV #4 the patient had Sennosides and Polyethylene Glycol both ordered as needed for constipation. The patient also had Lorazepam every 4 hours as needed for agitation and Olanzapine every 6 hours as needed for agitation/anxiety. RRNHV #5 patient had Lorazepam every 4 hours as needed for anxiety/agitation as well as haloperidol every 4 hours as needed agitation. In RRNHV #8, the patient had the medication Santyl ordered without specific indication of where it was to be applied. RRNHV #7 the patient had Diastat Acudial rectal kit 1 time per day as needed for seizures and diazepam every 12 hours as needed for seizures, RRNHV # 11- the order for Silver Sulfadiziazine Apply to affected skin for skin irritation/wound care had been missing the area of application. The patient also had MiraLAX, Senna and Bisacodyl ordered as needed for constipation and Tramadol and Acetaminophen ordered as needed for pain. 
RRNHV #12 incomplete wound care order as it had not contained who was to complete the care nor the frequency. RRNHV #13 Orders for Dulcolax and Senna as needed for constipation. This was validated with the compliance team present during the record review.
 Observed in Record Review. In 11 of 14 patient records reviewed, of active patient records, the Surveyor noted the Plan of Care missing patient specific identified problems. For example, In RRNHV #1 the patient had issues with constipation; however, this had not been included on the POC. RRNHV #2 the patient had constipation and a new pressure injury on the buttocks, but this had not been included on the poc. The patient in RRNHV #3 had liver cirrhosis with significant ascites that was being drained 3 times per week; however, there had been nothing on the POC to even indicate that this had been a problem for the patient. In RRNHV #4 the patient had edema, insomnia, nausea and shortness of breath, but these had not been addressed on the POC and in RRNHV #6 the patient was a diabetic on 2 doses of insulin; however, diabetes had not been included on the POC. The same patient also had a primary diagnosis of CHF that had not been addressed, as well as COPD, edema and urinary tract infections. RRNHV #7 POC had not contained pneumonia and pulmonary symptoms, as well as g-tube and feedings. In RRNHV #8 the POC had not contained nutrition, fall, and the recent GI bleed. RRNHV #9 the POC had not addressed: pain, dysphagia, dysarthria, dyspnea, falls and nutrition. RRNHV #10 the POC had not included nutrition, cirrhosis complications, and diabetes. RRNHV #11 the POC had not included: Peg-Tube, Tube Feeds, nausea, skin redness and CHF and in RRNHV #14 the POC had been missing falls, constipation, and CHF. This was validated with the Compliance team present during the record review. 
”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 161 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 14 patient records reviewed, of active patients, the Surveyor noted orders for the use of Durable Medical Equipment requiring interventions had been missing from the Plan of Care. For example, in RRNHV #3 the patient had liver failure with significant abdominal ascites. The RN and the PCG had been draining off 1,000- 2,000 ml of fluid 3 times per week using an Aspira Drainage Kit. There had been no orders for this procedure in the patient record. RRNHV #7, the patient had a G-Tube and a continuous feeding pump system. The patient medical record had no orders related to the care of the G-tube, nor the safe care and management of the feeding pump. In RRNHV #8 the patient had an open wound receiving care by the RN and the care home; however, there had been no orders to provide the care. This was validated with the Compliance Team present during the record review.”
-
Initial & comprehensive assessment of patient (42 CFR 418.54)
“Observed in Patient Home. In 3 of 9 home visits conducted, and records reviewed hospice staff did not identify potential safety risks in a patients’ residence. In the records of RRIPU#2, RRHV#2 and RRHV#4 safety assessments were not documented as part of the initial comprehensive assessment. This RFI was reviewed with hospice leaders at the Vice President, Director and Manager level.”
-
Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))
“Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 9 home visits conducted, and records reviewed the hospice did not document completion of the initial comprehensive assessment within five days of election of the hospice benefit. In the record of RRIPU#1 spiritual, psychosocial, and bereavement assessments were not documented within the required time frame. The same was true of spiritual assessments in the records of RRIPU#2, RRHV#1, and RRHV#6. This RFI was reviewed with hospice leaders at the Vice President, Director and Manager level”
-
Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 9 home visits conducted, and records reviewed the interdisciplinary team did not update the comprehensive assessment every 15 days or less. In the record of RRIPU#1 the elements required of a comprehensive assessment were not gathered by an RN within the required time. This RFI was reviewed with hospice leaders at the Vice President, Director and Manager level.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, of active patients, the Surveyor noted orders for specific patient education noted on the IDG, but could not validate that the education occurred. IDG RRNHV #10 had orders for diabetic education, including monitoring of blood sugars; however, there had been no documentation that the education had been provided nor that blood sugars had been monitored. This was validated with the Compliance Team present during the record reviews.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 9 home visits conducted, the hospice did not use standard precautions to reduce the risk of infection. For example, at RRHV#3 an RN performed hand hygiene but only covered her palms and the anterior surfaces of her fingers with the gel multiple times. These actions did not comply with the Hand Hygiene policy or CDC guidelines. This RFI was reviewed with hospice leaders at the Vice President, Director and Manager level.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, where a Hospice Aide (HA) was ordered, the HA Plan of Care (POC) created by the RN has assigned tasks to the HA that had not applied to the patient they were providing care to. In RRNHV #3 and RRNHV #4, the HA POC had ‘Empty Ostomy’ listed as care to be provided; however the patient had not had an ostomy. This was validated with the Compliance team present during record review.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))
The inspectors’ words, 97 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 5 patient records reviewed, where the patient had Hospice Aide (HA) Services ordered, care was not documented as being provided according to the ordered plan of care. For example, in RRHV #2 and RRHV #3, the HA had orders to record the last bowel movement (BM); however, this had not been documented as completed. In RRNHV #12, the HA had orders to record the BM and the Mid Arm Circumference; however this had not been documented as completed. 
