Hearth Record

Treasure Coast Hospice of Martin

A hospice in Stuart, Florida 34997

1201 SE Indian St, Stuart, Florida 34997. (772) 403-4500.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 5 hospices serving ZIP code 34997 had 11.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 26, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 26, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission7 deficiencies
  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 3 live discharge records, it was noted the organization failed to ensure that the patient was informed in advance about the expected outcomes of care and services. For example, in HOSRRRRDC#21 the patient was discharged from hospice services due to patient no longer terminally ill. The Notification of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was provided however, it was issued on the same day the patient was discharged. This finding was discussed and validated by the Director of Compliance and Director of Education.”

    Rule L0513. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 275 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 6 of 20 patient records reviewed, it was noted the organization failed to ensure that the hospice plan of care plan includes all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications necessary to meet the patient’s needs. For example in HOSRRHV#1, Hydromorphone 1mg/ml PRN for pain and Acetaminophen 650 mg supp PRN, the orders did not include specific indications to differentiate the use of each medication, such as mild, moderate, or severe pain. HOSRRHV#2, Xanax Tablet 0.5 mg 2 tablets Oral at bedtime to take 2 tablets PO at bedtime and 1/2 tablet (0.25 mg) 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed, however, the orders did not include specific indication for use. HOSRRHV#5- Acetaminophen 650 mg supp. PRN for mild pain and Hydromorphone HCl 1 mg PRN for pain/sob, however, the orders did not include specific indication for use. HOSRRHV#6 -Acetaminophen 650 mg supp. PRN for mild pain and Hydromorphone HCl 1 mg PRN for pain/sob, however, the orders did not include specific indication for use.HOSRRNHV#7, multiple PRN pain medications i.e., Acetaminophen 650 mg suppository PRN for pain; Hydromorphone 1 mg PRN for pain, and Oxycodone-Acetaminophen 10-325 mg PRN for pain, were ordered for pain management; however, the orders did not include specific indications to differentiate the use of each medication, such as mild, moderate, or severe pain. HOSRRNHV#18 - Acetaminophen 650 mg supp. PRN for mild pain and Hydromorphone HCl 1 mg for pain/sob, however, the orders did not include specific indication for use. This finding was discussed and validated by the Director of Compliance and Director of Education.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 271 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 6 of 10 active patient records with hospice aide services, it was noted the organization had failed to ensure that the written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a registered nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide. For example, in HOSRRHV#5, the aide care plan did not contain instructions related to oxygen safety precautions for a patient receiving oxygen therapy, nor did it include guidance for reporting signs and symptoms of bleeding associated with antiplatelet medication such as Aspirin. HOSRRHV#6, the aide care plan did not contain instructions related to oxygen safety precautions for a patient receiving oxygen therapy. HOSRRNVH#7, the aide care plan did not contain instructions related to oxygen safety precautions for a patient receiving oxygen therapy, nor did it include guidance for reporting signs and symptoms of bleeding associated with anti-coagulant/antiplatelet medications, including Aspirin and Plavix. HOSRRNHV#8, the aide care plan did not contain instructions related to bleeding precautions as it did not include guidance for reporting signs and symptoms of bleeding associated with antiplatelet medications, such as Aspirin. HOSRRNHV#11, the aide care plan did not contain instructions related to oxygen safety precautions for a patient receiving oxygen therapy, nor did it include guidance for reporting signs and symptoms of bleeding associated with antiplatelet medications, Aspirin. HOSRRNHV#15, the aide care plan did not contain instructions related to bleeding precautions as it did not include guidance for reporting signs and symptoms of bleeding associated with antiplatelet medications, such as Aspirin. This finding was discussed and validated by the Director of Compliance and Director of Education.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 143 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 23 patient records reviewed, In the In-Patient Unit (IPU), the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was ordered to obtain vital signs measurements. Review of three (3) shift notes contained no documentation that vital signs were obtained, and one (1) note contained incomplete vital sign documentation with temperature and pulse rate measurement missing. During an interview, the IPU Nurse Manager stated that CNAs document vital signs on a paper record rather than in the electronic medical record. However, the Nurse Manager was unable to provide the paper documentation (VS log) for review, explaining that the vital sign logs were not uploaded in the EMR and had already been shredded. Therefore, there was no evidence available to verify that the vital signs were obtained and documented as required. This finding was discussed and validated by the Inpatient unit Manager.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 129 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 23 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the organization failed to ensure that all documentation entries were appropriately authenticated and dated. For example in HOSRRDC#1, reviewed of the paper-document DC Instructions revealed that the document was signed and dated; however, the signature did not include a professional credentials. Also noted in record HOSIn-patient#1, review of the IPU clinical record revealed that a CNA clinical note remained unsigned for four days after the care was provided. During an interview , the IPU nurse Manager stated that the CNA clinical notes are expected to be completed and electronically signed before the end of each shift. This finding was discussed and validated by the Director of Compliance, Director of Education, and IPU Nurse Manager.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 241 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 7 of 20 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to evaluate the patient’s understanding of the education and training provided. For example, HOSRRHV#1, the hospice nurse documented teaching related to pain management, however, the patient’s/caregiver’s response to the education was not documented. There was no evidence that understanding of the instructions was assessed or validated. HOSRRHV#2, the hospice nurse documented teaching related to dietary modification to manage bowel function and pain relief measures, however, the patient’s/caregiver’s response to the education was not documented. HOSRRHV#4, the hospice nurse documented teaching related to hydration and maintain proper fluid intake; causes and management of nausea, however, the patient’s/caregiver’s response to the education was not documented HOSRRNHV#8, the hospice nurse documented teaching the patient/family regarding oxygen safety; however, the record lacked documentation of the patient’s or caregiver’s response to the education, including understandin, comprehension, or need for reinforcement. HOSRRNHV#9, the hospice nurse documented teaching related to maintaining a safe environment; however, the patient’s or caregiver’s response to education was not documented. HOSRRNHV#10, the hospice nurse documented educating the patient/caregiver’ on pressure relief measures to prevent further skin breakdown; however, the patient’s or caregiver’s response to the teaching was not documented. HOSRRNHV#11, the hospice nurse documented educating the patient/caregiver’ on pain management, however, the patient’s or caregiver’s response to the teaching was not documented. This finding was discussed and validated by the Director of Compliance and Director of Education & Quality..”

