Emerald Coast Hospice
A hospice in Panama City, Florida 32405
401 E 23rd St, Ste C, Panama City, Florida 32405. (850) 769-0055.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 12 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
12 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 3 hospices serving ZIP code 32405 had 12.
The last inspection on record was on Jul 11, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jul 11, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care12 deficiencies
-
Initial assessment (42 CFR 418.54(a))
“Upon patient record review 1 of 27 (Patient #13) did not have evidence that the hospice Registered Nurse must complete an initial assessment within 48 hours after the election of hospice care in accordance with §418.24 Patient#13: The record indicated that the election of benefit states effective date 8/8/23. The election of benefit form was signed and dated 8/8/24. There is no evidence RN initial assessment performed within 48 hours of 8/8/2023.”
-
Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))
“Upon patient record review 1 of 27 (Patient #13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient#13: The record indicated that the election of benefit states effective date 8/8/23. The election of benefit form was signed and dated 8/8/24. There was no evidence psychosocial and spiritual assessment completed within 5 days of 8/8/23.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))
“Upon patient record review 1 of 27 (Patient #4) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient#4: There is no evidence of an initial spiritual assessment being completed.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 108 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #11) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient#11: The record indicates on 4/23/25 ketoconazole 2% apply 1 cm 2 times a day. However, there was no specified area of application indicated. The medication profile was update with location in order to correct on site.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 276 words
“Upon patient record review, 5 of 27 (Patient #1,#3,#11,#16,#17) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient#1: The record indicates the patient takes valproate 500mg/5ml 4 times a day for seizures. There is no evidence of seizure precautions on care plan. The record also indicates the patient has a PEG tube. There is no indication of goals and interventions regarding specific PEG tube care and flushes. The care plan was updated in order to correct on site. Patient#3: The record indicates seizure precautions are indicated on the aide plan of care. There is no evidence of seizure precautions on care plan. The Care plan was updated in order to correct on site. Patient#11: The record indicates seizure precautions, aspiration precautions, and oxygen safety/precautions are on the aide plan of care. There is no evidence of these precautions on care plan. This was updated in order to correct on site. Patient#16: The record indicates aspiration precaution are indicated on the aide plan of care. There is no evidence of this precaution on the care plan. This was updated in order to correct on site. Patient#17: The record indicates fall precaution are indicated on the aide plan of care. There is no evidence of this precaution on the care plan. This was updated in order to correct on site.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 99 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 27 (Patient #1,#11) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient#1: There was no evidence of an order for PEG tube care and flushes. An appropriate order was entered in order to correct on site. Patient#11: The record indicates on 4/23/25 ketoconazole 2% apply 1 cm 2 times a day. However, there was no specified area of application indicated. The order was update with location in order to correct on site.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 96 words
“Upon patient record review 1 of 27 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services provided are based on all assessments of the patient and family needs. Patient#4: The record indicates patient had an X-ray on 6/19/25 after a fall. The family called triage on 6/21 requesting results and was told the results had not yet been received. There was no evidence of results being received or any further follow up with X-ray company or patient. The agency obtained and uploaded the X-ray results and entered a coordination note.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 469 words
“Upon patient record review, 6 of 27 (Patient #1,#5,#7,#8,#9,#16,#19#20) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient#1: There is no evidence of fall precautions, aspiration precautions, or seizure precautions on aide plan of care. Also, there was no notification or mention that patient had PEG tube on aide plan of care. In order to correct on site, these needs were added to aide plan of care. Patient#5: The record indicates the aide frequency was ordered as 4 times per week. However, this order is unclear as documentation shows 2 aides going together 2 times per week. A new order was written with frequency of 2 aides to visit 2 times per week for a 2 person assist. Patient#7: The record indicates bleeding precautions are on the patient care plan. However, there is no evidence of this on the aide plan of care. This was added in order to correct on site. Patient#8: There is evidence that wheelchair, oral care, and nail care on the aide plan of care are assigned “every visit as needed”. In order to correct on site the aide plan of care was updated and as needed was removed. Patient#9: There is evidence that the shower task is assigned” every visit per patient request assist with getting into shower” on aide plan of care. This was corrected on site by updating to “ every visit stand by assist”. Patient#16: The record indicates bleeding precautions are indicated on the plan of care. There is no evidence of this on the aide plan of care. This was added to aide plan of care in order to correct on site. Patient#19: The record indicates fall precautions are indicated on the plan of care. There is no evidence of this on the aide plan of care. This was added to aide plan of care in order to correct on site. Patient#20: The record indicates the aide frequency was ordered as 4 times per week. However, this order is unclear as documentation shows 2 aides going together 2 times per week. A new order was written with frequency of 2 aides to visit 2 times per week for a 2 person assist.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 120 words
“Upon patient record review 2 of 27 (Patient #10,#17) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient#10: The record indicates the aide’s first visit to patient was on 6/19/25. There is no evidence of an aide supervisory visit being performed from 6/19 to present. The agency did completed an aide supervisory visit during survey on 7/9/25. Patient#17: There is no evidence of an aide supervisory visit completed between 5/22/25 and 6/23/25.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))
“Upon patient client record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #13) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient#13: The record indicated that the election of benefit states effective date 8/8/23. The election of benefit form was signed and dated 8/8/24.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
The inspectors’ words, 129 words
“Upon patient client record review, 2 of 27 (Patient #5,#6) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient#5: The aide plan of care indicates patient has an amputation. There is no evidence in patient chart of an amputation. This was documented in error and removed from the aide plan of care in order to correct on site. Patient#6: Upon review of record evidence showed that RN narrative on 7/1/25 and 6/27/25 were the exact same. This was also found for RN narrative on 6/13 and 6/22.”
-
Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))
“Upon client record review, 1 of 27 (Patient #6) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient#6: The care plan indicates there is an intervention for SN to assess PICC line dressing at every visit. There is no evidence of documentation that this was completed from 5/20/25-7/3. Documentation indicates the facility removed the PICC line on 7/3/25.”
All 3 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2025 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 12 deficiencies cited |
| Apr 25, 2025 | Complaint inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Feb 11, 2025 | Complaint inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 9, 1992.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.8% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 58% at home, 26% in assisted living, 11% in a nursing facility, 5% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 11.6 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 6.6% |
| Visits near death | 94.8% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Wiregrass Hospice, LLC runs it.
- 10 owners or officers are people: Jennifer Bowman (corporate director); Cathy S Blanchard (corporate director); David Robinson Arnold (managing employee (on the payroll)); Patience P Mcgee (corporate officer, 0%); Angela Eidt (corporate officer, 0%); Angela Eidt (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer); William H Long (corporate officer); William H Long (corporate director); Kirk Thevis (corporate officer).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jul 2, 2018 |
| Wiregrass Hospice Care LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 15, 2000 |
| Healthfield Operating Group, LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 15, 2000 |
| Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jul 8, 2018 |
| Centerwell Health Services Holding Corp | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 15, 2000 |
| Centerwell Health Services Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Feb 1, 2016 |
| Wiregrass Hospice, LLC | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | 100% | Mar 15, 2000 |
| Humana Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | Jul 2, 2018 | |
| Healthfield, LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | Mar 15, 2000 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 98.42% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 67.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 3 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 32405, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 12; this one had 12.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Emerald Coast Hospice This hospice | 12 |
| Vitas Healthcare Corporation of Florida | 4 |
| Vitas Healthcare Corporation of Florida | 62 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.