This was validated with the Compliance team present during the record review.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 9 home visits conducted, and records reviewed the hospice did not ensure that a registered nurse supervised the hospice aide during an on-site visit to the patient’s home. In the record RRIPU#1 supervisory visits were not documented every 14 days as required.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. Volunteer competence was not assessed and documented as part of orientation. This was learned during the volunteer program tracer and confirmed during the HR competency session. This RFI was reviewed with hospice leaders at the Vice President, Director and Manager level.”
-
Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 142 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records reviewed, of active patients, the Surveyor noted education on the proper use of equipment had not been documented as provided to the caregiver providing the care. For example, in RRNHV #3, the patient care giver had been using an Aspira System to drain 1000-2000 ml of fluid from the patients abdomen 3 times per week. The patient record had no documentation to support that the pcg had received education on providing this care nor that the PCG had demonstrated safe use of the system including observation of infection control. RRNHV #7, the patient had a G-Tube feeding system with continuous feeds. There had been no documentation available to validate education had been provided to the parent providing the care. This was validated with the Compliance team present during the record reviews. 
”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 9 home visits conducted, the hospice did not coordinate the patient’s care, treatment or services. For example, during visit RRHV#6 no current plan of care, hospice election form, advance directives, and certificates of terminal illness were found in the skilled nursing facility where the patient resided. This RFI was confirmed by the Compliance Manager who was at the visit.”
-
N/a (42 CFR 418.110(c)(1))
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 9 home visits conducted, the organization did not identify potential safety risks. At RRHV#2 one of two M-24 tanks and 2 M-4 tanks were standing unsecured in the patient’s home. The HHA did not identify the problem or act to correct it. This RFI was confirmed by the Compliance Manager who was at the visit.”
All 3 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2024 | Complaint inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Feb 1, 2024 | Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission | No deficiencies cited |
| Dec 21, 2023 | Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission | 16 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 4, 1984.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 92.1% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 59% at home, 30% in assisted living, 7% in a nursing facility, 1% in a hospital, 2% in an inpatient hospice.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 11.4 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 7.6% |
| Visits near death | 92.1% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Chapters Health System Inc. owns 100% directly since May 1, 2008.
- Chapters Health System Inc. runs it.
- 23 owners or officers are people: Andrew K Molosky (managing employee (under contract), 100%); Robert M Walker (managing employee (on the payroll)); Tara Friedman (corporate officer); Tracy Robert (managing employee (under contract)); Andrew K Molosky (corporate officer, 0%); Todd A Webb (corporate officer); Rhonda G White (corporate officer); Valerie Zolman (corporate officer); Paola Delp (corporate officer); Kimberley Wolfe (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jerry Fogarty (corporate director); Jason M D’auria (managing employee (under contract)); Valerie H Goddard (corporate director); Sheri Strobel (corporate officer); Gayle Martin (corporate director); Edward Podgorski III (corporate director); Adam Besnard (corporate director); Gayle Eaton (corporate director); Mary Beth Reardon (corporate director, 0%); Latasha Mcfarlane (corporate director); Nicole Romence (corporate officer); Crystal Bucciarelli (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Crystal Bucciarelli (corporate director, 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chapters Health System Inc. | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | May 1, 2008 |
| Chapters Health System Inc. | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | 100% | May 1, 2008 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 75% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 79% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 99.9% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 40.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 9 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 6 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 33637, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4.5; this one had 16.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Lifepath Hospice This hospice | 16 |
| Suncoast Hospice | 1 |
| Gulfside Hospice, Inc. | 5 |
| Good Shepherd Hospice | 4 |
| Accent Care Hospice & Palliative Care of Hillsboro | 8 |
| Suncoast Hospice of Hillsborough, LLC | 0 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.