    Rule L0702. Standard-level.

  • N/a (42 CFR 418.110(c))

    “Observed in Building Tour. While on survey, the exterior oxygen manifold area was identified with unsecured oxygen pressure cylinders. This was verified by the facilities team.”

    Rule L0824. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 26, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 18, 1984.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 15.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 11% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 45% at home, 28% in assisted living, 22% in a nursing facility, 3% in an inpatient hospice, 1% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day15.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends11%
Visits near death96.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Health and Palliative Services of the Treasure Coast owns 100% directly since Oct 1, 2004.
  • Health and Palliative Services of the Treasure Coast runs it.
  • 23 owners or officers are people: Richard Leigh Lynch (corporate director); Cynthia Lennard (corporate director); Jackie Kendrick (corporate officer); Jackie Kendrick (other role (CMS gives no detail)); Peter W Culley (corporate director); William Duwane Pickens (corporate director); Richard Paul Mishock (corporate director); Carl Martello (managing employee (on the payroll)); Ewald Wesley Bender (corporate director, 0%); Mary Ann Alderman (corporate director); Glenn Allen Beville (managing employee (under contract)); Mike Ammen (corporate director); Patrick Lawrence Silas (corporate director); Mary Coleman (corporate director); Jimmy Anne Haisley (corporate director); Philip Y Berger (corporate director); Christopher Mcalpine (corporate director); Scott Hoffman (corporate director); Ann Louise Decker (corporate director); Tony Hurt (corporate director); Eileen Moore Emery (corporate director); John C Crouch (managing employee (on the payroll)); William George Clifford (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Health and Palliative Services of the Treasure CoastOwns 5% or more directly100%Oct 1, 2004
Health and Palliative Services of the Treasure CoastRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Oct 1, 2004

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.85% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 58.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 5 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 34997, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 11; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 5 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 34997
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Treasure Coast Hospice of Martin This hospice7
Treasure Coast Hospice of St Lucie11
Hospice of Okeechobee Incorporated4
Emerald Coast Hospice12
Vitas Healthcare Corporation of Florida62

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.