Hearth Record

Heartland Hospice (Broward)

A hospice in Plantation, Florida 33324

150 S Pine Island Rd Ste 540, Plantation, Florida 33324. (704) 664-2876.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 15 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

15 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 7 hospices serving ZIP code 33324 had 11.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 15, 2025: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

15 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

15 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 14, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care15 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 164 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 19 (Patients #4,#6,#7,#8,#11,#12,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications. Patient 4: Upon observation during home visit medication reconciliation, the facility medication profile did not contain scheduled docusate that was on the hospice medication profile. Patient 6: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of oxygen instructions on the medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The medication profile contained oxygen with a delivery method of a BIPAP in error. Patient had a nasal cannula for administration. Corrected on site. Patient 8,12,14: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of oxygen instructions on the medication profile, however an order for oxygen was present. Corrected on site. Patient 11: The medication profile contained Miralax oral powder with no instructions to mix with a diluent. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 110 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #8,#9) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient 8: There was no evidence of sacral wound measurements from admission 9/6/24 thru 11/11/24 as required per agency policy for weekly measurements. Patient 9: There was no evidence of wound measurements to left heel, ankle, and dorsum since admission 9/18/24 as required per agency policy for weekly measurements.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 230 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patients #8,#9,#12,#13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 8: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of oxygen and history of heart failure exacerbation causing hospitalization. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to cardiac and respiratory dysfunction included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 9: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to respiratory dysfunction included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 12: The patient is on hospice services with a brain tumor. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to neurological dysfunction included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 13: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient issue with orthopnea. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to respiratory dysfunction included in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 122 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #6,#7,#11) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 6: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of an order for oxygen rate, frequency, and delivery method. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The medical record contained an order for oxygen with a delivery method of a BIPAP in error. Patient had a nasal cannula for administration. Corrected on site. Patient 11: The medical record contained an order for Miralax oral powder with no instructions to mix with a diluent. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 199 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patients #1,#4,#7,#10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification assessment 9/10/24 identifying patient use of a walker, wheelchair, shower chair, and commode. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 4: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification assessment 9/26/24 identifying patient use of a hospital bed, low air loss mattress, and over bed table. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification assessment 9/30/24 identifying patient use of a walker. There was no evidence of an order for the walker included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient use of a bed, wheelchair, oxygen equipment, and nebulizer. There was no evidence of an order for the bed, wheelchair, oxygen equipment, and nebulizer. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 171 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #6,#10,#13) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 6: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification assessment 6/10/24 and 10/7/24 identifying patient issue with dysphagia requiring pureed diet and thickened fluids for aspiration prevention. There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to included problems, goals, and interventions related to dysphagia. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification assessment 10/15/24 identifying patient issue with increased dysphagia. There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to included problems, goals, and interventions related to dysphagia. Corrected on site. Patient 13: The medical record contained nursing documentation 9/24/24 identifying patient had a fall with right wrist fracture. There was no evidence the plan of care was updated to include problems, goals, and interventions related to fall safety. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 107 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #1,#3) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 1: The medical record contained an order for nursing visits twice weekly. There was no evidence of a second visit completed the week of 9/29/24. Corrected on site with late data entry of reason for missed visit. Patient 3: The medical record contained an order for nursing visits twice weekly. There was no evidence of a second visit completed the week of 10/27/24. Corrected on site with late data entry of reason for missed visit.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice investigates all adverse events, incidents, accidents, variances or unusual occurrences that involve patient care and develops a plan of correction to prevent the same or similar event from occurring again. Patient 13: The medical record contained nursing documentation 9/24/24 identifying patient had a fall with right wrist fracture. There was no evidence of an investigation and plan of correction to prevent similar events. Corrected on site with late entry of fall details.”

    Rule L0569. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 156 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #15,#16,#17) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patient 15: There was no evidence of the tasked 6 month phone call completed after death. Patient 16: There was no evidence of tasked phone calls completed at 48-72 hours, 4-6 weeks, and 6 months after death. Patient 17: There was no evidence of the tasked 6 month phone call completed after death.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 335 words

    “Upon patient record review 7 of 19 (Patients #1,#3,#4,#10,#11,#12,#14) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 1: The medical record contained an order for aide visits five times weekly. There was no evidence of a fifth visit completed the week of 10/13/24. Corrected on site with documentation of reason for missed visit. Patient 3: The medical record contained an order for aide visits three times weekly. There was one visit documented for the week of 10/27/24. Corrected on site with documentation of reason for missed visits. Patient 4: The medical record contained an order for aide visits three times weekly. There was no evidence of third visits completed the weeks of 9/29/24 and 11/3/24. Corrected on site with documentation of reason for missed visits. Patient 10: The medical record contained an order for aide visits five times weekly. There were three visits completed the week of 9/22/24 and 4 visits completed the week of 10/13/24. Corrected on site with documentation of reason for missed visits. Patient 11: The medical record contained an order for aide visits three times weekly. There was no evidence of a third visit completed the week of 10/6/24. Corrected on site with documentation of reason for missed visit. Patient 12: The medical record contained an order for aide visits two week one then three visits weekly effective 10/13/24. There was no evidence of a second visit completed the week of 10/13/24 and a third visit the week of 10/20/24. Corrected on site with documentation of reason for missed visits. Patient 14: The medical record contained an order for aide visits five times weekly. There was no evidence of a fifth visit completed the weeks of 10/13/24 and 10/20/24. Corrected on site with documentation of reason for missed visits.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #12) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 12: The patient started receiving aide services 10/18/24. There was no evidence of an aide supervisory visit.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. The agency had a volunteer utilization rate of 2.85% in 2023.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 16 (Personnel #5) did not have evidence that a skills competency assessment, specific to each discipline had been conducted for all personnel including volunteers initially during orientation.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #18) did not evidence that each patient record contains physician orders. Patient 18: There was no evidence of an order to discharge due to extended prognosis.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 1: The medical record contained missed visit documentation 10/8/24 and 10/10/24 that did not explain attempts made for rescheduling or reason for missed visits as required per communication note template.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 15, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Nov 14, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care15 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 1, 1983.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 17.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 90.6% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 70% at home, 23% in assisted living, 5% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day17.2 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.8%
Visits near death90.6% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Odyssey Healthcare Inc. owns 100% directly since Jul 1, 2001.
  • 9 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); Ronald C Lazas (corporate director, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate director, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%); Patti George-King (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Odyssey Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jul 1, 2001
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 11, 2018
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 11, 2018
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Dec 22, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Dec 22, 2022

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 70% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 72% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 96.75% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 48.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 7 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 33324, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 11; this one had 15.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 7 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 33324
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Heartland Hospice (Broward) This hospice15
Accentcare Hospice & Palliative Care of Broward County5
Hospice By the Sea Inc.11
Lifepath Hospice16
Catholic Hospice Inc.7
Vitas Healthcare Corporation of Florida62
Continuum Care of Broward LLC6

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.